2006-419: LEARNING STYLES OF ENGINEERING & ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY STUDENTS – SIMILARITIES, DIFFERENCES ANDIMPLICATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE PEDAGOGYEugene Rutz, University of Cincinnati Eugene Rutz is Academic Director in the College of Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. Eugene's responsibilities include new program development, distance learning program development, and evaluation of instructional technologies. He has a BS in Nuclear Engineering and an MS in Mechanical Engineering and is a registered professional engineer. Eugene has worked in the nuclear power industry, as a design engineer, and as a university researcher and instructor.Virginia Westheider, University of Cincinnati
2006-1503: EXCELLENCE IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONALTECHNOLOGY: VIEWS OF UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING STUDENTSCristina Pomales-Garcia, University of Michigan Cristina Pomales-García is a graduate student in the Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan. She received a B.S. in psychology from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez in 2001 and a M.S. from the University of Michigan in 2003. Her research interests are engineering aesthetics, educational technology, distance learning technology and engineering education. Address: 1205 Beal Ave. Ann Arbor, MI 48109; e-mail:cpomlaes@umich.eduYili Liu, University of Michigan Yili Liu is
2006-1900: SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICSTALENT EXPANSION PROGRAM: AN ANALYSIS OF A PILOT PROGRAMTaryn Bayles, University of Maryland-Baltimore County Taryn Bayles, Ph.D. is a Professor the Practice of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical & Biochemical Engineering Department at UMBC. She has spent half of her career working in industry and the other half in academia, and has received over $3M of NSF funding in Engineering Education & Outreach over the last three years. She has been recognized with several teaching and mentoring awards and the USM Regents' Faculty Award for Collaboration in Public Service.Claudia Morrell, University of Maryland-Baltimore County
2006-967: STRATEGIES FOR INTEGRATING SERVICE-LEARNING INTO THEENGINEERING CORE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELLAND THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYAmy Banzaert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology AMY BANZAERT is a graduate student in MIT's mechanical engineering department, studying the use of service learning in engineering education, and alternative forms of charcoal made from agricultural waste for use in developing countries. Previously, she worked for three years as MIT's service learning coordinator, developing the program from its early beginnings. She has also worked as a design and manufacturing engineer for Texas Instruments.John Duffy, University of Massachusetts-Lowell
University of Maryland.Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering Dr. Norman L. Fortenberry is the founding Director of the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academy of Engineering. Prior to joining NAE in October 2002, Dr. Fortenberry held various executive and managerial positions within the National Science Foundation. He received his S.B., S.M., and Sc.D. degrees, all in mechanical engineering, from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Page 11.496.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Documenting the Research Base
2006-1057: A PROCEDURE FOR GATHERING EXPERIENCE FROMPRACTICING ENGINEERS IN ORDER TO TEACH EXPERIENCE IN THECLASSROOMJames Hanson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. James Hanson is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He teaches mechanics courses for the freshman through senior levels including structural analysis and design. He is a strong advocate of hands-on learning and problem-based learning. He is a licensed professional engineer. He has also taught at Cornell University and Bucknell University.Patrick Brophy, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Pat Brophy is an Associate Professor of Psychology at the Rose-Hulman Institute of
Annual Conference and Exposition.Donald Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University Dr. Donald D. Carpenter is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering. Dr. Carpenter also serves as Chair of the Educational Innovation Collaborative at LTU and Coordinator of the Civil Engineering Assessment Program. He is actively involved in ASEE and serves as Faculty Advisor for the ASCE Student Chapter at LTU. His research interests involve academic integrity, assessment tools, urban stream restoration, and watershed processes.Matthew Mayhew, University of North Carolina-Wilmington Dr. Matt J. Mayhew is Director of Student Life Assessment at the University of North Carolina Wilmington. He completed
, similar to that used inprofessional practice, be used with student work to improve student learning and the quality ofsubmissions?” In the fall semester of 2005, peer review was initiated in a Fluid Mechanicscourse at Stevens Institute of Technology and a Heat Transfer course at the United StatesMilitary Academy (West Point). These attempts are assessed and compared to methods used intwo Structural Analysis courses at the U.S. Military Academy that have been performed andimproved over 4 semesters since the spring of 2004.I. Structural Analysis Courses at the U.S. Military AcademyLike all engineering design, developing a system to improve students’ learning and motivatethem to check their work was an iterative process. At the U.S. Military Academy
2006-1902: USING RAPID FEEDBACK TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNINGJohn Chen, Rowan University John Chen is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering. He has been a faculty member since 1994, when he began his career as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University. He joined Rowan University in his current position in 1998. He is an active member of ASEE and is currently the Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Division.Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan University Jennifer Kadlowec is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Rowan University. She began as an Assistant Professor in 1999 after she received her M.S. and Ph.D. in
2006-852: TESTING THE EFFECT OF SENTENCE HEADLINES IN TEACHINGSLIDESMichael Alley, Virginia Tech Michael Alley is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations (Springer-Verlag, 2003).Madeline Schreiber, Virginia Tech Madeline Schreiber is an associate professor in the Department of Geosciences at Virginia Tech. She teaches the introductory level course Resources Geology and higher-level courses in hydrogeology. She has an MS and a PhD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a BS from Yale University.Katrina Ramsdell, Virginia Tech Katrina Ramsdell is a rising senior in the Department
questions (analysis, conceptual understanding).References1. Littauer, Raphael (1972) Instructional Implications of a Low-Cost Electronic Student Response System. Educational Technology, October 1972.2. Roselli, Robert J, & Brophy, Sean P. (2002) Exploring an electronic Polling system for the Assessment of Student Progress in two Biomedical engineering Courses. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual conference & Exposition, 2002. American Society for Engineering Education.3. Duncan, Douglas (2005), Clickers in the Classroom. Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Addison Wesley, San Francisco, CA.4. Jeremy Roschelle, J., William R. Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson,L. (2004
2006-465: TEACHING CHEMISTRY AS A CROSS-CULTURAL SUBJECT: IT &LINGUISTICSMargherita Landucci, Liceo Artistico Statale Margherita Landucci is a graduate in Physical Chemistry of Pisa University. She has worked at CNR (the National Council for Research)in spectroscopy and electrochemistry and taught at Pisa University. She has published works in The Journal of Chemical Society. She is the Italian coordinator of the project "Science and Technology in Society" promoted by The Association for Science Education,UK, and is teaching Phisical Chemistry and Materials Tecnologies at the Liceo Artistico Statale of Venice, Venezia.Fabio Garganego, Municipality of Venice Fabio Garganego is a graduate
2006-1481: ASSESSING STUDENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE LEARNINGOBJECTIVESJoanne Mathews, Illinois Institute of TechnologyDaniel Ferguson, Illinois Institute of Technology Senior Lecturer, Interprofessional Studies Program (IPRO), Il Institute of TechnologyMargaret Huyck, Illinois Institute of TechnologyAbhinav Pamulaparthy, Illinois Institute of Technology IPRO Team Project Manager; major in MMAE Page 11.240.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Assessing Student Acquisition of Knowledge of Learning Objectives for an Interprofessional Projects ProgramAbstractThe Interprofessional Projects Program
with the direct experience of a real ocean,especially by someone who has never experienced an ocean. Both passages suggest thatrepresentation as a means of effective communication may have inherent problems.In a broader sense, science and technology routinely rely upon visual representations toefficiently communicate concepts and summarize information. By “representation”, it is meantthat some visual symbol (often simple in nature), diagram, or other communication device isemployed to represent or model a more complex “real” object. Often the represented object is infact “real”. For example, a mechanical engineering text may present a simple diagram intendedto represent an actual pump (see Figure One). Sometimes the represented object is an
2006-2132: ENHANCING ENGINEERING OUTREACH WITH INTERACTIVEGAME ASSESSMENTLeilah Lyons, University of Michigan Leilah Lyons is a doctoral student in the Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Michigan. Her interests include use of technology in informal and pre-college education.Zbigniew Pasek, University of Windsor Dr. Pasek is an Associate Professor at the Dept. of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Windsor, Canada. He was previously with University of Michigan. His research interests include manufacturing automation and system design, informal engineering education, and decision-making processes in organizations
1Civil Engineering 1 1Computer Engineering 1 0Computer Science 5 1Electrical Engineering 5 4Engineering Physics 1 2Engineering Undecided 6 1Industrial Engineering 7 3Mechanical Engineering 20 11Mechanical Technology 1 0Petroleum Engineering 26 49TOTAL 73 73Note. The Freshman/Sophomore group are those students who completed 61 or fewer credit hours, and theJunior/Senior group were students who completed more than 61 credits.Materials and ProcedureThe materials included the Metacognitive Reading Strategies Questionnaire
, Florida A&M University,Florida State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, North Carolina A&T State University,North Carolina State University, University of Florida, University of North Carolina at Charlotteand Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. To protect the rights of humanparticipants, each university is assigned a letter that is only known by the researchers involved inthe study.The following nomenclature is used consistently in this study to define the student populations. • Stayers: Undergraduate students who matriculated in an engineering field as defined in Page 11.1324.4 the Classification of
2006-1889: ENGINEERING EDUCATION: TARGETED LEARNING OUTCOMESOR ACCIDENTAL COMPETENCIES?Joachim Walther, University of Queensland JOACHIM WALTHER graduated from The Darmstadt University of Technology (Germany) with a Bachelor in Mechanical and Process Engineering and a “Diplom” in General Mechanical Engineering. As a PhD student he is now member of the Catalyst Research Centre for Society and Technology at the University of Queensland. His research interests lie in the areas of cognitive and social aspects of engineering design and education.David Radcliffe, University of Queensland DAVID RADCLIFFE is the Thiess Professor of Engineering Education and Professional Development in the School of
engineering undergraduate degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering,and Math-intensive (STEM) institutions experience imbalance unlike most other undergraduatesin co-educational institutions. The curricular demands on those enrolled are particularly intenseand focused, leaving little opportunity for pursuits aside from studies. [1] As engineeringeducation seeks to broaden its enrollment, it becomes important to better understand the studentexperience. This paper explores the question: What is the role of life balance in satisfaction andpersistence of engineering students?Our data indicate that engineering students have a desire for more balance than their academicenvironment will allow. If engineering education wants not only to recruit but to
of Mechanical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is involved in many national efforts on engineering education and research including serving as chair of the Advisory Board for the Engineering Directorate of NSF and of the Advisory Board for the NSF Science of Learning Center focused on engineering education at the University of Washington. Page 11.3.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 15 Years of Engineering Education Reform: Lessons Learned and Future ChallengesIntroductionSince the founding of the ECSEL and Synthesis
2006-483: MEASURING ENGINEERING CLASSROOM COMMUNITY:LEARNING AND CONNECTEDNESS OF STUDENTSTodd Johnson, Washington State University Dr. Johnson is Assistant Professor in Educational Psychology. His primary teaching activity includes theoretical foundations of learning and instruction, educational statistics, educational measurement,assessment of learning, and program evaluation. He served as Co-PI on an NSF ?Bridging Engineering Education? grant called the CyberMentor (Mathematics and Engineering via New Technologies: Outreach and Recruitment) project. A major part of this grant was to promote and develop partnerships and interdisciplinary initiatives connecting education, engineering, K-12
2006-1368: COMMUNITY BUILDING AND IDENTITY DEVELOPMENTTHROUGH GRADUATE COURSEWORK IN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONHeidi Diefes-Dux, Purdue University Heidi Diefes-Dux is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education (ENE) at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering (ABE). She is the chair of the ENE Graduate Committee and she is a member of the Teaching Academy at Purdue. She received her B.S. and M.S. in Food Science from Cornell University and her Ph.D. from ABE in 1997. Her research interests include open-ended problem solving, evaluation of education technology, and first-year and graduate curriculum
. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Chicago, IL, June, 2006. 8. Olds, B. M., Streveler, R. A., Miller, R. L., and Nelson, M. A. (June, 2004). “Preliminary Results from the Development of a Concept Inventory in Thermal and Transport Science.” Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, UT. 9. Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T.H., and Resnick, L. B. (2000). “Naive Physics Reasoning: A Commitment to Substance-Based Conceptions,” Cognition and Instruction, Volume 18, Number 1, 1-43. 10. Rowe, G., Wright, G., and Bolger, F. (1991). Delphi: A Reevaluation of Research and Theory. Technological
2006-2047: TRACING STUDENT DEVELOPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION OFENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIOSJennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students’ preparedness for professional engineering
2006-1379: USING INQUIRY-BASED ACTIVITIES TO PROMOTEUNDERSTANDING OF CRITICAL ENGINEERING CONCEPTSMichael Prince, Bucknell University Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. His research interests focus on chemical engineering education, active learning, problem based learning, and inquiry-based methods.Margot Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot Vigeant is a newly minted associate professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University. Her research interest in this topic stems from her own frustration in thermodynamics, and her profound hope we can find a way that people can "get it" the first time around
2006-1515: BUILDING AND ASSESSING CAPACITY IN ENGINEERINGEDUCATION RESEARCH: THE BOOTSTRAPPING MODELJosh Tenenberg, University of Washington-Tacoma Josh Tenenberg is an Associate Professor in the Computing and Software Systems program in the Institute of Technology at the University of Washington, Tacoma. He holds a B.M. in music performance (San Francisco State University, U.S.A.) and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Computer Science (University of Rochester, U.S.A), where his primary research was in Artificial Intelligence. His research areas have included automated planning, knowledge representation and reasoning, reinforcement learning, temporal logic, and cognitive modeling of computer
. • Focus Areas (or concentrations) that address public policy issues of relevance to engineering students. We have identified the following for further exploration: Environmental Policy; Resource Utilization Policy; Science and Technology Policy; and, International Development Policy. • An independent project (honors thesis) related to an issue from one of the concentrations which will include an internship (domestic or foreign) or service- learning component.At the end of this investigation phase, all Program faculty had a broader understanding of thefield of public affairs, a deeper appreciation for the interface of public policy and engineering,and a clearer view of the current state
Washington Philip Bell is an associate professor of Cognitive Studies in Education at the University of Washington where he directs the ethnographic and design-based research of the Everyday Science and Technology Group (http://everydaycognition.org). As a learning scientist, he has studied everyday science expertise and learning, the use of digital technologies within youth culture, children's argumentation, the design of novel learning technologies, and approaches to inquiry instruction in science. Bell has a background in human cognition and development, science education, and electrical engineering and computer science.Helen Chen, Stanford University Helen L. Chen is a
organization as well as outstanding teaching awards at both Ohio State and Indiana Universities. Dr. Chism has been involved in several engineering education projects, including the assessment of the Gateway Coalition and the current Rigorous Research in Engineering Education project. Her publications are about many topics in teaching and learning and professoinal development in higher education, including assessment, instructional technology, diversity, and physical spaces for learning.Karl Smith, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities KARL A. SMITH is Morse-Alumni Distinguished Teaching Professor and Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Minnesota. His research and development interests
offered.Introduction As engineering educators become increasingly aware of the demand for a diverseengineering workforce of the future, retention issues plaguing the field have drawn addedattention. Focus has therefore been placed on the choices, achievement, and interests ofundergraduate engineering students. Researchers have suggested that students’ choices to pursueand persist in engineering, and their achievement and interest in the field, are significantlyinfluenced by their engineering self-efficacy beliefs – their confidence in their abilities toperform the tasks that they deem necessary to succeed in the field.1, 2 The richness of the literature surrounding the assessment of science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM