have definitive research findings by 2008.AcknowledgementsFunding for this project is supported by Dr. Joan F Trevelyan scholarship award at the Schoolof Mechanical Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth.ReferencesBarley, S. and B. A. Bechkey (1994). "In the Backrooms of Science: the Work of Technicians in Science Labs." Work and Occupations 21(1): 85-126.Beder, S. (1989). ""Towards a More Representative Engineering Education"." International Journal of Applied Engineering Education 5(2): 173-182.Bucciarelli, L. L. (1988). "An ethnographic perspective on engineering design." Design Studies 9: 159-168.Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing Engineers. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.Darr, A. (2000). "Technical
densitywere also prescribed at the boundary as user-specified under the up-windadvective difference scheme. Depth-varying initial conditions of salinity andtemperature were obtained from Mt. Mitchell Cruise data [16]. A constant bedfriction coefficient was assumed (0.0026) and the horizontal eddy viscosity wasset at 1.98×106 cm2.s-1. Heat flux parameters were obtained after consultingseveral references and after conducting comprehensive calibration tests [18].For the wind fields considered in summer and winter simulations, typical andconstant in time winds were based on combined data from two sources,Hellerman [27] and UAE Meteorology Department. The last 30 years of 106available records of Hellerman wind data were averaged up and found adequate
Page 11.1135.7 for enabling control and data acquisition with respect to the new experiment.References[1] C. L. Bohus, A. Crowl, B. Aktan, and M. H. Shor, “Running control engineering experiments over the internet,” in Proceedings of the 13th IFAC World Congress, (San Francisco, CA), 1996. paper no. 4c-03.[2] M. L. Corradini, G. Ippoliti, T. Leo, and S. Longhi, “An internet based laboratory for control education,”in Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, (Orlando, FL), December 2001.[3] S. E. Poindexter and B. S. Heck, “Using the web in your courses: What can you do? what should you do?,” IEEE Control System, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 1999.[4] A. Gupta, M. A. Gabr, and V. C. Matzen, “Alternatives in the
Mult. Choice on line Mult. Choice paper Average Score 67%, s=11.5 69%, s=8.5 While a few students did dramatically improve or lower their test 1 score whengiven the re-test on paper, the average score did not see a significant change. Overall theslight increase in average score is consistent with the expected average increase if eachstudent were instead offered another online attempt. The clear conclusion fromexamining the average scores and the standard deviations (s) is that little, if any, testingbias is introduced by offering the test online versus the more traditional paper/opscanmethod. Comparable time limits were place upon both paper and online test
, the compliance constants may be determined usingequations (9) – (11), which follow from inversion of the stiffness matix in equation (1)2. C44 = 1/S44 (9) C11-C12 = (S11 – S12) -1 (10) C11 + 2C12 = (S11 + 2S12) -1 (11)The compliance constants may then be used to determine the anisotropic values for Young’smodulus3: 1 = s11 (12) E[100 ] 1 1 1 = s11 − [( s11 − S12 ) − s 44
on a leadership role in their respective communities.The paper will conclude with a discussion of the results of anevaluation of the program which was used to gather both studentand teacher/mentor input at the symposium, a listing of lessonslearned, and plans for the future development and extension of theprogram. Page 11.959.1IntroductionNavy’s civilian science and technology (S&T) workforce numbersome 22,000 strong. Of those some 4,000 charge 50% or more oftheir time to actual S&T projects and are considered to be the corepractitioners of S&T for the Navy. Almost half of those 4,000 holdPh.D.s1 with about half working at the Naval Research Laboratory(NRL) and
the County of Maui, the Maui HighPerformance Computing Center, and the U. S. Department of Labor.Participation in the first day’s program included 12 local technology employers (eight of whichalso were actively involved in planning the day’s activities), 32 students and 11 teachers.Students heard from technology employees about their career paths while teachers learned howto prepare their students for tech careers. Everyone then heard a presentation onentrepreneurship in technology. Finally, students chose a breakout session with one of eightparticipating technology companies. On the second day, participants toured the University ofHawaii Institute for Astronomy and the Maui Space Surveillance ComplexDuring the six weeks preceding the event
2006-115: LEVERAGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO ENHANCE THEMANAGEMENT OF GRADUATE EDUCATION PROGRAMSWayne Whiteman, Georgia Institute of Technology Wayne E. Whiteman is a Senior Academic Professional and Director of the Office of Student Services in the Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He received his BS degree from the United States Military Academy in 1979, a master?s degree from MIT in 1987, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 1996. Whiteman is a retired Colonel in the U.S. Army and completed 24 years of active military service. He served on the West Point faculty from 1987 to 1990, and 1998 to 2003
Participant In Similar Programs 15 11# FINAL SURVEY - 25 OUTSTANDING VERY GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSTSF YES NO1 EDGE Program 6 17 22 PLATO Instructional Materials 2 8 8 5 2 S. I. Leader's Knowledge &3 13 5 3 2 2 Leadership4 S. I. Leader's Willingness To Help 9 9 3 3 15 S. I. Leader 12 5 4 2 26 Recommend
and present a group-basedinterim report. The report was required to consist of • Problem statement o Describe the issue(s) o Report the project sponsors’ requirements for addressing the issue(s) • Scope & schedule of the project o Itemize the work the project is going to do o Balance the responsibilities of the team members o Schedule the project (daily work schedule, and workload of each team member) • Benefits of the project o Estimate the benefits of the solution to address the issue(s) in the project (note: quantification will be needed in final report)The interim report was the first milestone of the project and the guideline for the remainingwork. After
solution to problems and the relationshipbetween science and technology. Loepp [37] did a comparison study of the M/S/T standards,demonstrating the parallel nature of the engineering design process, scientific inquiry and theproblem solving process.The organization of content standards in science is intended to develop the students' cognitiveability based on critical thinking and scientific reasoning. The ability to learn through inquiry is abasic skill needed to understand how science principles and concepts could be applied toengineering principles and design. Most engineering disciplines require a high level ofproficiency in basic mathematics and science knowledge and skills.National Standards for Technological Literacy, STL, [28] promotes the
subject matter content in these coursesshould be modified to include an appropriate coverage of these topics.Recently, a successful attempt was made to introduce environmental, health, and safetyissues and non-traditional manufacturing processes to mechanical engineering technologyundergraduate students in a beginning manufacturing processes course. The relativeenvironmental, health and safety aspects of each particular process was discussed duringthe traditional lecture(s) as well as during an individual lecture prepared specifically onenvironmental, health, and safety issues pertaining to manufacturing. In addition, aneffort was made to emphasize these important issues during the scheduled laboratory timeof the course. Future efforts include
Learning, Vol. 61, 1995, pp, 15-22.[4]. Levin, J., and Wyckoff, J., “Predicting Persistence and Success in Baccalaureate Engineering”, Journalof Education, Vol. 111, No. 4, 1991, pp. 461-468.[5]. Moreno, S. E., and Muller, C. “Success and diversity: The transition through first-year calculus in the university”, American Journal of Education, Vol. 108, 1999, pp.30-57.[6]. Lucas, S. (2003). Factors associated with African American engineering students’ success in first yearcollege calculus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis.[7]. Hoffer, T. B., Rasinski, K. A., & Moore, W. (1995). Social background differences in high schoolmathematics and science course taking and achievement (NCES Report No. 95-206). Washington
Microprocessors,” Proc. of International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD) Conf., Nov. 1997.[7] J. Hamblen, H. Owen and S. Yallamanchili, “An Undergraduate Computer Engineering Rapid Systems Prototyping Laboratory,” IEEE Trans. on Education, Feb. 1999.[8] M. Holland, J. Harris, S. Hauck, “Harnessing FPGAs for Computer Architecture Education,” Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. on Microelectronic Systems Education, June 2003.[9] J. Chang and S. Agun, “On Design-For-Reusability in Hardware Description Languages,” Proc. of IEEE Computer Society Annual Workshop on VLSI (WVLSI'00), 2000.[10] Yong-Kyu Jung, Rapid Digital System Deisgn Laboratory Assignment: Instruction Decoder Design and Implementation in Verilog, http://etidweb.tamu.edu/classes/entc249
acquired.ConclusionThe teaching of attack understanding based information assurance requires the use ofguaranteed isolation of laboratory networks. Providing Distance Education courses witha remote laboratory network presents challenges to providing adequate isolation. The useof IP-KVM switches adds a very strong layer of isolation, and in combination with theuse of emulation software such as VMWare or other virtual operating systemenvironment, provides an adequately isolated laboratory network for some exercises.References[1] Frincke, D., “Who watches the security educators?”, Security & Privacy Magazine, IEEE Volume 1, Issue 3, May-June 2003 Page(s):56 – 58[2] Eppes, T. & Schuyler, P., “A General-Purpose Distance Lab System
2006-580: ASYNCHRONOUS COLLABORATION: ACHIEVING SHAREDUNDERSTANDING BEYOND THE FIRST 100 METERSRaghvinder Sangwan, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Raghvinder S. Sangwan is an Assistant Professor of Information Science in the School of Graduate Professional Studies at the Pennsylvania State University. He currently teaches software engineering to professional graduate students from Fortune 500 companies such as Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Merck, Siemens, and Unisys. Dr. Sangwan is a Consulting Member of Technical Staff at Siemens Corporate Research, with over seven years of experience in software engineering research and development. Formerly, he was a lead architect at Siemens Medical, where
, 2003, v 23, n 17, pp 6748-53. 3. Kelly, S. W., Burton, A. M., Kato T., Akamatsu S., “Incidental Learning of Real-World Regularities,” Psychological Science, 2001, v 12, n 1, pp 86-89. 4. Kundrat, M. E. “Measurement and Methods Improvement for the Grand Valley State University STEPS Camp,” submitted to the STEPS Director, GVSU. 5. Greif, Michel. The Visual Factory. Productivity Press, Portland, OR: 1991.. 6. Weiss, W. H. “Human Engineering Goals, Minimum Injuries, Maximum Productivity,” Production Engineering. 1982. 7. Barnes, R. Motion and Time Study.. New York: Wiley, 1980. 8. Konz, S. Work Design.. Columbus, OH: Grid, 1979. [1990] 9. “Ergonomics:: The Scientific Approach to Making Work Human,” International
2006-1740: A MODEL FOR BUILDING AND SUSTAINING COMMUNITIES OFENGINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCH SCHOLARSRobin Adams, Purdue University Robin S. Adams is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is also leads the Institute for Scholarship on Engineering Education (ISEE) as part of the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE). Dr. Adams received her PhD in Education, Leadership and Policy Studies from the University of Washington, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Washington, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Dr. Adams' research is
-based demonstrations previously mentioned. This new board interconnects aTexas Instrument (TI) C6711 or C6713 DSP starter kit (DSK) to an Analog Devices (AD)quadrature modulator (AD9857). This modulator is capable of operating at up to 200 millionsamples per second (MS/s), with a resulting carrier or intermediate frequency of up to 80 MHz(i.e., 40% of the system’s sample frequency). An onboard 32-bit direct digital synthesizer (DDS)is used to generate the carrier waveform values. Baseband 14-bit in-phase and quadrature (I/Q)data are presented to the modulator, which can be programmed to interpolate the data at rates of4x to 252x. The AD9857 is interfaced to the DSK using an Altera Cyclone FPGA. The FPGAprovides queuing of the I/Q data, and the
, byte count, load address and record type. The recordformat also has a 2-character suffix containing a checksum7.There are six types of records for the Intel 32-bit Hexadecimal Object file. The recordtypes are 00 Data Record, 01 End Record, 02 Extended Segment Address Record, 03Start Segment Address Record, 04 Extended Linear Address Record, and 05 Start LinearAddress Record. 1. Data Record The data record which is record type 00 is the record that holds all of the data of the file. This record begins with a colon “:” followed by the count of the byte, the first byte of the address and the type of record “00”. After the data record type “00”, the data bytes follow. The checksum follows the data bytes and is 2’s
output data. Figure 2: Virtual wind tunnel laboratory with airfoilThe students are enabled to select the input parameters (angle of attack, area of airfoil), select thesystem of units and request the corresponding results by clicking the “Plot” button as shown inFigure 3. If the students want to get the outputs for a specific velocity, they can input it in theDefault Inputs block and then click the “Output the Results” button. For example, if the angle ofattack is 8°, the area of the airfoil is 5 m2 and the specified velocity is 222 m/s, the studentsobtain the outputs shown in Figure 4. Page 11.141.5
by the dean in thelate 1990’s to help stem the fairly high attrition rate of the engineering programs. At the time,each of the engineering technology programs (civil, electrical, and mechanical) had their ownfreshman course of two credits and didn’t really want to change. This change would add anadditional two credits to the curriculum which, under university guidelines, would mean that twocredits would have to be dropped elsewhere in the curriculum. Additionally, while the Page 11.835.2undergraduate engineering programs were four-year programs, with ninety percent of theirstudents starting as new freshman, the four year engineering technology
can be accessible to students, without any increase in complexity, leading to a veryeffective method to teach the programming fundamentals.Whereas the approach described above has been used on numerous occasions and inmany institutions, we believe that it has rarely been done in Matlab. Our experience with Page 11.1203.7using this method the past three years is very encouraging.References1. Brockman, J., Fuja, T. Batill, S., “A Multidisciplinary Course Sequence for First-Year EngineeringStudents,” 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 2002.2. McWilliams, L., Silliman, S., Pieronek, C. “Modifications to a Freshman
Male Female2. Did someone from MSU come to your high school to talk about engineering? Yes No I can’t remember3. Which of the following people influenced your decision to enroll in engineering at MSU? Check as many as apply. My parent(s) or legal guardian(s) My brother(s) and/or sister(s) Other relatives Past math/science teacher(s) Past other teachers My high school counselor(s) Other non-relatives (friends, co-workers) Recruiters from MSU Other, please describe:4. Have you ever attended the Minority Apprentice Program (MAP) at MSU? Yes No5. Which of the following
in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering form Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a Bachelor of Science form the U. S. Coast Guard Academy. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Connecticut. He previously taught at the Coast Guard Academy from 1974 to 1978 while serving on active duty in the Coast Guard. He retired form the Coast Guard in 1992 at the rank of Captain having had assignments in Marine Safety, Naval Engineering, Acquisition, and Research and Development. His last assignment on active duty was as Commanding Officer of the Coast Guard Research and Development Center in Groton, CT. After retirement from active duty, prior to coming to the
drivers. The RocketPort interface turned out to be easy once MSCommserial communications had been developed. Note MSComm only supports COM ports one to Page 11.89.5sixteen, which makes RocketPort COM ports seventeen to twenty invalid for VB.MC03 was found not to have the ability to receive serial data late in the development cycle. Thislimitation was a surprise for the project and GE Fanuc factory technical representatives. This isunderstandable due to the large quantity of PLC models GE Fanuc sells. A solution wasdesigned by directly wiring MC04’s outputs six to fourteen to MC03’s inputs eight to sixteen.Then, the transmitted serial data planned for
delivery formats; and thegreater student satisfaction at NJIT for courses that use WebCT as their asynchronous learningnetwork platform.1. IntroductionSince offering its first distance learning courses in the 1970’s, the New Jersey Institute ofTechnology, NJIT, has been a leader in distance learning education. From its inception, NJIT hasemphasized the use of computer-mediated communication systems, or asynchronous learningnetworks (ALNs), as a means to keep distance learning students engaged in their coursework, topromote a sense of community among classmates, and to improve student learning. The firstALN used at NJIT was the Electronic Information Exchange System, EIES1. This system wasexpanded and modified to make it web-accessible, and became
overviewyour idea, rationale, major activities, expected results, and achievement of the NSF meritreview criteria of intellectual merit, and broader impacts. Thus, at minimum, the projectsummary should state the issue or problem you propose to study, establish its relevanceand importance to your field of study, state your research hypothesis, and define the longterm goal(s), short term objectives, and associated activities. This is a good point todefine your proposed activities in the areas of research, education, and service oroutreach if appropriate. It is mandatory to state the intellectual merit and broaderimpacts of your proposed work in the project summary, as these address NSF’s meritreview criteria that are required of all proposals submitted
created that consider architectural, operating systems, compiler, andhardware issues in power-aware systems. Associated with each module, are (a) backgroundinformation at the appropriate level, (b) list of references for further study, (c) description of theproblem(s) to be studied, and (d) relevant software.There are six topics over which these modules range: architecture, voltage scaling, operatingsystems and middleware, compilers, VLSI, and wireless networks. A brief description of somerepresentative module is provided below.Architecture • Static and Dynamic Power: This module explains the two types of power consumption in Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) circuits. Techniques to mitigate the two are covered