Conference Session

Innovation & Assessment in the delivery of IT/IET

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Stienecker, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

the 1960’s, [1] the industry has grown in leapsand bounds, similar to many other technology fields. According to statistics released by theRobotic Industry Associates (RIA), the robotics industries’ only trade group[2], the industry hasdoubled since 1996 [2]. When one reviews [3, 4, 5] the instructional materials currently available tothe robotics student she or he will find an assortment of old applied industrial robotics materialpublished in the mid to late 1990s with a plethora of robot design and kinematics texts that werepublished after 1999. This represents the traditional and current approach to the roboticseducation at many institutions. In the last four decades the student that took a robotics class wastypically a mechanical or

Conference Session

Preparing Engineers for the Global Workplace

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Parkinson, Brigham Young University; John Harb, Brigham Young University; Spencer Magleby, Brigham Young University; Chelita Pate, Brigham Young University

Tagged Divisions

International

defining solutions involves learningcultural sensitivity.On top of these advantages, students find these projects to be very worthwhile and fulfilling. Asstated by Krishna S. Athreya, head of Engineers for a Sustainable World, “helping theimpoverished have a better life can, for students, be a life-changing experience.”12We will continue to support these types of programs and consider them to be just as valuable—perhaps more so—than traditional study abroad programs.SummaryIn this paper we have described our efforts in developing study abroad programs over the pasttwo years. We began by studying exemplary programs of others. For the 2006/2007 school year,we sponsored seven programs of various format types. We discussed the strengths andweaknesses

Conference Session

Public Engineering of Engineering, K12 Standards, and Overview

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Welty, University of Wisconsin, Stout; Linda Katehi, University of Illinois; Greg Pearson, National Academy of Engineering; Michael Feder, National Research Council

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

communities believe that an engineering focus,particularly design activities, provides valuable context, application opportunities, andmotivation for student learning as well as teacher engagement. 4 5 Design approaches to scienceteaching can focus student attention on solving specific problems, as in the Learning by Design(LBD) method developed by Kolodner et al.6 LBD purposefully links the design aspects ofproblem solving with an “investigate and explore” phase, which in significant ways resemblesand reinforces the process of science inquiry. Fortus et al.’s 7 design-based science units have asimilar orientation. Modeling and design activities can also be used very deliberately to illustrateand make concrete science concepts, such as mechanical

Conference Session

Information and Network Security

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barry Cumbie, Auburn University; Chetan Sankar, Auburn University; P.K. Raju, Auburn University

Tagged Divisions

Information Systems

Foundation.Bibliography1. UN Atlas of the Oceans (2007). Human settlements on the coast, accessed August 24, 2007, available at http://www.oceansatlas.com/servlet/CDSServlet?status=ND0xODc3LjIxMDkmNj1lbiYzMz1kb2N1bWVudH MmMzc9aW5mbw~~2. Hinrichsen, D. (1998). Coastal Waters of the World: Trends, Threats, and Strategies. Washington D.C.: Island Press.3. Alabama Gulf Coast & Convention & Visitors Bureau (2007). CVB statistics, accessed August 24, 2007, available at HTUhttp://agccvb.org/stats/UTH4. Infoplease (2007). Coastline of the United States, accessed August 24, 2007, available at http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001801.html5. Gibb, F., & Buchanan, S. (2006). A framework for business continuity management

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics III

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Godfrey, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Todd Taylor, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Corinna Fleischmann, U.S. Coast Guard Academy; Daniel Pickles, U.S. Coast Guard Academy

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

discussions began and their format. The paper will also review the advantages ofthese lunches, including reduced workload for instructors and the integration of ethicsinto the curriculum without displacing discipline-specific engineering topics. Finally,possible applications of USCGA’s experience to other programs are discussed. Page 13.1161.3BackgroundThe USCGA is one of four federal service academies and as such is focused on theacademic, military and physical development of young men and women as leaders inservice to our nation. USCGA provides the U. S. Coast Guard (USCG) withapproximately 190 new Coast Guard officers each year. Upon graduation from

Conference Session

Physics Education Research (PER) Relevant for Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Maloney, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne (Eng)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

leaving school having seenonly EOCNE’s, or types 1 to 3 in the Johnstone scheme, could easily be at a majordisadvantage when faced with other types of problems. Page 13.1092.9 References1. I. A. Halloun and D. Hestenes (1985) “The Initial State of College Physics Students” American Journal of Physics, 53, 10432. R. Hake (1998) “Interactive Engagement Versus Traditional Methods:A Six-thousand- student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses“, American Journal of Physics, 66, 643. E. Kim and S-J. Pak (2002) “Students Do Not Overcome Conceptual Difficulties After Solving 1000

Conference Session

Assessment

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University; Maura Borrego, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jenny Lo, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

this study. Also, we would like to thank CASEE for supporting Dr.Pierrakos as a NAE CASEE Postdoctoral Fellow, and graduate student Shankar Arul, whoassisted us with the analysis.References1. Seymour E., Hunter A.B., Laursen S.L., DeAntoni T., 2004, “Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study,” Science Education, 88(4), pp. 493-534.2. Hunter A. B., S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour, Jan. 2007, “Becoming a Scientist: The Role of Undergraduate Research in Students’ Cognitive, Personal and Professional Development,” Science Education, 91(1), pp. 36-74.3. Russell S.H., M.P. Hancock, J. McCullough, April 2007, “The Pipeline: Benefits of Undergraduate Research

Conference Session

Challenges of CE Education in a Global World

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Ressler, United States Military Academy; C. Conley; Richard Gash, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective forEvaluations during the 2008-2009 Accreditation Cycle, “ November 3, 2007. Accessed athttp://www.abet.org/forms.shtml, January 3, 2008.8. Ressler, S. J., R. W. Welch, and K. F. Meyer (2004). “Organizing and Delivering Classroom Instruction.” Journalof Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130 (3), 153-156.9. Ressler, S. J., et. al, “Implementing a Civil Engineering Program for the National Military Academy ofAfghanistan,” Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh,June 2008

Conference Session

Innovative Programs - Structure, Delivery, Evaluation

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Robertson, Arizona State University; Joseph Tidwell, Arizona State University; Ronald Thomas, Raytheon; William Charlton, Boeing

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

acceptability.There are two starting points to evaluate the parameters of any specified risk. Thedevelopment steps are shown in figure 4. P – S Matrix Hi History probability Lo How it evolves Quantified impact Lo Hi Stakeholder views Severity measure Early indicators Trigger point Action by Responsible Engineering Authority (REA

Conference Session

Innovations in Teaching Physics or Engineering Phy

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Kohlmyer, Georgia Institute of Technology; Michael Schatz, Georgia Institute of Technology; Richard Catrambone, Georgia Institute of Technology; Marcus Marr, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

direction), directly into the page (in the –z direction), or it may be zero. magnetic The z-component of the magnetic field in this field region region changes with time according to the function 6 cm Bz = Kt2 – P, where t is time, K = 0.12 T/s2, and P = 3.0 T. Outside of the 6 cm radius, the magnetic field is always zero. 11 cm A thin metal ring of radius 11 cm is concentric with the region of magnetic field. The ring has a +y resistance of 1.3 x 10–3 Ω. (a) At time t = 3 s, find the magnitude of the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bonnie Ferri, Georgia Tech; Jill Auerbach, Georgia Institute of Technology; Joel Jackson, Georgia Tech; Jennifer Michaels, Georgia Institute of Technology; Douglas Williams, Georgia Tech

Computer Engineering Concepts,”Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.[2] Durfee, W., Li, P., and Waletzko, D., 2005, “At-Home System and Controls Laboratories,” Proceedings of theAmerican Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.[3] Heck, B.S, Clements, N. S., and Ferri, A.A., 2004, “A LEGO Experiment for Embedded Control SystemDesign,” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, Oct. 2004, pp. 61-64.[4] Hendricks, R.W., Lai K.M., and Webb, J.B., 2005,”Lab-in-a-Box: Experiments in Electronic Circuits ThatSupport Introductory Courses for Electrical and Computer Engineers,” Proceedings of the American Society ofEngineering Education Annual Conference

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Energy Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarma Pisupati, Pennsylvania State University; Jonathan Mathews, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

of Education, National Center for Education Statistics:2004.2. Church, A.; Reeve, F., A Comparison of Hybrid and Online Instruction in Two SchoolLibrary Media Graduate Courses: A Preliminary Study. In 2007.3. Pisupati, S. V., Environmental Protection: Your Power and Energy. 3 ed.; KendallHuntPublishing Company Duboque, Iowa, 2008; p 302.4. Christopel, D., The Relationship among Teacher Immediacy Behaviors, StudentMotivation, and Learning. Communication Education 1990, 39, (4), 323-340.5. Mayer, R. E., Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In Instructional-DesignTheories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Reigeluth, Ed. LawrenceErlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, 1999.6. Pisupati, S. V

Conference Session

Assessment of K-12 Engineering Programs and Issues

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Faik Karatas, Purdue University; Amy Micklos, Purdue University; George Bodner, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

of the nature of science in science education. In Ed. W. F. McComas. The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.10. Finson, K. (2002). Drawing a Scientist: What We Do and Do Not Know after Fifty Years of Drawings, School Science and Mathematics, 102, 335-345.11. Robinson, M., & Kenny, B. (2003). Engineering Literacy in High School Students. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23, 95-101.12. Carroll, D. R. 1997. Bridge Engineering for the Elementary Grades. Journal of Engineering Education, 86 (3), 221-226.13. Grose, T. K. (2006, October). Trouble on the horizon. ASEE Prism , 16 (2), 26-31.14. Lyons, J., & Thompson, S

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design I

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Schrage, Georgia Institute of Technology; Michael Richey, The Boeing Company; Kenneth McPherson, The Boeing Company; Xavier Fouger, Dassault Systemes; Cedric Simard, Dassault Systemes

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

create a strategic university/industry model thatwill not only benefit the universities and industries, but the students themselves and laythe foundation for a stronger workforce in the future. Note that this is the first phase ofthis project and it is intended that we will publish additional phases of this work over thenext couple of years as we complete our study. To this extent, we will be comparing anddiscussing our efforts with this project to others of the same field in the future.Bibliography1. Lamancusa, John S. et. al. The Learning Factory: Industry-Partnered Active Learning. Journal ofEngineering Education. January 2008.2. Jiusto, S. and DiBiasio. Experiential Learning Environments: Do They Prepare Our Students to be Self-Directed

Conference Session

Software Engineering Course Content

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bruce Maxim, University of Michigan - Dearborn

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (Capprica, Portugal, June, 2005), ACM Press, New York, NY, 2005, 123-127.13. Rabin, S. Introduction to Game Development, Charles Rivers Media, Hingham, MA, 2005.14. Rollings, A. and Morris, D. Game Architecture and Design, New Riders, Indianapolis, IN, 2004.15. Rouse, R. Game Design: Theory and Practice, Wordware, Plano, TX, 2001.16. International Game Developers Association Curriculum Framework, (6 September 2005)17. Maxim, B. R., Software Requirements Analysis and Design, NIIT, Atlanta, GA 2004.18. Michael, D. and Chen, S. Serious Games: Games that Educate, Train, and Inform, Thomson Course Technology, Indianapolis, IN, 2006.19. Maxim, B. R. and Akingbehin, K. Experiences in

Conference Session

Engineering and ET Relationships & Professional Development

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Lambrechts, Wentworth Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

discussionis over what is to be included in the bar raising?“Raising the Bar” for Civil EngineeringThe stated objective of ASCE is to “raise the bar” for entry into the profession of civilengineering; the concern being that the BSCE degree awarded today does not prepare thegraduate to the level of education that was provided 55 or 40 years ago4. Many of us ‘old-timers’ agree that our under-graduate education of the 1960’s and early 1970’s was more intenseand technically demanding than currently required. In her recent book, Galloway compares thehigher level education needed in 1900 and in 2000 between civil engineering and medicine, andnotes that it still only takes four years of academic study to become a P.E. in civil engineering,whereas it now

Conference Session

Venturing Out: Service Learning, Study Abroad, and Criterion H

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Ollis, North Carolina State University; Anthony Smith, CPE-LYON FRANCE

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

clearly offer corresponding experiences in their chosenconcentration(s). The six week syllabus in Table 2 suggests parallel, but not integrated, efforts inFrench language instruction and chemistry/chemical engineering laboratory practice.While the French language instruction occurred at two levels (for students with low ormoderate prior French experience), the lab was integrative in the sense that instructionswere provided in French, and the US students translated these into English, then wrotetheir lab reports in standard form for our US engineering campus program. Our USstudents downloaded our typical lab manual from our US campus website prior todeparture for France, and followed its designated report format. These practices allowedeasy

Conference Session

Teams and Teamwork in Design II

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vukica Jovanovic, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Mileta Tomovic, Purdue University; Richard Mark French, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

national competition in robotics. In the summer of 2002, she had an internship in an aircraft manufacturing company Embraer, in the part of the company Gamesa Aeronautica, section Moasa Montajes, Spain where she worked in product distributed environment. After graduating with a Master of Science (M. S.) degree, in area of Industrial Engineering, specialization in Production Systems in 2006, M.S. Jovanovic subsequently continued to work towards her Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree at Purdue University, department of Mechanical Engineering Technology. She is currently working as a Graduate Research Assistant in Product Lifecycle Management Centre of Excellence Laboratory at Purdue

Conference Session

ERM Poster Session

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Dahm, Rowan University; Roberta Harvey, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

six sections participated in a common three-hour weekly lab, and completed the Page 13.1345.3same design projects and writing assignments. The Let Me Learn® process was implemented intwo of the six sections by the writing instructor; the other four sections did not use LML. At theend of the semester, students were given a survey that asked them to rate their agreement withthe following four statements on a scale where 1=strongly agree and 4=strongly disagree:1. My team worked together to DEFINE its project goal(s).2. My team worked together to REACH its project goal(s).3. My team RECOGNIZED my skills, knowledge, and abilities.4. My team

Conference Session

Innovations in ME Laboratory Instruction

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory Davis, Kettering University; Craig Hoff, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

compare with othervehicles, it is customary to solve for the rolling resistance coefficient(s) and thecoefficient of drag. These values provide insight into the causes of the road load forceand let the designer compare values with other vehicles.Equation 1.1 can then be substituted into equation 1.2, providing a relationship betweenthe two unknown parameters µ 0 and CD, and the vehicle speed and rate of deceleration.By measuring the vehicle speed and deceleration (and by also determining the frontalarea and air density), we can solve for the rolling resistance and the coefficient of drag.These coefficients can then be used to predict the motion of the vehicle in response tovarying tractive effort and conditions.The simplest method to determine

Conference Session

Design in Freshman and Sophomore Courses

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Shaw, Geneva College; Murat Tanyel, Geneva College

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

) project, setting up and teaching laboratory and hands-on computer experiments for engineering freshmen and sophomores. For one semester, he was also a visiting professor at the United Arab Emirates University in Al-Ain, UAE where he helped set up an innovative introductory engineering curriculum. Dr. Tanyel received his B. S. degree in electrical engineering from Bogaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey in 1981, his M. S. degree in electrical engineering from Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA in 1985 and his Ph. D. in biomedical engineering from Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA in 1990

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adrienne Minerick, Mississippi State University

quality of The Bonds REU Program was:a. Excellent, b. Very good, c. Neutral, d. Poor, e. Very PoorAppendix BREU Evaluation Survey for Workshops, Summer 20071. How satisfied are you with the materials provided for this activity?2. How satisfied are you with your opportunity for questions / input / interaction?3. How satisfied are you with the quality of the speaker(s), instructor, staff, etc.?4. This activity changed my initial perceptions.5. This activity provided valuable information / skills that I will use later.6. What did you like most about this activity?7. What did you like least about this activity?8. What would you recommend to improve this activity?Appendix CREU Evaluation Survey for Plant Trips, Summer 20071. I feel this plant trip

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Laboratories

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve Naumov, Purdue University Calumet; William Obermeyer, Purdue University Calumet; Rahul Singhal, Purdue University Calumet; Eduardo Garcia, Purdue University Calumet; Nasser Houshangi, Purdue University Calumet

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

ECE 371’s laboratory teaching philosophy, the ECE 464laboratory provides students the forum to assume a higher degree of design responsibility.Having acquired the necessary implementation skills, students are expected to traverse the entire Page 13.1315.9digital systems design flow in order to successfully complete each project. Using this design-directed teaching style, the newly defined academic goals for the ECE 464 laboratory section areshown below. • Apply behavioral and register-transfer level (RTL) digital system modeling in the context of larger, more complex digital systems found on modern microprocessors • Expose

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Teaching Part Two

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephan Durham, University of Colorado at Denver; Micah Hale, University of Arkansas; Seamus Freyne, Manhattan College

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

information in a way that provides students with a great learningexperience.Bibliography1. Davis, S. (2007) “Learning Styles and Memory,” Institute for Learning Styles Journal, Vol. 1, Fall 2007. pp. 46- 51.2. Rosati, P. (1998). “The Learning Preferences of Engineering Students from Two Perspectives,” Proc. 1998 Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov. 4-7, 1998, Tempe AZ.3. Felder R.M. and Spurlin, J. (2005). “Applications, Reliability, and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles,” International Journal of Engineering Education. Vol. 21, No. 1., pp. 103-112.4. Mamlouk, M.S. and Zaniewski, J.P. (2006). Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers, 2nd Edition

Conference Session

Money and People; Resource Management for Recruitment and Retention

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Anderson-Rowland, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

engineering and computer science students who made up close to 60% of the totalenrollment in the program. Through the programming, the CIRC students were exposed totopics not normally found in the classroom such as portfolios, writing a good resume, and talksby practicing engineers on what it is “really like in industry”. The program has been determinedto be very successful and is being continued with an NSF S-STEM grant.II. Program HistoryThis first group was composed of 12 transfer students, 9 women, 5 minority students, and 2freshman minority students who were unable to attend Arizona State University withoutscholarship assistance. All of the students had at least a 3.0 GPA and all were in need offinancial assistance as determined by their FAFSA

Conference Session

Emerging Issues in Engineering Education Research and Pedagogy

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ann McKenna, Northwestern University; Robert Linsenmeier, Northwestern University; Matthew Glucksberg, Northwestern University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Adaptive Expertise and Transfer of Design Process Knowledge, 129 (7), July 2007, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, pp. 730-734.21. Pandy, M.G., Petrosino, A.J., Austin, B. and Barr, R. (2004). Assessing Adaptive Expertise in Undergraduate Biomechanics, Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 211-222.22. Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In Charles M. Reigeluth (Ed.) Instructional Design Theories and Models, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.23. Walker, Joan M.T., Cordray, David S., King, Paul H., and Brophy, Sean P. (2006). Design scenarios as an assessment of adaptive expertise, International Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lynette Osborne, The George Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

sample size offemales in the present study, and thus the general lack of statistical power in major analysis,these differences were not deemed detrimental to the study.Table 2. Percentages of females and males in each major, by those enrolled in the Universityprogram and by those participating in the study. FEMALE MALE Major Enrolled Participant Enrolled Participant Total (By Major) s s N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) Enrolled Participant sAerospace/ 16 (8%) 2 (13%) 98 (11

Conference Session

Global Engineering Education Initiatives

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edmundo Tovar; José Carrillo; Jesús García

Tagged Divisions

International

European framework. Compatibleinstruments for quality assessment, S. Puirséil, Seminar on Methodological common instruments for assessment andaccreditation in the European framework, Santander, July 28th - 30th 200412. The use of performance indicators in Higher Education, M. Cave, S. Hanney, M. Henkel and M. Kogan,Kingsley Publishers, 199713. PIC: Programa Institucional de Calidad. UPM. 2005. www.upm.es/innovación.14. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs during the 2008-2009 evaluation cycle. ABET Board ofDirectors.2007. www.abet.org. Page 13.1384.1315. Education Criteria for Performance Excellence. Baldrige National Quality

Conference Session

Web-Based Learning in Engineering Technology

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

CHITRA RAJAGOPAL, Kent State University, Tuscarawas Campus

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

.” magazine of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), Spring 2007, p 34[2] Sadeghi, Ramin, Moslephour, Saeid “Distance learning, the philosophy of its existence, general definitions and its place in electronic government.” American Society of Engineering Education, 2006[3] R. Uhlig, S. Viswanathan, J. Watson, H. Evans “Effective Instruction of an Online Engineering Course.” American Society for Engineering Education, 2007.[4] Darnell Austin “A web- based program in industrial technology.” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education, 2007[5] Entering the mainstream: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in United States, 2003 and 2004, Solan –C and the Solan Center for Online Education[SCOLE],2004[6] B.Nasseh, “A brief

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Teaching Part One

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suleiman Ashur, Indiana University - Purdue University Fort Wayne

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Body ofKnowledge (BOK) and come up with recommendations to meet both ABET 2009 criteria andBOK.AcknowledgmentThe author would like to thank the Civil Engineering Curriculum committee that developed theoriginal curriculum for the program. The committee did an excellent job in making this programcomes to life at IPFW. In addition, the author would like to thank the current Civil EngineeringCurriculum committee and all faculty members in the Department of Engineering at IPFW fortheir input and comments on the original manuscript of this paper.Bibliogr aphy1. Ashur, S. and Moor, S. (2007). ÐAssessment of Citrix Impact on Educational Achievement of IPFWEngineering Students0Ñ"Tgrqtv"uwdokvvgf"vq"vjg"Eqnngig"qh