does lifelong learning (specifically informal, self-directed learning) play inalumni career trajectories?RQ2: How do alumni characterize the influence of the undergraduate curriculum on theirlifelong learning motivations and strategies?RQ3: What other individual or program factors do alumni identify as influential for lifelonglearning?3.2 Interview ApproachAs part of a larger curriculum realignment study involving program instructors, chairs, andalumni, we developed a semi-structured interview protocol to gather stakeholders’ perspectiveson many facets of the program. The institutional research ethics board approved these interviews.Four different interviewers with an understanding of the program and prior qualitative interviewexperience
material to production. The By applying evaluative reduce the risk of increased speed of techniques, students can inherited disease. At the statistical analysis analyze the relationships same time, there are through computer between resources and medical and ethical processors is powering technology to improve concerns surrounding technological sustainability efforts
environments. Students will understand that teamwork promotes: a. Development of an ethical mindset and ability to seek assistance to get the job done. b. Collaborative skills, experience, and knowledge to solve challenging problems. c. Credibility of solutions derived from multiple perspectives. d. Learning from and professional development for team members. e. Better communication, trust, support, and a positive working environment. 4) Communication: Students will exercise their communication skills in oral and written forms. Students will learn to practice empathetic and respectful communication during discussion sessions, student collaborations, and team project presentations. 5) Social
Education Journals,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 2014, doi: 10.1353/csd.2014.0006.[6] E. J. Hutcheon and G. Wolbring, “Voices of ‘disabled’ post secondary students: Examining higher education ‘disability’ policy using an ableism lens,” J. Divers. High. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–49, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0027002.[7] L. Ben-Moshe, A. J. Nocella, and A. J. Withers, “Queer-cripping anarchism: Intersections and reflections on anarchism, queer-ness, and dis-ability,” Queering anarchism, pp. 207–220, 2013.[8] T. Armstrong, “The Myth of the Normal Brain: Embracing Neurodiversity,” AMA Journal f Ethics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 348–352, 2015, doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504.[9] H. B. Rosqvist, N. Chown
detailedoverview materials regarding what is to be covered during the course to set expectations and minimize thechances for miscommunication. The course is designed to provide broad coverage of a wide range of topicsrelated to UAS flight operations, as delineated in the Course Goals and Learning Outcomes below.Course Goals: The student will be able to: • Gain a broad understanding of UAS as an enabler for scientific research and public service missions • Appreciate unique challenges of the Alaska environment affecting UAS operations • Appreciate vital legal and ethical considerations in the use of drones for business or personal use • Investigate the ability of specific UAS/sensor packages in supporting mission requirements • Understand mission
literary history of science and technology. She has served twice as the chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society (LEES) Division of ASEE and received that division's Olmsted Award for outstanding contributions to liberal education for engineers. Her current research projects focus on humanistic education for engineers as a system that transcends particular courses and institutions; the interdependence of ethics, communication, and STS in engineering; and establishing a collective identity for the diverse community engaged in teaching and researching engineering communication.Michael Alley (Professor of Teaching) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
buzzword across all areas.Digital transformation articulates business strategies, heralding new opportunities byincorporating technology and streamlining processes, thus companies employ technology toimprove performance, expand their scope and optimize results. According to García Díaz [1], itmay in turn be deduced that digital transformation allows institutions to adapt to a sociallyresponsible and ethical business model. This in turn allows them to apply a scalable developmentmodel, without forfeiting their influence on environmental impact reduction by streamliningprocesses and reducing consumption of non-renewable materials, such as paper.Likewise, the world has witnessed how technology has been incorporated into various areas,leading to
provide a justification.Twenty out of 30 participants (11 men, eight women, one non-binary student) indicated that,from their perspectives, professional merit seemed to be a primary factor that determinedrecognition and access to opportunities in engineering. For instance, one participant described:“I think to be in a professional or leadership opportunity, you do have to prove yourself.Nobody's going to hire somebody who doesn't have any experience… because you really got toprove, ‘Yes, I know what I'm doing. I'm ethically sound, I am technically sound, I am efficientand I reduce the cost of companies while making a super product.’ So those opportunities are forthose people who have shown that. I think that's true.” (Participant 11)From this
future and existing members, or personally loan the resource out. Create Organizational Resources (in Role Clarity and Task Mastery): Newly-hired engineers create new resources and update pre-existing organizational resources when they find the resources provided by the organization inadequate for learning their roles, necessary knowledge, and job skills. Sometimes organizational documentation is missing or hard to access, so, for example, the newly-hired engineer will create a list of instructions for a certain set of processes and either update the pre-existing document or share their work with their coworkers.3. Have Good Work Ethic (in Acculturation and Workgroup Integration): Newly-hired
toward developing neoteric educators is the fourth focus ofMyHE4.0 [8], [9], [10]. However, the question is, are Malaysian educators ready to respond to21st-century challenges? Can Malaysian universities manage the convergence, fluidity, powershifts, contingency, and ethical issues that came with the 21st-century challenges? Investmentin emerging technologies and human connectivity, building digital resilience, and institutionalcapabilities in digital governance and accountability are vital strategies for survival. However,is the Malaysian higher education community doing enough to adapt to this transformation?Moreover, there is increased resistance to change in adapting and shifting the mindset ofeducators towards adopting technology-based
students may not know how to conduct the revieweffectively. They have to learn how to attribute credit for any prior work referred in research.They also need to learn what intellectual property rights are, and how to maintain ethics inresearch. All students involved in this project learned greatly as how to respect the work ofothers and how to address those in the new work properly.6- Evolvement of the experimental procedureOne of the major characteristics of this undergraduate research activity was the process of thegrowth and development of the different stages of the experimental work that can be evaluated asbeing innovative, i.e., starting from simple and affordable possibilities, and gradually makingprogress toward using more powerful
several initiatives. Dr. Hammad is an active advocate for diversity and inclusion in STEM and Cybersecurity. Her service has been recognized by IEEE exceptional, chapter achievement, and exemplary service awards.James K. Nelson (Associate Vice Chancellor) Associate Vice Chancellor in the Texas A&M University System and Director of the RELLIS Academic Alliance.John Romero Cybersecurity instructor, maker of IoT, techie, software developer, sailor, private pilot, Air Force veteran, and electronic warfare technician. Mentor, coach, and facilitator for young adults entering the workforce. Passionate instructor and influencer for positive ethical leadership. Research interests include cybersecurity social engineering, human
. Fundamental principles areintroduced in the context of solving a given engineering problem, and other skill sets such ascommunication, economics, safety, and ethics can also be introduced to add depth and meaningto solving the problem. As Felder states, “students learn best when they perceive a clear need toknow the material being taught” [11]. PBL creates learning environments with rich extendedproblems that, when carefully designed and implemented, can engage learners in challengingtasks (problems) while providing guidance and feedback [12, 13]. Moreover, there have beenmany active learning strategies like cooperative learning, guided design, problem-based learning,hands-on learning and computer simulation, “clickers”, gamification, etc. that have
had prior experience in conducting whiteboardinterviews as part of their company’s hiring process, and were trained in research ethics. Theresearchers wrote the interview protocol with input from the interviewers. The interviews werevideo recorded for later transcription. Students were able to use verbal and written descriptions,including pseudocode or class diagrams.The interview protocol consisted of two parts, both of which used Corc. Participants received asimplified class diagram showing Corc’s Hand, Card, Face, and Suit classes.Participant were first given Problem 1, which used the game War. Two players each play one cardat a time. The higher face wins; matching faces result in a tie. Participants were instructed tosolve only the
: © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 2022 ASEE Annual Conference • An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors • An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contextsThe CPAEM course is designed to meet these objectives; consequently, the course descriptionprovided in the syllabus and undergraduate
experienceddifficulties in keeping up with their assignments and exams, especially in the online format, andthis was not made easier by the subsequent illness, along with financial and social stressencountered in their daily lives as reported by faculty members. In addition to students, Facultymbers also experienced a decrease in morale during the Fall 2020 period with no subsequent endto the pandemic insight and many struggled in balancing the pandemic life and keeping up withconsistent online work ethic as reported in several interviews. On the other hand, faculty members who adopted face-to-face class format tended toreport decreased stress levels and anxiety among their students mainly due to the enhanced socialfactor and group work that face-to-face
academia and industry to build capacity and education programs in areas such as: Engineering Leadership, Engineering Ethics, Professionalism, Societal Impact of Technology, Curriculum Development, and Communication. Dr. Barakat expertise and interest include also the areas of Mechatronics, Control, Robotics, Automation, and Nanotechnology Education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Remote Laboratory-Based Learning in A Thermal Fluid CourseAbstractMost educators look for experiential learning elements to engage students through interactiveconcept practice, thus leading their students to reach improved levels of
General Criteria 3 and 5 as well as relevant program criteria.The Curriculum section could then have three components: ● Support the attainment of Criterion 3 outcomes. Criterion 3 student outcomes 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 would probably be satisfied in a quality Master’s program. These can be briefly termed solving complex engineering problems using engineering, science, and mathematics, engineering design, communications, experimentation and data analysis, and acquiring and applying new knowledge. Outcomes 4 (ethical/ professional responsibilities), and 5 (working in teams), are not now commonly included in many Master’s programs, but could be required courses for graduates of non-ABET EAC accredited baccalaureate
, Florida. 10.18260/1-2—32681[4] H. Sjursen (2007). “The new alliance between engineering and humanities educators”, Global J. of Engng. Educ., vol. 11(2), pp. 135-142.[5] D. Riley (2008). “Engineering and Social Justice”, Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, and Society, vol 3(1), pp. 1-152.[6] R. Shannon & M. Mina (2021, July), The Challenges of Engineering Education, Engineering Practice, Code of Ethics, and Social Justice Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37843[7] National Academy of Engineering. (2003) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies
4.80 5.13 -2.604 .009 RejectPropose Solutions/Hypotheses Propose one or more solutions/hypotheses that indicates a deep comprehension of the 4.57 5.05 -2.976 .003 Reject problem Propose solutions/hypotheses that are sensitive to contextual factors 4.50 5.30 -3.607 .000 Reject Be conscious of ethical, logical, and cultural dimensions of the problem when proposing 4.60 5.05 -3.155 .002 Reject a solutionEvaluate Solutions Evaluate solutions deeply and elegantly 4.55 5.10 -3.988 .000 Reject Consider history of the problem, review logic/reasoning, examine feasibility of a 4.48
: Identify barriers for returning women to enter EmTech education and workforce Objective 2: Inform best practices to create effective re-entry strategies in EmTech for returning women Objective 3: Connect with scholars, policy makers and leaders to make change in the EmTech fieldsFigure 1. NSF RESET Conference ObjectivesThe theme topics of the sessions were drawn from these objectives, which included, but notlimited to [15]:• Current state of computing/technology• Curriculum initiatives• Upskilling and reskilling in EmTech• Non-traditional paths in EmTech• New initiatives for tech diversity• Diverse routes to EmTech• Tech re-entry lessons learned• Women tech initiatives• Work ethic for the 21st century
lessons.Approximately 30% of the surveyed students cited technical difficulties, audio lags, blurryvisuals, and wifi issues as challenges. Other constructive feedback, specifically from ADVsinclude: • Only two of my teachers posted lectures to canvas. Defeats one of the main purposes. • Hard to read white boards and tech issues (sound and disconnects). • Notes on board hard to read. • It is distracting and difficult to hear students' questions.Summary of FindingsVeteran and active-duty students bring persistence and mental toughness for academic workstemming from their goal-oriented work ethic in the military [8],[ 9]. In addition, their worldexperience provides a different and critically broad experience, which contrasts with thetraditional
experiences bytalking with these students.The research team will collect additional data as students graduate to gather further feedback onhow the mentoring shaped the student's experience. However, at this point, while we havecollected data from the seven students who graduated, the data would reveal the students'identities, which would be contrary to proper ethical research methods. Thus, at this point, onlydiscourse analysis of student documents and survey responses from mentors were used in thispaper.conclusionsDiscourse analysis was used to analyze the ideas and themes that were the most influentialstudents, as reflected in mentoring reports and scholarship sponsor thank-you notes. The resultsshowed that students are concerned about internships
Paper ID #37520Engineering Instruction, Inclusion, and Comics – Reflectionsfrom a Student Illustrator and an InstructorAddison TotmanSreyoshi Bhaduri Dr. Sreyoshi Bhaduri is an Engineering Educator and People Research Scientist. As part of Global Talent Management Science at Amazon, she employs innovative and ethical mixed-methods research approaches to uncover insights about the 21st century workforce. Sreyoshi has a doctorate in Engineering Education, and Masters degrees in Applied Statistics (M.A.) and Mechanical Engineering (M.S.). She earned her Bachelors degree in Mechatronics Engineering from Manipal
roles in an ethical, professional and adequate manner, these processes can becarried out successfully and with a similar quality that face-to-face processes."Furthermore, the experience gathered on online education indicates that this type ofeducation will remain in time, continuously adapting to technological progress andeducational trends. Therefore, innovating in online education tools and conditions becomesa sizeable challenge and a tremendous opportunity for student institutions [13].V. ConclusionsThis article aimed to analyze how the type of modalities, synchronous or asynchronous,influences the academic performance of adult students, through variables such as averagegrade, percentage of class failure and percentage of students who
.tb00039.x.[5] R. Suresh, “The relationship between barrier courses and persistence in engineering.” Journal of College Student Retention, 8(2), pp. 215–39, 2006/2007.[6] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press, CO, 1997.[7] T. Armstrong, Neurodiversity: A Concept Whose Time Has Come. Da Capo Press. 2010. p. 3.[8] T. Armstrong “The Myth of the Normal Brain: Embracing Neurodiversity.” AMA J Ethics.17(4): pp. 348-352, 2015. doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504.[9] C. L. Taylor, A. Esmaili Zaghi, J. C. Kaufman, S. M. Reis, and J. S. Renzulli, “Divergent thinking and academic performance of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Biomedical Engineering from the University of Michigan. She currently serves the IUPUI BME Department as Associate Chair and Director of the Undergraduate Program helping develop and implement curricular changes to embed engineering design, ethics, and technical communication throughout the BME curriculum. Prior to joining the faculty at IUPUI, Dr. Miller’s P-20 educational efforts included curriculum writing and program development for the John C. Dunham STEM Partnership School and Michael J. Birck Center for Innovation. Since joining IUPUI, Dr. Miller has been awarded internal and external grant funding to realize BME curricular changes and to pursue engineering education research of BME student self-efficacy toward design
mathematics. In manycircles ET is described as hands-on or as applied engineering. Ethics of the engineeringprofession also requires that graduates be mindful of the impact that technological advances haveon society, its culture, and the economy and the environment.Therefore, the importance of understanding the use of research in the educational environment issignificant. Understanding changes, how to interpret current findings, and develop ways toincorporate those changes in ongoing projects is critical to the continued progress of technologyand our society. With a clear focus on the engineering technology student and the tool used toassess their experience of research in the classroom this work will set a precedence for thisimplementation to
disability (e.g., non-disabled) in ways that reflect on the fluidity of disability; that is,one is non-disabled until they are disabled [1, 4]. Such perspectives center individual personhoodand lived experience of people with disabilities, highlight the diverse nature of disability, andposition accessibility and inclusion as ethical necessities that a society is responsible for. Theseperspectives contrast those often used in the social, physical, and bureaucratic structures thatshape the lived experiences of people with disabilities [5]. Such structures tend to rely onmedicalized models that describe disability as a condition to be treated and/or accommodatedusing a set of prescribed approaches regulated by policy [6, 7].Conceptualizing and
engineering curriculums case studies of engineering designs that causedloss of life and/or catastrophic failure of infrastructure system(s) are used to emphasizeengineering ethics. This theme may stem from such training and resulting sense of moralobligations. Regarding differences, practitioners associated creativity with developing multiplesolutions to a problem and thinking outside of the box. Faculty participants did not mentionthese. On the other hand, faculty brought up having access to resources and how it impacts theircreative problem solving. They tend to be less creative when resources such as googling similarproblems on the Internet are available to them. This was not mentioned by practitioners. Thisparticular example may not have