Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yang Shao, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015025.pdf[2] S. A. Valverde-Zavaleta, R. H. Mellin Rubio, A. E. Rafael Sánchez, M. Gonzales Loli, and E. Reynosa Navarro, “Pedagogy of Success: Perception in undergraduate and postgraduate students at a Peruvian university,” F1000Research, vol. 10, no. 1160, Nov. 2021. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.55310.1.[3] M. L. Costa, L. van Rensburg, and N. Rushton, “Does teaching style matter? A randomised trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching,” Medical Education, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 214–217, Feb. 2007. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02677.x.[4] L. Patrick, L. A. Howell, and E. W. Wischusen, “Roles matter: Graduate student perceptions of active learning in the STEM

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Jay Porter, Texas A&M University; Emel Cevik, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Jennifer Whitfield, Texas A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Maram Alaqra

supported by the National Science Foundation under DRL Grant Number1615019. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations presented are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] T.J. Moore, K.M. Tank, A.W. Glancy, and J.A. Kersten, “NGSS and the landscape ofengineering in K-12 state science standards,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 52,no. 3, Jan, pp. 296-318, 2015.[2] National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council, Engineering in K-12Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects, The National AcademiesPress, Washington, DC, 2009.[3] S. Pruitt, “The Next Generation Science Standards: The Features and Challenges,” J

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University; Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga; Claudia Calle Müller, Florida International University

professional 5. What is green design? responsibility 6. A context-sensitive solution in design 5. Apply the principle to a 7. Role of the engineer, ethics, and professional simple example project or responsibility homework assignment(s) 8. Development/infrastructure examples in the course 9. Information about general rating priority areas 10. Guest speakers 1. Why sustainability? 1. Why sustainability? Capstone 2. What is sustainability? 2. What

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Teamwork, Reflection, and Wellness

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Whitney Blackburn-Lynch, University of Kentucky; Matthew Sleep, University of Kentucky

generallyfeel good about that. Reaching our intrinsic goals (discussed in Meaning) leads to large gains ina sense of well-being [1].Classroom ImplementationIn EGR 103, the students are tasked with a team-based design project. They spend a majority ofthe semester learning the skills, developing the tools, and working to complete a functioningdesign with their team. The faculty work along side the students to aid in their success incompleting the required project. Until this past year, the design presentations anddemonstrations would occur in the last day(s) of class. Because of the realization that taking thetime to celebrate the completion of the project and recognize the accomplishment of the students,the faculty have been instructed to use the last

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Daignault; Audra Morse, Michigan Technological University

within the department, stronger technical writing skills, and asense of community. The CEGE Department would recommend WRITE-D to other programslooking to provide discipline-specific writing support to their graduate students.References1. Phillips, T., Graduate writing groups: Shaping writing and writers from student to scholar.Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2012.2. Bell, K., Creating a community of learners: Affinity groups and informal graduate writingsupport. Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2016.3. DeFeo, D. J.; Kılıç, Z.; Maseda, R., From productivity to process: Flipping the writing group.Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2017, 5 (3 S1), 544.4. Doody, S.; McDonnell, M.; Reid, E.; Marshall, S. C., Doctoral Peer Writing Groups

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Van Hilst; Reginald Parker, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Prescott

as a whole.PERT was developed in the mid 1950’s, about the same time as TPM. In fact, WBS is a PERTpractice. But PERT was developed specifically for projects with large knowledge gaps, scheduleuncertainty, and components that had never been tried before.In the remainder of this paper, we will look more deeply at all four of these practices, startingwith PERT, and present a proposal for combining elements of each to create a more realistic riskmanagement strategy to address the schedule risks in undergraduate capstone projects.PERTCPM and PERT were both developed for project scheduling in the late 1950’s. The Critical PathMethod (CPM) was developed by DuPont for maintenance and construction projects on chemicalplants. They had an experienced

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob Marszalek, University of Missouri - Kansas City; Michelle Maher, University of Missouri - Kansas City

] S. M. McKenzie, “Factors in engineering educational persistence: The correlation between identity and self-efficacy,” Doctoral dissertation, Southern New Hampshire University, 2015.[5] A. J. Elliot, and K. Murayama, “On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 613- 628. 2008, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613.[6] C. S. Dweck, and E. L. Leggett, “A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality,” Psychological Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 256-273, 1988, doi: 10.1037/0033- 295X.95.2.256.[7] C. S. Dweck, Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York, NY: Random House, 2006.[8] C. S

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amir Hedayati Mehdiabadi, University of New Mexico; Elizabeth Moschella-Smith, University of New Hampshire; Mala Htun

, A. S. (2019). Expanding the discourse surrounding sexual harassment: The case for considering experienced and observed hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, and gendered incivility. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 79-83.Crouch, M. (2016). Why can’t we behave? Justice and ethical conduct in the academy. Social Philosophy Today.Earnshaw, V. A., Reisner, S. L., Menino, D. D., Poteat, V. P., Bogart, L. M., Barnes, T. N., & Schuster, M. A. (2018). Stigma-based bullying interventions: A systematic review. Developmental Review, 48, 178-200.Else, H. (2018). Does science have a bullying problem? Nature, 563, 616-618.Fairchild, A. L., Holyfield, L. J., & Byington, C. L. (2018). National

Conference Session

ERM: Persistence and Attrition in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cassie Wallwey, The Ohio State University; Giselle Guanes, The Ohio State University; Tyler Milburn, The Ohio State University; Jeremy Grifski, The Ohio State University

examining the engineering culture through the lens of exclusion and‘weeding out.’ Our intent with this Work in Progress paper is to start a conversation that leveragesframeworks from other fields to understand how engineering culture acts as exclusive and exacerbatesissues related to retention and attrition, as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion.BackgroundThe exclusion of people from larger groups or communities has been studied through a variety of contextsover the years. Social exclusion in European contexts commonly refers to the exclusion of people oftenbased on class or socioeconomic status (The Social Exclusion Unit, 2001). This research becameespecially popular in the United Kingdom in the mid 1900’s as researchers and government

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 3: Mixed - Research, Engineering Design, Design Thinking, and Curriculum Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julia Brisbane, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jeremi London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kingsley Reeves, University of South Florida

. Pusca and D. Northwood, “Design thinking and its application to problem solving,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 20, pp. 48–53, Jan. 2018.[6] K. B. Wendell and J. L. Kolodner, “Learning Disciplinary Ideas and Practices Through Engineering Design,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 243–264. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.017.[7] M. Arık and M. S. Topçu, “Implementation of Engineering Design Process in the K-12 Science Classrooms: Trends and Issues,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 21–43, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-09912-x.[8] G. Lemons, A. Carberry, C. Swan, L. Jarvin, and C. Rogers, “The benefits of model

Conference Session

ERM: Identity Impacts (Identity Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jerry Yang, Stanford University; Joseph D Towles, Swarthmore College; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Sara Atwood, Elizabethtown College

-generation and/or low-income (FGLI) students encounter knowledge practices that devalueand delegitimize their own experiences, financial pressures, curriculum overload, lower familysupport that may contribute to accessing engineering internships [6], [7]. This qualitative research paper seeks to investigate the role(s) engineering industryinternships play in developing engineering professional identity for FGLI students. We ask thequestion, “How do technical engineering industry internship experiences impact FGLI students’recognition and engineering professional identities?” Interviews with ten self-identifying FGLIengineering students at a mid-size private university were conducted and analyzed through thelens of recognition, and six

Conference Session

ERM: Identity Impacts (Identity Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cristian Vargas Ordonez, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Siqing Wei, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Tiantian Li, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

-troubles- getting-to-the-u-s-threaten-stem-pipeline.[4] A. Flores and H. Aleaziz, “Some schools are now online-only due to the Coronavirus. ICE says their international students must leave the U.S.,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/adolfoflores/foreign-students-online-schools- college-ice-deport. [Accessed: 11-Mar-2022].[5] J. Burris and V. McGovern, “Focus – Excellence everywhere,” Burroughs Welcome Fund, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.bwfund.org/career-tool/focus-excellence- everywhere/. [Accessed: 06-Jan-2022].[6] D. Pyvis and A. Chapman, “Culture shock and the international student’ offshore”,’” J. Res. Int. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–42, 2005, doi: 10.1177

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thea Pepperl

sketch or prototype their designs. To address thisgap, we will include a lecture on prototyping and provide examples of medical device development fromideation to prototype phase. When reflecting on their civic and community engagement, studentsassociated the ability to respond to a cardiac arrest more strongly than their ability to apply design-thinking skills to address community needs. This may indicate a stronger association with medicalprofessionals helping the community. The results from this qualitative analysis will be used to develop asurvey to examine other preconceptions about engineering as well as evaluate the efficacy of the module.References[1] Kotche, M., Felder, A. E., Wilkens, K., & Stirling, S. (2020). Perspectives on

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - PBL with Control Theory, Writing, ABET, and Shaping Ethical Worldviews

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samuel Snyder, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

-2020/ (accessed Nov. 04, 2019).[2] “ASME Code of Ethics of Engineers,” 2012.[3] J. Lucena, G. Downey, B. Jesiek, and S. Elber, “Competencies Beyond Countries : The Re-Organization of Engineering Education in the United States , Europe , and Latin America,” J. Eng. Educ., no. October, pp. 433–448, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2008.tb00991.x.[4] K. Q. Fisher, A. Sitomer, J. Bouwma-gearhart, and M. Koretsky, “Using social network analysis to develop relational expertise for an instructional change initiative,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 5, 2019.[5] S. E. Brownell and K. D. Tanner, “Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and...tensions with professional identity

Conference Session

PCEE Technical Session 6: Engineering Design in High School

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen Plaster, The University of Akron; Nidaa Makki

and Training Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 32, Dec. 2017.[9] E. Silva Mangiante and A. Moore, “Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Reflections on Integrated Science/Engineering Design Lessons: Attending, Analyzing, and Responding to Students’ Thinking,” Journal of STEM Teacher Education, vol. 54, no. 1, 2020.[10] J. R. Hanson, S. Hardman, S. Luke, and B. Lucas, “Developing pre-service primary teachers’ understanding of engineering through engineering habits of mind and engagement with engineers,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2021.[11] A. T. Estapa and K. M. Tank, “Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: a professional development approach centered on an engineering design

Conference Session

Assessment in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Araoluwa Adaramola, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

theNational Science Foundation.References[1] B. N. Geisinger, and D. R. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors*.” International Journal of Engineering Education. vol. 29. No. 4, pp 914-925, Mar. 2013. Available: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/1392 [Accessed May 16, 2022][2] S. L. Arena and J. L. Davis, “The Concept-Specific Effects of Cooperative Learning in an Introductory Engineering Mechanics Dynamics Course,” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 387–397, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2020.1777886.[3] D. A. Amos, C. M. Pittard, and K. E. Snyder, “Active Learning and Student Performance in a Materials and Energy

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - NAE Grand Challenges, Graduate Students, Sustainability, and Makerspaces

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna Engelke, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

makerspace trainings and maker-integrated courses. The flexibilityand accessibility afforded by online learning, combined with the tactile nature of usingmakerspace tools to design and create, has created an effective model for blended makerspacelearning at UNC-Chapel Hill.References[1] M. F. Morado, E. M. Ayelén and A. Jarman, "Learning by making: A framework to revisit practices in aconstructionist learning environment," British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 52, (3), pp. 1093-1115,2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13083.[2] T. Trust, R. W. Maloy and S. Edwards, "Learning through Making: Emerging and Expanding Designs forCollege Classes," TechTrends, vol. 62, (1), pp. 19-28, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0214-0

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Akos Ledeczi, Vanderbilt University; Veronica Catete; Devin Jean, Vanderbilt University; Marnie Hill, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Shuchi Grover; Brian Broll, Vanderbilt University; Tiffany Barnes, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Lauren Alvarez, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Isabella Gransbury, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Gordon Stein, Vanderbilt University

speakers to bringin female role models from industry to highlight their innovative and collaborative work in thefield. We will train the CS Frontiers teachers on these materials in summer 2022, before they pilotin virtual summer camps prior to implementing the units in their academic courses.acknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants1949472, 1949492 and 1949488. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References [1] S. Grover and R. Pea, “Computational thinking: A competency whose time has come,” Computer Science Education: Perspectives

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Doris Espiritu, Wright College; Ruzica Todorovic; Bridget O'Connell

transferring. Belonging and Self-efficacy survey data especiallyduring the pandemic will be carefully analyzed and correlated with students’ performance longitudinally.Practices that generated results will be expanded and disseminated for replication.7. ACKNOWLEDGMENTThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DUE-1832553. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material arethose of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The PIespecially acknowledges the late Melissa Mercer-Tachick, President and Lead Consultant of MUSEEducational Consulting. Melissa designed, meticulously administered, and analyzed the survey and

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmad Fayed, Southeastern Louisiana University; Genesis Alegria Aguilar, Southeastern Louisiana University

modules for subsequent students to learn by experiments which can beadded as a lab module in upper level classes.ObjectivesThe main objective was to educate the Engineering Technology (ET) undergraduate studentsabout Vibration Analysis and perform relevant research. Shaking Table II, two accelerometers,and data acquisition kit were used to serve this purpose. Figure 1 and Figure 2 show the detailsof the equipment and data acquisition kit. The used accelerometer allows the analysis of severalvibration conditions with measurement of RMS or Peak Vibration Readings over wide range offrequencies, measurement of acceleration up to 490 m/sec 2, with sensitivity of 10.2 mV/(m/s²).MethodologyA team of three undergraduate students enrolled in ET494 (the

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 3 Capstone Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chelsea Salinas, Colorado School of Mines; Joel Bach, Colorado School of Mines; Megan Sanders, Colorado School of Mines

] [17]. We believe that we have created an interesting alternativecapstone experience that challenges students to hone their time management, project management andcommunication skills through a unique multi-project, multi-client, multi-team model.Bibliography[1] R. L. P. S. Howe S., "The 2015 Capstone Design Survey Results: Current Practices and Changes over Time," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1393-1421, 2017.[2] S. Howe, "Cultivating the Capstone Ecosystem to Educate the Engineer of 2020," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 2(B), pp. 653-658, 2018.[3] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby and C. D. Sorensen, "A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design

Conference Session

WIED: Support for All in the WIED Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jia Zhu, Florida International University; Monique Ross, Florida International University; Disha Patel, Florida International University

–329, 2005, publisher: American School Counselor Association. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732626 [4] M. Kargarmoakhar, M. Ross, Z. Hazari, M. Weiss, M. Georgiopoulos, K. Christensen, and T. Solis, “Computing Pathways: A Quantitative Inquiry into the Dynamic Pathways of Students in Computing with Gender Comparisons,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Jun. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10194755-computing-pathways- quantitative-inquiry-dynamic-pathways-students-computing-gender-comparisons [5] J. Margolis and A. Fisher, Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press, 2002. [6] J. Zhu, L. Zahedi, and M. S. Ross, “Evaluating Publications’ Keywords in Computer

Conference Session

WIED: Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sylvia Mendez, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Kathryn Watson, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs; Valerie Conley, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs

recognizing thepower of positive role models. It is time for higher education institutions to adopt inclusive,family-friendly policies and practices that support women pursuing the professoriate.Funding AcknowledgmentThis research is sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Alliance for GraduateEducation and the Professoriate (AGEP; award #1821008). Any opinions, findings, conclusions,and recommendations belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNSF.ReferencesAhmad, S. (2017). Family or future in the academy? American Education Research Journal, 87(1), 204–239. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316631626Allen-Ramdial, S.-A. A., & Campbell, A. G. (2014). Reimagining the pipeline: Advancing

Conference Session

ERM: ERM Medley Session!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Nur Shahira Samsuri; Maizam Alias; Akbariah Ary Mohd Mahdzir, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

’ conation iv. Person-item distribution map (PIDM) using the Rasch model to investigate students’ perception of agreement or disagreement towards each itemInstrument analysis using Rasch Model The 96-items GOI was first introduced by Kathryn S. Atman, who previously studiedthe goal accomplishment style and psychological types amongst middle school students in theUnited States [8]. In this study, the GOI instrument was distributed to different populations andenvironments, which is the first-year engineering students in one of the universities inMalaysia, which may affect the items’ reliability and validity. The Rasch measurement model is used to assess the psychometric properties in termsof reliability and

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 5: COVID-19 Pandemic Lessons and Best Practices

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hans Tritico, University of Mount Union; Okechukwu Ugweje, University of Mount Union; Chad Korach, University of Mount Union; Ethan Shirley, University of Michigan

and aquatic ecology from the University of Michigan. He is married and has two children who all love to travel.Okechukwu Ugweje (Professor)Chad S. Korach (Associate Professor and Director, School of Engineering)Ethan Andrew Shirley © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Advancing Global Competencies within a Required Global Engineering Course During COVID-19While COVID-19 adversely affected every aspect of education, hands-on experiences and study-abroad programs were perhaps hardest hit. The University of Mount Union prides itself on theunique training it offers students for the global engineering

Conference Session

Aerospace Division Technical Session: Sustainability and the Workspace

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yun Dong, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Subhanwit Roy, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; MacKenzie Reber, Grove City College

Conference Session

PCEE Technical Session 5: STEM Teacher Instructional Moves

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pamela Lottero-Perdue, Towson University; Jamie Mikeska

Paper ID #37136Simulated Engineering Teaching Experiences: PreserviceTeachers Learning to Facilitate Discussions to Help StudentsBecome Informed Designers (RTP)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue (Professor of Science & Engineering Education) Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego; Alex Phan, University of California, San Diego; Carolyn Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego; Marko Lubarda, University of California, San Diego; Nathan Delson, University of California, San Diego

five potential answers ranging from “to a great extent” to “not at all”and two free response questions were utilized in this study. The Likert scale questions used inthis study were: ● Did the oral exam(s) contribute positively to your learning in the course? ● Do you feel that the oral exam(s) helped improve your technical speaking skills? ● Did the oral exam(s) increase your motivation to learn? ● Do you feel the oral exam(s) contributed positively to academic integrity in the course? ● Did the oral exams cause you undue stress?The two free response questions asked about the best aspects of the oral exams and their areas ofimprovement. To run ANOVA on ranks tests and find the correlation between different factors,scores of 5

Conference Session

Disability, Neurodivergence, and Sense of Belonging in STEM: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

D. C. Beardmore, University of Colorado Boulder; Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado Boulder; Angela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder

remains a dominantideology in public opinion, professional practice, academic policy, and law in the U. S. today [1].The legal definition of disability in the U. S. exemplifies the medical model. Section 3 of theAmericans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and its 2008 amendment defines disability, with respectto an individual, as “(A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more ofthe major life activities of such individual; (B) a record of such an impairment; or (C) beingregarded as having such an impairment” [34]. The second model, called the social model ofdisability, emerged in the late 20th century [15] and has quickly become a widespreadepistemology in disability studies [35]. The social model posits disability as a

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Secil Akinci-Ceylan, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Rocio Chavela Guerra, Rowan University; Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University

+ courses in the analysis and broaden our study toother platforms beyond Coursera, as well as examining webinars and workshops on related topics.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon Non-Academic Research Internship supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. 1712195/2013144 and work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. EEC-1748499. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Dyer, J., Townsend, A., Kanani, S., Matthews, P., Palermo, A., Farley, S., & Thorley, C. (2019). Exploring the workplace for LGBT+ Physical Scientists.[2] Cech, E. A