supportmodels. We plan a future study with think-aloud interviews to explore how individual studentsmake use of the models in their learning effort.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumbers DUE #1834425, 1834417 and 2022412. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] P. S. Steif and A. Dollár, "Reinventing the Teaching of Statics," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 723-729, 2005.[2] A. Dollár and P. S. Steif, "Learning modules for statics," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 22, pp. 381-392, 2006.[3] J. Lesko, J
forsuccess. Results suggests that good outcomes require well-designed assignments, well-managedgroups, student accountability, and instructor feedback [14, 17, 18]. Not surprisingly, variouskinds of conflict can undermine the potential of team-based learning [19]. For example, lack oftrust among teammates can sow discord. In particular, learning in the context of a team-baseddesign project may be limited when there is a perception that one or more teammate(s) is notmaking a sufficient or fair contribution to the team. This kind of individual disengagement,characterized by allowing others to carry out the more difficult or time-consuming work, iscommonly referred to as social loafing [19].Some studies suggest ways to promote team cohesion and prevent
principles, namely promotingknowledge reinforcement and increasing the correlation between assignments and lectures, willbe generally applicable regardless of course modality and pedagogical methods.References[1] R. Schwartzman, “Refining the Question: How Can Online Instruction Maximize Opportunities for All Students?,” Commun. Educ., vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 113–117, Jan. 2007.[2] A. Horspool and S. S. Yang, “A Comparison of University Student Perceptions and Success Learning Music Online and Face-to-face,” MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, vol. 6, pp. 15–29, 2010.[3] C. A. Platt, A. N. W. Raile, and N. Yu, “Virtually the same? Student perceptions of the equivalence of online classes vs. face-to-face classes,” vol. 10, pp
Continuous Delivery pipeline. For the CD pipeline, the project is actively exploring options thatuse Docker to run our production environment while maintaining the ability to deploy in a nativeenvironment. It is our hope that this future work amplifies the benefits we have already experienced withfrequent iteration and code quality.References[1] G. Kulczycki and S. Atkinson, “Why educators need to team with industry professionals in softwaredevelopment education,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Jun. 2018.[2] J. Perretta and A. DeOrio, “Teaching software testing with automated feedback,” 2018 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition Proceedings, Jun. 2018.[3] S. P. Chow, T. Komarlu, and P. T. Conrad, “Teaching testing with
: National trends and new directions, Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.[3] Blake, H., Brown, N., Follette, C., Morgan, J., & Yu, H., "Black, indigenous, people of color,and international students: experiences and resolutions beyond COVID-19," American Journal ofPublic Health, no. 111(3), pp. 384-386, 2021.[4] Bound, J., Braga, B., Khanna, G., & Turner, S., "A Passage to America: University fundingand International students," National Bureau of Economic Research, 2016.[5] Burrell, J. O., Fleming, L., Fredericks, A. C., & Moore, "Domestic and international studentmatters: The college experienes of Black Males majoring Engineering at an HBCU," Journal ofNegro Education, no. 84(1), pp. 40-55, 2015.[6] Burt, B. A., Knight, A., & Robeson, J
References1. Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edstrom, K. (2007). Rethinking engineering education. The CDIO Approach, 302, 60-62.2. Huang, J., Vo, T., Wordley, S., & Ryan, K. (2018). Facilitating effective teamwork-engineering instructors' perspectives on strategies. In 29th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference 2018 (AAEE 2018) (p. 729). Engineers Australia.3. Gren, L., & Lenberg, P. (2018, May). The importance of conflict resolution techniques in autonomous agile teams. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Agile Software Development: Companion (pp. 1-4).4. Thomas, K. W. (1976). 'Conflict and conflict management'. In: Dunnette, M. D. (Ed
. Silbersdorff, B. S¨afken, and T. Kneib, “Introductory data science across disciplines, using python, case studies, and industry consulting projects,” Teaching Statistics, vol. 43, pp. S190–S200, 2021. [4] P. M. Shankar, “Introduction of data analytics in the engineering probability course: Imple- mentation and lessons learnt,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1072–1082, 2020. [5] M. S. Prokopyev, E. Z. Vlasova, T. V. Tretyakova, M. A. Sorochinsky, and R. A. Solovyeva, “Development of a programming course for students of a teacher training higher education institution using the programming language python,” Propositos y representaciones, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 484, 2020. [6] H. J. Passow, “Which
. Trejo, S. Hurlebaus, Z. Medina-Cetina, and D. Slocum,“Robot-assisted bridge inspection,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 77-95, 2011.[3] H. Trinh, D. Kim, and K. Jo, “Structural analysis of multiple building for mobile robot intelligence,” IEEE SICEAnnual Conference, pp. 2002-2007. 2007.[4] B. Hur, B. Y. Ryoo, W. Zhan, C. Bustos, G. Consuelo, L. Orozco, and R. Vazquez, “Progress in AutonomousBuilding Inspection Drone Development for Scanning Exterior Damage of Buildings,” Journal of Management &Engineering Integration, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 23-33, 2020.[5] B. Hur, K. Myles, Z. N. Adelman, M. Erraguntla, M. A. Lawley, E. J. Kim, J. L. Burgi, K. Price, K. Fritz, D. H.Stalcup, Z. Pan, Z. Stokes, B. W. Harris, F
, vol. 72, no. Spring, pp. 1-13,2013.[6] A. Chen, "3-D printers spread from engineering departments to designs acrossdisciplines," Chronicle of Higher Education, September 17, 2012.http://chronicle.com/article/3-D-Printers-Arent-Just-for/134440/[7] S. R. Gonzalez and D. B. Bennett, "Planning and implementing a 3D printing servicein an academic library," Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, vol. 78, pp. 1-14, 2014.[8] S. Pryor, "Implementing a 3D printing service in an academic library," Journal ofLibrary Administration, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2014,doi:10.1080/01930826.2014.893110.[9] D. Ketchum, "Makerspaces in Libraries," Journal of Academic Services, 2016,doi:10.1080/15367967.2016.1208017.[10] G. Nowlan, "Developing and
% … y… ty e al ty s s rs ge ue
Financial decision making, First year engineering, Senior project, and Change management. Her research is in Engineering Education where she has received $9.8 million of funding from NSF as either PI or Co-PI. She researches equitable classroom practices, integrated learning, and institutional change. She spent the 2019-2020 academic year at Cal State LA where she taught and collaborated on research related to equity and social justice. With her colleagues at Cal State LA she recently received an NSF grant called Eco-STEM which aims to transform STEM education using an asset-based ecosystem model. She is also a Co-PI on an NSF S-STEM grant called ENGAGE which is working to make a more robust transfer pathway for local
international consulting projects. While at MIT, his dissertation research and collaborative research with institute colleagues focused on domain-specific self-efficacy in engineering entrepreneurship, and on the impact of project-based pedagogies on persistence in engineering among undergraduate students. He served as Director of Institutional Research at Goshen College for five years before coming to EMU in 2016. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com STEM Scholars Engaging in Local ProblemsAbstract Eastern Mennonite University received a 5-year S-STEM award for their STEM ScholarsEngaging in Local
. We are in the process of conductingpost-implementation interviews to gather more information that may help explain thesedifferences.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grantnumbers DUE #1834425, 1834417 and 2022412. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] E. Davishahl, T. Haskell and L. Singleton, "Engaging STEM Learners with Hands-on Models to Build Representational Competence," in 127th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual Online, 2020.[2] S. A. Sorby, "Educational Research in Developing 3-D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students
Total Intervention 777 382 Total Students 1676 970AcknowledgementsThis research is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (grant numbers DUE-1821092, DUE-1821036, DUE-1821488, and DUE-1821277).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] L. Deslauriers, L. S. McCarty, K. Miller, K. Callaghan, and G. Kestin, "Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, no. 39, p. 19251
, Michigan. Dr. Irwin is PI for an NSF S-STEM grant until 2023. He is experienced in the manufacturing industry as well as the teaching profession with five years in engineering design, several years part time consulting in industry and over 30 total years of teaching. Dr. Irwin’s research focus is on teaching and learning in computer aided design, analysis, & manufacturing subjects.Michael Johnson (Professor) Dr. Michael D. Johnson is a professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. He also serves as the Associate Dean for Inclusion and Faculty Success in the College of Engineering. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product
. 14, no. 4, pp. 526-539, 1 Aug. 2021.[7] S. Abraham, M. Vurkaç, A. Miguel, N. Nguyen and O. Ong, “Teaching Embedded Systemsin the Context of Internet of Things (IoT),” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,Tampa, FL, USA June 16-19, 2019.[8] V. Chang and C. Martin, “An industrial IoT sensor system for high-temperaturemeasurement,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, (95), pp. 1-13, 2021.[9] K. Sangeethalakshmi, S. Preethi Angel, U. Preethi, S. Pavithra, and V. Shanmuga, “Patienthealth monitoring system using IoT,” Materials Today: Proceedings, Available online June 24,2021.[10] J. Morgan, J. Porter and M. Johnson, “Engineering STEM: Using IoT and EnergyManagement to Build Interest in Engineering at the Secondary Education Level,” 2019
completing the internship. We strongly believe that the grantactivities will build a network of interested students, STEM educators, administrators andsupporters to maintain the rate of production of new STEM teachers and alleviate the need ofSTEM teaching in this region.Acknowledgement and Disclaimer This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1851631. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References Coon, A. N. (2020). Maybe I Should Try Out Becoming a Teacher”: Why Science Majors Enter Science Teaching. Interdisciplinary Journal of
activities are particularly encouraged to avoid the furthermarginalization of these populations.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1953102. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] A. Farrell, “What Teachers Can Learn from Industry Internships,” Educational Leadership,vol. 49(6), pp. 38-39, Mar. 1992.[2] J. Dubner, S. C. Silverstein, N. Carey, J. Frechtling, T. Busch-Johnsen, J. Han, G. Ordway,N. Hutchison, J. Lanza, J. Winter, J. Miller, P. Ohme, J. Rayford, K. S. Weisbaum, K. Storm andE. Zounar, “Evaluating Science
wish to acknowledge the National Science Foundation under grant No. 1725674 forsupporting this work. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] A. Villalta-Cerdas, D. E. Thompson, S. L. Hegwood. “Integration of Research-basedStrategies and Instructional Design: Creating Significant Learning Experiences in a ChemistryBridge Course” In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[2] L. D. Fink, Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designingcollege courses. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub., 2003.[3] M. A. Reyes, M. R. Anderson-Rowland, M. A. McCartney. “Freshman
and the critical role of systems engineers in guiding how systems engineering should be utilized. • Roles Focused on Teams That Build Systems – Systems engineering does not occur in a vacuum; it is, instead, an intensely social discipline. The roles in this category are those that focus on enabling diverse, multi-disciplinary teams to be successful. Table 1. The roles of systems engineers identify by Hutchison, Wade, and Luna [2017].Role Name Role Description Focused on the Systems Being Developed Concept An individual who holistically explores the problem or opportunity space and Creator develops the overarching vision for a system(s) that
Paper ID #36905Works-in-Progress: Introducing Active Learning inSemiconductor Device CourseHansika Sirikumara Hansika Sirikumara, Ph.D., is an Assistant professor of Physics and Engineering at E. S. Witchger School of Engineering, Marian University Indianapolis. She completed her MS and PhD degrees from Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Her research expertise/interests are in engineering material properties for semiconductor device applications using computational methods. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
wassignificantly varying. The authors plan to continue testing with a larger population of studentparticipants to understand the effectiveness of the information communication of the applicationin learning.AcknowledgmentWe are obliged for the financial support of the McElhatan Foundation for the research. We alsothank volunteers who joined us to test the application.7 References[1] J. Carmigniani and B. Furht, Handbook of Augmented Reality, no. November. 2011.[2] R. Azuma, Y. Baillot, R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier, and B. MacIntyre, "Recent advances in augmented reality," IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 34–47, 2001, doi: 10.1109/38.963459.[3] J. Carmigniani and B. Furht, Handbook of Augmented Reality, no. July
with program coordinators and students. A summary of the LA studentrespondent characteristics is provided in Table 1.Table 1. LA student survey respondents Institution Surveys Surveys % % % % Time as LA with with useful Eng STEM female+ URM^ (S = semester; consent data major* major Q = quarter) PublicVLgR1 155 145 13 81 64 10 46% 1S, 32% 2S, 14% 3S PrivateMedDocHi 23 16 50 100 67 6 31% 2Q, 25% 4Q PublicVLgMasters 55 41
circuits course(s). Because mastery of each of thesefundamental concepts is essential for future courses, the use of standards-based grading (SBG) isappealing, as it measures proficiency on an objective-by-objective basis.SBG has been implemented in several fundamental undergraduate engineering courses, includingfluid mechanics [2], thermodynamics [3], signals and systems [4, 5], and software verification[6]. In electric circuits, other grading strategies and interventions have been used, such as usingteam-based learning [7], reflection and metacognition [8], and mastery-based grading [9]. Itshould be noted that, while SBG and mastery-based grading are quite similar approaches, onemajor difference in the author’s approach to SBG is that all-or
United States, the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professionsremain disproportionately white and male when compared with the overall population [1]. This is also thecase with higher education degree attainment [1]. Our university has one of the more diverse studentpopulations in the U. S. [2], and a stated commitment to social justice, equity, and inclusion [3].However, our faculty demographics reflect the national trends in the STEM professions. Thus, ourstudents may not see people like them represented in our faculty or their chosen professions. Representation does matter for college STEM students. STEM college students from historicallyunderrepresented gender and ethnic groups indicated that watching STEM
Consortium.reported among the participants. Table 1 shows the outcome of each KI and whether or not itstarget level was achieved. Table 1 - Overall Project Success Key Indicators REFERENCES [1] Gottlieb, Michael, et al. "Rethinking the approach to continuing Key Target Actual (M)et, professional development conferences in the era of COVID-19." Journal Indicator Achievement Achievement (U)nmet, of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 40.3 (2020): 187-191. (KI) (S)ame [2] Price
encouraging. The reality is that disciplinary siloes can formwith a navel gaze focus. We need more collaboration, open minded discussion, and integration,promoting a continuum of knowledge that engenders creative and productive activities.This material is based upon work supported and ispired by the National Science Foundation(NSF) under award EEC-1623125. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF. References1. Gamire E, Pearson G, editors. Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Island Press; 2006.2. National Research Council. Technically speaking: Why all Americans need
-Criteria-11-29-17.pdf[2] A. C. Loignon, D. J. Woehr, J. S. Thomas, M. L. Loughry, M. W. Ohland, and D. M. Ferguson,“Facilitating peer evaluation in team contexts: The impact of frame-of-reference rater training,” Acad.Manag. Learn. Educ., 2017.[3] J. E. Bono and A. E. Colbert, “Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of coreself-evaluations,” Pers. Psychol., 2005.[4] G. Dai, K. P. De Meuse, and C. Peterson, “Impact of multi-source feedback on leadership competencydevelopment: A longitudinal field study,” J. Manag. Issues, 2010.[5] J. W. Smither, M. London, and R. R. Reilly, “Does performance improve following multisourcefeedback? a theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings,” Pers. Psychol., 2005.[6] S. A
respondents’ personality trait of extroversion has a correlation with theirresponses to the questionnaire. The study has provided useful insight and baseline data. It hashighlighted the opportunity to increase the tolerance of ambiguity of undergraduate students. Thefuture work entails the designing and implementing of interventions to assist the students inincreasing their tolerance to ambiguity.AcknowledgementsThe research is supported by NSF Grant # 1832041.References[1] S. Schrader, W. M. Riggs, and R. P. Smith, “Choice over uncertainty and ambiguity intechnical problem solving,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 10, no. 1-2, pp. 73–99, 1993.[2] E. Frenkel-Brunswik. “Tolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual
courses.References[1] NCES https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf[2] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Barriers and Opportunities for2-Year and 4-Year STEM Degrees: Systemic Change to Support Students’ DiversePathways (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2016).[3] J. A. Fredricks, P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris, “School Engagement: Potential of theConcept, State of the Evidence,” Review of Educational Research, Vol. 74, No. 1, Spring, 2004.pp. 59-109. Published by: American Educational Research Association Stable URL. [Online].http://www.inquirylearningcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Fredricks2004-engagemt.pdf[Accessed on January 29, 2022].[4] G. D. Kuh, T. M. Cruce, S. R. houp, J. Kinzie, and R. M. Gonyea