Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Demos and Interactives

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Haejune Kim, Texas A&M University; Phapanin Charoenphol, Texas A&M University

vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 3-24, 1998.[3] M. Prince, "Does active learning work? A review of the research," (in English), J Eng Educ, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, Jul 2004, doi: DOI 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2004.tb00809.x.[4] D. R. Webster, R. S. Kadel, and W. C. Newstetter, "What Do We Gain by a Blended Classroom? A Comparative Study of Student Performance and Perceptions in a Fluid Mechanics Course," (in English), Int J Eng Educ, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 2-17, 2020. [Online]. Available: ://WOS:000506204800002.[5] D. Yang and K. Pakala, "Building an effect online thermodynamics course for undergraduate engineering students," 2017.[6] A. W. Chickering and Z. F. Gamson, "Seven principles for good practice in

Conference Session

Computers in Education 9 - Technology I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Forney, Loyola Marymount University; Mandy Korpusik, Loyola Marymount University; Masao Kitamura, Loyola Marymount University

policy’s (π) job is to map some state (s) of the Pacman board to some action (a)that is best to take: π(s) = aWhat follows is a detailed description of each learning tool presented herein alongside suggestedchoice points with which students may experiment for the purposes of deeply understanding thedeep-learning pipeline (and its limitations). 1 Here, “successful” control of Pacman is dictated by the transportability tier being solved (detailed later). Ingeneral, the idea of a successful policy in this environment is one that efficiently collects pellets while avoiding ghosts.Pacman Trainer (PT)Pacman Trainer (PT)2 is a web application akin to data crowdsourcing platforms like Ama-zon’s Mechanical Turk [https://www.mturk.com/] and the more

Conference Session

Incorporating Technology in the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Sanders, California State University, Fullerton; Serop Kelkelian, California State University, Fullerton; Markus Wieser; Guenter Bischof, Joanneum

tensorof integer rank r ≥ 0 may be defined as a set of N r components ai1 i2 ···ir (each index ix rangesfrom 1 to N , where N is the dimension of the space of interest) that transform according to thefollowing rule: a′i1 i2 ···ir = Ri1 j1 Ri2 j2 · · · Rir jr aj1 j2 ···jr , (1)where the aj1 j2 ···jr are the tensor’s components in some coordinate frame S, the a′i1 i2 ···ir are thecomponents of the same tensor in a frame S ′ obtained from S by applying one or more of thetransformations of interest (those being translations and proper rigid rotations in Euclidean space,and Lorentz transformations in Minkowski spacetime), Rij is an orthogonal matrix representingthe transformation, and we are employing the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 2: Peer Mentoring/Learning, Teaching Assistants, and Career Mentorship

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald Tembrevilla, McMaster University; Andre Phillion, McMaster University; Shelir Ebrahimi, McMaster University

IAIs to ensureeverything is running smoothly behind the scenes including the coordination of team formationand peer evaluation, scheduling and student communications as well as support for technicalchallenges that may arise.There are four main projects or modules within this course. For each module, the regular weeklycourse routine is: course instructor(s) introduces a fundamental concept in one or more of thecore topics (Materials Science, Graphics Design, Computing, Engineering Design, Practice &Profession) along with a corresponding activity or related milestone of a design projectundertaken by all students, these happen in 3 hours of lectures each week Then, in each 3-houronline lab, one of the 11 IAIs gathers a maximum of 80 students

Conference Session

LEES 2: Stories of Intersectionality and Institutional Marginalization

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janelle Grant; Stephanie Masta, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Darryl Dickerson, Florida International University; Alice Pawley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Matthew Ohland, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

. Isabelalso often expressed that she wanted to get along with their group members, and Isabel hopedthat her group members (all white students) had best intentions. Isabel noted that addressingmarginalizing behaviors done by peers is out of her control, but she felt that she controls herability to study and remain focused on her end-goal of graduating with an engineering degree.Isabel believed that the deficit perspectives of Black and Brown students were part of everydaylife, something that they would need to get used to while at college, and especially throughouttheir career. Our theme of “Marginalization is just part of Life” also aligned with findingsreported by Wolfe et al. [10]. For example, in Wolfe et al.’s work, exclusion based on race

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Online Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Samuel Garcia, NASA EPDC

campus. Perhaps the most relevant and revealing findingfrom the study centered on the social and academic impacts of having direct, face-to-faceinteraction with both peers and instructors. Students noted that this factor led to higher levels ofengagement and academic success, while providing the necessary opportunities to build andsustain relationships with peers. Attending class physically helped curb the negative and damagingeffects of isolation and served boost their overall socioemotional health. Future studies willcontinue to examine the long-term effects of learning in isolation, how students learned to copeduring difficult circumstances, and how faculty members work to accommodate student learningneeds.REFERENCES[1] Russell, S. H. (2006

Conference Session

Pedagogy in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Hirshfield, University of Michigan; H. Scott Fogler, University of Michigan; Chris Barr, University of Michigan

concepts to standard core chemical engineeringtheory and problems. As process safety consists of a complex range of topics, shorttutorials are found on the SafeChE initiative site to also help faculty more easilyintegrate these Safety Modules into their course(s).In this paper, we discuss the findings from an assessment done to determine the impactof students engaging with the SafeChE Safety Modules regularly throughout corechemical engineering courses. Specifically, a survey was created to determine if theSafety Modules achieved the following goals: • Emphasizing how process safety is a professional obligation of a chemical engineer • Increasing how often students think about safety • Increasing student confidence in completing

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 3: Mixed - Research, Engineering Design, Design Thinking, and Curriculum Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gracie Judge, University of Michigan; Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan

study highlighted the need for curricularintegration of social justice in an engineering problem-solving context. Courses outside of the traditional EE curriculum also have the potential to introducesociotechnical content [15], [16]. In a study of interdisciplinary engineering education, Hoopleand Choi-Fitzpatrick [15] developed course materials for faculty to explore the intersection ofdrones and society. Similarly, Huang and Reddy [16] designed a robotics course module for anelective robotics course to promote critical thinking about the ethics and social implications ofrobotics [16].Module Description Inspired by Lord, Przestrzelski and Reddy’s [1] module about conflict minerals andPolmear et al.’s [13] ethics and societal

Conference Session

Remote Pedagogy in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Gargac, Ohio Northern University

course offering (Spring ‘18) and students were allowed 1.5weeks to complete each course. A recent (2018-19) overhaul of the THORS library standardizedthe course length to approximately 2-3 hours of material. This enabled students to reasonablycomplete an entire course in one week. Starting in 2019, students were assigned weekly coursesfor the first half of the semester and then were able to “Choose their own” curriculum of sevenTHORS courses for the second half of the semester. A sample curriculum was provided to helpstudents without specific manufacturing interests. Table 3: Number of THORS courses assigned each course offering S'17 S'18 S'19 S'20 F'20 S'21

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip M Holmes, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; Cynthia H McCollough, Mayo Clinic; Shuai Leng, Mayo Clinic

2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 F W S F W S F W S F W S Figure 1. Timeline of course in this study with major events labeled. F, W, and S represent the fall, winter, and spring quarters, respectively. The purpose of this work is to describe the methods used to implement a two-person TA team withina graduate-level engineering course, describe how the team operated in practice, and retrospectivelyassess the effectiveness of the team. The objective of this TA team was to aid the course directors andinvited lecturers in transitioning a medical imaging course from a traditional format to a flippedclassroom format and help define policies and procedures

Conference Session

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Francesca Bartram; Natalie Wint; David Maxwell Rea

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division

. Dryburgh, "WORK HARD, PLAY HARD: Women and Professionalization in Engineering—Adapting to the Culture," Gender & Society, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 664- 682, 1999.[8] W. Faulker, "Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering:," Social Studies of Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759-792, 2000.[9] W. Faulkner, "‘Nuts and Bolts and People’ Gender Troubled Engineering Identities," Social Studies of Science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331-356, 2007.[10] J. S. McIlwee and G. J. Robinson, Women in Engineering: Gender, Power, and Workplace Culture, SUNY Press, 1992.[11] J. A. Mejia, R. A. Revelo, I. Villanueva and J. Mejia, "Critical theoretical frameworks in engineering education: An anti-deficit andliberative approach

Conference Session

ERM: Conceptualizations of Engineering and Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nikita Dawe, University of Toronto; Lisa Romkey, University of Toronto; Amy Bilton; Kimia Moozeh, University of Toronto

Conference Session

Centering Black Experiences in STEM: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Merriweather, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Marah Lambert, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Shaunelle Casey; Cathy Howell, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Niesha Douglas

found to be critical to successful doctoral degreematriculation and academic progress [14], [15], [16].McGee et al.’s [13] review mirrors others [11], [12], [17] who have explored the experiences ofBlack STEM doctoral students at HWIS. but what surprised the researchers was that BlackSTEM doctoral students from HBCUs had similar experiences. What was most telling was thesimilarity between experiences of Black STEM students at HBCUs and HWIS. HWIS are oftencastigated for their racially inhospitable environments and anti-Black racism attitudes which arevisible in their practices, policies, and dispositions, both institutionally and personally. In spite ofthe overall student body and faculty “looking like them” their departments did not

Conference Session

Social Identities and STEM Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Kaufman-Ortiz, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Hector Rodriguez-Simmonds, Purdue Engineering Education

, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) STEM PractitionersIntroduction Where are the gays in engineering? LGBTQ+ people have always existed, but ourvisibility in society has ebbed and flowed across civilizations. Our presence has not changed inthe U.S.’s recent history, but our visibility has increased over time [1]. Some pridefully exclaimtheir presence in English and Spanish: “I’m here, I’m queer, get over it!”; “¡Estoy aquí, soy de lacomunidad, y no vas a definir quién seré!” Employee Resource Groups (ERG’s) withincorporations, groups such as the National Organization of Gay and Lesbian Scientists andTechnical Professionals (NOGLSTP), Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (oSTEM), and Out for Undergrad (O4U

Conference Session

LEAD Tech Session #2: Assessing and Evaluating Engineering Leadership Development.

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth Volpe; Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Denise Simmons, University of Florida; Danielle Weisenfeld, University of Florida; Jackson Carcaba, University of Florida

traditional engineering programs arehistorically rooted in the military developed engineering education from the early 1800’s [34],[35]. Though the profession has adapted and evolved greatly over the past 200 years, with thedevelopment of new technologies and roles for engineers, little in the core engineering curriculahas changed. Many engineering education programs are already struggling to stick to the originaldesign of a rigorous and technically focused curriculum, while simultaneously attempting tointegrate the use of new engineering technology into a brief 4-5 year time frame.Understandably, there then remains little room for the integration of leadership skills and coursesinto the curricula as it is already seeking to cover an abundance of

Conference Session

ERM: Mentoring for Everyone! And Let's talk about Graduate Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Bahnson, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Catherine Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Monique Ross, Florida International University

amelioration; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development for nontraditional data. Her NSF CAREER award studies master’s-level departure from the engineering doctorate as a mechanism of attrition. Catherine earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering from Purdue University, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Monique S. Ross (Assistant Professor) Assistant Professor, Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International University, research interests include broadening participation in computing through the exploration of: 1) race, gender

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Bork, University of Michigan; Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan; Nicholas Young, University of Michigan

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mike Borowczak, University of Wyoming; Andrea Burrows, University of Wyoming; Shawna Wolf, University of Wyoming; Shaya Wolf, University of Wyoming; Hui Hu, University of Wyoming

and much more consistent than in 2020. Thelowest number of unique views in 2021 was 23 for Activity 4. Despite having the lowestunique viewers for 2021, this video still had a similar number of views as video two in2020, and had more views than 2020’s video three, four, and five. While unique views alsodropped throughout the 2021 camp, a higher of number of camp attendees were maintainedthroughout all five activities; the 2021 camp finished with 25 unique views of the final video,five times more than in 2020.4.1.4 Watch TimeNext consider the watch time, describing the total hours per day the videos were watched(across all viewers). The watch time of each video per day shows that camp attendees in2020 watched each video according to the camp

Conference Session

PCEE Session 3: Robotics and Design Competitions

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anurag Purwar, Stony Brook University; Amanjeet Bagga, Stony Brook University; Cynthia Colón, Stony Brook University; Imin Kao, Stony Brook University

follow-on research and development of the SnappyXODesign has been supported by an NSF I-Corps award (#1823736) to SBU and STTR Phase andPhase 2 awards (awards #2126882) to the startup. All opinions and conclusions presented in thispaper are those of authors only and not of funding agencies.References [1] S. Papert, Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1980. [2] D. A. Kolb, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984. [3] R. D. Beer, H. J. Chiel, and R. F. Drushel, “Using robotics to teach science and engineering,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 42, no. 6, p. 85–92, 1999. [4] A. Eguchi, “Robotics as a

Conference Session

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hao He, University of Missouri - Columbia; Heather Hunt; Suzanne Burgoyne; Joshua Saboorizadeh

. 2016, doi: 10.1080/21650349.2015.1026943.[12] A. N. N. Hui and S. Lau, “Formulation of Policy and Strategy in Developing Creativity Education in Four Asian Chinese Societies: A Policy Analysis,” J. Creat. Behav., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 215–235, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01334.x.[13] A.-T. Koh, “Linking Learning, Knowledge Creation, and Business Creativity: A Preliminary Assessment of the East Asian Quest For Creativity,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 85–100, May 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(99)00075-X.[14] K. So and Y. Hu, “Understanding creativity in an Asian school context: Korean teachers’ perspectives,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 33, p. 100573, Sep. 2019, doi

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azadeh Bolhari, University of Colorado Boulder; Shelby Tillema, University of Colorado Boulder

provided for in-depth informationon the platform. Additionally, the authors would like to thank the teaching assistants in the targetcourses: Nadia Jorgenson, Lauren Magliozzi and Ayush Shahi who assisted Dr. Bolhari in thisproject.References [1] N. Anderson, K. Potočnik, and J. Zhou, “Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework,” Journal of Management, 40(5), pp. 1297–1333, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128 [2] K. M. Y., Law, and S. Geng, “How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students?” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), pp. 897–914, 2019

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Nagel, James Madison University; Melissa Aleman, James Madison University; Kelly Sadel

Students interacting with professors 4 Routine and Schedule Student discussion of utilizing a schedule, having a routine, or having a schedule. 5 Project Changes Student notation of changes with respect to projects as a result of the transition(s) induced by the pandemic. 6 Space Use with Respect Student discussions of the link between the use of space to Community and community. 7 Professor’s Reaching Any discussion of how professors connected with students Out / Adaptability / remained in contact with students / helped students with the

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Johanna Acosta, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Jacoba Ubidia, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Miguel Andrés Guerra, Universidad San Francisco de Quito; Vanessa Guerra, University of Virginia; Cristina Gallardo, Universidad San Francisco de Quito

, 2015.[8] D. M. Richter y M. C. Paretti, "Identifying barriers to and outcomes of interdisciplinarity in the engineering classroom", Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 29-45, mar. 2009, doi: 10.1080/03043790802710185.[9] M. A. Guerra y Y. Abebe, "Pairwise Elicitation for a Decision Support Framework to Develop a Flood Risk Response Plan", ASCE- ASMEJournalofRiskandUncertaintyinEngineeringSystems, jul. 2018, doi: 10.1115/1.4040661.[10] P. W. Holley y C. Ben Farrow, "Expanding collaboration in academia: case study of the development of construction products", J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 139, n.o 2, pp. 139-147, 2013.[11] R. E. Davis, S. Krishnan, T. L. Nilsson, y P. F. Rimland, "IDEAS

Conference Session

LEES 4: Understanding and Disrupting Engineering Cultures

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Tomblin, University of Maryland College Park; Nicole Mogul, University of Maryland College Park

preliminaryexperience is showing that the three weeks of training, the self-reflection and the observationsare creating a more collaborative environment for the teaching fellows. They are quicker toadjust their classroom practices and seem more flexible in the classroom (e.g., the projectorwasn’t working at the beginning of class, so we just did the AV Scenarios handout untilclassroom support arrived). Importantly, using tools of mindfulness, our UTFs now approachstudents with increased patience, humility, and curiosity, which seems to result in improvedstudent engagement with both activities and their debrief.Literature Cited[1] D. Riley, Engineering and Social Justice, San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool, 2008.[2] K. Moore, D. L. Kleinmann, D. Hess, S

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 4 Best in DEED

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas Fila, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Corey Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

also be the instructor(s) or the students.Criteria will often reflect the goals or outcomes the client(s) hope to achieve through the course.Learning outcomes are clear outcomes for many courses, however there could be other targetedoutcomes such as changing student motivation, preparation for future courses, remediation forlearning gaps, identity building, or acquainting students with certain ideas or professional fields(e.g., from practicing engineers).A course will have constraints placed on it. These will need to be identified by the client or thedesigner(s), i.e., instructor(s), as limits placed on the course. Some constraints may be externallydefined or mandated, such as course duration and timing, location, and eligible

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 3 - Humanitarian Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Awatef Ergai, Kennesaw State University; Shane Peterson; Ginny Zhan, Kennesaw State University; Sabine Smith

/mentalhealth/stress-coping/parental-resources/young-adulthood/index.html [Accessed: January 27, 2022][2] L. Bland, “Impact of cross cultural study experiences on cultural sensitivitydevelopment,” in 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/16409[3] K. Davis and D. B. Knight, “Impact of a global engineering course on student culturalintelligence and cross-cultural communication,” Journal of International Engineering Education,vol. 1, pp. 1-38, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jiee/vol1/iss1/4[4] G. L. Downey, J. C. Lucena, B. M. Moskal, R. Parkhurst, T. Bigley, C. Hays, B. K. Jesiek, L.Kelly, J. Miller, S. Ruff, J. L. Lehr, and A. Nichols‐Belo, “The globally competent

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Osazuwa Okundaye, Texas A&M University; Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Francis Quek, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Sharon Lynn Chu, University of Florida; Qing Li; Shaoping Qiu, Texas A&M University

of the commission expert group on taxation of the digital economy, chaired by vitor gaspar,” Brussels: European Commission, 2014. [3] G. McKinsey, “Manufacturing the future: The next era of global growth and innovation,” tech. rep., McKinsey Global Institute, 2012. [4] P. Nunnenkamp et al., “Determinants of fdi in developing countries: has globalization changed the rules of the game?,” tech. rep., Kiel working paper, 2002. [5] C. Anderson, The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hachette Books, 2006. [6] J. Pihlaja et al., “Learning in and for production: An activity-theoretical study of the historical development of distributed systems of generalizing,” 2005. [7] O. Okundaye, S. Chu, F. Quek, A

Conference Session

Research Frameworks for Identity and Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 9

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malini Josiam, University of Texas at Austin; Taylor Johnson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Janice Hall, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Walter Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Crystal Pee

, elevating participants’ voices, mitigating bias in data collection, analysis andinterpretation, establishing credibility, building claims of transferability, and managing powerdynamics. Tracy (2010) proposes eight universal criteria for assessing quality in qualitativeresearch: 1) worthy topic, 2) rich rigor, 3) sincerity, 4) credibility, 5) resonance, 6) significantcontribution, 7) ethical, and 8) meaningful coherence. A worthy topic is one that is relevant,timely, significant, and/or interesting. Rich rigor involves using sufficient theoretical constructs,time in the field, sample(s), and/or context(s). Tracy views self reflexivity as a part of sincerity,which also includes transparency about methods and challenges. Credibility involves

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Design and Labs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Wickenheiser, University of Delaware; Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware; Amy Trauth, University of Delaware; Marcia Gail Headley, University of Delaware

, significant material is added to address the needs of the projectspecifically and the aforementioned learning objectives generally, as described below. Coursecontent is delivered through videos released on a weekly basis, with the following exceptions.The last two weeks of the fall semester are devoted to proof-of-concept fabrication and reviewfor the final exam, so no new content is presented. The final four weeks of the spring semesterare self-guided: each team must select three different parts within their project (e.g., gears, bolts,springs, belts), fully analyze the dynamics and loading condition(s) of each part, and determineits factor of safety for static and fatigue failure. In this way, students can practice using thetextbook as a reference

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 4 Best in DEED

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University; Sindia Rivera-Jimenez, University of Florida; Anastasia Hauser, University of Kentucky

effective team requires the inclusion of individual members' contributions to supportthe team's objectives. This definition of team building can support engineering educators in developingactivities and evaluation s that foster collaborative and inclusive environment environments thatencourage the collective understanding of the complexities of the engineering curriculum.This research paper will be grounded on the theoretical framework proposed by Van den Bossche andcollaborators (2006) for building high performance teams by identifying social and cognitive factors incollaborative learning environments [13]. This framework has been used to describe engineering teams.The dimension of this model permits the analysis of what type of activities can be