for a Material and Energy Balances course," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 109-118, 2017, doi: https://journals.flvc.org/cee/article/view/104416.[26] S. J. Stone and M. W. Liberatore, "Attitudes Toward and Usage of Animations in an Interactive Textbook for Material and Energy Balances," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--36728.[27] M. W. Liberatore and K. Chapman, "Reading anytime: Do students complete missed readings after the due date when using an interactive textbook for material and energy balances?," in ASEE Annual Conference, Tampa, FL, 2019, pp. 1-10, doi: https://peer.asee.org/33224
. 736, 2019.[17] D. Ramella, “Oral exams: A deeply neglected tool for formative assessment in chemistry,” in Active Learning in General Chemistry: Specific Interventions. ACS Publications, 2019, pp. 79–89.[18] M. Huxham, F. Campbell, and J. Westwood, “Oral versus written assessments: A test of student performance and attitudes,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 125–136, 2012.[19] A. S. Theobold, “Oral exams: A more meaningful assessment of students’ understanding,” Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, pp. 1–4, 2021.[20] L. K. Davids, “A study on the effectiveness of team-based oral examinations in an undergraduate engineering course,” in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &
/word-entrepreneur-mean/ (accessed Mar. 28, 2022).[5] M. S. Kennedy, H. L. Cox, and S. K. Lanier, “Board # 71 : Tracking Research Self-Efficacy of Participants in an NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates Site,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017.[6] A. K. T. Howard, Undergraduate Research for Composites in Extreme Environments, Second Year Study,” Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Daytona Beach, FL, March 4-6, 2018.[7] J. B. Hylton, D. Mikesell, J.-D. Yoder, and H. LeBlanc, “Working to Instill the Entrepreneurial Mindset Across the Curriculum,” Entrepreneurship Educ. and Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–106, Sep. 2019.[8] “Expanded KEEN Student Outcomes (aka e
Paper ID #37105Give me a coffee break! Pilot study on improving examperformance and reducing student stressNelson GranjaMiguel Andrés Guerra (Professor of Civil Engineering and Architecture) Miguel Andrés is an Assistant Professor in the departments of Civil Engineering and Architecture at Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, in Ecuador. Miguel Andrés is a civil engineer from USFQ (2009), was awarded a MSc in Civil Engineering – Construction Engineering and Management at Iowa State University (Fulbright scholar, 2012)and his PhD in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech (2019), as well as two Graduate Certificate in
Foundation to study increasing the fairness of engineering assessments. In total, she has been on the leadership of more than $24 million dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Tracy Anne Hammond (Professor) Dr. Tracy Hammond is the current Secretary of the Faculty Senate and passionate about Faculty governance. Hammond is
inspired by our students, who requested a greaterconnection between the technical content of classes and real world SJ issues, including the rolethat engineers play. The intent is to engage faculty in the development of new curriculum whileproviding a mechanism for direct student feedback on new ideas. Success was measured by thelevel of engagement of faculty in the challenge.A Call to ActionIn Spring 2019, a small group of diverse students requested that more social justice and appliedproblem solving be included in the curriculum. They organized and led the EngineeringMindfulness in Climate and Curriculum (EMC2), a group of faculty, administrators, and studentswith the goal of affecting change in our engineering community, classroom, and
of this pilot canadequately answer our four research questions with access to a larger sample size.Future WorkUpon amending the study based on community feedback obtained during the ASEE NSF postersession, we will expand this study during the fall 2022 semester to include fifteen engineeringstudents, tripling the sample size of this pilot. We also plan to run this same study withpractitioners (after performing a pilot) to investigate if any differences exist between these twopopulations.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by NSF Research in the Formation of Engineers [RFE DUE# 2113844,2113845, 2113846]. This work is also supported by the USDE Graduate Assistance in Areas ofNational Need (GAANN) Fellowship [P200A180055]. We would also like
) and desired personal characteristics for the graduatestudents (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving approach, data preparation, analytics, andpresentation). The contributions from the advisory board were the driving force for the newdirection and strategy for the graduate program. Industry professionals suggested and inputsfrom the board were successfully incorporated.A study by Stelyn (2019) suggested the perception of students played an important role in thestructure for the new course providing a learning experience. The student feedback and studentfocus group were used in generating new course structure, operations, and the course impact fortheir career. Student evaluations of teaching and learning and student suggestions on
; Carberry, A. R. (2021, January). Practicing Engineers’ Definition of Their Expertise: Emergent Themes and Frequency by Gender Identity and Role Change into Management. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.[10] Miskioglu, E., Martin, K. M., Carberry, A. R., Bolton, C., & Caitlyn, A. (2021, January). Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Approach to Measure Engineering Intuition. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.[11] D. R. Laker and J. L. Powell, “The differences between hard and soft skills and their relative impact on training transfer,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 111–122, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20063.[12] Cech, T. R. (1999). Science at liberal
communities.The next steps of this program will be to begin developing qualitative and quantitativeassessments of student impact and to work towards establishing metrics for the “Value to thePartners” activity. This will allow a more formal assessment of the functionality of thepartnership. These efforts will help understand and balance the trade-offs between student andcommunity outcomes while providing value to the partners.References[1] “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020 | ABET.” ABET, 2019.[2] E. De Graaff and W. Ravesteijn, “Training complete engineers: Global enterprise and engineeringeducation,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 419–427, Dec. 2001, doi:10.1080/03043790110068701.[3] J. Lucena, G. Downey
, and E. L. Diaz, “Education and building capacity for improving resilience of coastal infrastructure,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019, doi: 10.18260/1-2--32686.[5] C. L. Lopez del Puerto, H. E. Cavallin, J. L. Perdomo, J. M. Barreto, O. M. Suarez, and F. Andrade, “Developing a collaborative undergraduate STEM program in resilient and sustainable infrastructure,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2019, doi: 10.18260/1- 2--32629.[6] C. López del Puerto, I. Pagán-Trinidad, L. Aponte-Bermúdez, and S. Adams, “NUEVOS CÓDIGOS DE CONSTRUCCIÓN 2018 Y EDUCACIÓN PARA MEJORAR LA RESILIENCIA DE LA INFRAESTRUCTURA COSTERA EN PUERTO RICO 1 NEW BUILDING CODES 2018 AND EDUCATION TO IMPROVE
, 2022).[20] L. B. Wheeler, S. L. Navy, J. L. Maeng, and B. A. Whitworth, “Development and validation of the Classroom Observation Protocol for Engineering Design (COPED),” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1285–1305, 2019, doi: 10.1002/tea.21557.[21] D. L. Reinholz and N. Shah, “Equity Analytics: A Methodological Approach for Quantifying Participation Patterns in Mathematics Classroom Discourse,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 140–177, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.49.2.0140.[22] M. Sanders, S. Spiegel, and J. Zoltners, “Moving Beyond ‘Does Active Learning Work?’ with the Engineering Learning Observation Protocol,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. doi
science and math courses allows them toexperience real-world problems which enables them to make connections to STEM fields [2].Data show that K-12 students from rural areas are less likely to have experience with STEMfields in the classroom compared to urban areas. This is due to a multitude of factors includingbudgets and teachers not having the necessary resources [5]. Many urban schools receive morefunding, therefore drawing in more qualified teachers and more resources [4]. A difference inSTEM education between rural and urban schools seems to be due to financial reasons [4][5].Data was collected from a 2019 outreach summer camp designed to increase student interest inSTEM. The hypothesis is that summer camps affect students’ interest in
tolink these topics in the curriculum and (2) students can see the benefits of combing materialsselection and simulation in design.References[1] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. July, pp. 223–231, 2004, doi: 10.1038/nature02568.[2] “National Survey of Student Engagement.” https://nsse.indiana.edu/nsse/index.html (accessed Feb. 02, 2022).[3] S. J. Quaye, S. R. Harper, and S. L. Pendakur, Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. Routledge, 2019.[4] K. Krause and H. Coates, “Students’ engagement in first‐year university,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher
process.ReferencesAEP. (2021, February 20). GuaraniSat-1: Paraguayan Space Agency.https://www.aep.gov.py/index.php/proyectos/guaranisat-1Kurita, J. H., & Ortiz Coronel, D., & Moreira Bogado, L. D., & Vega, B. F. (2020, June),CanSat Pico-satellite Building Workshop as an Effective Tool for STEAM Education, A Ca-se Study Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, VirtualOn line . 10.18260/1-2--34257Coronel, C. D., & Mosqueda, M. L., & Vega, B. F., & Stalder, D. H., & Kurita, J. H. (2021,July), Building 1U CubeSat as a Tool to Promote Project-Based Learning in Paraguay, a CaseStudy Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, VirtualConference
Dale and Suzi Gallagher of Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. He studies the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing student teams and with collaborators has been recognized for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Program Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
by the ASEE community e.g., to remix and create funshareable instructional content memes, and to create accessible audio and text descriptions for studentswho are blind or have low vision. Text extracted from each scene can also used to improve the accuracyof captions and transcripts, improving accessibility for students who are hard of hearing or deaf.1 Introduction Recent advancements in educational technologies have made available many innovative approaches toengage students with the course materials. In addition to standard-classroom teachings, efficient and reliableeducational tools have been developed to make the content more accessible to all students. ClassTranscribe isan educational web application that is designed to offer
learning and assessment tool in her introductory physics courses for non-majors. One component of her research focuses on the role that various forms of technology play in terms of student learning in physics and in engineering. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) for over 30 years. Dr. Larkin served on the Board of Directors for ASEE from 1997-1999 as Chair of Professional Interest Council (PIC) III and as Vice President of PICs. She has received numerous national and international awards including the ASEE Fellow Award in 2016 and the Distinguished Educator and Service Award from the Physics and Engineering Physics
the labs (determination of addresses and nicknames needed for a lab and sketches of HMI screens) to be submitted as pre-lab work to force students to be better prepared for lab. • Review all lab documents for clarity. • Look at improving cable length and cable management on the equipment. • Look at adding another module with solenoids and other devices.References[1] A. R. M. Khairudin, A. Abu-Samah, N. A. S. Aziz, M. A. F. M. Azlan, M. H. A. Karim andN. M. Zian, “Design of Portable Industrial Automation Education Training Kit Compatible forIR 4.0” in 2019 IEEE 7th Conference on Systems, Process and Control (ICSPC), 2019, pp. 38-42, DOI: 10.1109/ICSPC47137.2019.9068090.[2] S. Hsieh, “Design and Evaluation of Sensor
Powered by www.slayte.com Long-Term Impact of Humanitarian Engineering Projects on Views of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Preliminary Qualitative Results from AlumniAbstract: This paper details a poster presented in the National Science Foundation (NSF) GranteesPoster Session for the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference. The study, aptly titled, aims to examinethe ‘Long-Term Effect of Involvement in Humanitarian Engineering Projects on StudentProfessional Formation and Views of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI).’ As part of thelarger study, this poster details the results from alumni (n=19) of the Lipscomb Universityengineering program collected through an open-ended questionnaire. The research
studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. She also earned a graduate certificate in human-centered design (HCD) from the Interdisciplinary Graduate Education Program at Virginia Tech. Marie’s interest in values and engagement in professional cultures also extends to innovation and its experts. With Matthew Wisnioski and Eric Hintz, Marie co- edited Does America Need More Innovators? (MIT Press, 2019). This project engages innovation’s champions, critics, and reformers in critical participation.Elizabeth A. Reddy (DR.) Anthropologist and STS scholar studying how we build engineering values, practices, and risk mitigation techJessica Smith Jessica M. Smith is Professor in the Engineering, Design & Society Department at the
] Burke, A., Okrent A., & Hale, K. (2022). The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022. National Science Foundation (NSF). National Center for Engineering and Science Statistics (NCESS). Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221[6] Delahanty, C., Herring, S., Timby, T.A., & Genis, V. (2021, July), Education in a Remote World: Focus on Workforce Readiness. Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/education-in-a- remote-world-focus-on-workforce-readiness[7] Farrell, O., Brunton, J. A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 17, 25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239
; Fellow ASEE and 2Abdul Syed Ph. D.1 Professor Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Dept., Founding Director Microelectronics/VLSI Technology – University of Massachusetts Lowell (UML), MA and 2Post-Doc. UML, Adjunct Southern NH University, NH Corresponding Author: Kanti Prasad – Kanti_Prasad@uml.edu Abstract — In order to conduct applied research and carry out innovation in Monolithic MicrowaveIntegrated Circuits (MMIC) Design and Fabrication technology, theoretical instructions in MMIC, RadioFrequency (RF), and Microwave electronics course work must integrate fundamentals in researchinvestigations. The analytical calculations are carried out with adequate graphical tools such as SmithCharts and Electronic Design
Project,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition Proceedings, Jun. 2017.[11] J. Davis and S. A. Rebelsky, “Developing soft and technical skills through multi-semester, remotelymentored, community-service projects,” Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium onComputer Science Education, 2019.[12] H. Zhang, M. W. Easterday, E. M. Gerber, D. Rees Lewis, and L. Maliakal, “Agile ResearchStudios,” Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work andSocial Computing, 2017.[13] M. Ellis, C. Amelink, S. Edwards, and C. Shaffer, “Incorporating practical computing skills into asupplemental CS2 problem-solving course,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content AccessProceedings, Jun. 2020.[14] “Run Gitlab runner in a
Offer,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2019, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028666.[3] H. L. Chen et al., “A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding How Colleges, Universities, and Employers Prepare and Support Undergraduates in Engineering Internships,” in 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2018, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659009.[4] S. A. Atwood, S. K. Gilmartin, A. Harris, and S. Sheppard, “Defining First-generation and Low-income Students in Engineering: An Exploration,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020.[5] D. Verdín, J. M. Smith, and J. C. Lucena, “Recognizing the funds of knowledge of first-generation
Paper ID #37888To Do Good, Learn Well: Engineering a Virtuous Cyclebetween Technical Rigor and Diverse, Equitable, andInclusive Teaching PracticeGerald J. Wang (Assistant Professor) Jerry Wang is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering (by courtesy) and Chemical Engineering (by courtesy), at Carnegie Mellon University. He received his BS in 2013 from Yale University (Mechanical Engineering, Mathematics and Physics), SM in 2015 from MIT (Mechanical Engineering), and PhD in 2019 from MIT (Mechanical Engineering and Computation). He performed postdoctoral research at
engineer” QuestionIn a mechanical engineering lab course, students were asked to list the critical characteristics ofengineering professionals. The data collected from Spring 2019 to Spring 2021 were coded toidentify ethical, social, or environmental aspects, and the results are presented in Figure 3.Ethical items have some prevalence of reporting, but environmental and social aspects rarelyappear within the self identification of professional characteristics. The course where thisquestion was administered in, does not specifically cover content that addresses social justiceissues, or more broad social impacts or environmental impacts. A higher prevalence of social andenvironmental professional responsibility would be expected within a course
discussed based on thecourse’s first implementation during summer 2021.Bridge Course Design and DevelopmentThe designed bridge course for the engineering technology students followed a similar approachto the chemistry bridge course previously reported in the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference[1]. The design model is referred to as the Integrated Course Design [2] and starts with the goalsof the course, followed by an analysis of the situational factors surrounding the course, with thelast step being the components of the course (i.e., assessment and feedback, learning activities,and instructional practices). Thus, the goals of the course were established before the content andlearning activities were selected. The design team then explored the
bronchoscopy teaching with easily accessible low-cost 3D-printing. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, 2017. 15: p. 37-41.10. Blake, N. and F. Adam, Integrating a 3-D Printer and a Truss Optimization Project in Statics, in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2016: New Orleans, LA.11. Huang, T.-C. and C.-Y. Lin, From 3D modeling to 3D printing: Development of a differentiated spatial ability teaching model. Telematics and Informatics, 2017. 34(2): p. 604-613.12. Wong, J., et al., Board 17: Design and Small-Scale Testing of 3D Printed Seismic Isolators, in ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exposition. 2019: Tampa, FL.13. Trimble. SlketchUp for Web. 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 25, 2021]; Available from
. 119, no. 2, pp. 100–106, Apr. 2018.[18] E. Perignat and J. Katz-Buonincontro, “STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 31, pp. 31–43, Mar. 2019.[19] J. E. Martinez, The search for method in STEAM education. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.[20] U. Balaji, “Service learning through robotics,” in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021.[21] E. Reynaud, L. Barrington, and E. Willard-Schmoe, “Integrated service-learning: students perspectives,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[22] L. E. Whitman and C. Mason, “Assessing service learning reflections,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2013.[23] P