faculty to help them write proposals and navigate the proposal preparation and grant management processes. She was a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her work operationalizing social capital for engineering education. More recently, Julie has encouraged the engineering education research community to embrace methodological activism, a paradigm whereby researchers intentionally choose methods for the political purpose of empowering marginalized populations. Learn more about her research team, Elevate, at juliepmartin.com.Deepthi Suresh I am a graduate student in biomedical engineering with a research focus in engineering education. I seek to improve the undergraduate experiences of other biomedical engineering students in ways
timeline to allow for delays and shifts.Related to the flexibility theme, we recommend that researchers prepare alternate interviewquestions and activities to allow for participants to best take part in the study. Additionally, wesuggest building a research timeline with significant buffer space to allow for the many delayswhich can occur in this type of research.Conclusion & Future WorkSignificantly more work is needed to better understand the impact and experiences of allstakeholders and participants in informal STEM learning experiences. A better understanding ofthese experiences will help support the development of a STEM-literate society and futureSTEM professionals, meeting the needs present in national calls. However, this type of
social interaction problems nowadays, as research indicated“the majority of coursework in engineering education today focuses on technical knowledge and skills ofmathematics, science, and engineering as well as new graduates generally feel prepared for the technicalaspects of practice, but many have difficulty transitioning to the socio-technical practices and culture ofthe workplace[28] ”.Additionally, to explore the collaborative inquiry deeply, we conducted a longitudinal study for threeinnovative engineering design works (arc-path prediction, parallel design of robot structure andsymmetrical design for robots) in our research case “Robo”. It can be seen that the three dimensions ofcollaborative inquiry are significantly repeated in different
Paper ID #37847A Strategic Curriculum Design for an IntroductoryEngineering Course to Encourage Self-Empowerment ofMinority StudentsVictor Manuel Garcia (Research Associate) Victor Garcia holds a PhD in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Victor is currently a research civil engineer at the US Army – Engineer Research and Development Center in Vicksburg, MS. He leads research projects sponsored by the US Department of Defense that focus on improving the design and construction practices for military transportation installations. Victor has been also collaborating with UTEP faculty on
these activities were impacted adversely by the pandemic,such as the postponement of this trip from Spring 2021 to Fall 2021, the transition of in-personinstruction to online instruction in late October, and the less than perfect final project’scompletion rate, beyond the normal adaptation of a course in a different country given thefacility and product differences. The different academic calendars in the U.S. and Bulgarianinstitutions also made it impossible in finding a suitable period for the students from bothinstitutions to interact, but we were able to connect the students with other American visitors inBulgaria to get comments on their designs. There were many other challenges, including thecultural influences on design, and
survey, re-formulate the question, propose a solution,an improvement, or an updated approach, design/build/implement the proposed approach, andpresent to others. In this cycle, the search for discovery and innovation materializes.This preliminary work investigates the use of research materials, introduction of practices, andthose performing this kind of work in the classroom, at every level. This study is done at a largeresearch institution where research is pervasive throughout and there are many engineeringtechnology students. Researchers chose the Student Perception of Research IntegrationQuestionnaire (SPRIQ) to assess student perception of research in their learning environment.The first step in assessing the implementation of CR in a
like snorkeling.An alternative option exists for students who do not want to travel with the class to completetheir international engineering field experience. This individual field experience option allowsstudents to craft their own engineering field experience. Requirements for this individualexperience are meant to ensure students have an equivalent experience while attaining thelearning outcomes for the course. Students are required to work or shadow an engineer that isworking in a country outside of the United States for 40 hours. While the nature of theengineering work is up to the student and the host engineer, the student does need to practice oneof the steps in the design process and have interactions with community or project
engineering teamsusing evidence-based practices.A common practice for engineering education practitioners when dealing with teamwork involvesestablishing technical objectives, forming the group, and assessing team performance at different stagesof the semester. However, for some, it remains mysterious what teaching practices work best to fostercollaboration and how that relates to the team performance at the end of the project.To get evidence-based practices, we need to use a theoretical framework such as the Beliefs andBehaviors Model to explore this social process of building mutually shared cognition. After the Scope ofWork (SOW) of the design project is assigned to the teams and the task performance is established,students need to start
experiences of academics investing extra time in developing andsupervising research projects for the Icarus Program. Our results suggest that the time investmentin providing students with a hands-on experience where they could voluntarily engage with realprojects had a positive impact on the faculty development of the faculty members. Theydescribed how participating in the program improved their teaching practices by being able tointeract closely with students and better understand what they thought was important. This alsoled to more engagement from the students in their courses by developing some out-of-the-classroom interactions with their professors. Similarly, this allowed for an opportunity toimprove their mentoring and research practices
school. He described being frustrated with thedepartment’s lack of effort and interest in helping graduate students create meaningfulconnections and felt stressed because of the ensuing social isolation. He was coping with thesechallenges through Acceptance and Active coping. “But it was nice when [undergraduate university] would host like barbecues or whatever. And I think there's less incentive for universities to do that for grad students, 'cause I think a lot of grad students don't care about that stuff. Like I said, a lot of people are very focused on their research, they wanna get that finished and they wanna do the best work that they can do in this limited amount of time. And I think that's totally valid
Paper ID #38336Sketchtivity, an Intelligent Tutoring Software: BroadeningApplications and ImpactMorgan Weaver (Graduate Research Assistant)Hillary Merzdorf Hillary Merzdorf is a Ph.D. candidate at Purdue University in the School of Engineering Education. Her research interests are in flexible assessment practices incorporating both traditional psychometrics and technology-based approaches, digital engineering education tools, and cognitive engineering methods for learning research.Donna Jaison Graduate Student at Texas A&M University.Vimal Kumar Viswanathan (Associate Professor) (San Jose State University)Kerrie
training. We leaned upon the expertise of on-campus resources including the Center forInclusion and Diversity (CCID) [28] and the Center for Teaching, Learning, and Outreach(CTLO) [29] to develop best practices for both the speaker and facilitator sides of the project.Our facilitator search consisted of independent research that we conducted to find speakers at ourinstitution and other schools with relevant expertise, as well as a survey sent to the departmentsoliciting speaker suggestions. The latter effort did not yield many recommendations and most ofthe speakers came from our research. We primarily found speakers based on their published workor lectures we found online, but other approaches included making use of our school’s alumninetwork and
Paper ID #38391Examining Faculty and Graduate Student Attitudes on Stressand Mental HealthDavid Feil-seifer David Feil-Seifer is an Associate Professor in Computer Science at the University of Nevada, Reno. His primary research interests are Socially Assistive Robotics (SAR) and User Interface design for Unmanned Autonomous Systems (UAS-UI). His research is motivated by the potential for SAR to address health-care crises that stem from a lack of qualified care professionals for an ever-growing population in need of personalized care as well as the uses for aerial robots for disaster mitigation. Prior to his
impact andproductivity within their profession. Jensen et al. [14] conducted a bibliometric analysis andfound that scientists who were active in wider dissemination activities (industry partnerships oroutreach presentations) produced more scholarship than those who did not participate in widerdissemination activities. In fact, the most active researchers publish in traditional journals andthen share in at least two of the following ways: communicating via popular media, collaboratingwith industry, or teaching. For these reasons, we set out to determine if researchers generally,and engineers specifically, could find ways to more effectively communicate their researchfindings with the public in several different informal learning
technologies, advanced composites manufacturing techniques, and materials characterization. His current research interests are in heat transfer, pyrometry, structural design, heat treatment, metal forming & fabrication, composites manufacturing, and product design and development. He is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) as well as the Society for the Advancement of Material and ProcessEngineering (SAMPE) and he holds a position as a Technical Specialist (Materials and Processes Engineering) at a majorGeorgia aerospace airframe manufacturer. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comLean Practices in Academia; A
student’s chosen undergraduate degree programme. TheIEP emphasizes creativity, communication, choice, interdisciplinarity, teamwork, professionaldevelopment and responsible innovation by learning through projects and the social context ofengineering. A main goal of the IEP at its inception was to position people and the complexchallenges of our world at the center of engineering thinking and practice for students bychanging the way we teach engineering at UCL. The IEP is 8 years old with the first intake ofyear 1 students under the new IEP curriculum in 2014-15 and our first graduating class in 2017.Over 6,000 students have graduated so far.The IEP has several innovative curricular features. An interdisciplinary cornerstone engineeringdesign module
from minority student population groups [15].Prior researchers have noted the benefits of REU in improving the research competencies ofundergraduate students [4] [12]. However, it has also been suggested that students are sometimesconfused as to whether they should continue in academia or get some experience in the industrybefore deciding about graduate school [16] [17]. To that end, REU sites provide a great platformfor students to understand what graduate school and research look like, opportunities thereafter,and how to prepare for them. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the impact of differentprofessional development activities in a REU program on overall student experiences andoutcomes. More specifically, this paper presents a
ofengineering education bounded by the EL community of practice. A substantial portion of theresearch on EL education is published through ASEE, primarily through the LEAD division.Therefore, this review supports the continued growth of this nascent field and identifies growthopportunities that will accelerate EL development and broaden its impact. Identifying, codifying,and synthesizing the previous research in EL provides crucial foundations for advancement andreduces the likelihood of redundant efforts [2]. Ultimately, this review seeks to answer threedriving research questions: 1) What topics has the EL research published at ASEE conferencesfocused on since 1996? 2) Are there gaps in the EL research published at ASEE conferences thatindicate growth
well as the minor. It also holds a university designation for social science andwriting-intensive credit. In the first half of the course, students define identity (including race,ethnicity, gender, sexuality, class, and ability) and intersectionality, understand forms ofoppression (e.g., racism, white supremacy, sexism, misogyny, misogynoir, transphobia,homophobia, classism, and ableism), examine social justice movements to eradicate theseoppressions, and identify policies that exclude/protect identities (across both society andcomputing environments). In the second half, this knowledge is used to examine how technologyreplicates/amplifies these societal issues, the impact on identities, and tech-related policies.Identity-centered approachThe
practices in academic mentoring: A model for excellence,” Nursing research and practice,vol. 2012, p. 3, 2012.[2] K.D. Kendricks, A.A. Arment, K.V. Nedunuri, & C.A. Lowell, “Aligning Best Practices inStudent Success and Career Preparedness: An Exploratory Study to Establish Pathways to STEMCareers for Undergraduate Minority Students,” Journal of Research in Technical Careers, vol. 3,no. 1, pp. 27-48, 2019.[3] M. Vandermaas-Peeler, P.C. Miller, & J.L. Moore, J. L., Excellence in mentoringundergraduate research, Washington D.C.: Council on Undergraduate Research, 2018.[4] L. Varghese, & L. Finkelstein, “An investigation of self‐efficacy crossover between mentorsand protégés within mentoring dyads,” Annals of the New York Academy of
competencies of future students tomatch SM needs [6]. Governments of countries such as South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore, all keyplayers in the Asian manufacturing market, are also pursuing SM technologies and researchers arecurrently developing maturity models for SM adoption. As evident from these initiatives, the need for SM learning infrastructure requires engineeringcolleges and technical schools to develop new curriculum to better prepare graduates for this new SMenvironment to support the reconfiguring factories and supply chains [8]. There is a clear need to focuson developing a SM curriculum specifically focused on skill sets and competencies needed for effectiveSM technology adoption and implementation to address current knowledge gaps
Chair of ASEE's CDEI during the Year of Impact on Racial EquityHomero Murzi (Assistant Professor) Dr. Homero Murzi (he/él/his) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with honorary appointments at the University of Queensland (Australia) and University of Los Andes (Venezuela). Homero is the leader of the Engineering Competencies, Learning, and Inclusive Practices for Success (ECLIPS) Lab where he leads a team focused on doing research on contemporary, culturally relevant, and inclusive pedagogical practices, emotions in engineering, competency development, and understanding the experiences of traditionally marginalized people (e.g., Latinx, international students
Paper ID #37208Minority-serving Institution Partnerships StrengthenUnderrepresented Minority Recruitment for a ResearchExperience for Undergraduates Program (Experience)Jessica Perez Jessica G Perez is the Associate Director of Education and Inclusivity for the Engineering Research Center for Power Optimization of Electro-thermal Systems (POETS). Dr. Perez earned a B.S. in Biological Engineering from MIT and a Ph.D. in Chemical and Biological Engineering from Northwestern University. Her professional interests include engineering education, inclusive teaching, and DEI best practices in higher ed.Joe Muskin Joe
onthe personal well-being of students and faculty.Figure 1. Instructional arc for research questions and data analysis.Data CollectionData were collected at Colorado School of Mines which has about 5500 undergraduates and1600 graduate students, with 33% women, 28.5% underrepresented students, and 15.4% firstgeneration students. This setting provided a group of high-achieving students and faculty in ahigh-pressure academic environment with whom I could explore the impact of faculty-studentinteraction on well-being in these conditions. I was a participant researcher as a faculty memberfrom the humanities and I recruited 4 additional faculty members from STEM disciplines(chemistry, physics, math, and chemical engineering) through convenience
Paper ID #37101WIP: ASEE Year of Impact on Racial Equity: P-12 Parentsand Guardians EngagementHomero Murzi (Assistant Professor) Dr. Homero Murzi (he/él/his) is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with honorary appointments at the University of Queensland (Australia) and University of Los Andes (Venezuela). Homero is the leader of the Engineering Competencies, Learning, and Inclusive Practices for Success (ECLIPS) Lab where he leads a team focused on doing research on contemporary, culturally relevant, and inclusive pedagogical practices, emotions in engineering
Paper ID #37747The Generalized Exergy Equation: A Rigorous Developmentand Detailed Presentation Suitable for Presentation toAdvanced Undergraduates and Beginning Graduate StudentsSheldon M. Jeter (Associate Professor) Sheldon M. Jeter has mechanical engineering degrees from Clemson, the University of Florida, and Georgia Tech. He has been on the academic faculty at Georgia Tech since 1979 and will retire in August 2022. He has written over 250 refereed journal articles and conference papers and numerous research reports and other articles. He has supervised 16 Ph. D. graduates and numerous other research students
]. Research into the culture ofengineering itself highlight what Cech [16] describes as a ‘culture of disengagement’ inengineering, upheld by three ideologies: depoliticization, which frames ‘non-technical’ issuessuch as public welfare as tangential to engineering work; technical-social dualism, whichprioritises the technical details and devalues ‘social’ dimensions; and meritocracy, whichpresents existing social structures as being fair and just. According to Cech, this ‘culture ofdisengagement’ from issues of public welfare may serve to sustain structures and practices ofinequality for disadvantaged groups.In a general sense, some of the factors suggested to impact upon the completion rates ofengineering degrees include: unsupportive institutional
in specific scholarly areas (e.g.,biomechanics, robotics, broadening participation, or engineering education). There is a growingrecognition across disparate fields (e.g., science communication [3] and public health [4-5]) of adisconnect between scholarly research dissemination and practice. As a result, the intent todisseminate research findings to a wider audience is not achieved, and the research-to-practicegap widens. This paper highlights a novel approach to audio dissemination for broadeningparticipation, as one model for how to center impact and change in engineering educationresearch design.1.1 Dissemination, Impact, and Change in Engineering Education ResearchMany in the engineering education community view the primary goal of
intersection of food-energy-water systems. Relying on a conceptual frameworkthat identifies several competencies -- the skills, knowledge, and pedagogical methods that arevital for successful transdisciplinary teamwork -- we designed an approach that capitalizes onfaculty expertise, student interests, and teamwork.In this paper, we offer a model of an innovative approach to training graduate students -- CohortChallenges offered by the INFEWS-ER. Specifically, we describe the fundamental elements thateach Cohort Challenge shared: a broad theme related to a wicked problem that gives graduatestudents the flexibility and independence to formulate their own research questions and designtheir own projects; training in competencies for conducting
University ofColorado Boulder.References[1] D. Mirza, P.T. Conrad, C. Lloyd, Z. Matni, and A. Gatin, “Undergraduate teaching assistants in computer science: A systematic literature review,” Proc. ICER ’19, ACM, 2019, pp. 31-40, https://doi.org/10.1145/3291279.3339422.[2] K.A. Schalk, J.R. McGinnis, J.R. Harring, A. Hendrickson, and A.C. Smith, “The undergraduate teaching assistant experience offers opportunities similar to the undergraduate research experience,” J Microbiol Biol Educ, vol. 10, pp. 32-42, 2009.[3] J. Kinkead, F. Titchener, and R. Wheatley, “Best practices for undergraduate teaching assistant programs,” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 139-159, 2019.[4] C.J. Felege, The long-term