Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bernard Van Wie, Washington State University; Zeynep Durak, Washington State University; Olivia Reynolds, Washington State University; Kitana Kaiphanliam, Washington State University; David Thiessen, Washington State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Oluwafemi Ajeigbe; Aminul Islam Khan, Washington State University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University; Heidi Curtis, Campbell University; Carah Watson, Campbell University; Jacqueline Gartner, Campbell University

Islam Khan Received his B.S. and M. S. from the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology where he also served as a Lecturer and Assistant Professor. Currently, Khan is a Ph.D. candidate at Washington State University. He has been involved in multidisciplinary research including hands-on learning for STEM education, transport modeling in micro/nanoscale devices, and various inverse techniques including Bayesian inference, Monte Carlo methods, neural network, and deep/machine learning for adeno-associated virus and liposome characterization. In 2020, he was awarded the best Research Assistant award by the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State University. Khan plans to pursue a

Conference Session

Issues Facing STEM Programs at Rural Two-Year Colleges

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lesley Strawderman, Mississippi State University; Mahnas Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University; Umar Iqbal; Alta Knizley, Mississippi State University; Jenna Johnson, Mississippi State University; Rani Sullivan, Mississippi State University; Shane Brauer, Mississippi State University

take multiple discipline-specific engineering courses intheir initial semester. Discovering a major is not a good fit often results in transfer studentsleaving engineering or significantly lengthening time to degree completion. To promote students’confidence in their major choice, students will view a video introducing engineering majorsavailable at Mississippi State University. The BETS course will include additional pertinentinformation for new transfer students. Topics for BETS Transitions include: • How to use the CANVAS course – A quick how-to video to highlight the functions of the course • Choosing an Engineering Major – Engaging video(s) to introduce engineering majors • Orientation – Information about orientation

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hadi Kazemiroodsari, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Yetunde Folajimi

] Griffiths, Mark D. "The educational benefits of videogames." Education and health 20, no. 3 (2002): 47-51. [2] Squire, Kurt. "Changing the game: What happens when video games enter the classroom?" Innovate: Journal of online education 1, no. 6 (2005). [3] Jayasinghe, U and Dharmaratne, “Game based learning vs. gamification from the higher education students’ perspective,” in Proc. International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering, no. August, pp. 683–688, 2013 [4] Lin, W. C., Ho, J. Y., Lai, C. H. and Jong, B. S. “Mobile gamebased learning to inspire students learning motivation,” in Proc. 2014 International Conference on Information Science, Electronics and

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Technical Session 4- COVID and Virtual Learning

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patrick Sours, The Ohio State University; Howard Greene, The Ohio State University

, B. Jesiek, and S. Elber, “Competencies Beyond Countries: The Re-Organization of Engineering Education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America,” J. Eng. Educ.,vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 433–447, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00991.x.[4] B. K. Jesiek, Q. Zhu, S. E. Woo, J. Thompson, and A. Mazzurco, “Global EngineeringCompetency in Context: Situations and Behaviors,” p. 16, 2014.[5] “Jacoby, B. Service-learning essentials: Questions, answers, and lessons learned.” Wiley &Sons.,2015.[6] J. Lucena, J. Schneider, and J. A. Leydens, “Engineering and Sustainable CommunityDevelopment,” Synth. Lect. Eng. Technol. Soc., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–230, Jan. 2010, doi:10.2200/S00247ED1V01Y201001ETS011.[7] J. K. Hawes et al

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Levitin, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE); Teddy Ivanitzki, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE); Rashida Johnson, American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)

significantly lower percent than thatof science and engineering (S&E) doctorates awarded to women and underrepresented groupsthat year [10]. It also does not reflect the capacity or talent of those more than 90,000underrepresented people who earned S&E doctorate degrees between 2005 and 2015 in the U.S.[11]. This trend led Congress to allow eligible agencies to use 3 percent of their small businessgrant budget set aside for administrative purposes to support underserved groups under theSBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011. As result, many agencies use this fund for outreach tounderserved groups.The private sector tells a similar story. Diversity VC, a nonprofit partnership promoting diversityin venture capital, reported in 2019 that, in a

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Philipp, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga; Bradley Harris, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

, & P. Davies, “Implications of threshold concepts for course design and evaluation,” Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, 2006, pp. 195-206.[5] D. Harrison & R. Serbanescu, “Threshold concepts in physics,” Practice and evidence of the scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education, 12(2), pp. 352-377, 2017.[6] T. Barrett, D. Cashman., & S. Moore, “Designing Problems and Triggers in Different Media: Challenging All Students,” In New Approaches to Problem-based Learning. S. Loyens, Ed. Routledge, 2010, pp. 32-49. DOI: 10..7771/1541-5015.1519[7] W. Hung & A. Amida, “Problem-Based Learning in college science,” In Active learning in

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bryce Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman; Sidrah MGWatson; Sarah Heller; Leilani Contos

technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2011.[2] S. E. Page, The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (in English), 2008.[3] R. A. Miller, A. Vaccaro, E. W. Kimball, and R. Forester, "“It’s dude culture”: Students with minoritized identities of sexuality and/or gender navigating STEM majors," Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, vol. Advance online publication, 2020, doi: 10.1037/dhe0000171.[4] K. M. Cooper and S. E. Brownell, "Coming out in class: Challenges and benefits of active learning in a biology classroom for LGBTQIA students," CBE—Life Sciences

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines; Rockwell Clancy, Colorado School of Mines; Andrea Gammon, Delft University of Technology; Ryan Thorpe

., Kirkman, R., & Swann, J. L. (2010). The engineering andscience Issues Test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment. Scienceand Engineering Ethics, 16(2), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z[5] Canary, H. E., Herkert, J. R., Ellison, K., & Wetmore, J. M. (2012). Microethics andmacroethics in graduate education for scientists and engineers: Developing and assessinginstructional models. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[6] Clancy, R. F. (2020). Ethical Reasoning and Moral Foundations among Engineering Studentsin China. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference& Exposition.[7] Kerr, A. J., Brummel, B. J., & Daily, J. S

Conference Session

Instrumentation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Loker, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College

• Executive summary of the results (Word file): o Written description (1-2 paragraphs) of the hardware design (also include OrCAD PSpice schematics) o Written description (1-2 paragraphs) of the software design (also include a flowchart created in Word, ppt, or other s/w) o Testing procedure (numbered step by step testing procedure for each engineering requirement) o Results (1-2 paragraphs) o Signed academic integrity statement • 2-3 minute video (posted on YouTube) demonstrating successful completion of the lab project • Upload to Canvas the following: o Word file that contains the executive summary o All software source code o Link to videoGrading

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vicki May, Dartmouth College; Diana Kardia

experienced exclusion based on my social identity. f. Overall, I am comfortable with the climate.2. What have you done to improve the climate in the past three months (check all that apply) a. Asked someone to join you for coffee or lunch b. Organized an event c. Thanked someone for their support d. Stopped by to say ‘hi’ and chat with others e. Other:3. Further thoughts related to the climate/culture?Overall, the climate initiative at Dartmouth has been successful in that response rates have been high,discussions and workshops have been well attended, some changes have been implemented, and feedbackhas been positive.References▪ Hostler, S. and Gressard, R. (1993). “Gender Fairness Environment Scale, University of Virginia

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor Garcia; Diane Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Suzanne Atiya, University of Texas at El Paso; Karla Ayala Mendoza

(NAERJournal), 4(1), 46-53[2] Buzzard, Christopher, Victoria Crittenden, William Crittenden, and Paulette McCarty (2011), “TheUse of Digital Technologies in the Classroom: A Teaching and Learning Perspective,” Journal ofMarketing Education, 33 (2), 131–139[3] Tuten, T., & Marks, M. (2012). The adoption of social media as educational technology amongmarketing educators. Marketing Education Review, 22(3), 201-214.[4] Esteve Del Valle, M., Gruzd, A., Haythornthwaite, C., Paulin, D., & Gilbert, S. (2017). Social mediain educational practice: Faculty present and future use of social media in teaching. In Proceedings of the50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.[5] McGlynn, A. P. (2009). Proven pathways to success for minority

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maya Menon, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Marie Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Sustainable Development,” 2015. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed Nov. 23, 2021).[2] UNESCO, “Sustainable Engineering,” United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2017. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science- technology/engineering/sustainable-engineering/ (accessed Nov. 06, 2020).[3] National Society of Professional Engineers, “Code of Ethics for Engineers,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/NSPECodeofEt hicsforEngineers.pdf[4] NAE, “14 Grand Challenges for Engineering,” 2008. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/challenges.aspx (accessed Nov. 23, 2021).[5] F. S. Crofton, “Educating for Sustainability

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zia Din, University of Houston

(RPCs) are among the features included in PUN 2. They provide Photon server(s) so that fast,scalable, and reliable communication is done [24].3.5. Pilot testThe authors conducted user pilot testing to measure the reliability of the VR application in termsof user experience and content. This involved students who had volunteered to be part of thepilot testing. They were given Oculus Quest 2 as the head mount device to pilot test the VRapplication. Before starting the experiment, the authors gave a brief tutorial on the differentfeatures and functionalities present in the application and the task objectives to be done as part ofthe testing. After completing the experiment, the users were given a post-test questionnaire to getfeedback on the

Conference Session

Statics and Dynamics Topics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amir Yazdi, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

distributed throughout the system. One of the first topics of discussionin a System Dynamics or Vibrations course usually involves lumping elements of continuousmechanical systems such that their total inertia, stiffness, and damping can be represented asmass, spring, and damper elements, respectively. Distributed-parameter models involve partialdifferential equations (PDEs), which are significantly more difficult to solve than the ordinarydifferential equations (ODEs) associated with lumped-parameter models. The mathematicalcomplexity of distributed-parameter models, however, allows for the motion of the system to bedetermined at any location and at any time. If the primary behavior(s) of the system are only ofimportance, lumped-parameter models

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 12: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cyril Okhio, Clark Atlanta University; Sade Tramble, Kennesaw State University; Amy Buddie, Kennesaw State University; Ayse Tekes

, Engineering, and Mathematics, National Academy of Sciences Report 2001 4. Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2002 5. Hathaway, R. S., Nagda, B. A., & Gregerman, S. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 614-631. 6. Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22, 55-72. 7. Schneider, K. R., Bickel, A., &

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Olivia Roa

research is supported by the National Science Foundation (#1920780). Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. Shah and S. N. Chenicheri, "Using student voice to improve student satisfaction: TwoAustralian universities the same agenda." Journal of Institutional Research (South East Asia)vol., pp. 43-55, 2009.[2] R. Al-Hammoud, "Molding the Interactive Flipped Classroom Based on Students' Feedback".2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[3] A. Ieta, R. Manseur, and T. Doyle, "Restructuring Of An Electronics Lab UsingComprehensive Student Feedback", 2010 Annual

Conference Session

ERM: Instruction and Engagement

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald Prendergast, University of South Carolina Aiken

appear to have difficulty being patient with theprocess of learning from the videos.Future Ideas1) The author plans to continue with traditional classroom instruction for lessons one, two, andfive with one adjustment – to create back-up videos for the material presented in class. This way,when a student misses a class or needs to review something that he or she didn’t fullyunderstand, they can watch the back-up video(s).2) The author is considering having students do the video tutorials as homework prior to classand then doing the independent portions of the homework in the classroom. The benefits of thisflipped classroom approach would be to have more interaction time with students during theirportion of the homework that is less structured and

Conference Session

PCEE Session 4: Resource / Curriculum Exchange

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Huppert, Minnesota State Engineering Center of Excellence; Jason Bruns, Minnesota State University, Mankato

. Aaron S. Budge, Ph.D., P.E. Acting Dean College of Science, Engineering and Technology The Engineering Machine Design Contest Minnesota State University, Mankato is an excellent way for universities and colleges to engage with secondary

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Adjusting Course Content

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron Estes; Heeyun Shon, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

another. The game-based section of the course was compared with atraditionally instructed section. Students in the game-based section performed better on 14 of 21conceptual questions [3], were more engaged as assessed by the Experience-Sampling Method[13], and made more meaningful connections between core concepts [14]. Using a differentdynamics/control videogame, Spumone, Coller found that students in a game-based section of thecourse scored 0.8 standard deviations higher on concepts covered by the game than students in atraditional section [14], [15].Modified Pong Game for a Control Systems CourseThe famous video game Pong was developed by Atari, Inc. in the early 1970’s [16]. In this 2Dgame, the player volleys a ball from one side of the

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Design and Labs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria-isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Eric Dieckman, University of New Haven; Ismail Orabi, University of New Haven; Samuel Daniels, University of New Haven

results seen in the unannounced quiz correlate withcontent/performance in final project reports. Systematic assessment of final reports from both theThermo-fluids Lab and the Capstone Project course may provide insight into how and if studentsincorporate concepts of uncertainty into their data analysis and results presented.References [1] Fairbrother, R. and Hackling, M., (1997). Is this the right answer?, International Journal of Science Education vol 18, No. 8, pp. 887-894. [2] Kirkup L, Johnson S, Hazel E, Cheary R W, Green D C, Swift P and Holliday W, (1998). Designing a new physics laboratory programme for first year engineering students, Physics Education vol 33, pp 258-265. [3] Allie, S., Buffler, A., Campbell, B., Lubben, F

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven Edalgo, Clemson University; Karen High, Clemson University

psychologyas a framework to understand working adults perceptions of transitioning into retirement. Theframework was not originally intended for usage on students. Several dissertation studies ineducation research have used this framework (Lazarowicz, T., 2015; Powers, M., 2010; Pendleton,K., 2007). Lazarowicz (2015) used Schlossberg’s framework to understand the perceptions ofcommunity college transfer students transition experience to a 4-year university. Powers (2010)incorporated aspects of the three phases of Schlossberg’s Theory to study nontraditional maledropout students. Pendleton (2009) studied welfare recipients attending postsecondary institutionsby framing the study around Schlossberg’s 4 S Model of the Moving Through phase of theframework

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 3 - Humanitarian Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pritpal Singh, Villanova University

included or removedfrom the user interface of the application.2. What were some of the challenges of working with students 1 and 2 at LandivarUniversity?● Student 1 at Villanva University: The major challenges of working with student 1 at LandivarUniversity mostly stemmed from communication. It took some time finding our footing, learningstudent 1’s strengths, and knowing when to delegate work. There was a learning curve incommunicating effectively what I wanted and needed student 1 to do without seeing him inperson. This meant having multiple Zoom meetings with him 1-on-1 to discuss exactly what theidea was and show him how to implement it. It was also difficult working with student 1 atLandivar University since sometimes his Wi-Fi would not work

Conference Session

Computers in Education 6 - Best of CoED

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zeynep Akdemir, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); N. Sanjay Rebello

Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1614813Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., & S, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research.Haryadi, R., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). PhET simulation software-based learning to improve science process skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1521, No. 2, p. 022017). IOP Publishing.Karplus, R. & Butts, D. P. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Admissions, Transfer Pathways, and Major Selection

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Lovely, University of Kentucky; Matthew Sleep, University of Kentucky

Kentucky.References[1] S. Fayer, A. Lacey, and A. Watson, “STEM Occupations: Past, Present, And Future.” Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2017/science- technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and- future/pdf/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present- and-future.pdf[2] “Fall 2010 through Fall 2019, Completions Component,” U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data[3] “2012-17 Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study,” National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), Oct. 31, 2019

Conference Session

We Love our MOMs (Mechanics of Materials)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarira Motaref, University of Connecticut

students to demonstrate their learning via this activity.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underIUSE/PFE:RED Grant No. 1920761. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Editorial review by Raha Esmaili Zaghi, Alexander Grey, Peggy Trygstad (Horizon Research,Inc.) is much appreciated.References[1] https://ovpr.uconn.edu/services/rics/irb/researcher-guide/does-evaluation-require-irb-review/#[2] Motaref, S., “The Evaluation of Different Learning Tools in Flipped Mechanics ofMaterials”, 2020 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Virtual Conference

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jean Larson, Arizona State University; Claudia Zapata, Center for Bio-mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics; Edward Kavazanjian, Arizona State University

Paper ID #38223Connecting Research to the Broader Community: Developingand Implementing a Graduate Course Across an EngineeringResearch Center’s Partner UniversitiesJean S Larson (Education Director) Jean S. Larson, Ph.D., is the Educational Director for the NSF-funded Engineering Research Center for Bio-mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics (CBBG), and Associate Research Professor in both the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment and the Division of Educational Leadership and Innovation at Arizona State University. She has a Ph.D. in Educational Technology, postgraduate training in Computer

Conference Session

ERM: New Research Methods and Tools

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Sara Vohra; Eileen Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

items from Method 1’s strongest factors were coupled with a different set ofitems in Method 2’s factor structure.Method 3: Under-loading and cross-loading iterations. In this method, five under-loading itemswere removed, one cross-loading item was removed, and then that procedure was repeatediteratively. In total, 49 items were retained across 10 factors. We noticed that whileimplementing this method, the removal of one cross-loading item often reduced the total numberof factors, presumably by weakening the factor structure of two latent factors from the previousiteration and causing the weaker of the two latent factors to be removed from the sample.Method 4: Fixed factors. In this method, the number of factors was fixed to 10, and otherwise

Conference Session

ERM: Exploring Educational Technology in Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Danielle Dickson; Rafal Jonczyk; Elif Gunay; Janet Van Hell, Pennsylvania State University; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma

Paper ID #37269Utilization of Automatized Creativity Ratings inLinguistically Diverse Populations: Automated Scores Alignwith Human RatingsDanielle S. Dickson Danielle Dickson received her PhD from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2016 with a dissertation examining the memory system’s representation of numerical information, using behavioral and electro-physiological (EEG, brainwaves) measures. She extended this work into comparisons of children and adults’ arithmetic processing as a postdoctoral scholar at The University of Texas San Antonio. Her most recent research examines creative thinking

Conference Session

Two-Year College Potpourri

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Diego Reyes; Brooke Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.xBahr, R. P., Jackson, G., McNaughtan, J., Oster, M., & Gross, J. (2017). Unrealized Potential: Community College Pathways to STEM Baccalaureate Degrees. The Journal of Higher Education (Columbus), 88(3), 430–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2016.1257313Bos, A., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Stutterheim, S. E. (2013). Stigma: Advances in Theory and Research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.746147Fry, R., Kennedy, B., & Funk, C. (2021). STEM jobs see uneven progress in increasing gender, racial and ethnic diversity. PEW Research Center

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 1: Adapting to COVID and other Design Challenges

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Orser, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Lorraine Francis, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; John Sartori; Kyle Dukart, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Brody Hultman, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Lauren Linderman, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; Aaron Massari, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; R Penn, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities

’ experiences.Throughout this journey, students and faculty clearly did not enjoy the transition to onlinelearning. Despite this negative baseline, the data show no significant change in survey responsesconcerning the design process (CSE 1012 LO #2-3), core quiz grades (EE 1301 LO #1-3), or theoverall perceptions of students (SRTs). Thus, there is good reason to believe that these sustainableadaptations, necessitated by the pandemic, should be retained.References[1] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 103–120, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.[2] K. A. Smith, S. D. Sheppard, D. W. Johnson, and R. T. Johnson