Asee peer logo
Displaying results 61 - 90 of 99 in total
Conference Session
Understanding Inclusivity and Equity in STEM Contexts: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tyrine Jamella Pangan, Tufts University; Chelsea Andrews, Tufts University
. A., Tsai, J., Boll, A., Blacklock, J., & Johnson, K. (2019). Pain and gain: Barriersand opportunities for integrating sociotechnical thinking into diverse engineering courses. InProceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds weneed. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongfive approaches. SAGE Publications.Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic,and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291.Faulkner, W. (2007). ‘Nuts and bolts and people
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Student Success Boot Camps, Summer Bridge Programs, and Living Learning Communities
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Miriam Howland Cummings, University of Colorado Denver; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Stephanie Ivey, The University of Memphis; Craig Stewart; David Russomanno, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Danny King, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; James Campbell, The University of Memphis; Tom Altman; Michael Jacobson, University of Colorado Denver; Gregory Simon, University of Colorado Denver
unique campus-specific aspects. For example, Scholars at all three institutions participate in Summer Bridgeprogramming through their home campus, but each Summer Bridge program has unique aspectscatering to the specific needs and structures of each institution.Purpose of Summer BridgeAt all three institutions, Summer Bridge serves several purposes. In the broadest sense, thepurpose of Summer Bridge is to provide additional academic and social support for incomingScholars (that is, students receiving the S-STEM scholarship). More specifically, the purpose ofeach Summer Bridge is to create community among these students, prepare them for theacademic rigor of first-year engineering curriculum, and build their STEM identity and sense ofbelonging
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Best Diversity Paper
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marian Kennedy, Clemson University; Cora Allard-Keese, Clemson University; Joshua Alper, Clemson University; Jennie LaMonte, Clemson University; Aubrey Baldwin, Clemson University
Paper ID #37687Work in Progress: Preparing Students for UndergraduateResearch Online and In the Classroom - Framework,Participant Reflections, and Lessons LearnedMarian S. Kennedy (Associate Professor) Marian Kennedy is an Associate Professor within the Department of Materials Science & Engineering at Clemson University. Her research group focused on the mechanical and tribological characterization of thin films. She also contributes to the engineering education community through studying the process/impacts of undergraduate research and navigational capital into graduate school.Cora Allard-KeeseJoshua D
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session: Student Success
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathryn Wingate; Aaron Johnson, University of Michigan; Kayla Brooks, University of Colorado Boulder
different reason not tied to lack of resources: found a major better suited to their interests, decided to pursue another career or life opportunity, did not develop a strong engineering identity, etc.ConclusionsOverall this paper was a data driven approach to understand how SES impacts studentpersistance and performance through the aerospace engineering curriculum at a large R1university. We found that students from low SES backgrounds struggled more in calculus andearly aerospace classes, left the major at a higher rate, and had lower 6-year graduation ratescompared to students from high SES backgrounds. The admissions criteria at this universitysuggests that students come in with a strong math background. Students from low
Conference Session
DEED Technical Session 9 - Design Across the Curriculum
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenneth Reid, University of Indianapolis; George Ricco, University of Indianapolis; David Olawale, University of Indianapolis; Md Rashedul Sarker, University of Indianapolis
experience [3, 4]. Wedeveloped our notion of professional skills influenced by a series of publications in BurningGlass [6, 7], emphasizing overall communication, organizational, and writing skills as a toppriority for our graduates.A brief review of design spines and their history was previously undertaken by the faculty teamin another report [8]. In this work, the authors summarized historical efforts by seminal authorsin the field such as Sheppard, Frank, and others influential in the development and defining ofthe design or professional spine educational philosophy in the engineering education sphere [9,10].In the intervening years since our last report, a number of reports and works on design spineshave been published [11-16]. One of the more
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joe Muskin, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Dee Dixon; Henry Griffith, San Antonio College; Andrew Alleyne, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Alfred Alaniz, San Antonio College; Jessica Perez, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign
prefer to stay closer to home for their graduate studies. If a program is interested in students transferring to their PWI, it may also be important to consider schools who waive out-of-state tuition: either for people who live in bordering states or based on the merit of candidates.4. Staff support. An active career counseling staff or program coordinator is an invaluable resource when looking to develop relationships with a MSI. These personnel are ideally in direct contact with students daily through their management of extracurricular activities involving registered student organization (RSOs), engineering clubs, and student support services. This contact can be leveraged to help identify students, especially nontraditional
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah Bork, University of Michigan; Joi-lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan; Nagash Clarke
family members to check in with one another andshare important news that builds capital between members. Social capital is thought of as thecommunity resources and networks that individuals access from their communities or networks.An example of this might be the professional networks that people engage in and may leverageto identify career opportunities or other supportive resources. Navigational capital may manifestas someone having the proficiency and resources to maneuver effectively through society. Forexample, graduate students may receive advice or assistance from postdoctoral fellows aboutnavigating the job market. Aspirational capital encapsulates the dreams, goals, and vision of thepeople to whom you belong. An example of this could be
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Admissions, Transfer Pathways, and Major Selection
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Danyelle Ireland, University of Maryland Baltimore County; Jordan Esiason; Amanda Menier; Rebecca Zarch
/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and-engineering/undergraduate-education-enrollment-and-degrees-in-the-united-states[2] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics.“Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019”.Alexandria, VA, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/digest[3] M. M. Uddin, “Best Practices in Advising Engineering Technology Students for Retentionand Persistence to Graduation,” Journal of Technology, Management & Applied Engineering,36(1), 1–13, Jan. 2020.[4] B. K. Townsend and K. Wilson “‘A Hand Hold for a Little Bit’: Factors Facilitating theSuccess of Community College Transfer Students to a
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 6: Admissions, Transfer Pathways, and Major Selection
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Elmore, State University of New York at Binghamton; Koenraad Gieskes, State University of New York at Binghamton; Nicole Alfarano, State University of New York at Binghamton
their choice of major? [8]. They also took a similar approachBinghamton University has taken.While the motivation and types of information used in their choices is important, other studieshave also investigated the sources of the information. One study concluded that “Self-LedExploration of Engineering Disciplines” (SLE) is the single most important source ofinformation that students use in deciding on an engineering major [9]. Mohammadi-Aragh et al.surveyed a range of factors, including parents’ educational achievement, timing of the desire tostudy engineering, and current engineering major in order to develop a survey instrument thatcould be used by universities to collect information concerning the choice of engineering major[10]. Some other
Conference Session
Social Justice and the Curriculum: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Raghu Pucha, Georgia Institute of Technology; Terri Dunbar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ruth Yow, Georgia Institute of Technology
papers. He is honored with Inaugural Georgia Tech. College of Engineering Outstanding Teacher Award in 2022, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Award in 2020, Geoffrey G. Eichholz Faculty Teaching Award in 2015 and Undergraduate Educator Award in 2012 from the Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL), Georgia Tech.Terri Dunbar Terri Dunbar is currently a PhD candidate in Engineering Psychology at the Georgia Institute of Technology, as well as a Graduate Teaching Assistant at Tech's Center for Teaching & Learning. Her research focuses on identify best practices in how to scaffold and sequence the learning activities to support the development of systems thinking while using simulations.Ruth Yow (Georgia Institute of
Conference Session
ERM: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Urmi Ghosh-Dastidar; Sandie Han; Nadia Kennedy, New York City College of Technology; Diana Samaroo; Armando Solis
accomplished the following: (1) recruited andincreased participation in five targeted science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)majors, focusing on women, underrepresented student population, and undeclared and liberal artsstudents with strong math preparation; (2) retained and graduated academically talented, low 2income students in STEM programs by strongly encouraging students to register for 15+ creditsper semester to promote timely progress to graduation; (3) provided comprehensive supportstructures at critical junctures that include financial support, academic advisement, academicsupport, and career counseling, using a natural cohort approach to developing a professional STEMidentity
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 12: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jacques Richard, Texas A&M University; Janie Moore, Texas A&M University
Paper ID #37304Student performance impacted from modifying a first-year/semester engineering core course during a globalpandemicJacques C. Richard (Instructional Associate Professor/Aerospace Engineer) Dr. Jacques C. Richard is an instructional associate professor and REU Principal Investigator at Texas A&M University. He got his Ph.D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He studies plasmas using particle and spectral methods, as well as engineering education factors that build critical algorithmic thinking skills in diverse engineering students. Research includes plasma turbulence and plasma jets, and jet engine
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Division - Huh? What Did You Say? What Does That Mean?
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lynn Mayo, RePIcture; Katie Wheaton
boost their STEM resume. Through our technology platform and community, RePicture.com, students tell the story of STEM all around us and discover diverse role models. The RePicture Program is helping students “breaking through” the artificial barriers that prevent many from pursuing and flourishing in STEM by building their STEM identity, moving beyond what they know, and showing them what is possible.Katie P. Wheaton, M.S., P.E., S.E. Katie P. Wheaton is a Senior Instructor in the Civil & Environmental Engineering Department of Case Western Reserve University. She teaches undergraduate courses related to Structural Design, Surveying, Computer Graphics, and Civil Engineering Systems. She is the faculty advisor
Conference Session
LEES Session 8: Care and Commitments
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michelle Ausman; Dean Nieusma, Colorado School of Mines; Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines; Stephen Rea; Kylee Shiekh, Colorado School of Mines; Beck Corby, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
situational analysis of semi-structured interviews, we attribute this lack of competenceto “undone ethics” in engineering education. Here, we want to formulate what the ideas aroundundone ethics might look like, particularly in the context of engineering education andengineering ethics. This paper develops the terminology “undone ethics” through exploring theconcept of “undone science,” drawn from literatures of science and technology studies (STS).Undone science is defined as research that has been “left unfunded, incomplete, or generallyignored”[1],[2]. In order to map out the connections of undone ethics to undone science, weattempt to create a typology of undone ethics, drawing from empirical, qualitative data throughinterviews with engineering
Conference Session
ERM: Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and MORE!
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Nagel, James Madison University; Bethany Popelish, James Madison University; Melissa Aleman, James Madison University; Tobias Reynolds-Tylus, James Madison University
introduced to welding by her grandfather. She hadmany opportunities to weld and use other tools growing up which was a big factor in choosingthis engineering program. This undergraduate-only engineering program aims to prepare itsstudents for a changing landscape of engineering that requires engineers to be adept creators,problem-solvers, and collaborators. Here students learn engineering through the practice ofengineering and as Jesse tells me, “all I want to do is build stuff.” That made this program, withfabrication projects built into engineering coursework, an ideal choice for her.As she goes on to explain how she developed the skills needed to accomplish her current project,a theme emerges. When she has a question about materials, she talks to
Conference Session
Thinking Outside the STEM Box: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Piyush Pradhananga; Mohamed Elzomor, Florida International University
School of Construction, Sustainability, and Infrastructure at FIU where he focuses on multidisciplinary research that harmonizes sustainability in construction. His other research interests include Sustainable Construction, Robotics, and AI-based Construction, Engineering Education, Green Buildings, Sustainable Infrastructure, Resilient and Sustainable Post-Disaster Reconstruction, and Circular Economy. Piyush is also a LEED Green Associate and ENV SP (i.e., Envision Certified Professional in Infrastructure Sustainability).Mohamed Elzomor (Assistant Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com
Conference Session
ETD Technical Session 8 - ET Pedagogy II
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anne Lucietto, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Joel Jarrett, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Enrique Barbieri, University of Houston; Yasmine Al Abdul Raheem
Technology, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 32, 2012.[7] A. M. Lucietto, "Identity of an Engineering Technology Graduate,," presented at the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[8] H. Eshach, "Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education," Journal of science education and technology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 171-190, 2007.[9] A. M. Lucietto, "Who is the engineering technology graduate and where do they go?," in Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Erie, PA, 2016: IEEE, pp. 1-7.[10] Elena Bartolomé, Ignasi Florensa and Marianna Bosch (2021): Teaching Strength of Materials through ‘‘Study and Research Paths’’: Invariants and Differences
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elsa Gonzalez, University of Houston; Emma Perez, University of Houston
influence of familismo on Latinastudent STEM identity development,” Journal of Latinos and Education, vol. 20 no. 2, pp. 177-189, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080/15348431.2019.1588734.[32] R. M. Banda and A. M. Flowers, “Birds of a feather do not always flock together: A criticalanalysis of Latina engineers and their involvement in student organizations,” Journal of HispanicHigher Education, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 359-374, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1538192716662966.[33] J. Cavazos, M. B. Johnson, and G. S. Sparrow, “Overcoming personal and academicchallenges: Perspectives from Latina/o college students,” Journal of Hispanic Higher Education,vol. 9 no. 4, pp. 304-316, Oct. 2010, doi:10.1177/1538192710380744.
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Integrated Engineering and Interdisciplinary Impacts
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohammed K Faris, University of Mosul / Iraq; Charles Pierce, University of South Carolina; Gurcan Comert
southeasternregion. The research experiences for undergraduate students were built upon the followingprinciples: • Students should demonstrate knowledge of fundamentals and be proficient with computational tools as preparation for graduate studies and, ultimately, to be more marketable for competitive jobs; • Students deserve opportunities in supportive learning environments to develop as independent thinkers within cutting-edge research projects; and • Students should be encouraged to explore their passion and developed interest field, as it might not be as present in their home institution, which in turn should facilitate understanding the value of more education.2.1 Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Research
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eun-young Kang, California State University, Los Angeles; Matthew Jackson, California State University, Los Angeles
those whoare academically talented - have inadequate preparation for the increased rigors of collegeeducation through their K-12 education and limited family guidance due to the fact that moststudents are first generation college students. With support from NSF Scholarships in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM), the Culturally Adaptive Pathway toSuccess (CAPS) program aims to build an inclusive pathway to accelerate the graduation foracademically talented, low-income students in Engineering (Civil Engineering, ElectricalEngineering, and Mechanical Engineering) and Computer Science majors at Cal State LA, whichtraditionally serves the underrepresented and educationally disadvantaged minority students inthe Los Angeles
Conference Session
Student Division Technical 3: Mixed - Research, Engineering Design, Design Thinking, and Curriculum Design
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hugh Scribner, University of Colorado Boulder; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; Jean Hertzberg, University of Colorado Boulder
identity. For the purposes of thisstudy engineering identity is defined as set out by previous work by Stevens et al. [5] : anindividual’s belief that they ARE an engineer. As Stevens explains, this shift towards identifyingas an engineer is often accompanied by changes in disciplinary knowledge, and as a studentnavigates through the education process., For example, a student will likely have a strong senseof engineering identity when they feel that they are able to do tasks they associate with thoseperformed by a successful engineer, are identified as an engineer by their mentors, peers, andfamily, and have passed certain courses and graduated [6]. It should be noted that while this studyfocused on the engineering identity of mechanical
Conference Session
Issues Facing STEM Programs at Rural Two-Year Colleges
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
D. Boyer, Clemson University; Shannon Conner, Clemson University; Luke Duncan; Louise Averitt, Clemson University; Marian Kennedy, Clemson University
research group focused on the mechanical and tribological characterization of thin films. She also contributes to the engineering education community through studying the process/impacts of undergraduate research and navigational capital into graduate school. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: Addressing Recruitment Issues with Potential Transfer Students from State Technical CollegesIn this work-in-progress paper, we present emergent recruitment issues encountered during anongoing design-based project with participants from two-year colleges for an NSF-fundedscholarship program. Our hope is
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 13: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #2
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sophia Santillan, Duke University; Lupita TeMiquel-McMillian, Duke University; Jennifer Ganley; Stacy Tantum, Duke University
mentorship that goes beyond the logistics of successfully completing a degree tothe holistic goals of whole-student growth and discovery of a path to lifelong personalfulfillment.Studies have shown that diverse array of factors may impact a student’s adjustment to collegeand their academic success, including self-efficacy and sense of belonging and community [1,2].We set out to create an advising framework that by design supports students as they develop self-efficacy and places students in cohorts to support community building and sense of belonging.This advising effort builds on previously reported efforts to implement a learner-centeredapproach for first-year advising, Advising-as-Teaching, at Northwestern University’sMcCormick School of
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 10: Best of First-Year Programs Division
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Victor Garcia; Peter Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Diane Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Irma Torres-Catanach; Nora Cuvelier, University of Texas at El Paso; Crystal Cholewa; Karla Ayala Mendoza
and learningopportunities to keep the motivation and interest of students in STEM disciplines and preparestudents for what it will take to complete an academic and professional career in STEM.First Implementation of New Curriculum Design through Virtual EnvironmentEduGuide Participation and Mentoring InteractionsThe EduGuide online coaching platform was used as a strategy to complement the academicpreparedness and STEM identity development of first-year undergraduate students. The use of thisplatform was considered a key element of our curriculum, especially because its firstimplementation would occur in a virtual course setting due to the global pandemic. Topics suchas alleviating anxiety, class-taking strategies, community building, and
Conference Session
CIT Division Technical Session #3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Margaret Ellis; Godmar Back, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Walter Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kirk Cameron, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Crystal Pee
theirundergraduate education is composed of many facets and through the relationships built inthe research group, they are able to leverage these relationships in multiple ways.The ways in which students are collaborating with each other and faculty in the group areindicators of facilitated faculty and peer interactions and comprehensive feedback, which arequalities of HIPs. By students and faculty communicating in relation to their work within thegroup as well as outside of the group, they are able to develop deeper relationships with eachother as shown in their interview quotes. The way the group is designed to supplement whatthe students are learning in the classroom and promote communication among its membershelps promote an environment of collaboration
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Linda DeAngelo, University of Pittsburgh; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kevin Binning; Natascha Buswell, University of California, Irvine; Jennifer Cribbs, Oklahoma State University; Erica McGreevy, University of Pittsburgh; Christian Schunn, University of Pittsburgh; Anne-Ketura Elie, University of Pittsburgh; Kevin Kaufman-Ortiz, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Beverly Conrique, University of Pittsburgh; Carlie Cooper, University of Georgia; Danielle Lewis; Jacqueline Rohde, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)
through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering.Allison Godwin (Associate Professor) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and of Chemical Engineering at Purdue University. She is also the Engineering Workforce Development Director for CISTAR, the Center for Innovative and Strategic Transformation of Alkane Resources, a National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging and identity development. Dr
Conference Session
Statics and Dynamics Topics
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel Vitali, The University of Iowa; Emma Treadway, Trinity University; Aaron Johnson, University of Michigan; Jessica Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Alice Nightingale, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Nicole Ramo, West Chester University; Martell Bell, The University of Iowa
students best learn modeling practices through their explicit inclusion inthe curriculum [3]. One such approach to incorporate mathematical modeling into undergraduateengineering education is through open-ended modeling problems (OEMPs) in which studentswork either individually or in groups to develop mathematical models that describe a real-worldscenario [17]. OEMPs are similar to Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) [19] in that studentsmake and substantiate assumptions throughout the process of establishing their mathematicalmodels. A key difference between MEAs and OEMPs is that OEMPs prompt students toconsider multiple alternatives to determine the first-principles model that best representsthe engineering system in question, which uniquely
Conference Session
LEES 4: Understanding and Disrupting Engineering Cultures
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chandra Turpen, University of Maryland College Park; Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland College Park; Keeron Rahman, University of Maryland College Park; Paul Adkins, University of Maryland College Park; Harkirat Sangha; Samshritha Bikki
, Technology, and Society (STS) programI. IntroductionIn many orientations to social science research, study participants are positioned as objects ofinquiry, but are not treated as partners in the inquiry process or within knowledge developmentprocesses. This paper offers one account of an engineering education research team disruptingthis dichotomy between “researcher” and “researched.”This work takes place in the context of an NSF-funded ethnographic investigation of Universityof Maryland (UMD) College Park Scholars Science, Technology, and Society Living LearningCommunity (STS-LLC) [1]. Our investigation focuses on understanding how engineeringstudents’ macro-ethical reasoning develops within the cultural practices of this community [2-5].In our
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexandra Jackson; Kevin Dahm, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Bruce Oestreich; Cheryl Bodnar, Rowan University; Scott Streiner, University of Pittsburgh
Paper ID #36435Longitudinal Assessment of Engineering Student EM Usingthe ESEMA Self-Report SurveyAlexandra Mary Jackson Alexandra Jackson is a first year PhD student at Rowan University seeking a specialization in Engineering Education. She began her research in Rowan's Experiential Engineering Education Department in the Fall of 2019, and has developed interests in entrepreneurial mindset and student development. In particular, she is interested in assessment of entrepreneurial mindset through both quantitative and qualitative methods, and is currently working in both survey and concept map assessment. She
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chris Ferekides, University of South Florida; Carol Haden, Northern Arizona University; Gokhan MuMcu, University of South Florida; Ismail Uysal, University of South Florida; Joel Howell; Chung Seop Jeong, University of South Florida; Wilfrido Moreno, University of South Florida; Arash Takshi; Kevin Yee; Paul Spector, University of South Florida
of a novel faculty teaching evaluation process with directengagement of student and industry review teams; (3) the launch of a new course series,Professional Formation of Engineers 1, 2, and 3 to provide electrical engineering students withprofessional skills and career development guidance to broaden their education experience andsupport them in better understanding their discipline and potential future careers; (4) Study ofthe impact of action-state orientation on student success. An overarching theme for the project isthat the new completely connected department model will engage all stakeholders in sharing theresponsibility to empower students to Take Responsibility to Understand Engineering (TRUE).INTRODUCTION The department of