Success Programs which include an array of services geared towardhelping students achieve academic success. These include general advising, career advancement,education abroad, disability resources, first-year programs, testing, tutoring and military services. Figure 1. Advising structure at this universityThe College of Engineering supports a dual advising system comprised of professional advisingand faculty mentoring. It has the office of the Assistant Director of Academics which serves asthe professional advising arm. It is aided by the undergraduate coordinator which is usually anindividual engineering faculty member. Both combined, advise the first-year and second yearstudents with their transitional needs
, particularly in the design thread of the ECE curriculum. Initial results are positive, andthe project is currently experimenting with different e-portfolio formats that can elicit howstudents are developing both functionings and capabilities. One major issue that is still beingworked out is how to have a single portfolio that covers all four years of the program. The initialexperiments are thus focused on having students address different prompts each year. In the firstyear students explore various functionings in the major and identify personally relevantfunctionings. In the second year the focus is on potential careers, extending the functioningsview beyond the undergraduate program. In the third year students focus on processes ofpersonal
Engineering (SE), Cybersecurity and Information Assurance(CIA)), are often indifferent to the content delivered in this manner and lack engagement withthe course material until the date of an assessment activity is near [1]. Not only does a passivelearning environment such as this fail to garner the students’ attention, but it also falls short indelivering opportunities for students to develop their soft skills.The materials for this course were originally designed for an in-person, active learningenvironment, using a variation of the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation,Evaluation) process model [2]. In previous in-person course offerings, the authors had observedhigher levels of engagement when students participated in class
, Tamesue, Asahi, & Ishikawa, 2015), self-regulated learning and past and present academic achievements (Wolters & Hussain, 2015). Theperseverance of effort subdimension of grit has also been found to strongly predict academicadjustment, college grade point average, college satisfaction, sense of belonging, faculty-studentinteractions, students’ intent to persist, and is negatively related to students’ intent to changemajors (Bowman, Hill, Denson, & Bronkema, 2015). While the consistency of interestsubdimension was found to predict career changes in adults (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009;Bowman et al., 2015). The motivation to explore the impact of the grit construct on students’learning outcomes in engineering school stems from the fact
Paper ID #37063U.S. Military Students in Civilian UndergraduateEngineering Programs: A Narrative Review of the StudentVeteran and Servicemember LiteratureHannah Wilkinson Hannah Wilkinson is a graduate student in Engineering Education at Utah State University. She received a B.S. in Chemical Engineering in 2019 from the University of Utah.Angela Minichiello (Assistant Professor) Angela (Angie) Minichiello, Ph.D., P. E., is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education and Adjunct Faculty in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Utah State University. Her research employs asset-based frameworks to improve
the NSF-funded Athena Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female faculty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ‘00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019 Computer Science Hall of Fame Inductee. She is a native of Durham, NC. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by
Paper ID #37659Connecting Education Abroad with an in-class EWBInternational Challenge ProjectThomas J. Siller (Associate Professor) (Colorado State University) Thomas Siller has been a faculty member at Colorado State Unversity for over 34 years.Abigale Johnson Abigale Johnson is a learning and development professional who most recently served as the Education Program Director at Engineers Without Borders USA, leading the organization's transformational educational initiatives. Through her role, Abigale served on the international steering committee of EWB organizations that were responsible for developing and
be presenting on COVID-19 and U.S. Higher Education: The Realities of Undergraduate International STEM Students’ Experiences.Trina L. Fletcher (Assistant Professor) Dr. Trina L. Fletcher is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Computing Education and a Faculty Fellow for the Division of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) at Florida International University. Her research includes asset-based studies on women and people of color within STEM education and engineering and computing education at historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs). Dr. Fletcher uses large-scale data sets to conduct research using mixed- methodologies focused her target populations. She is a 2022 NSF CAREER awardee for a project
Paper ID #37156First-Year Engineering Student Perceptions of CalculusExams and Future-Oriented MotivationCatherine Mary Kenyon Catherine Kenyon (she/her) is a PhD Candidate in the department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University under the guidance of Dr. Lisa Benson as well as a faculty member for the School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences serving as a lecturer and course coordinator for Calculus I. She received her B.S. (2017) and M.S. (2019) in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences from Clemson University. Her research interests are future time perspective, student motivation
, discussing the root, secondary,and immediate causes of a problem then analyzing the impacts and consequences. In semester two,smaller teams worked on a research project exploring the moral, legal, ethical, and social elementssurrounding an issue, evaluating from different disciplinary and personal perspectives. Other guests were integrated within this first year, to foster connections in the campuscommunity. This included faculty from the Center for Leadership and Service and Center forCommunity-Based Partnership, training through the engineering career center, conversations witha professional engineering and a scientific research librarian, and engagement with the VicePresident of the division of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Networking
form individual academic identities. In this manner,learning becomes more about the individual and less about the course.Mini-project scaffoldingThe first few mini-projects in a series are typically team-based and meant to build confidence infoundational concepts. Each subsequent project builds on the previous, culminating in studentscompleting individual mini-projects. The removal of scaffolds over time relies on the assumptionthat students are adapting to, and developing strategies for, these tasks, meaning that as theydevelop as problem solvers, they become capable of better exploring and planning within anopen-ended space. Indeed, students seem to derive a sense of personal accomplishment fromdoing this work, which may motivate and
Network (KEEN), the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), and serves on the First-Year Engineering Education (FYEE) Conference Steering Committee.Qin Zhu (Assistant Professor) Dr. Zhu is Assistant Professor of Ethics and Engineering Education in the Department of Humanities, Arts & Social Sciences and an affiliate faculty member in the Department of Engineering, Design & Society and the Robotics Graduate Program at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Zhu is Editor for International Perspectives at the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, Associate Editor for Engineering Studies, Chair of American Society for Engineering Education's Division of Engineering Ethics, and Executive Committee
after graduation? Explain. Feel free to include what career you are interested in. Question 10** -- Are aesthetics important in your non-professional life? Explain. Question 11 – How important are aesthetics to your studies? II. Motivated Use Question 7 **-- What motivates you when choosing an aesthetic while designing something? Question 12 – Presurvey wording: What influenced your decision to enroll in this course? Postsurvey wording: What motivated you to achieve in this course? III. Affective Value Question 5 – Rate your agreement with the following statement: I am interested in a career that is predominantly focused on design. Question 8** – How does making things on your own make you feel at the beginning of the
after graduation, whether theychoose to pursue a career or continue their education in a PhD program.As part of their graduate coursework, students will take classes from three different departmentsat MSU, which allows them to build connections with faculty and students from across campus.These units include the Department of Computational Mathematics, Science, and Engineering(CMSE), the Department of Statistics and Probability (STT), and the Department of ComputerScience and Engineering (CSE). Each contributing department teaches two of the six corecourses in the Data Science graduate program, which are: STT 810: Mathematical Statistics for Data Scientists. A streamlined introduction to probability and statistical theory, with an
graduate students. [18]The Library system at Penn State is one of the largest in North America, with several millionvolumes of books and materials along with several thousand journal subscriptions. TheEngineering Library works as a partner with the College to provide learning services and supportto students, faculty, and researchers. These services consist of information literacy instruction,research guidance, access to the Libraries' collections, student and faculty engagement, andlibrary outreach.The previous instructional model for teaching information literacy to the students at the Collegewas primarily via a 50-minute "one shot" class embedded in an engineering course. Itimmediately became apparent that the engineering librarian needs to make
discussed based on thecourse’s first implementation during summer 2021.Bridge Course Design and DevelopmentThe designed bridge course for the engineering technology students followed a similar approachto the chemistry bridge course previously reported in the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference[1]. The design model is referred to as the Integrated Course Design [2] and starts with the goalsof the course, followed by an analysis of the situational factors surrounding the course, with thelast step being the components of the course (i.e., assessment and feedback, learning activities,and instructional practices). Thus, the goals of the course were established before the content andlearning activities were selected. The design team then explored the
”, “Diversity Efforts” and “Faculty Endowed Recognition” awards. Her career spans local and international borders and have included roles in educational research, program administration, higher education accreditation and K-12 teaching. Dr Benjamin's research agenda explores issues related to minoritized student experiences, doctoral-level program quality, and engineering education. She is constantly envisioning novel ways to promote educational equity and consistently applies an educational quality lens to her scholarship.Kristin L Schaefer (PhD Student) Kristin Luthringer Schaefer is a licensed professional engineer (PE) and a licensed secondary teacher (grades 6-12), both in Texas, as well as the owner of her own
. Asdescribed by other researchers [21], in the absence of scientists of similar identities, she also hadto negotiate her identity with the normality of whiteness within scientific research spaces.Like other researchers [15], [16], our findings show that the development of science identity didnot necessarily lead to the REU students seeing themselves pursuing a research career. Central tothis decision was the perception of the REU students that scientific research was an individualendeavor not aligned with their desire for personal interactions in their future careers.This study supports further consideration of remote REUs, especially given the high cost of in-person REUs and geographic, family, and other constraints experienced by some students
students to learn andapply the practice.There seems to be common agreement among students and alumni that the first principlesthemselves might not be as useful as first principles thinking. This theme combined with lack ofassociating the utility value of first principles with a practical setting and conceptualizing firstprinciples as mostly content-focused, suggests that there might be a need to change the approachin teaching from first principles. The emphasis on first principles dates back to the creation of theprogram. However, one must also consider the conditions which resulted in such a decision in1934. The Faculty was moving towards conducting more research and perhaps an understandingof
engineering have been made by the National Academy of Engineering[11], the American Society of Engineering Education [12] and the National Science Foundation [13].Engagement and relevance was recognized by each of these governing bodies to be a weakness inundergraduate engineering education.The Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) was developed to create “a community ofengineering faculty and staff with a shared mission to graduate engineers with an entrepreneurial mindsetso they can create personal, economic and societal value through a lifetime of meaningful work” [14]. Inresponse to the call for reform in engineering education, KEEN members are driving change ineducational materials and teaching concepts so that engineering students
lesson onhow to use a decision matrix. Therefore, their final reports were generally lacking in anysubstantive discussion about how they arrived at an acceptable solution for the wing spar. It wasapparent that more often than not, the students simply manipulated numbers in the providedspreadsheet until a viable design emerged. Another critical shortcoming in the heritage courseand the final project was that students did not get any experience with physical prototyping.Physical prototyping is a major step in an engineering design process and is specifically calledfor in the institutional outcomes. Proficiency #6 of the AEM outcome reads:“USAFA graduates will be able to develop physical and/or virtual prototypes using engineeringtools which are
also to promote the individual understanding of his rolein a group.This research was conducted at Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ which is the firstLiberal Arts university in Latin America and the only one in Ecuador. It is located on thecountry’s capital, Quito. According to QS University Ranking, USFQ ranked #1 in Ecuador and#50 in Latin America. This private university enrolls about six thousand undergraduates andabout five hundred graduates every year. It also has a minority program, which providesscholarships to more than one hundred students from ethnic groups every year. Here, the civilengineering program falls under the Science and Engineering faculty with an average of 25students per professor. Additionally, there are two
Paper ID #36899Creating a STEM Diversity Collection in an AcademicScience and Engineering LibraryEric Prosser (Engineering and Entrepreneurship Librarian) Eric Prosser is the Interim STEM Division Head and the Engineering & Entrepreneurship Librarian with the Arizona State University Library. Eric is a liaison to the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering and provides research services for faculty, graduate students, and undergraduate students along with instruction in critical analysis and information literacy, including the legal and ethical use of information. © American Society
. Institutional mental health services, positiveinteractions with faculty, and mentorship with established professionals are all critical resourcesthat students need in their journey to becoming engineers.Future WorkWe are currently in the final semester of the longitudinal study, and we will interview theparticipants one more time. Once completed, we will have eight semesters of rich data followingour participants as they go from early engineering students to early-career engineers. We arecurrently developing papers exploring interactions between students and faculty and detailing theexperiences of COVID lived by four of the students in our study. As we near the end of thefunding for this project, we are developing a website that will house our students
language data. Experimentation Understand principles of design for social science experiments. Hypothesis Design theoretical experiments for making causal inferences. Independence Develop an independent research program. Coding Apply coding skills in execution of research. Mentorship Build mentor/mentee relationships with graduate collaborators.hands-on experience developing an independent research program in preparation for researchfellowships, graduate school, and STEM research careers.4 Program RecruitmentMisinformation is an emergent electronic threat to national security, personal, and public health.Online misinformation regarding COVID-19, and its causative agent the SARS-CoV
curriculumwhich brought the hardware and software together. This paper presents a study on the feasibilityand accessibility of this program and its effectiveness in engaging students and exposing themto key robotics concepts while helping them make suitable career decisions. The pre- and post-program surveys indicated that the students’ interest in a STEM field increased as a result of thiscamp, helped them understand that robotics is much more than just programming, and taughtthem mechanical design, practical electronics, and microcontroller programming in a flipped andexperiential learning format. Moreover, survey results also indicated an attitudinal shift in theirdecision making based on the knowledge, skills, and capabilities that they acquired in
in the deliberate decision to have geographic differences the student addsa variable to the explanations related to common sense and experience that we note above. Thefollowing student goes into educational and professional backgrounds to account for the responsesthey saw: Aside from my own results, I gathered the survey answers from my mom and dad. A person's background is important to the perspective they provide on certain matters, so it should make sense that their point of views should be brought to light. My mother is a top-of-her-class college graduate working as an accountant and my father is a sergeant detective for the IMPD. Both have been working in their respective line of work for as long as
Natural Resources Engineering, Biotechnical Engineering, Food Engineering andGeneral Biological Systems Engineering) offered by the department along with student motivations andplans to continue in the EBS major. This paper may be of interest to teaching faculty and departmentleadership in agricultural and biological engineering programs.Keywords: undergraduate, recruitment, retention, agricultural and biological engineering majorIntroductionThe selection process for choosing an engineering major by undergraduate students has received muchattention from the engineering education community. Studies of first-year student’s selection of anengineering major [1, 2] have utilized social cognitive career theory (SCCT) [3, 4] to frame three
Paper ID #37666Examining Engineering Education Research with AmericanIndian and Alaska Native Populations: A Systematic ReviewUtilizing Tribal Critical Race TheoryEdward Tyler Young Tyler Young is a graduate student at The Ohio State University currently pursuing a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. He graduated summa cum laude from Case Western Reserve University with a Bachelor of Science in Aerospace Engineering before embarking on a career in STEM education.David A. Delaine (Assistant Professor) © American Society for Engineering Education
focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects include studies of student attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their development of problem solving skills, self-regulated learning practices, and beliefs about knowledge in their field. Dr. Benson is an American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Fellow, a member of the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), American Educational Research Association (AERA) and Tau Beta Pi, and the 2018 recipient of the Clemson University Class of ’39 Award for Faculty Excellence. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002) in