Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Case, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Holly Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Marie Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Nicola Sochacka, University of Georgia; Joachim Walther, University of Georgia

the first workshop and collaboratively develop acoherent set of pilot projects to conduct over the summer. We will use the outcomes from theseprojects as a foundation to reach out to the broader engineering education community about theaffordances of secondary data analysis and best practices for conducting this type of work.Acknowledgement:This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantEEC-8060753.References[1] A. Johri, S. Yang, M. Vorvoreanu, and K. Madhavan, "Perceptions and Practices of Data Sharing in Engineering Education," Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 2, p. n2, 2016.[2] L. Perrier, E. Blondal, and H. MacDonald, "The views, perspectives, and experiences of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oleksandr Kravchenko, Old Dominion University; Konstantin Cigularov, Old Dominion University; Phillip Dillulio

. “Universities across Virginia Cancel on- Campus Classes to Limit Spread of Coronavirus.” dailypress.com. Daily Press, March 12, 2020. https://www.dailypress.com/news/health/dp-nw-coronavirus-college-preparations- 20200311-z477ideuc5fifodxnxi32pta6y-story.html. 2. Bao, Wei. "COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University." Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, no. 2 (2020): 113-115. 3. Cao, Wenjun, Ziwei Fang, Guoqiang Hou, Mei Han, Xinrong Xu, Jiaxin Dong, and Jianzhong Zheng. "The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China." Psychiatry research (2020): 112934. 4. Horn, Michael. “COVID-19's Ultimate Impact on Online Learning: The Good and the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marie Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jessica Deters, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education; Maya Menon, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Margaret Webb, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education

and Research, vol. 1, S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, and V. L. Vignoles Eds. New York: Springer, 2011, ch. 6, pp. 117-145.[8] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2014.

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Sander, The University of Iowa; Joshua Lobb, The University of Iowa; James Ankrum, The University of Iowa; Nicholas Bowman; Solomon Fenton-Miller, The University of Iowa

sets or interests that are best suited to their lab(s). • We are working on a compact that lays out expectations for both mentors and for mentees. For example, REU participants must attend all scheduled events. • REU participants will have more structured interactions with graduate students in our program through special panels and/or social events.References1. Seyhan, A.A. and C.J. Carini, Are innovation and new technologies in precision medicine paving a new era in patients centric care? 2019. 17(1): p. 114.2. Alexander, A., et al., Scanning the future of medical imaging. 2019. 16(4): p. 501-507.3. Asai, D.J. and C. Bauerle, From HHMI: Doubling down on diversity. 2016. 15(3): p. fe6.4. Page, S.E., The

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Audrey Rorrer; David Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Praveen Ramaprabhu; Terry Xu, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Mesbah Uddin, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; H. P. Cherukuri, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Kamalapriya Srinivasan

employmentlandscape. The specific innovation involves providing as an alternative to the current practice (inCarnegie R1 and R2 institutions) of externally peer- reviewed publication(s), with an alternatecapstone requirement: the development of a patentable technology as the capstone event. Yet, theexternal peer-review aspect is preserved, thus maintaining the academic rigor of the PhD programs.These changes are being piloted and tested in a Pathways to Entrepreneurship (PAtENT)program, implemented in multiple STEM departments (Mechanical Engineering, CivilEngineering, Physics and Optical Science, and Chemistry) across the University of North Carolinaat Charlotte (UNCC). The PAtENT program has four overarching goals: 1) to develop an alternateroadmap for

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vivian Jones, Bethune-Cookman University; Jillian Wendt, University of the District of Columbia

community and having the opportunity to engagein mentoring activities with their peers and their mentors. Within the current study, it wasrecognized that mentees are excited to persist in their current STEM fields and look forward tograduating to pursue a STEM career.Funding Acknowledgement This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1912205. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References 1) Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 2) Bandura, A. (1997

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Uri Feldman, Wentworth Institute of Technology; George Ricco, University of Indianapolis

course assignments, projects, assessments, and lab reportsfrom earlier offerings of the course. References[1] A. H. Sapci and H. A. Sapci, "Teaching hands-on informatics skills to future healthinformaticians: a competency framework proposal and analysis of health care informaticscurricula," JMIR Medical Informatics, vol. 8, (1), pp. e15748, 2020.[2] American Medical Informatics Association. Informatics: Research and Practice. 2022:https://amia.org/about-amia/why-informatics/informatics-research-and-practice.[3] S. Ly, F. Runacres and P. Poon, "Journey mapping as a novel approach to healthcare: aqualitative mixed methods study in palliative care," BMC Health Services Research, vol. 21, (1),pp. 915

Conference Session

Redefining Manufacturing Education Practices

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Casey Keulen, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Christoph Sielmann, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Dean Richert

: http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/mfg-fab.nsf/eng/00201.html[3] W. Poole, “New Program Proposal: Bachelor of Applied Science in ManufacturingEngineering.” University of British Columbia, Faculty of Applied Science, 2018.[4] C. J. Sielmann, “Questionnaire for Evaluation of an Engineering Program – Exhibit 1,Submitted by: University of British Columbia, Manufacturing Engineering Program.” CanadianAccreditation Board, 2021.[5] C. Sielmann, C. Keulen, and S.-F. Hu, “Multi-Campus Teaching In A CanadianEngineering Context: Assessing Presence Using The Coi Survey,” Proc. Can. Eng. Educ. Assoc.CEEA, 2021.[6] R. Hjelsvold and A. Bahmani, “Challenges in repurposing single-campus courses tomulti-campus settings,” Læring Om Læring, vol. 3, no. 1, 2019

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Basinger, University of Florida; Ariana Ortega; Diego Alvarado, University of Florida; Michelle Alvarado, University of Florida

characteristics," Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol 3(2), Dec. 2007 [9] K. Nguyen, J.E. Husman, M.J. Borrego, O. Shekhar, "Students' Expectations, Types of Instruction, and Instructor Strategies Predicting Student Response to Active Learning." AERA Online Paper Repository, 2017 [10] M. Gettinger, "Time allocated and time spent relative to time needed for learning as determinants of achievement." Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 77(1), 1985 [11] M. Gettinger "Learning time and retention differences between nondisabled students and students with learning disabilities." Learning Disability Quarterly, vol. 14.3, pgs. 179-189, 1991 [12] L. Deslauriers, L. S. McCarty, K. Miller, K

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laila Guessous, Oakland University; Dan DelVescovo, Oakland University; Darlene Groomes, Oakland University

International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, San Diego, CA, November 2013. 4. L. Guessous, Q. Zou, B. Sangeorzan, L. Smith, L. Yang, X. Wang, J.D. Schall, G. Barber and M. Latcha,“ AERIM Automotive-themed REU Program : Organization, Activities, Outcomes and Lessons Learned,” Paper AC 2001-1309, 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, June 2011. 5. E. Seymour, A.-B Hunter, S. Laursen, and T. DeAntoni, T. "Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates: first findings from a three-year study," Sci. Educ., 88, pp. 493-594, 2004. 6. A.W. Astin, What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass., 1993.7. E. T. Pascarella

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dawn Eckhoff, University of Central Florida; Michelle Taub, University of Central Florida; Hansen Mansy, University of Central Florida; Damla Turgut, University of Central Florida; Sang-Eun Song, University of Central Florida

Scholarship, vol. 11, pp. 1-9, Jan. 2014.[4] American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). “Considerations for COVID- 19 preparedness and response in U.S. schools of nursing,” AACN, March 20, 2020 [Online]. Available: https://www.aacnnursing.org/News-Information/COVID- 19/AACN-Recommendations [Accessed October 1, 2021][5] N. R. Wijesorriya, V. Mishra, P. L. P. Brand & B. K. Rubin, B. K. (2020). “COVID-19 andtelehealth, education, and research adaptions,” Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, vol. 35, pp 38-42, Sept. 2020.[6] C. M. Rutledge, K. Kott, P. A. Schweickert, R. Poston, C. Fowler & T. S. Haney,“Telehealth and eHealth in nurse practitioner training: Current perspectives,” Advances in Medical Education and

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 8: Effective Teaching and Learning in Post-Pandemic Classrooms and Other Curricular Innovations

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martha Torres, University of Texas at El Paso; Hector Erives, University of Texas at El Paso; Virgilio Gonzalez, University of Texas at El Paso

Engineering Courses," 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Virtual Meeting, 2021.[11] M. Torres and V. González, “Work in Progress: Online Electrical Engineering Laboratories Sessions: Analysis, Challenges, and Border Environment", 2021 ASEE Annual Conference. Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-online-electrical-engineering-laboratories- sessions-analysis-challenges-and-border-environment [Accessed: January 25,2022].[12] S. Dhawan, "Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19-19 Crisis," Journal of Educational Technology Systems, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 5-22, June 2020.[13] L. Mishra, T. Gupta, and A. Shree, "Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19-19 pandemic," International Journal of

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Afflerbach, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Nafsaniath Fathema, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Anne Gillian-Daniel, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Wendy Crone, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Dane Morgan, University of Wisconsin - Madison

,Satisfaction with Instructional Materials , and Satisfaction with Research Mentorship on s 5-pointLikert scales (1~5, 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest). The complete survey items areincluded in the appendix.Table 1. Measurement Scales Scale (Category) # of Items Scale ML Knowledge 11 1~5: 1= Not at all informed, 5= Very (Information) informed ML Skill 8 1~5, 1 = Not Skillful at all, 5= Very Skillful Overall/General Skill 14 1~5, 1 = Not Skillful at all, 5= Very Skillful Confidence 7 1~5, 1= Not Confident at all, 5=Very

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James McAllister, University of Arkansas

replacement cost. A fine is handed down to the user whodamaged or returned a kit with missing part(s). A replacement fee will be assessed for any kitthat is not returned. Those notes are listed under the loan policies on the inside cover of the kit.Another challenge is introducing new library staff to Arduino due to common turnover in theuser services (circulation) department. To resolve this, the engineering librarian hosts quarterlyworkshops for training new and interested library staff on Arduino kits. This workshop toucheson the checkout policy for the Arduino kits, when to replenish them, and navigating through theArduino libguide.ConclusionThe process of introducing Arduino Library Kits for checkout appears to be off to a great startwith

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carly Eressy, University of Texas at Austin; Brittain Sobey, University of Texas at Austin; Margo Cousins, University of Texas at Austin

53: Where did you study abroad? How was this experience? Question 54: I participated in undergraduate research with a faculty member for at least one semester. Question 55: Please select all of the BME workshops you attended at least once. If one of the workshops was selected for Question 55: Free-text response: Question 56: Please share how the workshop(s) were or were not helpful to you so we can improve them. Are there other topics we should cover in workshops? Question 57: Did you use the ECAC’s services during your time as an undergraduate? If “Yes” is selected for

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Decision Making, Problem-Based Projects, Role-Play, and a Nontraditional Project Theme

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deana Delp; Jake Okun, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

. 573-577, 2013.[4] S. Subhash, and E.A. Cudney, “Gamified Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 87, pp. 192-206, 2018.[5] T. A/L Rajendran, and P.M. Shah, “Students perception of Gamification: The Use of Kahoot,” International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 773-783, 2020.[6] A. Manzano-Leon, P. Camacho-Lazarraga, M.A. Guerrero-Puerta, L. Guerrero-Puerta, A. Alias, J.M. Aguilar-Parra, and R. Trigueros, “Development and Validation of a Questionnaire on Motivation for Cooperative Playful Learning Strategies,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1-10, 2021.

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri III

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmad Fayed, Southeastern Louisiana University

Figure 10. It was clear that the tensile strengthis linearly proportional with the percentage infill of the specimen. area (m2) Figure 9 Sample tensile specimen datasheet for specimen XT95-1 Tough Force, strain, and stress data with blue data bars (left). Stress-Strain plot (top right). Elastic portion of the Stress-Strain plot (middle right). Modulus of elasticity (E) & ultimate tensile strength (S u). Figure 10 Ultimate Tensile Strength variation with percentage infill for PLA.2. Impact TestResults from the PLA tough specimens can be seen below in the form of a table and scatter plot.The scatter plot helps visually see the linear correlation between infill percentage and specimentoughness

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deng Cao, Central State University; Marcus Nagle, Central State University; Cadance Lowell, Central State University; joshua jolly; Rajveer Dhillon, Central State University; Augustus Morris, Central State University

isexpected to use transfer learning to customize one or more pre-trained neural networks fornew classes. The new network(s) should be able to distinguish at least two new classes thatare not included in the pre-trained networks. Heavy coding is not required for this project,but each student needs to learn how to collect their own database and write proper code tore-train the existing network using transfer learning.The deliverable of the project is a working image classifier that can work on Linux,Windows, or Mac OS. Each student also needs to prepare a final project report that includesthe motivation, the implementation details, the achieved goals and discovered issues, alongwith a 10-minutes PowerPoint presentation to explain their project in the

Conference Session

CPDD Technical Session 2 - Trends in Student and Faculty Support

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mitchell Springer, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kathryne Newton, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

up from 29.9% adecade earlier in 2010. In 2000, one-third of people with at least a bachelor’s degree hadcompleted an advanced degree. By 2018, 37 percent had done so. The number of people withmaster’s degrees, then is roughly 13% of the current U. S. Population. The number of peoplewith professional degrees is roughly 1.2%, while the number of people with Doctorate degrees isclose to 2.2%Given this, what is the interest and likelihood of those with master’s degrees pursuing an onlineDoctor of Technology degree? And, demographically, who are those students?The Doctor of Technology (DTECH) program of this paper was nearly six and a half years in themaking. It began with a committee envisioning a degree concept through a yet to be

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Online Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bo Yu, University of Wisconsin - Platteville

) is the error signal at the kth time step. r(k) represents the reference temperature, andy(k) is the measured temperature. u(k) is the controller output and DC represents the duty cycle.For this activity, students are asked to write a python function in the program that represents theon-off controller. The inputs of the function are the setpoint and the actual temperature output, pv.The function should return the controller output, op. Once the program is done, they can run theprogram and plot the on-off response of the heater. Fig. 5 shows the response of an on-offcontroller. The top figure shows the temperature response changes with a setpoint for 1200 s. Thedashed line represents the desired temperature output. The 2nd figure from the top

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 5: Strategies for Increasing Classroom Engagement

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. David Burghardt, Hofstra University; Deborah Hecht

Conference, Seattle.5. Kerr, Barbara. (2015). The flipped classroom in engineering education: A survey of theresearch. Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive CollaborativeLearning. Florence, Italy.6. Garrick, R. (2018). Flipped Classroom Video Analytics. ASEE Annual Conference, Salt LakeCity.7. M. L. Fowler, Flipping signals and systems—Course structure & results. Acoustics, Speechand Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2014 IEEE International Conference. Pp 2219-2223, IEEE 2014.8. S. Zappe, R. Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger and H.W. Lee.” Flipping the Classroom to ExploreActive Learning in a Large Undergraduate Course” Proceedings ASEE 2009 Annual Conference.9. Burghardt, M. David. (2021). Burghardt Thermodynamics. Retrieved

Conference Session

ETD - STEM Issues in ET I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Asif Ahmed, State University of New York, Polytechnic Institute

. Reid, K. J., and Cooney, E. M., “Implementing rubrics as part of an assessment plan”. TheInternational Journal of Engineering Education, 24(5), 893-900, 2008.4. Schaffer, S. P., Chen, X., Zhu, X., and Oakes, W. C., “Self‐efficacy for cross‐disciplinarylearning in project‐based teams”. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 82-94, 2012.5. Ulrich, V., “Rating Capstone Design Students on an Industrial Scale”. In 2008 ASEE AnnualConference, Pittsburg, PA, June 22-25, 2008. (pp. 13-1018).6. Felder, R. M., and Brent, R., “Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABETengineering criteria”. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7-25, 2003.7. Osman, A., Yahya, A. A., and Kamal, M. B., “A benchmark collection for mapping programeducational

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel L Romero; Jessica Stershic; Taylor Ryan; Michael Young

of Energy, “A Common Definition for Zero Energy Buildings,” Sep. 2015.[3] M. Eastment et al., “Solar Decathlon 2002: The Event in Review,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, DOE/GO-102004-1845, Jun. 2004.[4] L. Cervantes, T. Letts, L. Vita, and T. Juliani, “Power Forward 4.0: A Progress Report of the Fortune 500’s Transition to a Net-Zero Economy,” World Wildlife Fund, Jun. 2021.[5] “Annual Impact Report: Fiscal Year 2021,” Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education. [Online]. Available: https://express.adobe.com/page/n7LSTrJx9RmA5/[6] U.S. Department of Energy, “Solar Decathlon: About Solar Decathlon,” Solar Decathlon. https://www.solardecathlon.gov/about.html (accessed Dec. 17, 2021).[7

Conference Session

ERM: Problem Solving and Conceptual Understanding

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Boni Yraguen, Georgia Institute of Technology; Hannia Koolman, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Katherine Fu, Georgia Institute of Technology; Anna Lummus, Georgia Institute of Technology

category was not considered in analysis. 11Table 7. Paired Samples Testing Bloom’s Category p value Paired Samples Test Skewness (S) Remember <0.05 Sign Test -0.824 Understand <0.05 Sign Test -1.222 Apply <0.05 Sign Test -1.910 Analyze 0.031 Wilcoxon Test 0.228 Evaluate

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juan David Ortega-Alvarez, Virginia Tech (primary) and Universidad EAFIT (secondary); Matthew James, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Catherine Twyman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Benjamin Chambers, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Tahsin Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123–138, 2006.[2] M. Mosgaard and C. M. Spliid, “Evaluating the impact of a PBL-course for first-year engineering students learning through PBL-projects,” in 2011 2nd International Conference on Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace Electronic Systems Technology (Wireless VITAE), Feb. 2011, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2011.5940927.[3] K. M. Yusof, A. N. Sadikin, F. A. Phang, and A. A. Aziz, “Instilling professional skills and sustainable development through Problem-Based Learning (PBL) among first year engineering students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 333–347, 2016.[4] C. S. Simmons, “Using CATME team-maker to form student groups in a

Conference Session

WIED: Analysis, Challenges, Success, and Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Coleen Carrigan, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Liesl Folks, The University of Arizona; LAURENE TUMIEL BERHALTER, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Nancy Schiller, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

: https://www.facebook.com/UBNavigate/ • Twitter Page: https://twitter.com/UBNAVIGATE • Ten downloadable case studies that teach a variety of concepts, issues and strategies concerning women in STEM: https://www.buffalo.edu/navigate-project/case-studies.htmlReferences[1] Catalyst. (2015). Revealing the Real Millennials: Workplace Gender Bias. New York.Retrievedfrom http://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/revealing-real-millennials-workplace-gender-bias. 7[2] Bird, Sharon R., and Karla A. Erickson. 2010. A constructive controversy approach to casestudies. Teaching Sociology 38(2): 119-131.)[3] Shields, S. A., Zawadzki, M. J., & Johnson, R. N

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yilmaz Hatipkarasulu, The University of Texas at San Antonio; Guntulu Hatipkarasulu

Paper ID #37617An Organizational Review of CIP Code Designations forConstruction Science, Technology, Engineering, andManagement Programs and CurriculumYilmaz Hatipkarasulu (AssociateProfessor)Guntulu S Hatipkarasulu © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com An Organizational Review of CIP Code Designations for Construction Science, Technology, Engineering, and Management Programs and CurriculumABSTRACTThe higher education programs in the United States are organized using the Classification ofInstructional Program (CIP) codes. This taxonomic scheme

Conference Session

WIED: Activities and Programs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Weiss-Lopez; Michael Frye; Orion Jones

) and AEOP REAP through the Rochester Institute of Technology.Reference[1] N. N. Heilbronner, (2012). “The stem pathway for women.” Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212460085[2] A. Connors-Kellgren, C. E. Parker, D. L. Blustein, & M. Barnett, (2016). “Innovations and challenges in project-based STEM Education: Lessons from ITEST”. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9658-9[3] N. Dasgupta, & J. G. Stout, (2014). “Girls and women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471[4] S. Cano, (2022

Conference Session

ERM: ERM Medley Session!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tina Wang; Laura Jun Chee Yong, Pennsylvania State University; Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Linda Hanagan, Pennsylvania State University

, R.W. & Brown, S.D. & Hackett, Gail. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. Career Choice and Development (4th Ed.. 255-311).[5] Oyserman, Daphna & Destin, Mesmin. (2010). Identity-Based Motivation: Implications for Intervention. The Counseling psychologist. 38. 1001-1043. 10.1177/0011000010374775.[6] Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).[7] Oyserman, D. (2015). Pathways to success through identity-based motivation, 188. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195341461.001.0001[8] Knight, M., & Cunningham, C

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division Technical Session 3: Best of ELOS

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bridget Smyser, Northeastern University