Concepts Into Ece Design Courses: An Alternate Approach”, 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, June 2003.5. P. C. Lynch, C. Bober, J. Wilck,” An Integrated Approach to Developing Business Expertise in Industrial Engineering Students”, 2015 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2015.6. R. Dunn; J. Brauer. “Undergraduate Integrated Engineering & Business Curriculum In The College Of Engineering” 2004 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2004.7. M. I. Mendelson, “Integrated Engineering-Business Graduate Program, 1999 Annual ASEE Conference Proceedings, June 1999.8. P. Rogers,R. J. Freuler, “The "T-Shaped" Engineer” 2015 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2015.9. S. Dustker and W. C. Oakes,” Community-Engaged First Year Learning
]–[50], sharedexperiences (e.g., enrollment at the same university), and values. In that context, it is important for female students to see successful female STEMentrepreneurs for both symbolic as well as functional reasons [46], [51]. Symbolically, exposureto female STEM entrepreneurs can signal to female students that STEM entrepreneurship is notonly for men and that women can be successful in entrepreneurship. Functionally, femalestudents are likely to pay greater attention to female STEM entrepreneurs and take an interest inhearing about the challenges they have faced and how they have integrated the seeminglyconflicting social roles of being an entrepreneur and a woman. Consequently, we propose thatfemale students who are part of
Paper ID #37304What Engineering Leaders Lead: The Career Outcomes of an EngineeringLeadership Program’s Alumni CommunityDr. James N. Magarian, Massachusetts Institute of Technology James Magarian, PhD, is a Sr. Lecturer and Associate Academic Director with the Gordon-MIT En- gineering Leadership (GEL) Program. He joined MIT and GEL after nearly a decade in industry as a mechanical engineer and engineering manager in aerospace/defense. His research focuses on engineering workforce formation and the education-careers transition.Dr. Reza S. Rahaman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Rahaman returned to MIT in 2018 after
Teaching and Learning(associated with the norm of femininity). This is especially relevant as instructors aretypically hired without any formal training in pedagogy and have limited support orincentive to improve courses year-to-year nor to integration of curriculum beyond theirown specific teaching requirements. This challenge has been exacerbated by theaccelerating pace of educational technology available to both instructors and students.Examples of engineering leadership concepts that are delivered to engineering studentsand could support a cultural shift in instructors that would increase the femininity normassociated with non-technical content would be the exploration of personal values andorganizational values related to vision, mission and
classes developedand launched in Fall 2020. The first MSEM graduates completed their degrees in December2022. This paper presents the primary challenges curriculum development, graduating studentfeedback, and future planning for the program.KeywordsMaster’s program, engineering education, curriculum developmentIntroductionTennessee Tech University launched an effort in 2016 which addressed the planning,development, and operation of a new, online, graduate program in engineering management.The Master of Science in Engineering Management (MSEM) program was launched as acompletely online and asynchronous program of study, with courses offered collaborativelybetween the College of Engineering (COE) and the College of Business (COB). The primarygoal
. This theme suggested a stronger emphasis onleadership education throughout the engineering curriculum. ABET’s current leadership-related student outcome 3.5 requiresengineering program students to demonstrate, “an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provideleadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives,” [7]. This studentoutcome suggests a requirement for students to grasp and apply leadership principles in team-based work but lacks a direct outcomefor educational institutions to pivot for an integrated approach to leadership education in engineering. Participants suggested this lackof integration prohibits the ability for students to link and apply
, an FCA project is mapped to engineering disciplines.The results of this paper are intended to bring to light integrative engineering pedagogy throughthe utilization of an FCA project in the classroom.Research MethodologyThis study analyzed and categorized existing research on facility engineering practice and facilityengineering education from 1993 to 2023 by conducting a search of literature. Limited researchexists associated with the topic matter, so an extended search of industry organizations andaffiliations that support facility engineering was conducted. Further search criteria includedarchitectural engineering, civil engineering, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering,structural engineering, technology engineering of
, approximately 200,000individuals are employed in this sector, and the 36 billion Canadian dollar industry has more thandoubled in size since 2006 [15], [16].Beyond its steady growth as a sector, engineering consulting is an industry where leadershipskills are a valued and integral part of the work. Engineering consultants communicate withclients and other stakeholders frequently, primarily work in teams, and collaborate closely withclients in the development of custom solutions [17]–[22]. Engineers in these firms can also moveswiftly from one engagement to another, where the team, client, and technical nature of the jobmay be different depending on the specific requirements of the project [19]. According to Hininget al., PSF typically generate
recommendations), etc., that all require students to propose ideas,report progress, and keep the project flow on track effectively and efficiently. What is unique about this course is the integration of an auxiliary course named“Persuasive Communications for Technical Managers” (or “Communications”), which goeshand-in-hand with the Capstone course; it coaches students on indispensable communicationskills using interactive scenario-based simulations of real-time workplace conversations withupper management and direct reports, as well as providing guidelines on oral and writtencommunications techniques. This Capstone course utilizes a project-based learning approach and the Communicationscourse as a supplementary tool. As an outcome, students
way that can make them better problem solvers for life” so that “when studentsgraduate, they will be confident in their abilities, well integrated into the industry and have theskills to excel” [2]. Drawing from ABET intended outcomes and the needs of early careerengineers, this qualitative study explores how undergraduate students apply what they learn inthe EML course in curricular (i.e., senior design projects and other significant universityprojects) and non-curricular ways.Literature Review Evaluating the effectiveness of university engineering programs has been critical to thedevelopment of global engineering education in the last 30 years. Engineering Criteria 2000(EC2000) is an accreditation criterion introduced by ABET in 1996