results of the pre-assessment and their performance in the course material. Laman and Brannon investigated theneed to integrate prerequisite materials in a structural design of foundations course utilizingelectronic media [14]. Velegol et al. provided online modules for prerequisite topics for online orflipped courses. Their results showed an improvement in the students' knowledge of theseprerequisites after watching the videos [15]. Weiss and Sanders created a Review Video Library(or RVL) to help students review the prerequisite topics for several courses in the mechanicalengineering curriculum. Survey results showed that undergraduates who watched the reviewvideos felt that they improved their knowledge in that subject [16]. In another study
programs. Following her PhD, Fatima joined the Physics Education Research Group at the University of Maryland’s Department of Physics as a postdoctoral researcher, and now focuses on the study of ethics and institutional change in STEM higher education.Sona Chudamani, University of Maryland, College Park Sona Chudamani is a junior Computer Science major in the College of Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences at the University of Maryland, College Park. She is the co-corporate contact for the UMD Association for Women in Computing (AWC), a club that strives to create an inclusive community to promote gender equality and empowerment in computing fields. She is also the Editor-in-Chief for QUESTPress, a newspaper in
introducestudents to manufacturing and prototyping to reinforce concepts and visualize the consequencesof their design decisions. However, identifying outdated aspects of the course to be substitutedwith their modern counterparts can be challenging. In this paper, we describe the decisions madeto create a more advanced design environment in an introductory-level engineering design andgraphics course without losing critical engineering design foundations. This includes building aproject-based curriculum focused on computer aided design of a product with considerations formultiple manufacturing methods, including 3D printing, laser cutting, and injection molding.IntroductionThe objective of pedagogical improvements in engineering education is to strive
aims to address this challenge through theintroduction of an innovative multi-disciplinary project-based pilot course called "InnovationThrough Making".The "Innovation Through Making" course blends Entrepreneurial Mindset skills with coreEngineering Sciences (ES) curriculum providing aspiring engineers with a fundamentalunderstanding of knowledge and skills necessary for success in specialized areas of engineering,including mechanical, electrical, civil, chemical, and computer engineering. By mastering thecore engineering sciences, students develop a strong analytical and problem-solving ability thatis essential for success in the field of engineering [7-8].In this work-in-progress paper, we explore the development of the pilot course and aim
as a group, and allowing for a post-critique of the teaching to allowthe teacher to get feedback on their teaching approach. We have created a protocol for thisapproach that we are happy to share.One key aspect to note about an FLC is the goal is not to provide a specified curriculum thatimproves teachers by prescribing skills and knowledge. Instead, the goal is for a learningcommunity to have a focused discussion with respect to a formalized theme (as prescribed by Cox[22]), with the participants helping guide the experiences.Proposed Evaluation of InterventionOur FLC organization is the mechanism by which we use board games to enable and guideteachers’ experiences of learning again in compartmentalized 2-hour meetings. Our overallresearch
that face society will likely require new ways ofthinking that can emerge by applying different disciplinary lens/viewpoints to problems. But, thedisciplinary structures in higher education, while not all bad, do not readily provide a place for studentsand faculty within these disciplines to converge. For example, assigning multiple instructors fromdifferent colleges to teach in the same room at the same time do not coincide with universitysystems/structures/values. Also, gaining curriculum approvals within a larger institution across academicunits, each with their own curriculum oversight committees, is a difficult and time-consuming process.That said, the following sections will provide an overview of this model and lessons learned from
Electrical and Computer Engineering at University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her current interests include recruitment and retention of under-represented students in STEM, K-12 outreach, integrative training for graduate teaching assistants, service learning, and curriculum innovation for introductory computing courses.Prof. Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Blake Everett Johnson is a Teaching Assistant Professor and instructional laboratory manager in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His research interests include experimental fluid mechanics, measurement science, engineering education, engineering leadership, and
implementing acceptablesolutions; (2) to make connections from many information resources to intersect ideas,particularly by using structured methods for generating concept designs for their ideas onsustainable products and services; and (3) to develop product designs that create environmental,economic, and social value. Student teams completed a design project incorporating these newlearning materials. This paper provides an outline of the various lecture modules in the coursewith a brief description of the module contents. The paper also illustrates the integration of lifecycle analyses, entrepreneurial-minded learning principles [3], and structured product designmethods with an example student-generated project in the course.A brief overview of
to increasethe participation of students from diverse backgrounds in engineering majors. Additionally, theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology recently made a commitment to diversityand is considering changes to curriculum criteria which would require engineering programs todemonstrate a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion [1]. In alignment with USAFA’sstrategic plan and the anticipated accreditation criteria, the authors are developing a newfoundational engineering course as one element of an institution-wide effort to improve students’sense of belonging, make engineering majors more accessible to a wider audience, andultimately increase diversity among engineering graduates.In addition to exploring best practices from
importantimplications. In order to further effectively achieve teacher cooperation, theevaluation committee needs to work closely with the curriculum committee.3.3 Student power“Student-centered” teaching is one of the educational philosophies followed by 4colleges and universities. The main function of the school is to maximize the role ofthe student in teaching. “student-centered” teaching is the foundation of the survivaland development of colleges and universities, and individualized education forstudents is the embodiment of the school’s characteristics. Taking WPI as an example,“student-centered” teaching is the basic educational philosophy of the “WPI Plan”.Under the guidance of the “student-centered” teaching
Photovoice with Entrepreneurial Design Projects as a High Impact Practice in Engineering Technology EducationIn the recent years, interdisciplinary research has become a necessary tool for successfullyfinding solutions to real-world problems. Yet, in the undergraduate engineering technologycurriculum interdisciplinary projects is extremely limited (if used at all), particularly in non-capstone project courses. In this study we present findings and lessons learned from aninterdisciplinary research project that integrates entrepreneurial mindset, bio-inspired design, andart into in an engineering technology classroom in the sophomore-year of the post-secondaryengineering technology education. Engineering
, pp. 32-38, 2003.[6] T. A. Nocera, A. Ortiz-Rosario, A. Shermadou and D. A. Delaine, "How Do Biomedical Engineering Graduates Differ from Other Engineers? Bridging the Gap Between BME and Industry: a Case Study," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2018.[7] C. P. Rivera, A. Haung-Saad, C. Wang and A. A. Wang, "Preparing early career biomedical undergraduates through investigations of stakeholder needs: A qualitative analysis," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020.[8] S. Higbee and S. Miller, "Work in Progress: Vertical Integration of Engineering Design in an Under-graduate BME Curriculum," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2019.[9] J. Xue, T. Wu, Y. Dai and Y. Xia, "Electrospinning and
Paper ID #37282Assessing Various Pedagogical Features of Remote Versus In-PersonIterations of a First-Year Engineering, Makerspace CourseDr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville Brian Robinson is an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Uni- versity of Louisville. His primary research focus is in Engineering Education, with highest interest in first-year (and beyond) engineering retention & the effects of value-expectancy theory on student persis- tence.Dr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Gheens
Paper ID #36830Engagement in Practice: Collaborating with University Extension on GameJam Workshops to expose middle school aged learners to basic programmingconceptsEzequiel Aleman, Iowa State University of Science and TechnologyEthan Paul RuchotzkeDr. Michael Brown, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Michael Brown is an assistant professor of Student Affairs and Higher Education at Iowa State Univer- sity. His research focuses on the development of curriculum, pedagogy, and instructional technology in introductory STEM courses in undergraduate and community college programs. ©American Society
. [9] had similar findings inaddition to finding that many instructors stated if the instructors thought the extra-creditassignments were useful for students then they should simply be required.With these perspectives considered, it is clear that many instructors have concerns regarding howextra credit assignments should be integrated into a curriculum, if at all. Zare [10] suggests thatsome of these concerns can be mitigated by making the work commensurate with the extra points,clearly communicating the special nature of those assignments, and setting clear limits on howmuch will be offered in the syllabus. Similarly, Burke [11] implemented a semester-longextra-credit assignment to mitigate his concerns that extra credit would be used as an
Paper ID #39200Work in Progress: Efficacy of a Peer Mentoring Program forUnderrepresented First-Year Students at a Predominantly White InstitutionDr. Kelyn Rola, Southern Methodist University Dr. Kelyn Rola is a Research Professor in the Caruth Institute for Engineering Education in the Lyle School of Engineering at Southern Methodist University. She is Director of the Thrive Scholars Program in the Lyle School, which supports historically underrepresented students in engineering and computer science during their transition to college. She received her Doctorate in Education Policy and Leadership at SMU with an emphasis
courses will be offeredseparately.This unique background sets the stage of the 5-DOF robotic arm project presented in this paper.The first prototype was developed by a team of three rising Engineering Physics sophomores,mentored by an engineering faculty member, during their 2022 Summer Engineering Internshipexperience. Currently another team of students are continuing the development and transferringthe Arduino-based system to the ROS 2 platform in their Directed Research course with the samefaculty member. Upon the completion of the migration to ROS 2, components of this robotic armsystem will then be integrated into the course projects of multiple courses in the BS-Engineeringand BS-Robotics curricula. Another direction of this project is to
)Collaboration 2 included computational methods for the first year of the project. In year two ofthe project, mechanical engineering had a curriculum change, and students taking a new class,electromechanical systems, participated in this project. The preservice teachers in collaboration2 were taking an educational technology class. Collaboration 2 met as an after-school club withfifth graders for approximately six weeks to design and build a bioinspired robot (Figure 3a).During the Covid-19 pandemic, this transitioned to zoom (Figure 3b), and returned to an in-person club in the spring of 2022 (Table 1) (a) (b)Figure 3. Students in collaboration 2 during the in-person after-school club (a) andworking
Engineering Network) framework further influenced therefinement process and integrated entrepreneurial mindset.Fall 2020: The assignment was introduced as an extra credit and connects to a previous assignedproject, namely Assignment #5 (see Appendix 1). The students were asked to brainstorm and toreplace the problem description from Assignment 5 with a story while keeping the same pipelineconfiguration, to brainstorm an application. To help the students get started, the instructorincluded a story beginning as an example: “there is a summer camp, and the camp director plansto use water from a nearby lake for some camp activities. The lake is about 50 ft below the campwater tank.... “.Also, part of the assignment was a peer evaluation, in which all the
an extensive review of both peer-reviewedliterature and university teaching and learning websites. Literature sources spanned the last fiveto ten years of research on successful inclusive strategies that have worked in classroom settings,particularly those in engineering classroom settings [5]–[8]. Teaching and learning centerwebsites were also integral in creating the menu because they provided pedagogical advice alongwith inclusive strategies as they are considered the practicing experts on shaping and shiftingclassroom environments. Integrating relevant and culturally diverse examples into coursematerial, ensuring a physically and technically accessible classroom, activating student voicesthroughout the entirety of the class, and
Engineering, as an ABET Program Evaluator; and is a member of the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) Education Committee. His research interests are in the broad area of cellular engineering that utilize interdisciplinary approaches towards better understanding of stem cell fate in the context of regenerative biomedical therapies. He is committed to integration of research and education, and has developed courses and programs that relate to entrepreneurship, service learning and community engagement. He is an elected Fellow of the Amer- ican Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE), an elected Fellow of BMES, and Past- President of the Institute of Biological Engineering (IBE). Awards and Honors include
this integration. First, many science teachers and the U.S. general population lack anunderstanding of engineering concepts and their applications [8]. Throughout the years,professional development opportunities for educators have risen to fill this knowledge gap andhelp instructors feel comfortable teaching an integrated engineering curriculum. As aconsequence, student opportunities to interact with engineering curricula have risen.The success of incorporating engineering concepts in classrooms before the college experience isplenty. A survey of 67 instructors teaching high school and middle school STEM classesdetermined that most students engaged more with engineering design projects than regular classactivities. Teachers felt that 69
Communication at Oregon Tech and also serves as an asso- ciate professor. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Areas of Improvement and Difficulty with Lab Report Writing in Lower-Division Engineering Laboratory Courses Across Three Universities.AbstractEngineering undergraduates often mention hands-on laboratory courses as the most excitinglearning experience in college. At the same time, they frequently point out that lab report writingis one of the most difficult tasks. Indeed, writing requires an extensive time investment forstudents, from developing ideas to proofreading before submission. Although engineeringeducators and writing educators offer impactful instructions in academic
tissues. Prior to that, he completed his PhD in Electrical Engi- neering at the University of California Berkeley and his BS in ECE at The Ohio State University. He first discovered the joys of teaching as an undergraduate TA with tOSU’s first-year engineering program, and he has been engaged with curriculum development and teaching projects ever since.Allison Connell Pensky, Carnegie Mellon University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Impact of Electronics Design Experience on Non-majors’ Self-efficacy and IdentityAbstractBefore the advent of the internet, electronics hobbyists embarked on lifelong learning journeyswith instructional books such as
students in developing their problem-solving abilities, logicalreasoning, and creativity is computational thinking [3], [7]. Moreover, Wing suggests thatcomputational thinking “complements and combines mathematical and engineering thinking…ascomputer science inherently draws on engineering thinking, given that we build systems thatinteract with the real world” [7]. To date, there has been a growing focus to includecomputational thinking in K–12 curriculum, especially through the teaching of computer scienceand coding skills [8]–[12].However, there is a gap in the literature regarding how to effectively integrate computationalthinking and engineering design into K-12 education. While there are some programs andinitiatives that have incorporated
. Prior to joining DU, Dr. Roney held both industry and academic positions. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Hair Dryer Design as a Synergistic Tool for Combining Thermodynamics and the Importance of Diversity in Design Team CompositionIntroductionThe past few years have shown an increasing emphasis on justice, equity, diversity, andinclusion (JEDI) within engineering curriculums [1]. This emphasis on JEDI, also referred to asdiversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), has been reinforced by changes made by the majoraccreditation body for engineering programs, ABET. In 2016, ABET proposed changes toinclude language highlighting an outcome of “creating a collaborative and inclusiveenvironment
theinstitute. The evaluation team interviewed a total of 23 volunteer participants via Zoom.Interviews ranged from 30 to 45 minutes. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribedusing Otter.ai, an artificial intelligence transcription service.The evaluation team designed and used a semi-structured interview protocol to allow for a set ofstandardized questioning across respondents, as well as understand personalized perspectives.Evaluators developed interview questions using the broader evaluation questions to gain insightinto the quality of the institute, its impact on participants’ learning and behavior, the results ofengaging in the institute, and the replicability of the training structure and curriculum. Questionswere also designed to
career, which despite being complicated, has itspositive side.” Other students mentioned, “In first semesters the subjects are really boring andhaving a course like this motivates me to discover everything that the major can offer” and “Wehave an idea of what we are going to do for the rest of our lives and, at least for me, I loved it.”DiscussionAccording to the American Society for Engineering Education, the main reasons why studentsdrop out are deficient advising and teaching; complicated engineering curriculum and a lack of“belonging” within engineering [14], [16]–[18], [23]. Introducing a first-year hands-on civilengineering course aims to reduce dropout rates at the undergraduate program. Many studentsstated that the course helped them
candidates for teacheDr. Scott R. Bartholomew, Brigham Young University Scott R. Bartholomew, PhD. is an assistant professor of Technology & Engineering Studies at Brigham Young University. Previously he taught Technology and Engineering classes at the middle school and university level.Ms. Wonki Lee, Purdue University, West Lafayette Wonki Lee is pursuing a PhD in Curriculum and Instructionˆa C™s Literacy and Language program at Purdue University. She received her B.A and M.S in Korean Language Education from Seoul National University, South Korea. She served culturally and linguisticalJessica Marie YauneyMr. Scott Thorne, Purdue University, West Lafayette Scott Thorne is a doctoral candidate at Purdue University in
withhigh levels of leadership and professional skills [3]–[5]. Historically, leadership and professionalskills have been referred to as “soft skills” indicating lesser importance than the “hard” ortechnical skills typically associated with engineering. Leadership development was often pushedto the margins of engineering education using an end-of-program project or a few electivecourses to fulfill the requirements [6], [7]. However, recent work explores the potential andsuccess of integrating leadership and professional development into the technical aspects ofengineering education. This literature indicates that out-of-class activities such as summerinternships or research experiences (e.g., REU programs) can be beneficial in furthering