Paper ID #37959Exploring the nature of engineering during home-based engineeringactivities designed for Spanish- and English-speaking families withyoung children (Fundamental, Diversity)Catherine Wagner, University of Notre Dame Catherine Wagner is a research staff member at the Center for STEM Education at the University of Notre Dame. She earned her Master of Education degree from Notre Dame in 2019 while teaching middle school science. She has collaborated with faculty in the Center for STEM on engineering research for several years, most recently leading an undergraduate research lab on early childhood engineering
]), supporttransferable skill development [7], and increase engagement [8]. Results in the physiology coursedescribed here support these outcomes. Individual test scores were not different across multiplesemesters including the Control and Intervention groups, and team scores in the Interventiongroups were increased by an average of 18% relative to the individual scores. Notably, each testcontained questions that were categorized as either “retention and recall” or as “comprehension”[12]. Comprehension questions assess students’ abilities to apply and integrate concepts in waysthat are useful for engineering problem-solving approaches, consistent with the idea oftransferable skill development. The average learning gain corresponding to the increased teamscores
integrated into every civil engineering curriculum and first-year studentsare introduced to the CEBOK3, the duty of responsible charge, and the “roadmap” that willprepare them for future practice, as part of their undergraduate education. The CEBOK3 can bealigned with course syllabi to reinforce how the courses being taken help fulfill theundergraduate education outcomes in the CEBOK3. Since these outcomes are closely alignedwith ABET criteria for civil engineering programs, this should not prove difficult to do.Throughout the four years of instruction, academia should continue to build understanding ofwhat is ahead for their students once they graduate. Students should have a clear understandingthat their education has only begun and that they will
, where $3000 wasgiven on day 1 of the program. The overall goals were to provide (1) Resource Recognition by introducing students tothe various academic and personal resources available on campus, (2) Personal Preparationthrough programming on subjects such as personal finance and mental health, (3) CareerPreparation through writing workshops and curriculum vitae editing, and (4) Network Buildingby connecting students with current graduate students. Students were also matched with facultyto conduct summer research in their field of interest. After a successful pilot in 2021, theprogram was conducted with a larger group of students in the summer of 2022.Program Structure:GREaT GradS Timeline – GREaT GradS runs on an accelerated
IIT Delhi for undergraduate studies and Cornell University for graduate work. He worked for nearly 15 years as a materials scientist at the DuPont company and moved in 2004 to Lehigh University. His research interests are in interfacial mechanical properties.Zilong Pan, Lehigh University Zilong Pan is an assistant professor of teaching, learning and technology, his research focuses on emerging educational technologies and innovative methodological approaches in educational practices and studies in STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) disciplines.Nathan Urban, Lehigh University Nathan Urban is Provost and Senior Vice President for Academic Affairs at Lehigh University. Urban earned his PhD
Paper ID #37870Designing and Implementing a Workshop on the Intersection between SocialJustice and EngineeringKavitha Chintam, Northwestern University Kavitha Chintam is a Ph.D. Candidate at Northwestern University in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering.Dr. Alexis N. Prybutok, University of Washington Alex Prybutok (she/her) is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Washington. She earned her B.S. in Chemical Engineering and her B.S. in Biochemistry from the University of Texas at Austin in 2016 and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Northwestern
Distribution Program at Texas A&M University. His research interests include integration of supply chain management with new product development decisions, distributor service portfolio optimization, and engineering education.Prof. Om Prakash Yadav, North Carolina A&T State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 International Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research Program on BigData in Energy and Related Infrastructure: Challenges and Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic and University Policies and PracticesAbstractEngineering workplaces are becoming globalized because of the growth of the internationaleconomy and improvements in information technology. Engineering programs
classes developedand launched in Fall 2020. The first MSEM graduates completed their degrees in December2022. This paper presents the primary challenges curriculum development, graduating studentfeedback, and future planning for the program.KeywordsMaster’s program, engineering education, curriculum developmentIntroductionTennessee Tech University launched an effort in 2016 which addressed the planning,development, and operation of a new, online, graduate program in engineering management.The Master of Science in Engineering Management (MSEM) program was launched as acompletely online and asynchronous program of study, with courses offered collaborativelybetween the College of Engineering (COE) and the College of Business (COB). The primarygoal
failure: An introduction to forensic structural engineering,” Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2010, doi: 10.1080/13287982.2010.11465051.[3] C. Reynolds, “Rewriting the Curriculum: a Review and Proposal of Forensic Engineering Coursework in U.S. Universities Background,” Forensic Engineering (2003), pp. 307– 319, 2003.[4] N. Delatte, “An approach to forensic engineering education in the USA,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Forensic Engineering, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 123–129, 2012, doi: 10.1680/fen.[5] S. E. Chen and R. Janardhanam, “Forensic Engineering Education Reform,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Forensic
Paper ID #38811Re-Evaluating the Examination of Minoritized Social Identities amongI-Corps Hub Program ParticipantsDr. Alanna Epstein, University of Michigan Alanna D. Epstein is an Assistant Research Scientist studying motivation, instruction, and entrepreneurial outcomes in the context of the NSF Innovation Corps (”I-Corps”) training program. She received her Ph.D. from the Combined Program in Education and Psychology at the University of Michigan, and her Bachelor’s degree in psychology was completed at Oberlin College. Her dissertation work focused on the longitudinal development high school students’ motivational
holistic education as priorities, extending the impact and involvement offaculty to the rest of the School, instead of a dedicated few working in isolation.Discussion and Future Work These strategies not only represent a way of integrating cognitive, affective, andinterpersonal skills into an engineering curriculum; they also serve to bolster existing learningoutcomes, particular those from ABET. Learning outcomes surrounding the 3Cs have been linkedto various ABET student outcomes [19]: teaming and story-driven learning to understand failuresupport ABET student outcome 5, and value sensitive design can be leveraged to address ABETstudent outcome 4. This, combined with a comprehensive approach leveraging individuals,connected courses, and
the potential toexclude those with the most need such as core discipline instructors with a Clinical or Professorof Practice that often have no research obligation, but have a large impact on undergraduates dueto their high teaching loads. Second, accreditation bodies also recognize the need for communication, and require thiselement to be included in an accredited undergraduate engineering program. An example is inABET’s requirement in Criterion 3, Outcome 3, which is “an ability to communicate effectivelywith a range of audiences”. While accreditation agencies do require communication-focusedelements to be integrated within the curriculum, such activities are typically required only onceover a four-year curriculum, which offers
critical to understanding the needs and constraints of teaching at themiddle school level in an under-resourced environment. Though many considerations were involved in theproposal submission stage, the real-world integration of this work was still a novel concept.Our intention was to create content that could be easily adapted by teachers after they were introduced tothe curriculum for their use. This meant that the lesson plans would need to fit within a standard period, ablock period (for intensive courses), or two successive normal class periods for a middle school class.Designing with a standard bell schedule in mind meant that on average we would have 40-60 minutes ofinstructional time per standard period. However, some of our proposed
behavior in learning environments. His academic training was in Physics and Philosophy before he turned to science (partic ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Faculty Workshop on Teaching SustainabilityDespite the urgent need to integrate sustainability throughout the engineering curriculum, mostfaculty have little to no training or confidence in doing so. We report on a 4-day pilot facultyworkshop delivered in January 2023 by an interdisciplinary group of faculty at a large mid-Atlantic R1 university designed to help engineering instructors do this. After substantial effort tocreate a mutual understanding around the diverse approaches we as faculty bring from ourrespective
Learn., vol. 7, no. 2, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.7771/1541-5015.1339.[6] T. J. Moore, S. S. Guzey, and A. W. Glancy, “The EngrTEAMS Project: STEM Integration Curricula for Grades 4-8 (Curriculum Exchange),” presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1212.1-24.1212.2. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-engrteams-project-stem-integration-curricula- for-grades-4-8-curriculum-exchange[7] A. Hira and M. M. Hynes, “Design-based research to broaden participation in pre-college engineering: research and practice of an interest-based engineering challenges framework,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 1–2, pp. 103–122, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1080
thinkingskills being assessed are often hyper-specific to that discipline (e.g. chemistry, environmentalscience). The results identified an important gap in the need for a more comprehensive tool thatis not tied to a specific discipline and a tool that can be applied outside of STEM contexts. Connecting the Research and Future DirectionsThe overarching theme tying together the research in this project is based on the importance ofcommunity in various K-12 contexts, ranging from training for the STW to curriculum forengineering efforts in rural schools. For example, leveraging partnerships and communityconnections is crucial for overcoming barriers presented by systemic disruptions while also beingincredibly important to leverage
Department at a private, mid-sized university was awarded theNational Science Foundation (NSF) Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer ScienceDepartments (RED) grant in July 2017 to support the development of a program that fostersstudents’ engineering identities in a culture of doing engineering with industry engineers. TheDepartment is cultivating this culture of “engineering with engineers” through a strongconnection to industry and through changes in the four essential areas of a shared departmentvision, faculty, curriculum, and supportive policies.As we conclude this project, we are auditing all the activities we did throughout our project. Inthis audit, we review our activities with an eye toward what was particularly impactful for us
this paper is to present an outline of the curriculum, examples of assigned studentprojects and educational strategies for the Deep Learning module and to discuss the successfulproject ideas completed by the students in the course over the past 2 years. Deep learning andcomputer vision have been generally under the purview of computer science and data sciencemajors, but software tools such as MATLAB and carefully selected curriculum can make AI andDL accessible to multidisciplinary engineering students who generally possess limited and variedsoftware development backgrounds.It should be noted that an application of deep learning models called large language models(LLMs) have been introduced into the mainstream in the past few years. Examples
of study? One method is to integrate them intocourses in the initial year of curriculums to allow interaction with students that could be effectivein retaining students in the program. Further study is needed on this topic, however, an initialreview of the changes made to the faculty included in beginning architectural design studios atOklahoma State University indicates that making these types of adjustments to beginning coursesmight be a step in the right direction.This study has some limitations, with one being that the survey was sent only to current studentsenrolled in the School of Architecture. To acquire a better understanding of why students haveleft their original major, the study could be expanded to include students who have
-solving (Yang et al., 2020, 2021) and for defining learning outcomes inour curricula. In this way, students use CT throughout the course of the engineering design cyclewith a focus on problem-solving and meaning making (Ardito et al., 2020; Leonard et al., 2017).This body of evidence shows promise for the design of curricula that effectively integrates CT todrive engineering design, leading to learning outcomes in both sets of practices. In subsequentsections, we provide examples of such integration from an engineering and CT middle schoolcurriculum. We describe our approach to engineering and CT, provide examples from ourMiddle School curriculum as part of Youth Engineering Solutions (YES) and introduce ourframework for CT and
a year of classroom implementation and data collection at the institution where thecurriculum was developed, the project team recruited math and engineering faculty from threeother colleges to pilot the models starting Fall 2020. The goal of this expansion was to increasesample sizes and diversity for statistical analysis of classroom data and to learn about theexperiences of faculty as they integrated the curriculum materials into their own courses. Theoriginal vision was for faculty to use the models in face-to-face instruction, but the transition toonline modality in response to the COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid pivot during thisexpansion that we reported on previously. Faculty participants who chose to continue with theproject worked
. This major would have students take an Introduction to Engineering Design class,Statics, Materials, complete an external project, and do a one-semester capstone. Thisengineering curriculum would be supported by math, physics and chemistry courses, includingelectronics and thermodynamics through the physics department. The initial engineering sciencedegree was not meant to be an ABET-accredited degree but a pathway for students interested inengineering to gain engineering training while integrating other interests such as business,environmental science, and data science. This degree was intended to provide strong preparationfor careers in areas such as entrepreneurship, project management, architecture/design,government technology policy
results (right)4.0 Assessment and Learning OutcomesLearning can be categorized into developing skills in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotordomains. Higher education focuses largely on the cognitive domain following Bloom’s taxonomy– knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation [11]. ABEToutcomes for engineering education integrate developing student abilities in both the affectivedomain by emphasizing soft skills and the cognitive domain by promoting critical thinking andcreativity [12]. While lecture-based instruction is essential from the point of view of deliveringcontent knowledge appropriate for an engineering curriculum, blending active, cooperative, andproblem-based learning with course lectures
from part-time workingstudents, other means of integrating industry experiences must be found to properly prepare full-time students, who do not have industrial experience, with professional skills and technicalknowhow. Ultimately, these skills should be integrated throughout the curriculum not just addedin a final capstone course and then the final capstone course should allow students to beimmersed in a professional environment. An industrial basis for as many projects as possible willprovide students the richest learning experience and help prepare them for their future careers.References [1] Home. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-technology
navigation experiences.Lara Hebert, University of Illinois, Urbana - Champaign Assistant Director of Engineering Outreach and Public Engagement at the University of Illinois. She brings to this position and this initiative expertise in teacher education and curriculum design.Dr. Meagan C Pollock, Engineer Inclusion As an engineer turned educator, through her company, Engineer Inclusion, Dr. Meagan Pollock focuses on helping others intentionally engineer inclusion™ in education and the workforce.Dr. Lynford Goddard, University of Illinois, Urbana - ChampaignDr. Luisa-maria Rosu Luisa-Maria Rosu is the Director of I-STEM (Illinois Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics) Education Initiative and a Research Associate in
academic advisor of the traditional four-year BS MCET studentsemphasized the need to complete these courses.Many of the 1000- and 2000-level, and to a lesser extent, the 3000-level SMSCP-specificcourses, relied on the initial $300,000 Mechatronics trainer equipment for lab exercises. Thisamount of funding procured a suite of eight Mechatronics integrated system modules with aFanuc robot to transfer workpieces, an industrial electric motor trainer, a modular industrialelectric motor control board trainer, and an associated lab curriculum. The Mechatronics systemmodules were the standardized, small-scale assembly line type that assembled a pneumatic valvein a series of steps using a variety of sensors and actuators in combination with
. As indicated by the first theme, ethics is an espousedvalue, but that value is not always reflected in the curriculum. With ethics only visible in selectengineering courses, the importance of ethics to engineering education and practice might not becommunicated to students. One implication of this finding is aligning purported values withcurricular requirements. Given social-technical dualism within engineering culture and thepriority of technical subjects [26], the limited visibility of ethics or its separation from technicalcourses can continue to reinforce this false dichotomy. Another tension arises when ethics isnarrowly constrained to academic integrity. Although an important component of emphasizingethical behavior, academic integrity
psychology emphasizing applied measurement. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Addressing New ABET General Criteria Focusing on Diversity, Equity, and InclusionIntroductionIn fall 2021, ABET released proposed changes to the General Criteria for accreditingengineering programs, including (a) definitions for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and (b)changes incorporating a basic grasp of these concepts to the curriculum (Criterion 5) and faculty(Criterion 6). While some may see the explicit inclusion of DEI as a radical revision of ABETcriteria, a historical perspective shows that the proposed new requirements are an incrementalreform stemming from a steady evolution of ABET’s integrating professional
. This theme suggested a stronger emphasis onleadership education throughout the engineering curriculum. ABET’s current leadership-related student outcome 3.5 requiresengineering program students to demonstrate, “an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provideleadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives,” [7]. This studentoutcome suggests a requirement for students to grasp and apply leadership principles in team-based work but lacks a direct outcomefor educational institutions to pivot for an integrated approach to leadership education in engineering. Participants suggested this lackof integration prohibits the ability for students to link and apply
Technical Education (CTE) programs.However, mere availability of 3DP is not enough for teachers to fully utilize its potential in theirclassrooms. While basic 3DP skills can be obtained through a few hours of training, the basictraining is insufficient to ensure effective teaching Engineering Design Process (EDP) at the highschool level. To address this problem, this project develops an EDP course tightly integrated with3DP for preservice teachers (PST) who are going to enter the workforce in high schools.Engineering design process (EDP) has become an essential part for preservice teachers (PST),especially for high school STEM. 3DP brought transformative change to EDP which is an iterativeprocess that needs virtual/physical prototyping. The new PST