implementations through the Massachusetts Health Information Exchange. At Wentworth, Dr. Feldman is focused on project-based instruction, hands-on simulations, experiential learning approaches, and first year curriculum. Dr. Feldman is one of the lead instructors for Introduction to Engineering courses, with enrollments in the hundreds each fall. His re- search and teaching interests, in addition to first year engineering, include telemedicine, health informat- ics, rehabilitation engineering, and medical robotics. Dr. Feldman has collaborated with researchers and engineers from organizations including Tufts School of Veterinary Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Vecnacares, and Restoreskills.Dr. George D. Ricco, University
Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Supplementing theoretical modeling with empirical data for improved designIntroductionOur first semester course in biomedical engineering includes a semester-long project thatintroduces students to the design process and allows them to practice working in teams. Thestudents work for a fictional company with a hypothetical hospital as a customer to design, build,and test a portable air filtration system. While the experience for the students has overall beenpositive, they struggle in a specific section of the course and fail to make a connection betweencourse content and application to the project. We are looking to address this short-coming withan
years of engineering and project management experience with a large variety of local, state, and federal projects and facilities. In addition to teaching civil engineering courses, Paul has assisted with engineering service projects in the United States, Uganda, Bolivia, and Guatemala. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Co-ops are Great! but What are the Final Numbers Telling Us?AbstractThis paper discusses the results of an engineering cooperative program for over a three yearperiod. At York College of Pennsylvania (YSP), students are required to pursue three co-opopportunities over the course of their four year academic schedule. Many faculty and industrypersonnel are familiar
University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in Sustainability from Arizona State University, and a Master’s degree in Environmental Management from Harvard Uni- versity and a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science from University of New Hampshire. Before earning his doctorate, he has worked for a decade in consulting and emergency response for Triumvirate Environmental Inc.Andrew LiRebecca Jun, University of Virginia
Paper ID #39981A SwarmAI Testbed for Workforce Development and Collaborative,Interdisciplinary ResearchMartha Cervantes, Johns Hopkins University Martha Cervantes is a Mechanical Engineer at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Labora- tory where she works in mechanical design and integration of robotic systems. Additionally, Martha is the project manger of the CIRCUIT Program at JHU/APL, which connects and mentors students from trailblazing backgrounds to STEM careers through science and engineering projects. Martha received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University, and she is currently
how to behave, succeed, and interact. Inengineering specifically, this can be seen in how traditionally, there have been lecture stylecourses where students are listening to learn, whereas in other disciplinary domains, like thehumanities, discussions are a part of how the learning is done. Other discipline specific rulesinclude how learning is measured, such as exams, projects, like in engineering or even aperformance piece, such as in an art discipline.StructuralIn the structural domain, institutions have policies and procedures that benefit some and notothers. In higher education, these policies and procedures include admissions processes andrequirements, defined by the institution itself.The structural domain of power is relevant as the
Engineering education plays a crucial role in shaping the next generation of engineersand scientists (Agrawal & Harrington-Hurd, 2016; Brothy et al., 2008). Given its importance,research studies have sought practical ways to improve engineering education practices acrossmultiple dimensions (Crawley et al., 2007; Litzinger et al., 2011; Pizarro, 2018). Among theseefforts, there has been a long-lasting and ongoing focus on project- and team-based learning inSTEM and engineering education research (Felder & Brent, 2016; Kolar & Sabatini, 1996;Wankat & Oreovicz, 2014). Researchers found that project- and team-based learning practiceslead to favorable learning outcomes and behaviors, as well as effective cognitive and non-cognitive
(pre-lecture activi-ties, in-class activities, homework, coding projects) is statistically equivalent. While performanceon exams is statistically significantly higher in the in-person section even after controlling for stu-dents’ incoming GPA (2.4 percentage points higher when compared with students in the onlinesection, p = 0.028), we find no statistically significant difference in students’ final weighted aver-age score (the advantage for in-person students reduced to 1.2 percentage points with p = 0.067).When we disaggregate by gender, we find that women in the online section outperform the womenin the in-person section. Men’s, underrepresented minorities’, and first-generation students’ per-formance follow the same trends as the whole
attitudes defined in the CEBOK3 that civil engineers shouldattain and then maintain through undergraduate and post-graduate formal education, mentoredexperience, and life-long self-development to serve in responsible charge of civil engineeringservices. Responsible charge is the legal standard for the licensed practice of engineering. Mostengineering statutes closely follow the definition provided by the National Council of Examinersfor Engineering and Surveying (NCEES) Model Law [2]: The term “Responsible Charge” asused in this Act, shall mean the direct control and personal supervision of engineering work.This includes responsibility for subordinates on the project team. An engineer serving inresponsible charge must be a licensed professional
ownership towards the game environment. Secondly, providing the user with a degree of control over a project, process or the organization is a good example of accomplishing this Core Drive.5) Social Influence and Relatedness: this aspect of the Octalysis framework concerns the social elements that motivate the users, such as social acceptance, feedback, companionship, mentorship, envy, and competition. An example situation evoking this Core Drive is when an individual observes a co-worker or a teacher that possesses great proficiency at a particular task, making the observer motivated to attain the same skill level.6) Scarcity and Impatience: associated with rarity or exclusivity, this Core Drive embodies a sense of desiring
taught courses (undergraduate, graduate and continuing edu- cation) and has participated in consulting projects in Lean-Six Sigma, Discrete Event Simulation (DES), Healthcare Engineering and Logistics. ˜ Tecnologico de MonterreyJ. Reyes Angulo Cedeno,Agustin Perez Araos, Tecnologico de MonterreyMarco Antonio de Luna Marco A. de Luna holds a Ph.D. in Bayesian statistics, Industrial Statistics and Optimization from the Universidad Politecnica de Valencia. He has a master’s degree in Quality Systems and Productivity and a master’s degree in Industrial Engineering. Since 1994 he has been a professor of the Industrial and Systems Engineering department, teaching topics of Industrial Statistics, Data Science
instructional strategies in Engineering Classrooms, supports educational components of grants, facilitates data and assessment project, and delivers teaching-focused professional development for graduate students and faculty in Engineering. His work explores the role of implement- ing online, blended, and flipped models in enhancing instruction and learning in Engineering programs, while bridging quantitative and qualitative methods. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Designing learning experiences with a low-cost robotic arm1 IntroductionThe increasing popularity of robotics in STEM education can be attributed to its involvement ininteractive and practical learning experiences
mutual agreements acrosscolleges may then vanish, continued disputes over academic territory, and challenges over resourceallotments. Essentially, there may be little to no incentives for academic departments to engage intransdisciplinary programming within the existing structures of higher education. However, some insightsand practices have emerged from this research project that can be useful in moving towardtransdisciplinary learning around topics of convergence. Accordingly, the paper will highlight features ofan educational model that spans disciplines along with the workarounds to current institutional barriers.This paper will also provide lessons learned related to 1) the potential pitfalls with educationalprogramming becoming “un
EducationAbstractThe vast scope of digital design and the cost associated with purchasing and maintainingspecialized lab equipment can pose a significant obstacle for pre-college students. This challengeis particularly significant for students from low-income and underrepresented minoritybackgrounds who often begin their higher education journey in community college programswith limited funding and access to engineering hardware. BEADLE, a project designed topromote equity in access to educational technologies, seeks to address this issue by providing anaffordable platform that allows students to remotely access industry-grade hardware to learn anddevelop their skills in digital design as a step towards pursuing advanced digital designcoursework in a
,Signals and Systems, and Microcomputers I, through which students gain solid foundation beforestudents take on senior design projects. Lab modules with open-ended design learning experience through using a lab-in-a-boxapproach were developed to allow students to solve lab problems with multiple approaches thatallow problem solving independently and collaboratively. Because this innovative lab designallows problem solving at various cognitive levels, it is better suited for concept exploration andcollaborative lab learning environments as opposed to the traditional lab works with a“cookbook” approach that tend to lead students to follow certain procedures for expectedsolutions with the absence of problem exploration stage. In addition to
intention is totransform the identity and mindset of the learners in our engineering programs from ‘student’ toengineer in training, or engineering apprentice.A key feature of pro-ops is that students take on professional roles in experiences intentionallydesigned to resemble a professional experience in all aspects, to differentiate them from justanother class project. We use immersion as a measure of the level of industry-like context, with ahigh level of immersion being required to qualify as a pro-op. The overarching goal of Pro-opeducation is to create a healthy professional culture (Pro-culture) within our engineeringprogram, where students engage in repeated professional experiences and tell stories about themthrough the reflective lens of
• System design, introducing concepts related to engineering complex systems.Swarm Dynamics • Swarm dynamics, illustrating through demonstration how simple rules can result in swarming behavior.BLIMP Construction • Build video, providing a step-by-step guide to building a BLIMP.The trifold release of videos via YouTube, Vimeo, and the project website is intended to maximizereach over multiple platforms. The videos posted to the project website are embedded withinspecific lessons of the previously described curriculum and incorporated as part of a resourcespage [10], which also provides a curated collection of publicly available videos and websites byother content creators that support learning in this domain. In Table 2, mini-lessons
course, in which one of the learning objectives was the ability to workeffectively on a team to complete a semester-long design project. Data were collected fromapproximately 90 participants in each of two fall semesters and 50 participants in each of twospring semesters, for a total of nearly 280 sets of responses. Study variables were the fourTuckman team development stages.The questionnaire was administered at the 75% completion point of the semester, where it wasexpected that the teams would have approached the Performing stage, or were between Normingand Performing. The questionnaire results revealed that student teams were operating accordingto the Norming and/or Performing stages, which could be an indication of face and contentvalidity
the PolyVent, potentially by students, by designing new printed circuit boards (PCBs). Figure 4: The control module, showing extensibility by adding PCBs.5. Real-time data viewing. The instrumentation producing a dynamic real-time graph of breath pressure, flow, and volume is provided by a separate WiFi enabled device (the VentMon), allowing easy projection on a large monitor to an entire class [8].6. Use of accessible parts. Many of the components, such as the air connectors, are off-the- shelf components purchasable in any country from vendors such as Amazon and McMaster-Carr. The parts are individually labeled with stickers.7. Mechanical component modularity. The PolyVent mechanical airway components are designed as
Engineering Education in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University, andDr. Andrea Goncher, University of Florida Andrea Goncher is an Assistant Instructional Professor in Engineering Education at the University of Florida. Her work focuses on teaching and learning projects in human centred design and humanitarian engineering. Her research interests include text analytics, international higher education, and engineering design education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Assessing Student’s Stakeholder Awareness Skills in an IntroductoryEngineering Design Course through Systems
well aware of these novel technologies, we need to update our curriculum andcourse design. In this paper, I present some laboratories (labs) that the students conducted as apart of a course project in the ubiquitous computing class. This course is an elective forundergraduate Computer and Information Sciences or Information technology students. Thestudents who take this course are either juniors or seniors. Covid-19 has taught us how remoteteaching is useful to ensure proper education during the time of the pandemic. This project aimsto design different lab modules that the students can conduct without purchasing hardware. Idesigned this course at the time of covid pandemic to ensure student learning and success in aneconomical way. I devised
Sciences at Kansas State University. Currently, he is working on several projects that examine co-evoRebecca Cors, University of Wisconsin - MadisonNathan P. HendricksDr. Stacy L. Hutchinson, Kansas State UniversityDr. Prathap Parameswaran, Kansas State University Prathap Parameswaran is currently an Associate Professor and the Fornelli Engineering professorship holder at the Civil Engineering department, Kansas State University. Parameswaran’s research interests pertain to all aspects of biological wastewater treatment and sustainable resource recovery from wastes using novel environmental biotechnology platforms. He is an international expert in the implementation and long term operation of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors
their role in ensuring a wide residential coverage to Chicago during itsexpansion.A cumulative online exam was given during the week of Thanksgiving, but students could takethe exam starting as early as the Thursday before Thanksgiving. The content of the examincluded all lectures, readings, and book discussions up to the date of the exam. In addition, theexam was divided into two online quizzes – one with all the closed-ended questions that could beautomatically graded at the end of students’ attempts and one with open-ended questions thatinstructors manually graded. Students were provided a second attempt at the automaticallygraded quiz during the exam period if they wished.Finally, a semester paper was given to students. This project was
Paper ID #39936Board 264: Endeavour S-STEM Program for First-Year Students: 3rd-YearResultsDr. Diana G. de la Rosa-Pohl, University of Houston Diana de la Rosa-Pohl is an Instructional Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Houston (UH). She is currently the Director of the Endeavour S-STEM Program. In addition to S-STEM courses, she teaches courses in computer engineering and capstone design. She has also developed multiple project-based first-year experience programs. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Endeavour S
university established goals anddominantly pursuing undergraduate majors. The University related actions to pursue.has five schools: Architecture and Design, Computing andData Science, Engineering, Management, and Sciences and Inclusive Excellence: We commit to the continuous de-Humanities. It offers 21 undergraduate degree programs and velopment of a campus culture that is increasingly diverse,equitable, and inclusive. We strive to develop a campus where projects, as discussed by the authors in [5]. In this paper,everyone feels valued and meaningfully supported toward the authors present an innovative method of using a learningreaching their full potential
teaching undergraduate engineers; the novelty of our approach is the focus onelectrical and computer engineers. This motivates our research question: Is PBL a more effectivepedagogy (than lectures) to teach ethical reasoning in support of social responsibility tofreshman ECE students during their primary introduction to the discipline?To answer this research question, the introductory course for electrical and computer engineering(ECE 121) at the University of Alabama (UA) has been redesigned to center ethics in theprofession. With this redesign, the course is offered in both PBL and traditional lecture style. Inthe following sections, we outline this project as a work-in-progress that includes: courseredesign, evaluation of student data on
professor, he worked as a structural engineering professional at Skidmore, Owings & MerrillDr. Robert Petrulis Dr. Petrulis is an independent consultant specializing in education-related project evaluation and research. He is based in Columbia, South Carolina.Dr. Wenshen Pong, P.E., San Francisco State University Wenshen Pong received his Ph.D. in Structural Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. He joined the School of Engineering at San Francisco State University in 1998. He teaches courses in Civil/Structural Engineering. He has received many grants from NSF, Department of Education and NASA.Dr. Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University Xiaorong Zhang received the B.S. degree in
learning.1. IntroductionThe understanding of the true motivations and drivers for why a post-graduate student wishesto do a PhD and enroll onto a doctorate program at university is a valuable piece ofinformation. Those personal and individual motivations set the foundations of their doctoraljourney. This journey is far from straight forward and seamless. It can be a trying venture thatchanges the candidate forever. In our role as supervisors and PhD project directors, we oughtto support the student when hiccups occur. An effective way to support the student throughthis personal and professional journey is to utilize and re-call upon their motivations.However, these are often not well articulated or communicated by the candidate because theyare
level.INTRODUCTION The National Curriculum Parameters for Undergraduate Engineering Programs in Brazil,instituted by Resolution No. 2, of April 24, 2019, establish that every undergraduate program inEngineering have a Pedagogical Project for the Program which, in addition to ensuring thedevelopment of the competencies established in the profile of the graduate and to present the set oflearning activities in the curriculum, clearly specify and describe “[…] VIII – the process of self-assessment and program learning management that includes the instruments for assessing the skillsdeveloped, and the respective contents, the diagnostic process and the elaboration of action plans toimprove learning, specifying the responsibilities and governance of the
Paper ID #38022Toward Bidirectional Faculty Development: A Collaborative Model forDesigning and Implementing Faculty Trainings on Evidence-BasedStrategies for Supporting Student Learning in Low- and Middle-IncomeCountriesMr. Steven Ghambi, Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences Steven Ghambi has over seven years experience as a lecturer in Materials engineering, currently with the Malawi University of Business and Applied Sciences (MUBAS). While searching for better teaching strategies, Steven got attached to the NEST project co-implemented by Rice University and MUBAS. Through these collaborations, Steven has