. Presenters shared ways they are enacting structural changes and social justiceinitiatives to propel towards a more equitable future for all womxn in engineering. Thesereflections provide a perspective that is not commonly found in the current literature, and theirconclusions provide insight into where future research efforts could be focused.IntroductionThe United States Congress has made many efforts to increase the number of womxn andunderrepresented minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) [1-2]. In this panel paper, the word “womxn” is referencing the intersectional feminist spelling of theword “woman”; this spelling seeks to avoid the suggestion of sexism and dualisms of gender andsexuality, to be inclusive to
major. This can make a student feel distantfrom their chosen major, and potentially lead to a lack of retention. Interaction with professorsfrom a student’s chosen major in the initial semesters of higher education might be advantageousin getting them involved and integrated into the program they have chosen. A report by thePresident’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology published in 2012, suggested thatthe first two years of college are the most critical to the retention and recruitment of STEMmajors [1]. Often curriculums have introductory courses for each program, and these aretypically taught wholly or in part by professors who are experts in a student’s field of study.However, there is often only a brief amount of time in courses
into a tactile test, called the Tactile MentalCutting Test (TMCT), designed to allow for tactile interpretation, instead of visual interpretation,of 3-D objects and their planar cuts. The TMCT allows all persons, including BLV populations,access to a tool that can quantify spatial ability. To increase the TMCT’s utility, the originalformat of the 25-question TMCT was split into two subtests (A & B), each containing 12questions. In 2021, the TMCT’s reliability in measuring spatial constructs of rotation, cuttingplane, and proportion in BLV populations was found to be good [1]. However, to increase theprecision of the results found in our pilot analysis, the research team desired a larger sample size.This paper presents a continued
live and video recorded). This paper describes a new classroom observationprotocol intended to monitor the focus (e.g., solo, pair, team, or whole class) and action (e.g.,discuss, speak/present, watch/listen, or distracted) of both students and teachers (instructors).The paper summarizes relevant background on evidence-based learning, student engagement,and classroom observation protocols, describes the development and structure of FASTOP,presents results from different pedagogies (e.g., lecture, laboratory, POGIL), and describeslessons learned and future directions. Results show distinctive patterns of student and teacherbehaviors for different pedagogies.1. IntroductionThe ICAP model describes the benefits of interactive (I), constructive (C
doctoral research focused on 1) how engineering stu- dents develop empathy during community-based learning (e.g., service-learning) and 2) how engineering educators can integrate empathy into their teaching. Before studying in the U.S., Linjue (Jade) earned her B.E. in Building Environment and Energy Engineering from the School of Architecture at Tsinghua University in China. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Lessons Learned: Designing an empathy workshop for engineering faculty to promote equity-focused teachingAbstract:This paper shares lessons learned from designing and reflecting on an empathy workshop for engineeringfaculty. The workshop
at colleges and universities worldwide. When paired with a hands-on laboratoryexperience, the foundational concepts of materials science can be made tangible to students. In alecture-only course, however, the relevance of course content to real-world application is oftenlost, and student understanding can suffer. This is because simple coverage of material by aninstructor is not sufficient for student learning [1]. Research has shown that students are moremotivated to learn when knowledge of course content can be connected to the solution to apractical problem [2]. To this end, it has been suggested that project-based learning (PBL) is aviable tool to support life-long learning and student understanding [3].Prince and Felder [2] define PBL
opportunity for students to berewarded for learning and teaching their peers. This study lays the foundation for a long-termlongitudinal study to understand further the impact of peer mentorship and socio-technicalprojects from freshman to senior years. The paper will present the benefits and challengesassociated with engaging seniors and first-year students while solving an authentic designchallenge through surveys and focus groups. These results will help develop the framework tobuild vertical integration within the curriculum for effectively teaching engineering design.IntroductionBackground Peer mentorship is a learning model that allows students to learn from one another in acollaborative and supportive environment [1]. The model involves
motorized mechanical system that controls a modular cameratraveling along a previously buried clear tube to take images of the suspected plants' root systemsfor further analysis. The device integrates mechanical motion control, digital imaging, and imageanalysis components into a portable handheld device for on-site rapid detection of PNs. The teamfollowed the product design processes to build the prototype, including concept design,specifications development, alternative designs, analysis, prototype construction, experimentaltests, and optimization to finalize product. The design and development of the proposed deviceinvolve three major components requiring multi-disciplinary collaboration: 1. Mechanical Design and Prototype Development: design
in STEM. My research area is in PreK-12 and diversity. Have an engineering background in my Master’s and Undergraduate. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Parents Becoming Informal Engineering Educators: Workshop for Parents (Resource Exchange) AbstractParents play very important roles in their children’s education, including engineering learningexperience [1][2]. From at-home activities to making decisions about where they send their kidsto school, and how they spend their time together, they have impact on their children’s learning.A more important role of parents was highlighted since the
, theClassroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate Students (COPUS) assesses active learningin Industrial Engineering courses, and quantitative and qualitative data on the significantcomponents of student achievement were gathered. Results obtained show that using ECP hasimproved students' awareness of material properties and increased their interest in learning aboutthe thermodynamics concept of heat transfer in connection to various solid materials.1. IntroductionAll STEM fields frequently use electronic devices to undertake scientific measurements; henceExperiment-Centric Pedagogy (ECP) is a successful STEM teaching method. Depending on thelearning environment and different teaching methods (instructor demonstration, cooperative andindependent
, applications, andmore. 1. A process interfaced with sensors and possible actuators. 2. A microcontroller connected to a network. 3. A ‘cloud platform’ to remotely receive and process the data. 4. Software at the microcontroller and cloud levels. 5. Additional elements might include Web or App interfaces for users (and much more.)The Hardware PlatformThere are many excellent choices for embedded systems in lower-level engineering courses.Over the years the author has made good use of Arduinos [8] and custom hardware [6][7]. Overtime the cost for these platforms has dropped consistently to the point now when they arebasically disposable components.In this recent application, the Raspberry Pi (RP) Pico W [1] was used. Some of the features
better able to visualize the behavior and construction ofstructures (based on literature review of concrete [1], steel [2], and timber design [3] coursespreviously conducted by one of the authors). However, discussion of these types ofdemonstration tools are largely absent from publications on timber education at the universitylevel. Therefore, the authors specifically focus on these methods to clarify challenging conceptsin the course.Literature ReviewThe effort to find existing small-scale physical models and interactive 3-D digital tools on timberdesign topics was not as fruitful as the authors had hoped. This may result from the fact that if auniversity offers a course on this material, it is often at the graduate level where perhaps
, computer, andmechanical engineering courses between 2016-2021 in engineering (N>1400) at a large publicresearch institution. The resulting dataset was randomly split into training (60%), validation(20%), and test set (20%). A popular NLP topic modeling approach (Latent DirichletAllocation—LDA) was applied to the training dataset, which determined the optimal number oftopics of code represented in the dataset to be four. These four topics were labeled as: (1)examples, where students expressed a need for TAs to illustrate additional problem-solving andapplied content in engineering courses; (2) questions and answers, where students desired moreopportunities to pose questions to TAs and obtain timely answers to those questions; (3) officehours
offered and theirimpact on students' participation in the practice questions and overall impact on students'performances in an introductory programming course. The programming course comprises 15modules, each covering one programming construct. In this paper, we will answer the researchquestions 1) How does extra credit influence students' participation in programming andproblem-solving practice questions? 2) How does participation in practice questions impactstudents' performance during exams in a programming course?We used a quasi-experimental research design to evaluate how extra credit influences students'participation and performance. Using the data from two semesters, each comprising 49 students,we introduced the same practice questions for
necessarily implementedduring the pandemic have impacted students’ perceived ability to complete capstone project taskswithout face-to-face interactions with teammates, further diminishing the value they place in in-person classroom attendance in capstone chemical engineering courses.2. Methods and Data2.1. Research QuestionsThe goal of this research is to understand the perceptions of senior undergraduate chemicalengineering students on factors influencing their classroom attendance and engagement with thecourse. The approach of this study is guided by the following research questions: 1. What factors do students feel contributed to themselves or others deciding not to attend classes in person in the Fall 2022 semester? 2. How do students
design courses are typically project-based, where students work inteams to address a “customer-provided” problem and develop real working solutions. This typeof project-based learning requires that students synthesize knowledge and apply skills to anopen-ended design problem. The open-ended nature of “customer-provided” problems thatstudents encounter in capstone design courses contrasts with the structured and constrained“instructor-provided” problems seen in their earlier coursework [1], [2]. Solving complex,unstructured problems is an essential skill for a working engineer, but it requires a differentskillset than that which is needed to solve the standard textbook problems typically seen inclassrooms [2]–[6]. Solutions to textbook problems
identify whether the chosen career path is “the rightchoice.” For students, the internship has its purpose, employers have found the internshipexperience to be a place where they can test and review future employees who may wish to jointheir companies. Many employers will put the student in multiple situations to test the studentwithin their company to identify if the student would be “the right fit” for their company culture[9]. This requires the employer to expose the student to many different people and job scenariosthat occur within the construction company [1].Literature ReviewHistorically the idea of an internship stemmed from the trades people of Europe in the 11th and12th centuries where the master craftsman and tradesman would take young
deadlines while reducing stress for students by allowing them tosubmit past the deadline for all assignments.Some key questions we address through our research are: 1) For which course assignments dostudents benefit from having a flexible deadline policy? 2) Is enforcing a “hard” deadline forweekly learning content necessary for students to perform well on larger assignments such asprojects and assessments? 3) Do flexible deadlines reduce stress and improve the courseexperience for both students and instructional staff?We use data from the Fall 2022 academic semester to inform future implementation of a flexibledeadline policy in large first-year courses. For Fall 2022, we piloted a flexible deadline structuresuch that if students submit past the
choices and analysis design The Rationale 1. Connected – Governing science concepts and Students should understand that engineering is fundamentally mathematical equations inform the design phase. design under constraints, the most basic of which are physical laws. [1], [2] 2. Relevant – The activity is connected to a real- Student engagement increases when they can see a connection world need or addresses a significant issue. between what they are learning and a problem affecting them or
this will support identifying EM, metacognition, and/or the achievement of athreshold skill. As part of this broader goal, we will create web-based digital tools to assessstudent writing and statistical regression models that would automatically classify thepresence of an Entrepreneurial mindset in student writing.IntroductionMetadiscourse markers (MDM) are words or phrases that signal the structure ororganization of the text to help forge a relationship with the reader and “offer aframework [1, 2] for understanding communication as a social engagement.” They signalthe writer’s views through hedges (almost, believed/believed to be, doubt, generally . . . ),attitude markers (surprisingly, interestingly, disappointing . . . ), emphatics
(Ray, 2019) and is situated throughthe conceptual lens of institutional betrayal (Smith & Freyd, 2014). The theory of racializedorganizations defines the following four major tenets explaining the manifestations of racism inorganizations: (1) racialized organizations enhance or diminish the agency of racial groups; (2)racialized organizations legitimate the unequal distribution of resources; (3) whiteness is acredential; and (4) the decoupling of formal rules from organizational practice is often racialized(Ray, 2019). Our work emphasizes the need to understand how organizations institutionalize racialinequities as a starting point for re-envisioning change efforts, structures, and models. For thiswork, we focus on institutions as
and machinery that was mentioned repeatedly when researching themechanisms and machinery for making an automated project. "Design of a Smart Ping Pong Robot"was the title of the model project [1]. There are numerous methods to improve the design of a pingpong robot. One of the best methods to build a ping pong robot is to use readily available materialsthat can be quickly replicated and scaled up.A PVC pipe is the most essential mechanism for keeping a steady stream of ping pong balls. ThePVC piping can handle a variety of sizes. A ping pong ball is typically 40 millimeters (mm) in size[2]. The PVC that would suit the average ping pong ball size is 1.5" PVC piping with an insidediameter of 41.27 mm [3]. This permits any mistakes that occur
community continues to work to broaden participation inengineering, we need to recognize the critical role parents play in children's education and careerdecisions [1]; [2]; [3]. Parental influence starts at birth, and children's interest in STEMdevelopment can begin before elementary school. It is heavily influenced by parents and theenvironment surrounding the child [4], mainly since children spend most of their waking hoursin out-of-school settings [5]. Additionally, exposure to engineering through toys at a young agecan impact children's interest in STEM [6]; [7]. While studies of school-based engineeringlearning are also critical, parents typically have a much more advanced understanding of theirchildren than teachers [4]. Parents can help
. The parts of the medicine cooler system must cool the air insidethe cooler and slow heat transfer into the cooler. Using their knowledge of thermal energytransfer, students brainstorm, plan, and create unique solutions to the problem (Anonymous,2023a). The unit connects to physical science standards related to thermal energy transfer as wellas the engineering design standards (see Table 1).Table 1: Engineering Medicine Coolers Unit Connections to NGSS (YES, 2023a) NGSS Performance Expectation In this unit, students... MS-PS1-6 Undertake a design project to investigate how dissolving different construct, test, and modify a device amounts of potassium chloride in water that either
were polled once again. Peer instructionallowed students to get real time feedback on topics that needed more coverage and allowed theinstructor insight into students comprehension.Data collection took place in a junior level computer science software design course over fivesemesters. The course ran for two hours, twice a week. Student perception of the use of Plickerswas measured with a questionnaire that was administered at the end of each semester. In total therewere eight sections across five semesters as shown in table 1. In total there were 163 responsesto the questionnaire for a response rate of 60.59%.There were 269 total students of which 163responded to the questionnaire for a response rate of 60.59%.The data collected indicate that
students the difference in thepercentage of graduate students earning C and F grades was determined.The results indicate that each of the different approaches taken to implement a retake policy inthe two different courses positively impacted student success, measured in terms of an increasein letter grade. There was also a reduction in the number of students earning unsatisfactorygrades. The results are discussed in terms of the additional workload needed by the instructors toimplement the retake policy.IntroductionSome believe that there is no place for retakes in college curriculum, as illustrated by thecommentary by Snare [1], who grouped retakes, dropping the lowest score, and curving scores asapproaches that can be used by professors to
verification.Introduction / Review of LiteratureThe Engineering Technology program at Illinois State University has offered a stand-aloneGD&T course since the fall of 2016. Faculty and industrial advisory board members had beendiscussing adding the course in prior years with the goal of providing students more experiencein dimensioning and tolerancing and precision measurement methods. The course covers GD&Tcontent based on the current ASME Standards for Dimensioning & Tolerancing [1], which issupported by workbook content and exercises [2], measuring activities (calipers and coordinatemeasuring machines), and modeling and drawing activities. Grades are based on laboratoryactivities (30%), weekly online quizzes (20%), two tests (30%), and an exam (20
) are alluseful for supporting a remote learning environment. KarmaCollab was developed at theUniversity of California, Davis (UC Davis) as an experimental platform to test new ways ofutilizing technology to streamline social learning and advance the remote experience for studentsand staff in STEM courses.Literature ReviewResearch is plentiful on the topic of integrating technology into the classroom. Pilgrim et al.discussed that using technology such as smartphone or web apps, provides educators the ability toengage students, foster higher-level thinking and develop problem-solving skills that align withtoday’s technological society [1]. Brindley et al. furthers this discussion with work on creatingcollaborative learning groups in an online
least the 1960s [1]. This work continues with the advent ofE-Learning systems [2]. There are numerous platforms for grading and student assessment list in[3]. This paper uses these concepts in grading of lab assignments for electric machinery.Literature SearchA search of the ASEE PEER Document Repository system for “Automated Grading MotorLabs” yielded 434 results. None of these appeared to directly relate to electric machinerylaboratory assignments. For example in [4], the author discusses grading an embedded systemsand microcontrollers lab, but not electromechanical devices; whereas in the authors’ focus in [5]is on flipped classrooms.Creating the Forms in Adobe AcrobatIn Adobe Acrobat Pro there is a feature that allows you to create forms