opportunities? Modified Measure of Engineering Identity Student's Survey (MEI) survey scientific Modified Sense of Belonging Scale (SoBS) 3. Did students find the identity, survey program to stimulate their sense of Modified General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) scientific identity, sense of belonging, Measuring Undergraduate Students' belonging, and self-efficacy? and self- Engineering Self-Efficacy Survey (MUSES) efficacy Modified Student
the course. This approach is rooted in the work on early intervention strategies.The idea is to focus on at-risk students. In this context, we do not consider the oral assessmentprimarily as being part of a summative assessment strategy. Instead, it is designed to be a touchpoint for a meaningful one-on-one interaction between a student and a member of theinstructional team. The value of early interventions for at-risk students is to increaseconnectedness to instructional staff and resources, and student engagement and self-efficacy. Theoral assessments were implemented explicitly with this focus. We also considered additionalbenefits, such as serving as formative assessments for the students to reflect on their level ofconceptual mastery and
. Dr. Hsu received his PhD in Educational Psychology from Texas A&M University and has a background of statistics education. He works closely with researchers in STEM to pursue high quality of STEM education for future researchers. He is currently participating in an NSF-funded grant (#1923452) to spearhead research into middle school students’ digital literacies and assessment. Recently, Dr. Hsu has received a seed grant at UML to investigate how undergradu- ate engineering students’ digital inequalities and self-directed learning characteristics (e.g., self-efficacy) affect their learning outcomes in a virtual laboratory environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dr. Hsu’s research interests include advanced
StudentsAbstractThis Complete Research Paper presents changes in data from a combined wellness, self-efficacy,and mindset survey for new students in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences(CEAS) at Western Michigan University (WMU) during their first semester. Correlationsbetween individual survey factors and student retention and success are explored. The generalstructure of a first-year experience course focused on various dimensions of wellness is alsodescribed.Two electronic surveys (start-of-semester and end-of-semester) were created in Qualtrics basedon the Perceived Wellness Survey (PWS), the Interpersonal, Community, Occupational,Physical, Psychological, and Economic (ICOPPE) wellness scale, mindset, and self-efficacy. Thecombined surveys were
. Suggestions for future enhancements ofthese automated assessments will be provided.I. IntroductionPractice and feedback are critical to student learning, and it is further enhanced when practice isaccumulated with timely feedback [1]. Assessment and evaluation are tools to measure orobserve knowledge gain from practice and feedback. With assessments instructors identify datato collect representing knowledge or skills, selects the instruments for measuring, andadministers the instrument [2]. Evaluation is then the practice of analyzing assessment data anddrawing conclusions from the results [2].Multiple studies have shown how low stakes formative assessments can lower test anxiety, aswell as improve student learning outcomes and self-efficacy
SWE member who zealously engages in community service work. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Full Paper: Impact of Inclusion of Makerspace and Project Types on Student Comfort with Additive Manufacturing and Three-Dimensional Modeling in First-Year Engineering ProgramAbstractThe following evidence-based practice study investigates the impact of utilizing a makerspace onthe exposure to additive manufacturing and three-dimensional modeling practices for first-yearstudents. This document builds upon recent literature which illustrated statistically significantgains in a plethora of self-efficacy and sense of belonging metrics over an academic year inwhich a makerspace was
their engineering workplace. DEIconcepts can be incorporated in first-year engineering curriculum to enhance student design andexposure to diverse cultures during this unique design for additive manufacturing (DfAM)teaching module. This paper describes the development of a DfAM workshop that incorporateshistorical and cultural themes. Students’ perception of the design experience will be measuredusing an engineering self-efficacy validated tool, pre- and post-workshop survey, and measureddesign outcomes (CAD model) after engaging in a DfAM workshop. The workshop uses activitiesguided by the Kern Engineering Entrepreneurial Network (KEEN) framework which includescuriosity, connections, and creating value. The workshop introduces the
," Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, vol. 9, pp. 339-363, 2022.[28] T. Sitzmann, K. Ely, K. G. Brown, and K. N. Bauer, "Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure?," Academy of Management Learning & Education, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 169-191, 2010.[29] E. M. Kissling and M. E. O'Donnell, "Increasing language awareness and self-efficacy of FL students using self-assessment and the ACTFL proficiency guidelines," Language Awareness, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 283-302, 2015.[30] A. Knight, "Using self-assessment to build self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation in athletes: a mixed methods explanatory design on female adolescent volleyball players
interaction, network density, network bridging, and networkreach at the school, district, state, and national/international community level, using 18statements. This instrument uses social network analysis (SNA) with visual network scales(VNS) to visualize and quantify characteristics of the CoP and then relates this to the constructsof self-efficacy and identity [24]. Preliminary results measured before and after the PD areshown below from our initial group of TRAILS 2.0 teachers (COP) Network Survey (n = 7). • Overall CoP Network size increased at the 95% confidence level (p < 0.05). • CoP Network size at the national/international level increased at the 95% confidence level (p < 0.05) • CoP Network sizes at the school
and mentors.Evaluating Impacts of Trained Participants on the Bioengineering CommunityWhile we hypothesize that our course empowers participants to accomplish the learning goalsand develop greater self-efficacy as educators while taking the class, we aim to further evaluatethe longer-term impacts of our course participants within the bioengineering departmentcommunity by measuring their effectiveness as TAs. We will design our data collection alongthree key dimensions: (1) Sampling a greater proportion of graduate students in Bioengineeringincluding non-course participants as a control, (2) Evaluating content mastery of pedagogicalknowledge covered in the course via written and/or oral assessment, and (3) implementinglongitudinal surveys to
]. Eudaimonic well-being refers to self-realization, choosing to engage inchallenging activities and continuously seeking opportunities for personal growth [5]. Thesethree forms of well-being have been shown to correlate highly with one another [8] and clusteronto a higher order latent construct. Based on the literature, this study considers the full extent ofwellbeing by creating a composite measure that consists of constructs such as satisfaction withlife, positive affect, and self-efficacy-resilience.PISA evaluation considers wellbeing as a multidimensional construct consisting of subjective aswell as material components that should reflect students’ lifestyle and quality of life [9]. Thisstudy specifically focuses on three main elements in PISA
, regardless of their engineering concentration and lay theinitial work for future performance enhancements for the students, educators, and policymakersin the STEM areas.IntroductionBangladesh's engineering and technology sectors are expanding as the country's economydevelops. Despite the country's relatively low level of economic growth, its engineering studentshave achieved remarkable academic performance, becoming some of the world's most qualifiedengineers. Researchers have demonstrated that self-efficacy, or the positive attitudes individualshold about their skills to accomplish activities, influences how they operate in a particulardomain, such as mental health and others [1, 2]. Increasingly, research findings indicate thatpsychological and
(3) Provide support to BD Fellows beyond BD funding in preparation for graduation andcareer. Our theoretical framework, further described above, values (1) self-efficacy, (2)science/research identity, and (3) social cognitive career theory model to recruit, enroll, andgraduate 12 LSAMP Fellows with STEM doctoral degrees. Our goals, then, are to (1) evaluateour intervention’s success on the three stated objectives and (2) measure the stated constructswithin the theoretical framework to test our theory of change.Approach to assessment.Evaluation of the BD Program will utilize both internal and external expertise. Thiscollaboratively managed evaluation will have a mixed-methods approach emphasizing the designof several survey instruments
-based assessments, presentations, and reflections. Thesesections were distilled using a combination of classroom experience and research. Eachof these elements is powerful on its own but added together they create opportunitiesfor students to build self-efficacy, belonging, and inclusion. These qualities then lead toclassrooms that can foster students who can find resilience and joy in diversity andcreate equitable spaces. The framework I developed is visualized in Figure 1 below. Iwill describe each of these elements and the research that went into them.Before the Framework: While doing research around actionable science DEIB strategies, I encounteredand studied social-emotional learning (SEL). While the tenants of following theframework
undergraduate research experiences impacts theirengineering identity and self-efficacy developments [4-7]. In addition, enhanced self-efficacypositively impacts engineering identity [4-6]. Other research explores the impact of a sense ofbelonging and community building on student development [8-11]. This paper examines theimpact of building a community of practice conceptual framework on both engineering identityand self-efficacy development of engineering students who participated in 10-week summerresearch experiences focusing on the engineering grand challenges as identified by NAE.Through building a community of practice, students experience a sense of belonging which webelieve adds to the engineering identity and self-efficacy
embarked on the design, implementation, and testing of amobile application (app) that offers an alternative venue for FBD practice. The app providesstudents with asynchronous opportunities for training, varied tasks that target specific FBDissues, and several levels of immediate feedback. We hypothesize that the gamifiedenvironment and puzzle-based gameplay will improve student skill and self-efficacy in drawingFBDs, particularly for women, who may feel less confident in their spatial skills. Data collected todescribe student experiences may also provide additional insight into how to improve FBDinstruction generally.In this paper, we detail the process for designing and implementing the app and provide initialdata regarding student impressions
Well-being to produce effective outcomes. For example, according toRyff and Singer, there are six dimensions of Well-being [11]. The first dimension is self-acceptance, which predominantly targets increasing self-efficacy and creating a strongersense of self among teachers. Faculty development programs have been shown to increaseteachers’ self-efficacy [12], which in turn improves student learning, motivation andcontentment [13], and improve teaching practices [14] as an outcome. The second dimensionis the positive relationship with others, which articulates the need for social support amongteachers to exhibit Well-being [15]. Various research has shown that learning as a groupduring faculty development programs has a significant impact on the
on nine semesters of Fab Friday programming, a total of 107 Fab Friday participantscompleted the Fab Friday Student Satisfaction Survey designed to provide recommendations forprogrammatic improvement. We measured three major areas: skill building, learning computerscience, and teamwork. In addition, we administered the Glynn et al. (2011) Science MotivationQuestionnaire (SMQ) [9]. The SMQ provides scores on 5 domains: Career motivation (anextrinsic motivation for learning CS to secure a good career), Grade motivation (an extrinsicmotivation for learning CS in order to achieve good grades), Self-determination (an individual’sbeliefs in their personal control over learning CS), Self-efficacy (an individual’s confidence intheir ability to learn
accreditation cycle. Baltimore, MD: ABET. 11. Coelho, G.L.D.H., Hanel, P.H.P, & Wolf, L.J. (2018). The Very Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition: Developing a Six-Item Version. Assessment, online first, 1-16. 12. Cropley, D. H. (2015). Creativity in Engineering: Novel solutions to complex problems, San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 13. Cropley, D. H. and Cropley, A. J. (2016). Promoting creativity through assessment: A formative CAA tool for teachers, Educational Technology Magazine, 56:6, pp. 17-24 14. Karwowski, Maciej & Lebuda, Izabela & Wisniewska, Ewa. (2018). Measuring Creative Self-efficacy and Creative Personal Identity. The Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving. 28. 45-57. 15
Model to increased student motivation and self-efficacy, none has attempted to fullyquantify the impact of the associated restructuring of the curriculum. As a result, the currentpaper describes a detailed analysis of the Wright State Model using the Curricular Analyticsplatform (https://curricularanalytics.org/), which provides new and significant insight into therelative roles of curricular complexity and centrality on the success of the Wright State Model.In particular, results suggest that while the Wright State Model has had only a negligible impacton the overall complexity of the engineering curriculum, it has measurably reduced thecomplexity and dramatically reduced the centrality of the required calculus sequence. Moreover,the relative
a lack of preparedness of elementary teachers to confidentlyteach science and engineering. Smith [8] reported 77% of elementary teachers felt well preparedto teach reading/language arts compared to 31% for science and only 3% for engineering.Coppola [9] found engaging teacher candidates (TCs) in engineering mini-units withschool-based field experience significantly improved engineering pedagogical contentknowledge and dispositional self-efficacy. Web and LoFaro [10] found that TCs’ self-efficacy forteaching engineering was increased by including experiences in various courses rather thanshort-term exposure in a single methods course.Overview of the ChangeMaker K-12 ModelChangeMaker K-12 learning path is divided into a series of four
pursuit of STEM careers. Example, “I can see myself in a STEM career.” 5. Intent to persist - Student intention to persist is highly indicative of actual persistence. Intent to persist can be examined in a temporal manner, looking at short-term, degree attainment, and long-term commitment [31]. Example, “I intend to attend graduate school in STEM.” 6. Self Awareness - Self Awareness represents the extent to which one can identify and articulate personal values and professional values, accurately assess strengths and limitations, and view challenges with a growth mindset. Self- awareness plays a critical role in how students learn and develop as STEM professionals [32]. 7. Self-Efficacy - Perceived self
through P3). Also, students who reported better interactions withteammates (B.5) had a stronger sense of self-efficacy in engineering classes in a statisticallysignificant way. Except for interactions with teammates, all behavior metrics were positively andsignificantly linked to the EI dimension that measured how much they were perceived as a goodengineer by their professors and peers. Similarly, when a student was perceived as a goodengineer by their peers, he or she tended to do a better job keeping the team on track (B.2), at asignificance level of 0.001. Results were detailed in Appendix Table A.4.Teamwork behaviors were linked to team conflicts in modest ways. Students who ratedthemselves lower on interactions with teammates tended to
identity development in middle school students experiencing engineering curricula[4], scaffolding knowledge at this level is an important aspect of continuing to build students’interest in studying engineering [5]. Such experiences help to improve student self-efficacy andattitudes toward STEM and facilitate students’ understanding of engineering during a crucialperiod of integrated scientific inquiry and engagement. The Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics Innovation and Design (STEM-ID) Curricula developed at the Georgia TechCenter for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC) integratefoundational mathematics and science in an engineering context through challenges thatintroduce students to advanced
dataset. This dataset incorporated condition-base scaling to account for the six operational modes within the data (Figure 3), as each mode could have its own nominal sensor values and failure points. Studentswere instructed to write a report showing their models’ performance: Figure 4 shows onestudent’s visualization of their RNN model, measuring the predicted RUL value to the test data’sRUL value for five engine units. The model’s performance accounted for 30% of their grade,compared to a baseline linear regression model with no data processing. Figure 4. Final Project RNN Model Performance (From Student’s Final Project)Results of pre and post course surveysA self-efficacy survey was selected as the primary
. Scholarship recipients will be linked throughcohort teaming sessions with campus resources, local industry partners and experts, and facultymentors, to propose, critique, select, develop, and implement commercially viable technologyproducts. The novel approach to engineering education developed through this project will serveto enrich the creative potential of new graduates in technical fields and expand small businesscreation and employment, both of importance to growth regions where there may be fewer largecorporate employers. Key dimensions of those who exhibit entrepreneurial thinking include agrowth mindset, a regular practice of creativity, and high personal self‐efficacy. Withentrepreneurism seen as an enabling force to overcome employment and
greater sense of belonging to discipline, self-efficacy, and career readiness; particularly for under-represented minority (URM) students [3].However, such active-learning experiences are usually offered late in their engineering degree(e.g., senior-capstone projects) rather than early and often throughout the curriculum. Mostredesign efforts to address this issue typically focus on single, or multiple but disjointed gatewaycourses [4]. An example of a critical path in the Electrical and Electronic Engineering (EEE)department at Sacramento State is shown in Figure 1.Figure-1: Example curriculum path in the EEE major, showing long engineering pre-requisite chains called critical-paths. Courses shown in Bold, shaded, are redesigned as a part of the
engineering education with a focus on emerging technology systems in thecontext of applications and societal impact. We do this through a program of faculty-mentoredmultidisciplinary research, professional development, and exposure to real-world issues thatreflect the impact of nanotechnology on society, the business community, human health, and theenvironment. This approach also supports self-efficacy, multidisciplinary team-building,understanding the broader impacts of technology, and building the skills necessary for researchand lifelong learning.Overall, the key goals are:1. To provide an exciting and productive research experience for each fellow.2. To create a small cohort of students, who share common goals, that supports the developmentof
phase, we now conduct weekly reviews of rules notebooksto understand patterns of misunderstanding, using these and other observations to responsively developlater class activities. In the conceptualization and investigation phases, during which we offer students previously gener-ated code examples, learning activities now include guided questions pointing students to explore specificconcepts (e.g., syntax, data structures, error messages) as well as to report on their understanding of thoseconcepts in open ended responses. Our future work will continue to study the results of applying this pedagogical strategy. We willcollect more data, including surveying students to measure self-efficacy and other indicators of studentaffect and collect
financial difficulty. Prior research has acknowledged that HC socializes students to conform to thestatus quo [21]. Within this largely middle-class, straight, White, able-bodied, and malediscipline, the status quo perpetuates gendered values (HC), such as masculinity,objectivity, and autonomy through messages embedded in institutional and instructionalways [32].HC in engineering Individuals process and respond to HC by recognizing it (awareness), processingit (emotions), deciding what they can do about it (self-efficacy), and acting (self-advocacy) [2], [4]–[7], [9], [11], [12]. Previous research characterized individuals’responses to HC into three categories: 1) minimal/no action, 2) negotiating self, and 3)changing the environment