Many students pursue undergraduate and graduate degree programs to enhance their jobprospects [1]. For many, this is the primary driver influencing their decision to continue theirstudies after high school [1]. In the United States, higher education is increasingly expensive [2].To justify the expense, many students likely increasingly want assurance that their professionalsuccess will be enriched, financially and in other ways. Despite professional success being a primary driver of students attending highereducation, engineering courses often still focus on theory [3]–[5]. Students complete homeworkand maybe in-class problems. There is likely an assumption (often implicit, in my experience)that these problems are relevant to the
; Vigeant et al.]. These courses value curiosity as one of thecomponents of an entrepreneurial mindset, but the primary emphasis is not on increasingcuriosity are it relates to engineering. The KEEN-affiliated programs typically teach in thecontext of working on real-world design projects, which is resources intensive and often limitedto 1 or 2 such course in an undergraduate engineering curriculum.In this paper, the authors aim to develop methods for teaching curiosity in more traditional labsetting, where all students can work on the same prescribed assignments. These curiositybuilding activities are implemented before student tackle their 15 week real-world capstonedesign project. Accordingly, the ultimate objectives of the KEEN affiliated
employed a design-based research approach (DBR)with one baseline and two full enactment cycles. In each cycle, students are surveyed, and focusgroups are interviewed before and after implementation.In this paper, we will present the details of data collection, analysis, and findings from the resultsfrom all three semesters. The challenges and gains of adopting the approach and how to transferto other programs will be further discussed.IntroductionThe chemical engineering field has expanded, resulting in an increased gap between academiaand industry [1-3]. This gap was acknowledged by John Chen at the 2013 American Institute ofChemical Engineering (AIChE) Annual meeting, who highlighted that the areas of growth inengineering research and faculty
WorldInternational research collaborations provide important opportunities to support innovativeresearch and address the significant global challenges facing the world today. One way todevelop researchers who are both interculturally competent and able to navigate global researchnetworks within their field is to provide international research experiences for students. Priorwork has indicated that such experiences lead to a wide range of learning outcomes includingintercultural competence, research skills, personal development, and, importantly, a newperspective on their career goals and trajectory [1]–[6]. However, in the midst of the COVID-19pandemic, international collaborations and programs for students faced challenges in continuingtheir typical
, and ethically. “Whilethere is broad agreement as to the need to better prepare engineers for global practice, there ismuch less agreement as to what skills and abilities define global competence, what combinationand duration of international education and experiences best instill it and what means andmetrics should be used to judge whether students have attained it” (p. 129) [1].The goal of the present project is to integrate innovative technology into the petroleumengineering classroom using a global digital platform and automated assessments using machine-learning methods, in order to increase intercultural competencies in students. Currentdevelopment of the web platform, titled Petroleum Engineer, is through a required sophomore-level
corporations, this evolution redefines bothindustrial business model innovation and reforms the manufacturing sector by using big data todrive the manufacturing process and associated decisions. One of the most promising approaches,Model-Based Enterprise (MBE), has shown its potential to drive smart manufacturing (or Industry4.0) by linking all sources of digital data through the product lifecycle 1 . The global net valueof the MBE market has grown from $7.89 billion in 2017 2 to $9.94 billion in 2019 3 , andthe forecast for the future market performance is set at about $44 billion by 2027. Beyondupgrading manufacturing equipment, companies have sought to develop a digital model-basednetwork for higher production efficiency and a profitable return on
an opportunity for research that can guideimplementation of ungrading and thus enable other scholarship.With the above context in mind, this evidence-based practice paper asks: 1) how do educatorsimplement ungrading in engineering courses? 2) what do educators vary in order to adaptungrading to their unique educational contexts? 3) how can we characterize the pedagogicaldesign space of radical or non-traditional grading schemes? We ask these questions as we do inorder to situate our work as a research through design effort, specifically the approach advocatedby Gaver (2012) in which a set of design solutions are interrogated to determine their invariancesas well as the dimensions of variation. In framing our effort as research through design
Informatics programs at various public and private universities with more than 15 years of administra- tive experience as a chair/program director and 25 years of teaching, research, service, and industrial experiences. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Relationship between mindset and grit on undergraduate engineering student retentionIntroductionThe Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reports that employment in STEM occupations has grown79% since 1990, from 9.7 million to 17.3 million in 2018. Forty-five percent of STEMemployment is from information technology (IT) and 19% is related to engineering [1]. Theworkforce in IT and engineering is predominantly male
-funded project studies whether providing students with training and practicewriting questions about their confusions in an undergraduate engineering statics course supportsimproved course performance and metacognitive awareness. Data collection for the projectincludes assessing multiple measures of students’ metacognition, including metacognitivemonitoring during statics exams. In this current study, we focus exclusively on the monitoringdata collected thus far.Metacognitive monitoring is the process of observing one’s understanding and approach whilecompleting a learning task [1]. One way to assess students’ metacognitive monitoring is tomeasure students’ ability to accurately either predict or postdict their score on an assessment oftheir
theinclusion of this type of content into their construction courses or programs.IntroductionPrevious research argued that engineering students have a 'culture of disengagement' aboutsocietal issues [1]. Furthermore, recent work on engineering and technology students'perceptions of using new technology suggests an over-focus on technical aspects within thoseprograms, to the detriment of social implications [2].Considering the societal impact of the built environment on the population, this lag seemsunjustified and concerning. Furthermore, history has several examples that indicate the effect ofpoorly functioning construction and infrastructure on the deployment of unsatisfactory servicelevels, high operation and maintenance costs, and unjustified
assignments facilitate students being able to learnremotely. Applications and lab projects can be controlled using IoT capabilities. As processorshave improved more affordable microprocessor or computer alternatives such as Arduino,Raspberry Pi and other similar platforms have become more commonly utilized in educationalsettings. In this project, IoT concepts, educational materials and methods are introduced tostudents through various avenues such as Independent Study courses, Capstone Senior Designcourses and Sensors courses.BackgroundFigure 1 shows a simple representation of an IoT system that utilizes a Raspberry Pi. TheRaspberry Pi could be replaced by an Arduino, Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), or aProgrammable Logic Controller (PLC). In
also explains the career placement, student retention, and community collegetransfer rates.Project ActivitiesThis NSF-funded project was initially planned for three years but was extended to four years dueto the COVID situation. The project includes five major activities as listed in Table 1. In thesubsequent sections, these activities and the project evaluation plan will be explained in detail. Table 1. Project activities. Activity Description (i) Design, develop, and offer the new course and laboratory (renewable energy) (ii) Summer K-12 workshops through the CPCP at NJIT (iii) Faculty development workshops for the instructors of other 2- and 4
play a vital role in educating and awarding advanced credentials toAmerica’s future scientists and technicians. The research supported by this National ScienceFoundation (NSF) Faculty Early Career Development Program (CAREER) award emphasizesthe importance of and expands understanding of the role that two-year colleges play in theengineering education and career pipeline. Yet, racial and location inequity in vertical transferhighlights a lack of access to life-changing educational opportunities [1, 2]. This researchfocuses on identifying unique geographic and cultural assets to make pre-transfer engineeringstudents, from a variety of backgrounds, locations, and opportunities, more successful. Thisresearch is intended to support increasing the
Performance Evaluation of an Ongoing Integrated Program for Recruitment, Retention, and Graduation of High- Achieving, Low-income Engineering StudentsAbstractThe present paper reports an update on an NSF-funded S-STEM program currently in its lastyear at the University of Illinois Chicago. Lessons learned during the project implementation arealso listed in the paper. A summary of the paper materials will be presented at the ASEE 2023Annual Conference and Exposition as part of the NSF Grantees Poster Session.The project's objectives are 1) enhancing students' learning by providing access to extra and co-curricular experiences, 2) creating a positive student experience through mentorship, and 3)ensuring successful student placement in
renewable energy curriculum proposed for higher education institutions anduniversities in the country.IntroductionAbout 770 million people in the world do not have access to electricity [1]. Of this population 597 millionlive in sub-Saharan Africa [1]. The opportunity for providing off-grid access to electricity to ruralcommunities has been demonstrated through solar powered mini-grids [2,3]. These systems typicallycomprise a set of solar panels, batteries to provide electricity when solar power is not available, e.g. atnight, and may employ a fossil-fueled generator to also provide backup power. While mini-grids of thistype are starting to provide access to electricity in communities, there are many limitations that arecurrently limiting their
todecarbonize buildings increase to meet climate change goals, educational programs to supportsuch energy workforce development efforts are becoming more prominent at many levels,including in the K-12 school systems, and in higher education. A recent report [1] funded by theU.S. Department of Energy (DOE) provides state-level workforce projections for the energyefficiency sector for 2025 and 2030. Within higher education, one long standing program thathas focused on this since the 1970s is the Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) program including37 university-based IACs operating across the U.S., typically with 10-30 active students percenter at any given time [2]. The IACs have two main goals. First is conducting building energyaudits of small and
, conducting literature review, and evaluatingand communicating results of research. Follow-up activities are ongoing during the teacher’sacademic school year, including carrying out the lesson plans in their classroom, teacherstraveling to conferences related to their field, and introducing students to careers in simulation,visualization, and industrial research, as well as STEM in general through presentations and fieldtrips.IntroductionSTEM Education provides students with multidimensional capabilities that are necessary to meetcurrent and future workforce needs due to constant technological advances in nearly all industries[1-4]. Unfortunately, only a small portion of students are both proficient and interested in STEMfields [5]. Researchers
awareness, audience awareness,and collaborative teamwork and leadership, as specified in ABET criteria 2, 3, and 5,respectively. Effective EC pedagogy and industry partnerships can be an effective andmeasurable approach to supporting these criteria.IntroductionInternational approaches to developing Engineering Communication (EC) skills include carefulassays of industry needs, employer expectations, and a continuous cycle of building career-relevant course content [1]. Researchers studying STEM student employability in East Asiahighlight written and visual communication modes as key opportunities for curriculardevelopment. Not surprisingly, whether internationally or centered in a US context, multi-modalcommunication is identified by both students
$163B in 2008 to $230B in 2018 although itemployed only 7.09% of the total workforce [1]. Lack of manufacturing training, outdated schoolinfrastructure, wrong student perception on manufacturing, and new teacher skills must beaddressed to sustain if not enhance the manufacturing status of Texas. This RET programprovides necessary skills for teachers, helps to upgrade school infrastructure so that inspiredstudents would consider STEM /Manufacturing fields as their primary choice. Themanufacturing-focused training of a diverse group of 37 teachers was completed in summer2018, 2019, and 2022 (Fig. 1). Unavoidable program delay in 2020 and 2021 was due to theworldwide pandemic.This paper presents the program and approach to train both in-service
thought processes. They demonstrated several key strategies such as replacingexisting solutions to problems with new technology and adding to existing products to identifyapplications. By understanding specific strategies used in solution mapping, this study can leadto explicit instructional tools to support engineering students in developing solution mappingskills.IntroductionIn engineering, design is an important skill that involves devising a system, component orprocess to address needs [1]. A typical engineering design curriculum teaches design processesthat begin by defining a problem and identifying potential solutions to address that problem [2]–[4]. Engineering textbooks focus on initial problem definition that often utilizes
contributed to inefficiencies in the freight system. Theongoing driver shortage is a top critical issue according to annual industry reports [1]. Manycomplex factors such as lack of awareness of the trucking profession, misinformed publicperception of the truck driver profession, technological advances in freight and driver retirementare some of the leading causes of this driver shortage [2]. Recruitment and workforce retention inthe freight transportation industry, fed through career pathways in civil engineering, are criticalfor the industry to thrive [2].The truck driver shortage can be addressed in part through specialized and engaging workforceoutreach activities. Such outreach efforts are devoted to early mentoring and recruitment toattract a
to perform the calculations accurately.Finally, through the work the instructor has done focused on improving course equity outcomes inSTEM for underrepresented minorities, specifically Latinx students, it has become apparent thatinfrequent, high stakes assessments of student learning is not a culturally responsive practice. Inorder to place learning (and not evaluating) at the forefront of any assessment, it was necessary torethink student assessments in undergraduate courses.In response to the observations outlined, the instructor chose to implement a mastery basedassessment scheme for a senior level reinforced concrete design course.BackgroundMastery based grading approaches have seen growing use in engineering [1]-[5]. While the nameused
standards are designed to produce graduatesthat are ready for work in technical fields. Institutions seeking accreditation from theEngineering Accreditation Commission of ABET must satisfy all General Criteria forBaccalaureate level programs. For instance, evidence of the engineering design process needs tobe specifically demonstrated for graduating engineering students based on the revised ABETcriteria 3, which requests that programs show that students have the “ability to apply engineeringdesign to produce solutions that meet specified needs...” [1]The requirements for showing “engineering design” ability has been well defined by the currentABET student outcomes. Engineering design begins with empathy towards the end user bydeveloping
, ArtificialIntelligence, Modeling & Simulation, and Flight Testing. Students learned fundamental skills inengineering, computer science, and mathematics, and were trained to use computational toolsneeded to engage in multidisciplinary UAV research. Most of the participants who have alreadygraduated have joined aerospace companies or Government organization and are working inUAV technologies or related areas including Lockheed Martin Corporation and NorthropGrumman Corporation. Some of the Participants were also accepted for summer internshippositions at companies or corporations that are heavily involved in UAV research anddevelopment. Figure 1. Participants of 2022 Summer REU Program.Figures 2 and 3 show the multidisciplinary teams of
engineers with strong technical knowledge,who can think creatively and critically, communicate effectively, and work in teams. However,the very nature of engineering, as defined by different organizations, points to the coupling of theengineering profession with society. “Engineering is the profession in which a knowledge of themathematical and natural sciences, gained by study, experience and practice, is applied withjudgment to develop ways to utilize, economically, the materials and forces of nature for thebenefit of mankind” [1]. With full undergraduate curricula to meet these technical and earlyprofessional competencies, engineers progressing in their careers as executives, analysts,consultants, and advisers will need graduate education to
-step guide with visualaids to walk readers through the process of constructing a Faraday cage suitable for classroom use.We presented comparative signal attenuation testing results of our custom-built Faraday cage. Wediscussed the challenges faced in our construction and curricular integration efforts. We discussedthe suitability of our custom-built Faraday cage in teaching and research environments. I. Introduction:With more schools starting to offer cybersecurity degrees, it is important that these schools alignwith the National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Workforce Framework forCybersecurity (NICE Framework) [1]. One part of that framework is developing a deeperunderstanding of cellular and wireless technologies
/demodulation, interpolation, FFT, filtering, delays, gain control, etc.). Transceiveroutputs are graphed for ease-of-use, although the process of tuning such outputs is arduous, dueto the irreplicability of precise hardware tx/rx chains [1]. The system defined and discussed in thispaper aims to address this issue via an interactive user environment which enables end users totune results in real-time and with sufficient specificity.Software defined radio (SDR) architecturesSince the release of Universal Software Radio Peripheral (USRP) in 2003 [2], Software DefinedRadio (SDR) has gained significant traction for its versatility in the construction of high-qualitycommunication prototypes. The ability to manage signal processing through FPGAs and
thinking and reasoning. To be effective problem-solvers, students mustunderstand the relationship between the MKT, SRC and SRM throughout the problem-solving activities.Four research questions will guide the research: (1) How do students perceive their self-regulation ofcognition (SRC) and motivation (SRM) skills for generic problem-solving activities in EM courses; (2) Howdoes students’ metacognitive knowledge about problem-solving tasks (MKT) inform their Taskinterpretation?; (3) How do students’ SRC and SRM dynamically evolve?; and (4) How do students’ SRCand SRM reflect their perceptions of self-regulation of cognition and motivation for generic EM problem-solving activities?A sequential mixed-methods research design involving quantitative and
and ASEE has established a diversity recognition program to recognize Schoolsthat have incorporated these aspects into their mission, a piece of which is the curricula [1]. Inaddition, the revisions to ABET criterion 5 (curriculum) now include the need to address DEI [2].To accomplish part of the curricular component, we have been working on hands-on activities thatare scalable from a first-year program to upper level courses in the Fred DeMatteis School ofEngineering and Applied Science (SEAS) at Hofstra University, a midsized, private universitylocated in Hempstead, NY. Hofstra is situated in a region that represents a very diverse communityand the students in our engineering programs mirror this diversity. For example, SEAS boasts a63.7