Science Foundation grant (#9972758, 1999-2004), entitled Combining Faculty Teamwork, Applied Learning Theory, and Information Technology: A Catalyst for Systemic Engineering Education Reform. Courseware and pedagogical developments have been the focal points of his professional career.Timothy Raymond, Bucknell University Timothy M. Raymond is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Bucknell University since 2002. He received his B.S. from Bucknell University in 1997 and his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 2002. His teaching and research interests include atmospheric chemistry and physics, aerosol and particle studies, and improving engineering education. He
-engineering students. To meet the needs of community collegeengineering programs, the logistical and commercial feasibility of shipping boxes or palettes ofequipment was investigated. This will allow community colleges to borrow, rent, or lease ratherthan own the equipment. These laboratories are suitable for use in either introduction toengineering or technological literacy courses. The laboratories attempt to utilize insights fromnon-engineering students to determine themes that may enliven introduction to engineeringcourses. Beginning engineering students may have interests more closely aligned with their non-engineer peers than current engineering professionals. Technological literacy courses on anumber of campuses have found that non-engineers
AC 2009-1678: HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS ENGINEERING DESIGN LESSONPLANNING THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTCameron Denson, Utah State University Cameron Denson is a post doctoral research associate for the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education at Utah State University. He earned a Ph.D. in occupational studies from the University of Georgia. His research interests include diversity initiatives and increasing student self-efficacy in science and math through infusing engineering design into 9-12 technology education. Previously, he was a middle school technology educator in North Carolina, active in the community activism and grassroots initiatives.Nathan Mentzer, Utah State University
Internationalen Kontext" and Member of International Monitoring Committee in IGIP, Council Member of "International Council for Engineering and Technology Education" (INTERTECH), Member of Administrative Committee of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc (IEEE-EdSoc) in USA, Board Member of “Global Council on Manufacturing and Management" (GCMM) and Director of Brazilian Network of Engineering (RBE/SP). He was President of Brazilian Chapter of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc (IEEE-EdSoc), Secretary of Santos region of SBPC - Brazilian Association for the Advancement of Science, Adviser for International
technologyprogram for their future careers in modern manufacturing companies, a new curriculum inRobotics Application Engineering has been developed and applied in the semester of spring 2008.This paper describes the course and laboratory of Robotics Application Engineering for studentsof manufacturing technology program (ITMT) in the Department of Industrial and EngineeringTechnology (IET).There are four Robotics courses offered in the IET Department spanning from 100 level to 400level to teach concepts, operation, programming, maintenance, interfacing, and applicationdevelopments of industrial robots. Robotics Application Engineering is taught as a 400 levelcourse for senior undergraduate students in the ITMT program. This course teaches
: technology, investment, and publicpolicy. A secondary objective for offering the course was to stimulate interest in energy-relatedcareers, a field that today lacks adequate personnel with expertise and will have vastly increasedneeds for such talent in the future3, 7.Throughout the course, frequent references are made to the engineering elements involved in agiven conversion technology, as well as the engineering issues latent in existing and proposedenergy policies. It is stressed that the discipline of engineering is often viewed as the applicationof science and technology to the needs of society, which reinforces to the students thatengineering energy solutions go beyond technology to include such aspects as economics,finance, and policy
AC 2009-450: INTEGRATING CONCEPTS OF SUSTAINABLE AVIATION INUNDERGRADUATE AEROSPACE ENGINEERING COURSESRamesh Agarwal, Washington University Page 14.754.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Integrating Concepts of Sustainable Aviation in Undergraduate Aerospace Engineering CoursesAbstractThe titles “Sustainable Aviation” or “Green Aviation” are recently being used withincreasing frequency to address the technological and socioeconomic issues facing theaviation industry to meet the environmental challenges of twenty-first century. Air travelcontinues to experience the fastest growth among all modes of transportation. Thereforethe
participation in the program.The focus of the Florida Atlantic University NNRNE Consortium was chosen to be hull designand shipboard automation for future ‘mission effective’ Navy support ships that would becategorized as fast, responsive and automated. Principal thrust of the program has been educationand training of students who will make up the next generation of ocean engineers and foster thedevelopment of novel uninhibited ideas. Over the duration of the program, ship systems specificto development of the SeaBasing concept and associated technologies were considered. Theemphasized areas have been (1) seakeeping, (2) dynamic stability, (3) drag reduction andpropulsion, and (4) shipboard automation and control. The goal of the program is
AC 2009-2316: WHY AREN’T THERE MORE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIESIN ENGINEERING?Ali Mehrabian, University of Central FloridaWalter Buchanan, Texas A&M University Page 14.1373.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Why Aren’t There More Students with Disabilities in Engineering?IntroductionStudents with physical disabilities are underrepresented in STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics). According to the NSF (National Science Foundation)1,“a higher percentage of students with disabilities than of those without disabilities dropout of high school. Among students who were eighth graders in 1988, 10 percent of thosewith disabilities and 6 percent
AC 2009-185: INTEGRATION OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING GRADUATEEDUCATION AND CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTFrancis Lutz, Monmouth University Francis Lutz, Professor in the Department of Software Engineering at Monmouth University, earned a bachelor's degree in civil engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology, and MSCE and PhD degrees from New York University. Prior to serving as dean of the School of Science, Technology and Engineering at Monmouth University, he served as Dean of Undergradaute Studies and professor of civil engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute.James McDonald, Monmouth University James McDonald, Associate Professor of Software Engineering at Monmouth
which utilized commercialoff the shelf components where possible. The team size was kept at a minimum to allowfor focus and a free flow of ideas. Communal research and frequent idea meetings were ahallmark of the group organization, providing a holistic systems design on the part ofeach engineer. Specialization was a gradual process resulting in member dedication tofields that interested them. The educational construction of the senior capstone coursebrought the students a greater understanding of the unique challenges posed by a rocketsystem and the relative lack of coursework dedicated to these challenges. Group memberswere allowed a large amount of independence in their efforts, which proved both ablessing and challenge. Space technology
sequence of two courses during the following academic year. The Silicon Valley programincludes living in the homes of entrepreneurs and interviews with financers, founders andCEO’s. During the academic year, students participate in a course taught jointly by the Collegesof Business and Engineering and work on interdisciplinary teams to prepare both prototypes andbusiness plans for their own entrepreneurial ideas. At end of the year each team competes in theWSU Business Plan Competition. The other parts of the program are an annual entrepreneurshipworkshop for graduate students and an elective course entitled, “Technology Ventures.”IntroductionIn December of 2003 with funding from Mr. Harold Frank, a 1948 Electrical Engineeringalumnus and founder
, and theyquestioned whether the reviewers check references 80.Bibliography1. M. Molenda, “On the origins of the ‘Retention Chart’,” Educational Technology, vol. 44, no. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2004, p. 64.2. D.G. Treichler, “Are you missing the boat in training aids?,” Film and Audio-Visual Communications, vol. 1, Feb. 1967, pp. 14-16, 29-30, 48.3. J.E. Stice, “Using Kolb’s learning cycle to improve student learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 77, no. 5, Feb. 1987, pp. 291-296.4. J.E. Stice, “Socony-Vacuum retention study,” email communication to Robert Befus, May 12, 2007.5. E. Dale, Audiovisual Methods in Teaching, 3rd ed., NY: Dryden Press, 1969.6. R.V. Krivickas, “Active learning at Kaunas University of
Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Introduction of Sustainability to Civil/ Construction Engineering StudentsAbstract:Recently, numerous civil engineering articles involve the concept of going green and sustainabledevelopment. Various papers related to sustainable development have been written but few relateto how civil engineering students can apply these innovations in their academic curriculum andassist them in discovering green technologies and their applications during a professional career.This paper is an effort to highlight the importance of knowledge regarding sustainability in theacademic curriculum. Education now-a-days is not just about knowing conventionaltechnologies, but also to
AC 2009-1182: COMPARISON OF INTERNATIONAL LEARNING OUTCOMESAND DEVELOPMENT OF ENGINEERING CURRICULAAshraf Alkhairy, Alfaisal University Ashraf Alkhairy, PhD is the Founding Dean of Engineering at Alfaisal University. He received the Bachelor's, Master's and PhD degrees in electrical engineering and computer science from MIT, where he worked as a research scientist. He has served on the faculty of King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, and was a visiting scientist at the Research Laboratory of Electronics at MIT and the Schlumberger Carbonate Research Center.Leland Blank, Texas A&M University Leland Blank, PhD, PE is currently Visiting Professor at Texas A&M University at
they can build to meet the challenges associated with theirindividual career paths and to adapt to the rapidly changing technologies. To that end, thecreation of cohesive course sequences as an opportunity to implement the reform was identified.Three cohesive course sequences, so called “track”, have been offered to the students. The Designand Manufacturing track provides seven closely-integrated courses to help students learn how toapply engineering fundamentals to practical design and manufacturing problems. The trackcourses include: Engineering Materials, Numerical Analysis, Manufacturing Processes, MachineDesign, Computer-Aided-Engineering, Advanced Manufacturing Engineering, andManufacturing Systems. The track courses will not only cover
PBLPedagogy with Modern Manufacturing Case Studies” (0737089). This project involves thedevelopment of real-world learning modules to illustrate to engineering students educationalconcepts such as: • safety (alarm management, emergency shutdown systems, and flare management), • control (cascade, ratio, feedforward, override controls, and model predictive control), • data acquisition (knowledge generation, information technology, data mining) • application of modeling to manufacturing improvements (real-time optimization, computer aided modeling and simulation, and data reconciliation)Our goal is to improve the problem solving ability of engineering graduates while familiarizingthem with the Information Technology (IT) tools found in a
design tools, technical writing, intellectual property,and ethics. Figure 1: Organization of the Engineering by Design course.Grades are determined by assessing student performance in both the project section and commonlecture, with the majority based on the project. In the project section, grades are based onattendance, peer evaluation, writing assignments, and presentations. In the common lecture,grades are based on attendance and quizzes.Further details of the course, its history, and how it supports the curriculum have been previouslypublished2.Digital HealthDigital health is the monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic and acute health conditionsthrough the use of medical devices, remote sensing technologies, local
University of Tennessee was initiated in fall 2001with a focus to provide students in Engineering with skills and knowledge of businessfocused towards new product development. National Science Foundation (NSF) providedfunding for the program from 2005 to 2008 which helped enhance the program and led todevelopment of several prototype products and commercialization of one the productsSafelightTM. The program has graduated more than 25 joint MS/MBA students so far withthe number growing every year. The graduates have a double set of skills:enterpreneurship and business skills along with the advanced engineering skills needed tobecome leaders in innovative science and technology. The faculty associated with theprogram, who had limited previous
Noted author andproduct designer Robert G. Cooper sums up the dilemma well, stating that “most companies lackmuch in the way of effective product innovation and technology strategy, and worse yet, seem ata loss for developing such a strategy.”14 Obviously, universities are, at least in part, as much responsible for this problem as theyare for the solution. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology recognizes thisshortcoming in engineering programs, and has clearly outlined the technical and non-technicalskills necessary for success in an increasingly complex and interdisciplinary workplaceenvironment.15 Teaching cognitive processing skills, communication and team working skills,ethics, global awareness, and environmental
and the Global EngineerIt is nearly universally acknowledged that the world is becoming increasinglyinterconnected, interdependent and integrated, and that technology is accelerating at anescalating pace. The interdependence of financial systems and world economies turned a“made-in-America” banking problem into a global economic crisis of historicproportions. Ease of travel allowed avian flu to spread from an isolated remote village inChina to cities around the world, and created a health crisis that brought Toronto to a nearstandstill. Global warming, global political unrest, global epidemics, global poverty –the challenges that future generations of engineers will be asked to address are global innature. Charles Vest31 urged universities to
Nafalski, University of South Australia Andrew Nafalski's career spans several decades in academic and research institutions in Poland, Austria, the UK, Germany, France, Japan and Australia. He holds BEng(Hons), GradDipEd, MEng, PhD and DSc degrees. He is Chartered Professional Engineer and Fellow of the Institution of Engineers, Australia, Fellow of the Institution of Engineering and Technology (UK), Senior Member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (USA) and Honorary Member of the Golden Key International Honour Society. He is currently a Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of South Australia in Adelaide and Professor of Information Technology and
must approach educating and training students. As our engineers prepare for the 21stcentury global market economy, they will face significant international competitors who arebuilding on the technologies the U.S. pioneered in the 20th century. Although the UnitedStates has led the world in advances in technology, competitors are harvesting thetechnological and economic advantages. Simulation-Based Engineering Science (SBES) is amajor area with current and future potential. In order to stay on the cutting edge, we mustmeet the challenges presented by other countries, such as those in Western Europe and Asia,whose governments are investing heavily in modeling and simulation and computationalengineering and science, threatening U.S. leadership in
AC 2009-2193: TEACHING SOCIAL COMPLEXITY AND MULTIDISCIPLINARYTEAM BUILDING: AN EXPERIMENTAL ENGINEERING APPROACHCraig Laramee, State University of New York, BinghamtonShelley Dionne, State University of New York, BinghamtonHiroki Sayama, State University of New York, BinghamtonDavid Wilson, State University of New York, Binghamton Page 14.1151.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Teaching Social Complexity and Multidisciplinary Team Building: An Experimental Engineering ApproachAbstractNumerous organizations, including the National Science Foundation (NSF), the AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology (ABET), and the National Academy of
Page 14.57.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Middle School Project for Science and Math Enhancement through EngineeringAbstractThis study is focused on the impact of curricular and extra curricular engineering-basedinstructional activities on middle students’ perceptions of their ability to become engineers.Middle school students are at an age where high interest activities are essential for motivationand relevant learning. This is also the age where students’ interest can be piqued to considercareers in STEM fields. This study also looks at math content knowledge, attitudes toward mathand science, and perceptions of technology, engineering, and what defines engineering.In 2007, the
AC 2009-206: DEVELOPING AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE ENGINEERINGDESIGN SELF-EFFICACYAdam Carberry, Tufts University Adam Carberry is a doctoral student in the Math, Science, Technology, and Engineering Education program at Tufts University. He serves as a research assistant and director of the Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program (STOMP) at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education & Outreach. His dissertation research involves the development of assessment instruments for investigating the impact of service-learning on engineering students.Matthew Ohland, Purdue University Matthew W. Ohland is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University
-based work already existed within the course, so it merely had to be adapted to meet CxCrequirements.In 2006, the CxC Faculty Institute hosted 33 faculty participants, with engineering facultycomprising the majority. The focus of the 2006 Summer Institute was on assessment strategiesin the four communications modes: oral, written, visual, and technological. Not only didparticipants explore assessment strategies and rubric design, they also learned ways to integrateiterative assessment effectively throughout the course of a project and a semester.Engineering Communication Studio. During the fall of 2005, the first of several plannedCommunication Studios opened on campus. These studios are intended to be integrated intovarious university colleges
the freshmen and pre-collegestudents at Hampton University and discusses the next steps in our plan to improve preparationand engagement in our engineering students. Our goal is to improve retention and learning. Andthis effort integrates educational research and the classroom experience.IntroductionThe nation’s current and projected need for more Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math(STEM) workers, coupled with the chronically lagging participation of students from ethnicallygrowing segments of the population, argue for policies and programs that will increase thepathways into engineering. Enhancing the curriculum is recognized to be an important way toimprove overall diversity in engineering. Retooling curricula to prepare students for
AC 2009-2150: APPLYING AXIOMATIC DESIGN AND KNOWLEDGE-BASEDENGINEERING TO PLASTIC DRUM DESIGNJaby Mohammed, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at Indiana Purdue University at Fort Wayne, IN. He received his PhD in Industrial engineering from University of Louisville in 2006. His research interest includes advanced manufacturing; design methodologies, computer aided design, six sigma, and enterprise resource planning. He is a member of IIE, ASEE,ASQ, SME, POMS, ITEA, NAIT, KAS, and Informs.Jared May, Morehead State University JARED MAY is currently a junior at Morehead State University. He is pursuing his Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology
. Results of this important metricwere compared to students’ course grades, engineering efficacy and outcomes-based academicprogram success. Results of this research indicate that engineering students who were mostglobally prepared were also most efficacious and received higher grades in courses. Additionally,diversity in preparedness among the subscales of the index was noted, suggesting that studentswith diverse demographic profiles have diverse preparedness indices.Keywords: Global, global preparedness, engineering education, preparation for globalworkforcesIntroduction We live in an era with unprecedented changes due to dramatic advances in technology onmany fronts. The explosive growth in computing and communication has revolutionized