beenmultiple measure assessments (pre-post). Some were designed to assess understanding of basicengineering and technology content (such as “What is Engineering?”), while others have focusedon measuring STEM learning resulting from student interaction with specific EiE units. Page 15.199.2Theoretical FrameworkThe main goal of the EiE curriculum is to help children to learn engineering and technology—not merely facts from and about these fields of study, but practices, habits of mind, and ways oflooking at the world through disciplinary lenses. At the dawn of the twentieth century, JohnDewey 1 advocated that progressive education should provide
AC 2010-1080: GROWING PAINS: CHINESE ENGINEERING EDUCATIONDURING THE LATE QING DYNASTYJunqiu Wang, Purdue UniversityNathan McNeill, Purdue UniversitySensen Li, Purdue University, West Lafayette Page 15.635.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Growing pains: Chinese engineering education in the late Qing DynastyAbstractWith the continued advancement of engineering as a global field of activity, it becomes criticalto understand engineering education from a more global perspective. Specifically, Chineseengineering education has been experiencing radical transformation and development over thepast twenty years, especially in
development of achat-bot built on student’s questions and understandings and perceptions of course contentprovides the instructor with a unique look onto the minds of students. With the oversight anddirection of the instructor and with the aid of students a true content specific engineeringartificial intelligence may be created. Through this process we may better understand thecomplex learning process of our students. Page 15.181.12Bibliography1. S. Crown, "Using Web-Based Games to Enhance the Teaching of Engineering Graphics" Proceedings of theIASTED International Conference, Computers and Advanced Technology in Education. Philadelphia, PA. May1999
wide-ranginginterests outside of formal education. But taken together were they liberally educated? 19What is clear is that the provision of additional subjects whether “tool” or “fringe” is noguarantee of liberal education unless instruction and content are designed with the goalsof liberal education in mind. If those goals are taken from such authorities as Arnold,Newman and Pattison then that means that there is a “cultivation of the intellect”, and afocus on the person rather than engineering. The value to engineering follows: it is not aliberal education if it does not create the space for reflective thought through which aperson can construct and reconstruct their identity. Inherent in Williams’s view thatengineering has lost its
ethical project context responsibility g. communicate effectively documentation, competitions, video conferencing h. understand interactions of project context engineering & society i. ability for life-long learning entrepreneurial habits of mind j. knowledge of contemporary issues project context k. use techniques, skills & tools of product design, production system modern engineering design, prototype fabrication & evaluation Figure 4: Matching
AC 2010-1524: LEARNING OUTCOMES ACHIEVEMENT IN COOPERATIVEEDUCATION: A SURVEY OF ENGINEERING STUDENTSJennifer Johrendt, University of Windsor Dr. Johrendt obtained her doctorate in Mechanical Engineering in 2005 from the University of Windsor after working for almost ten years as a Product Development Engineer in the automotive industry. Currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering at the University of Windsor, she previously worked for two years as an Experiential Learning Specialist in the department. She serves as both the Faculty and Departmental Cooperative Education representative. She has co-authored several journal paper publications and conference
client.Ultimately, students will realize at the end of this course that to be an engineering designer onecan not purely be an engineer; they require a creative mindset, the ability to work in a team, theability to think analytically and remain open-minded, an understanding of experiment design andrisk mitigation, and experience with costing. Engineering design is a multidisciplinary process.The identified process is a result of this instructor’s ongoing industrial involvement and wealthof experience in both engineering and business as a design engineer as well as a financialengineer. It is his experience in these areas that has resulted in a Faculty position involving acombination of the two. He also believes in the importance of design and economics
AC 2010-53: TOWARDS DEVELOPING AN ONTOLOGY FOR K-12ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONM. David Burghardt, Hofstra UniversityMichael Hacker, Hofstra University Co-director, Center for Technological LiteracyMarc Devries, University of Technology, DelftAmmeret Rossouw, University of Technology, Delft Page 15.1270.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Toward Developing an Ontology for K-12 Engineering Technology EducationAbstractHofstra University’s Center for Technological Literacy and the University of Technology, Delft,conducted an international research study in the summer of 2009 to identify the most
AC 2010-1634: CONFLICT BEHAVIOR AND ITS INFLUENCE ONENGINEERING DESIGN TEAMSXaver Neumeyer, Northwestern UniversityAnn McKenna, Northwestern University Ann F. McKenna is the Director of Education Improvement in the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University. She also holds a joint appointment as a Professor in the School of Education and Social Policy as well as a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and is the co-Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research (NCEER). She received her BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. in Science and Mathematics Education from the University of
laboratory for undergraduates. Journal ofEngineering Education, 97(2), 213-222.National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in thenew century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.National Academy of Engineering. (200). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineeringeducation to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National ResearchCouncil. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington DC:National Academy Press. Page 15.51.10National Research Council Board for Engineering Education. (1995). Engineering education:Designing an adaptive system. Washington DC
AC 2010-770: ASSESSING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ ABILITY TO USE THEMATHEMATICS THEY HAVE LEARNEDMaria Terrell, Cornell University Math Dept.Robert Terrell, Cornell UniversityLisa Schneider, Cornell University Page 15.201.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Assessing Engineering Students’ Ability to Use the Mathematics They Have LearnedAbstractA Mathematics Applications Inventory (MAI) is being developed by engineering andmathematics faculty at Cornell University to assess students’ ability to apply the mathematicsthey learn in freshman calculus to engineering-related problems. This paper reports on threeaspects of this work
processing, pharmaceuticals, andprosthetics. Its specialties such as bionics6 and bioprinting7 are gaining momentum thanks toinnovative neuro-prosthetics, bionic eye or ear development, and tissue and organ engineeringrespectively. On the other hand, another subset, biomaterials is searching for organic substitutesfor engineering materials. Biofuel8 development and bacteria-based energy generation9 areoccupying minds of the many. While DNA computing10 and bioinformatics11 are redefining theinformatics field, biometrics12 is growing deeper in our daily lives. Most importantly we arestarting experience a scientific revolution in our world through bionanotechnology13.For the U.S. to keep its competitiveness in the cutting edge technology arena, its
AC 2010-569: HIGH SCHOOL ENTERPRISE: AUTHENTIC ENGINEERINGEXPERIENCES IN SECONDARY EDUCATIONDouglas Oppliger, Michigan Technological UniversityJean Kampe, Michigan Technological UniversityValorie Troesch, Michigan Technological Univeristy Page 15.642.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 High School Enterprise: Authentic Engineering Experiences in Secondary EducationAbstractThe need for more, and better prepared, individuals entering STEM (science, technology,engineering, and math) education is well documented by several organizations.1 High SchoolEnterprise (HSE) is an extra- or in-curricular school activity in which students
, (2005), Measuring the mind: Conceptual issues in contemporary psychometrics. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.2 Devon, R., Engel, R., Turner, G. (1998), “The Effects of Spatial Visualization Skill Training on Gender and Retentionin Engineering,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 4: 371-380.3 Dollár, A., Steif, P. S. (2006), “Learning modules for statics,” International Journal of Engineering Education 22(2):381-392. Retrieved from http://www.ijee.dit.ie/ OnlinePapers/Interactive/Statics/Learning-Modules-for-Statics-Dollar-Steif.html4 Huang, M., Gramoll, K. (2004). “Online interactive multimedia for engineering thermodynamics,” Proceedings ofAmerican Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
the type of students entering our College of Engineering and Science; particularly, students appeared to have less self-reliance and low exposure to working with their hands. 3. The National Academy’s reports; “The Engineer of 20209” was of particular interest. 4. A desire to incorporate more hands-on activity while simultaneously increasing the rigor 5. Student retention data that indicated our previous curriculum was not properly preparing our freshman for their future engineering courses 6. Evidence that indicates robotics curricula tend to attract students10With these and other factors in our mind we began piloting various modifications to our existingIntegrated Engineering Curriculum. Our current Living
AC 2010-1300: DEVELOPMENT OF A WOMEN IN ENGINEERING PROGRAM:FROM RESEARCH TO IMPLEMENTATIONJudith Cordes, Michigan State University Judy Cordes has been working with women in engineering for over twenty years. Currently she is the Coordinator of the Women in Engineering Program at Michigan State University. She oversees recruitment and retention efforts for women engineering students and serves as the advisor for The Collegiate Section of the Society of Women Engineers. Judy also serves as an academic advisor for freshman engineering students.Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University Dr. Thomas F. Wolff is Associate Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Studies at Michigan State University
Science, 198920 Norris, S. & Phillips, L., What is at stake in knowing the content and capabilities of children’s minds? Journal of Theory and Research in Education, 2(3), 283-308, 2004.21 Dewey, J., Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan, 1944.22 Otto, K. N. and Wood, K. L., Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering, Systematic Design,and New Product Development, Prentice-Hall, NY, 2001. Page 15.366.2323 Hanson, J. and Sinclair, K., Social constructivist teaching methods in Australian universities- reported uptake and perceived learning effects: A
AC 2010-408: INTEGRATING COMPUTER PROGRAMMING TECHNOLOGIESINTO THE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMJorge Valenzuela, Auburn University Jorge Valenzuela received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in the year 2000. He is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. His recent research involves stochastic models for the evaluation of production costs and optimization of electric power generation. He teaches courses on Operations Research and Information Technology.Jeffrey Smith, Auburn University Jeffrey S. Smith is Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. Prior to
Technology Education. Accessed Jan 2008. 10. Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education. Accessed Jan 2008. 11. Doumont, JL. “Trees, Maps and Theorems: Effective Communication for Rational Minds”. Brussels, Belgium: Principiæ, 2009.12. Personal communication, Blakeslee, October 2009.13. Mullinix, B. "A Rubric for Rubrics: Reconstructing and Exploring Theoretical Frameworks". in Professional and Organizational Development (POD) Network Conference. 2007. Pittsburgh, PA.14. Mullinix, B. "Rubrics". 2009, Accessed Jul 2009. 15. Meuller, J. "Authentic Assessment Toolbox". 2009, Accessed Jan 2009. 16. Bargainnier, S., "Fundamentals of Rubrics, in Faculty Guidebook - A Comprehensive Tool for Improving
AC 2010-1221: AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE INNOVATIONCAPABILITIES OF ENGINEERING STUDENTSNicole Genco, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Nicole is a graduate student in Mechanical Engineering at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.Katja Holtta-Otto, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Katja is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth.Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin Page 15.151.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of
AC 2010-136: AN AUTOMATED BOTTLE FILLING AND CAPPING PROJECTFOR FRESHMAN ENGINEERING STUDENTSKala Meah, York College of Pennsylvania Kala Meah received his B.Sc. from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology in 1998, M.Sc. from South Dakota State University in 2003, and Ph.D. from the University of Wyoming in 2007, all in Electrical Engineering. Between 1998 and 2000 he worked for several power industries in Bangladesh. Dr. Meah is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Department of Physical Science at York College of Pennsylvania. His research interest includes electrical power, HVDC transmission, renewable energy, power engineering education, and energy
AC 2010-780: INCREASING GIRLS' INTEREST IN ENGINEERING BY MAKINGIT FUNJeanne Christman, Rochester Institute of Technology Jeanne Christman is an Assistant Professor of Computer Engineering Technology at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her academic area of distinction is in Embedded Systems Design. Jeanne received a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Clarkson University and an M.S. in Computer Science from the University of Texas at Dallas. She worked in industry as an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) designer prior to joining the faculty at RIT.Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth Dell is an Assistant Professor of Manufacturing &
Undergraduate Science Education, Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, National Research Council, 1999.16 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. L., (1999), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.17 Norbert J. Delatte, Paul A. Bosela, Rosemary Sutton, Joshua Bagaka’s, Implementing Forensics and Failures inthe Civil Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Forensic Engineering –From Failure to Understanding, London, UK, December 2, 2008.18 Frumkin, J. (2005). The wiki and the digital library. OCLC Systems & Services
). Advancing engineering education in the P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 369–87.4. Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson, London, U.K.5. Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th ed.). New York: Worth.6. Hatano, G. & Inagaki, K. (1992). Desituating cognition through the construction of conceptual knowledge. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds). Context and Cognition. Ways of knowing and learning. (pp. 115-133). New York: Harvester.7. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking Transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.8. Broudy, H.S. (1977). Types of knowledge and purpose of
AC 2010-1972: METHODS FOR EXPLORING ENGINEERING DESIGNTHINKING IN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT TEAMSCameron Denson, Utah State UniversityMatt Lammi, Utah State UniversityKyungsuk Park, Utah State UniversityElizabeth Dansie, Purdue University Page 15.869.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Methods for Exploring Engineering Design Thinking in High School Student Teams A better understanding of engineering and its relationship to society is critical for allAmericans even though few will pursue engineering as a career 1. At the heart of engineering isdesign and therefore developing an understanding of the engineering design process
AC 2010-1079: FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AHIGH-SCHOOL TEACHER.Rod Paton, University of Auckland Rod Paton holds BSc and MSc degrees in physics from the University of Auckland, New Zealand. He has been teaching high-school science and physics since the start of 1994. For the past 12 years he has been Head of Physics at Westlake Boys’ High School, Auckland, New Zealand. Rod has integrated ICT into the school’s physics programs and developed problem-solving books and practical manuals to enhance the skills and abilities of all students. His main research interests are centred on implementing steps to improve the problem-solving and academic-writing abilities of high-school
jobs and the workthey performed. One new engineer at Small Computer Company cited a number of reasons forhis enjoying his job. One reason was the company’s positive work environment. According tothis new engineer, the company had a very relaxed atmosphere and it was very easy to makeacquaintances within the company due to the large number of young people there. Alsocontributing to the positive work environment was the variety of hands-on work that his joballowed him to do. Page 15.1150.15 Q: Was there something that kind of stuck in your mind, impressed you the most? A: I guess what impressed me the most is the variety that I knew I was going
AC 2010-447: MIDDLE-SCHOOL TEACHERS’ USE AND DEVELOPMENT OFENGINEERING SUBJECT MATTER KNOWLEDGEMorgan Hynes, Tufts UniversityDavid Crismond, The City College of New YorkBarbara Brizuela, Tufts University Page 15.873.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Middle-School Teachers’ Use And Development Of Engineering Subject Matter Knowledge: Analysis of Three CasesAbstractThis paper reports on a portion of a study of three middle school teachers (twomathematics teachers and one science teacher) as they taught a unit of engineeringinstruction. The study investigated the subject matter and pedagogical contentknowledge these teachers used and developed as they taught
WOMEN ENGINEERING FACULTY ( “Navigating Your Journey on the Academic Sea”; NSF ADVANCE Conference, Over 60 URM Women Engineering Faculty @ Caltech Photo credit: B. Paz)AbstractAs they progress in their engineering faculty careers, Underrepresented Minority Women (URM)women are very familiar with unique issues at the intersection of race and gender (DeCuir-Gunby, Long-Mitchell, & Grant, 2009; Ranson, 2005; Ronen & Ronen, 2008). This familiarityresults from their own personal experiences in the Academy and provides a broad set ofresponses ranging from leaving the professoriate to a single-minded pursuit of success no matterwhat obstacles are presented (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of
was not TV. This was real. I felt grateful for when and where I was born. I have only known freedom, never known hunger, and always slept in a clean bed. But that was too often overshadowed by the realization of my remaining obligation to others less fortunate, especially the children of this world. Moreover, these years at Bell further solidified in my mind the importance of gaining an international perspective for the field of engineering. . . . It was then I experienced a real awareness that the science and engineering workforce needed to be regarded as more than a national resource. I now emphatically feel that global issues can only be solved by using global intellectual resources, and that the interdependency of