AC 2010-2357: INCORPORATING SOCIAL AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OFNANOTECHNOLOGY IN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY (STS)COURSESAhmed Khan, DeVry University Dr. Ahmed S. Khan is a senior Professor in the EET dept., College of Engineering & Information Sciences, at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. He received his M.Sc (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management., and his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, Outcomes Assessment, Application of Telecommunications Technologies in Distance Education, and Social
: Implicationsfor engineering education. In J.R. Bourne, A. Brodersen, & M. Dawant (Eds), The influence oftechnology on engineering education (pp. 36-65). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Dessouky, M.M., Bailey, D.E., Verma, S., Adiga, S., Bekey, G.A., & Kazlauska, E. J. (1998). Avirtual factory teaching system in support of manufacturing education. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 87(4), 459-467.Ditcher, A.K. (2001). Effective teaching and learning in higher education, with particularreference to the undergraduate professional education of professional engineers. InternationalJournal of Engineering Education, 87, 459-467.Doolen, T.L., Porter, J.D., & Hoag, J. (2003). The relationship between PDA usage and studentperformance in an introductory
mPSS project with other European universities, andat the moment of writing this work, our group has completed and tested two very different mPSScourses: ≠ “Introduction to ITIL® concepts and terminology”. The objective of the course is to be a tool for reviewing the main concepts and terminology of the third version of ITIL6 (Information Technology Infrastructure Library). It is based on the knowledge the students must have acquired after the normal process of learning in the ____’s postgraduate course of title “Curso de Experto Profesional en Gestión de Servicios TI basados en ITIL® e ISO 20000”, of 6 months of duration. This course has, as an optional objective, to prepare the students for an
Academic Year Course Term Enrollment Alternative Fuels Group Enterprise Fall 2009 27 Alternative Fuels Group Enterprise Spring 2010 25 Fuel Cell Fundamentals Fall 2009 41 Fuel Cell Technology Fall 2009 23 Fundamentals of Hydrogen as an Energy Carrier Fall 2009 27 Hydrogen Measurements Laboratory Spring 2010 12 Table 2. Course Enrollments During Prior Academic Years Course s Alternative Fuels Group Fuel Cell Fundamentals Fuel Cell Technology t
] J. L. Gibson and C. Chase, "Longitudinal Impact of an Inquiry-based Science Program onMiddle School Students' Attitudes Toward Science," Science Education, 86, 693-705, 2002.[5] X. Ma and J. W. Wilkins, "The Development of Science Achievement in Middle andHigh Schools: Individual Differences and School Effects," Evaluation Rev., 26, 395-417, 2002.[6] Project Lead The Way Web Development Team, "Project Lead The Way," 2004.Electronically accessed at: http://www.pltw.org.[7] K. Matthew and W. S., "Engineering in the Classroom," Science Scope, 30, 49-51, 2006.[8] M. A. Mooney and T. A. Laubach, "Adventure Engineering: A Design Centered, InquiryBased Approach to Middle Grade Science and Mathematic Education," J EngineeringEducation
Processing Industries. Williams holds an M. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology from Purdue University and is certified as a Vibration Analyst Category III from the Vibration Institute.Joseph Kmec, Purdue University Joseph F. Kmec is currently Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. His teaching areas of concentration are energy-based and include Applied Thermodynamics, Internal Combustion Engines, Motorsports, and Power Plant Systems. His recent activities involving student projects include engine simulation, power plant performance analysis, and nuclear technology. He may be reached at: kmecjf@purdue.edu
will employqualitative data collection techniques to provide a richer understanding of the kind of teachingrequired of capstone faculty and the ways in which various teaching methods impact studentlearning and development.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0846605. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. Page 15.1217.12Bibliography1. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. 2005
the workplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 90 (4), 685–692.4. Keane, Anne, & Gibson, Ivan. S. (1997). Development and Assessment of a Combined Communications/Design Course in Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 232, 3, pp. 309-320.5. Keane, Anne & Gibson, Ivan, S. (1999). Communication Trends in Engineering Firms: Implications for Undergraduate Engineering courses. Pp. 115-1216. Williams, Julia “Transformations in Technical Communication Pedagogy: Engineering, Writing and the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000”. Technical Communication Quarterly. Spring 2001, 107. Newell, James A, Marchese, Anthony J. , Ramachandran, Ravi P
. “Improvement of Graduate Students’ Performance in Design, Discovery, and Learning”. 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, Austin TX 3. Brooks, R. (a.k.a James Matthews) and Jahanian, S. “A Pedagogical Strategy for Gradual Enhancement of Creative Performance of the Students”. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1999. 4. Davalos, J.F., Moran, C.J., and Kodkani, S.S., “Neoclassical Active Learning Approach for Structural Analysis” 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburg, PA 5. Bonwell, C.C. and Eison, J.A., “Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom,” The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, Washington, D.C., 1991. 6. Roberts, S.C., Hollar, K.A., and
skill set will be a key asset for thebiomedical engineering community, setting us apart from our engineering colleagues and making Page 15.1335.13our students employment exceedingly desirable by the medical device community.Bibliography1. Thurston, P., "Academic Council Graduation and Job Placement Rates Survey," American Institute forMedical and Biological Engineering, November 2009.2. Bureau of Labor Statistics, "Engineers", U.S. Department of Labor, www.bls.gov/oco/ocos027.htm(accessed 1/7/2010).3. Howe, S., Lasser, R., Su, K., Pedicini, S., "Content in capstone design courses: Pilot survey results fromfaculty, students, and industry
, teams are formed, with the number of students in each team being decided by thetechnical advisor(s), the course coordinator, and any sponsor(s) in function of the expectationsfor the project. Most of the teams have three students, and students’ preferences have shifted inthe past years from having more interest on internal projects (i.e., no industry involvement) tohaving projects where an industry sponsor is involved. Among the many benefits andresponsibilities that industry sponsored projects provide, one specific benefit is the opportunityto emphasize to the students that engineering design is more than just doing the calculations thatwere typically done in the classroom.Faculty members need to search and request projects from their network
Page 15.753.6department at MSU were represented in the course. While some of the students were highly encouraged by their advisor(s) to enroll in the course, others received minimal input regardingtheir participation. Overall, the student population diversity in this class was immenselybeneficial. The different experience levels and perspectives allowed for lively discussion and awide range of issues and potential solutions. By sharing their experiences with one another, thestudents learned from each other’s mistakes and triumphs not only as related to graduate schoolbut also to their personal life. Essentially, the students within the class served as mentors toeach other; students that were further along in the graduate program were able to
Technology) program atIndiana Purdue Fort Wayne (IPFW) has been in progress for many years. Manufacturing courseshave been offered as part of the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) and IndustrialEngineering Technology (IET) degrees at IPFW since the 1970’s. During the period of late1970’s to the early 1990’s the department of Manufacturing Technology offered a Manufacturingoption as part of the MET program. Because of declining enrollments in the MET programduring the early 1990’s the Manufacturing option was discontinued. However as a part of theMET curriculum many of the manufacturing option courses have been continuously offeredsince that time. With the increased demand for manufacturing specific courses as requested bycurrent students, the
ensure the manuscript is consistent and within theboundaries of the journal’s scope and that the identity of the author(s) of the manuscript beconcealed from reviewers during the review process.Manuscript PreparationPreparation of manuscripts intended to be published in the EDGJ is guided by the latest edition Page 15.826.3of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association4. Even though thefollowing list may not necessarily be inclusive or applicable to all manuscripts that are submittedto all journals, authors ought be mindful of the following: evaluating content; design andreporting research; authorship; types of manuscripts
. Page 15.439.11 10Bibliography1. S. Krause, J. Decker, J. Niska, & T. Alford, (2002). A Materials Concept Inventory for introductory materials engineering courses, National Educators Workshop Update 2002, 17, 1-8.2. C. J. Boulter, & B. C. Buckley, (2000). Constructing a typology of models in science education, in Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (Eds.), Developing models in science education. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers.3. Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silverstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable? Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 64–66.4. D. Hestenes, M. Wells, & G. Swackhamer (1992). Force concept inventory
data. In this manner, five subjects were obtained by open coding on one hand, while twoconvergent subjects were observed by axial coding on the other hand. The outcomes of opencoding and axial coding are tabulated in Table 1. Table 1 Open coding and axial coding list Open coding Axial coding 1. Promoting the basic chemistry competence of 1.Basic chemistry students competence in occupation 2. Occupation domain domain 3. Basic Chemistry Competence in work place and performance of student 4. The viewpoint about attaining certificate(s) or 2.Curriculum of Chemistry certificate in vocational education system 5
. Chulalongkorn University Curriculum Quality Assurance (CU-CQA) Manual. Quality Assurance Section, Office of Academic Affairs, 2005.[4] Chamillard, A. T., Using student performance predictions in a computer science curriculum, Proceedings of the 11th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. Bologna, 26–28 June 2006.[5] Alphen, D. K. van and Katz, S. A study of predictive factors for success in electrical engineering, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Albuquerque, 24- 27 June 2001.[6] Zhang, G. Thorndyke, B., Ohland, M. W. and Anderson T. J., How science course performance influences student retention - A statistical
, knowledge- intensive jobs and the innovative enterprises that lead to discovery and new technology, our economy will suffer and our people will face a lower standard of living. Economic studies conducted even before the information-technology revolution have shown that as much as 85% of measured growth in US income per capita was due to technological change. (p. 1) Keeping pace with this pressing need, the white house has taken upon the Educateto Innovate (WhiteHouse Press release(s) (2009 & 2010) initiative): The AP (1/7) reports that on Wednesday, President Obama launched his $250 million "Educate to Innovate" campaign "to train math and science teachers and help meet his
, knowledge- intensive jobs and the innovative enterprises that lead to discovery and new technology, our economy will suffer and our people will face a lower standard of living. Economic studies conducted even before the information-technology revolution have shown that as much as 85% of measured growth in US income per capita was due to technological change. (p. 1) Keeping pace with this pressing need, the white house has taken upon the Educateto Innovate (WhiteHouse Press release(s) (2009 & 2010) initiative): The AP (1/7) reports that on Wednesday, President Obama launched his $250 million "Educate to Innovate" campaign "to train math and science teachers and help meet his
MEDIAN MODE AVG. TOTAL xx STUDENTS # A B C D E F G H I J K . . . . X Y Z RUBRIC COURTESY OF W. S. U. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WA. 99164. LIKERT SCALE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION (1: Strongly Disagree; 5: Strongly Agree)1 Visual 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 2 4 2 2
actually analyzing the ideas. The ideasgenerated can be analyzed based on the functions the problem requires it to fulfill. The evaluatorpredefines each function at different levels (e.g. high, medium and low) based on the type of theideas expected. The ideas falling in the corresponding level for each function receives a noveltyscore (e.g., High-10, Medium-5, Low-1). A novelty score for each idea can be calculated byassigning weights for each function and aggregating for an overall value. Novelty a posteriorican be calculated by counting the number of occurrences for the same idea for each function.The novelty score (S) for each function’s idea can be calculated using the formula: ܶ െܥ
. He's the PI on two NSF S-STEM grants providing academic and career guidance to students in CSEM fields. He's a Professor of Electrical Engineering within the Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering at ASU. Prior to joining ASU, he worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has authored over 190 technical papers and three engineering texts. He has given more than 60 invited presentations - including 13 plenaries. Since 1994, he has directed an extensive engineering mentoring-research program that has served over 300 students. He's an AT&T Bell Labs Fellow, Boeing A.D
-2010Accreditation Cycle. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. www.abet.org2. National Academy of Engineering. 2004. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century.National Academies Press.3. Davidson, C.I., H.S. Matthews, C.T. Hendrickson, M.W. Bridges, B.R. Allenby, J.C. Crittenden, Y. Chen, E.Williams, D.T. Allen, C.F. Murphy, and S. Austin. 2007. Adding sustainability to the engineer’s toolbox: achallenge for engineering educators. Environmental Science & Technology. July 15. 4847-4850.4. Allen, D., B. Allenby, M. Bridges, J. Crittenden, C. Davidson, C. Hendrickson, S. Matthews, C. Murphy, andD. Pijawka. 2008. Benchmarking Sustainable Engineering Educaiton: Final Report. US EPA Grant X3-83235101-0.5. ASCE (American Society of
instruction, and iv) PBL promotes deep learning and problem–solving skills.A. Essentials of PBL: Problem–based learning is a philosophy that has to be adapted to thespecific conditions and situation of an institution, and the nature of the specific field in which itis to be implemented. This is apparent in the different models of PBL implementation throughout the world. Therefore, there is no one –size-fits-all approach to PBL that can simply beimplemented from one institution to another 20. There are essential and required steps that have tobe mobilized at the start of PBL. At the start of learning in PBL is the selection of realproblem(s). This is, in fact, the major driving force for learning. Effort and time dedicated to theselection of problem(s
tothe CLOs and the Program Outcomes (POs). For this course, the CLOs and their mapping to thePOs has already been identified. Overall, the course syllabus and the course objectives are met toa great extent. As mentioned before, several assessment tools have been identified such as classwork/homework, quizzes/exams and projects. Sincere attempt is made to refer to the CLOs whiledesigning the contents of the assessment tools used. For example, many class work andhomework problems, and each exam question clearly stated the concept being tested in thatquestion, and to what extent that question addresses the CLO(s) and how it maps the PO(s).Students were informed where this information will be used. The stated CLO(s) is/are assumedto be satisfied
; Laanan, F. S. (2001). Making the transition to the senior institution. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2001(114), 87-97.9- Laanan, F. S. (2007). Studying transfer students: Part 2: Dimensions of transfer students’ adjustment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31, 37-5910- Laanan, F. S. (1998). Beyond transfer shock: A study of students’ college experiences and adjustment Page 15.553.12 processes at UCLA (Doctoral Dissertation). Available from Proquest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 9905522) Table 1: Background DemographicsAge
. Page 15.1316.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Using a Mousetrap-Powered Vehicle Design Activity to Convey Engineering ConceptsAbstractAs part of a NSF-sponsored project within GK-12, a curricular unit was introduced to students inan urban middle school elective course. The module sought to immerse students in a designproject, during which they would be introduced to theories and concepts relevant to theconstruction of a mousetrap-powered vehicle.The unit was designed to fit within the timeframe of the middle school‟s elective period, a 1.5-hour session per week for 10 weeks. After introducing the course goals and demonstrating theend “product,” students were encouraged to build upon a
serve as a basis for the development, execution, and refinement of the model(s).Lastly, we will produce a final report to summarize our findings as well as create an internet sitefor interested parties to contribute to, view, or edit.Bibliography 1. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 2. Pappas, E. & R. Kander. (2008). “Sustainable Societies: The Sustainable Engineering Design Curriculum at James Madison University,” Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Splitt, Frank G. (2002). Engineering Education Reform: A Trilogy. Published by the International