Paper ID #43360Supporting Engineering Students’ Identity Work Regarding their Career Trajectoriesfor a More Humanizing Engineering FutureMs. Yume Menghe Xu, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Menghe (Yume) is a PhD student in STEM Education at Tufts University. She holds a bachelor’s and a master’s degree in Chemical System Engineering from the University of Tokyo, Japan. Prior to pursuing a PhD at Tufts, she designed and developed educational apps for children, and worked with students, teachers, and makerspace in Japan to host making workshops using various materials and tools. Her research interest lies in
Paper ID #43782Unveiling Demographic Influences and Differential Career Preferences amongEngineering Graduate Students: A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical,Electrical, and Computer EngineersDr. Ebony Omotola McGee, The Johns Hopkins University Dr. Ebony McGee is a Professor of Innovation and inclusion in the STEM Ecosystem in the School of Education and the Department of Mental Health in the School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University. Dr. McGee is an electrical engineer by training and an 11-time NSF investigator awardee. She is the leading expert on both race and structural racism in STEM, with all its toxic
Paper ID #42000Exploring Early-Career Professionals’ Conceptions of ’Stretch Assignments’:A Qualitative Study of Recent Graduates from Engineering and Non-EngineeringFieldsDr. Shannon Katherine Gilmartin, Stanford University Shannon K. Gilmartin, Ph.D., is a Senior Research Scholar at the Stanford VMware Women’s Leadership Innovation Lab and Adjunct Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University.Sara Jordan-Bloch, Stanford University Sara Jordan-Bloch, PhD, is a sociologist and senior research scholar at the Stanford VMware Women’s Leadership Innovation Lab, where she also directs the Seeds of Change initiative
communication instruction to students as they progress through the senior capstone project and develop relationships with project stakeholders in industry. She also supports engineering communication program development, research, and implementation. Her Ph.D. research interests include social justice pedagogies; promoting diversity, equity and inclusion in higher education; service learning; program design and leadership; and qualitative research.Jacob Field, Oregon State UniversitySierra Kai Sverdrup, Oregon State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Report on a Student Community of Practice Program's Impact on Career Preparednessand Sense of Belonging Among Underserved
Engineering Education, 2024Exploring Sense of Belonging and Self-Efficacy in Engineering: The Role of Institutional SupportAbstractNumerous studies have explored the impact of self-efficacy and a sense of belonging onSTEM career selection and persistence, fostering identity development. Institutional supportis pivotal for STEM students' academic progression and persistence. Such support includeseducational guidance, mentorship, and cultural and athletic engagement. Evidence shows thatthese services enhance students' sense of belonging and motivation and influence their self-efficacy. This is particularly vital for first-generation college students. With its substantialfirst-generation and economically disadvantaged student
AbstractFostering heightened interest and engagement in engineering, cultivating diversity, equity, andinclusivity within the engineering workforce, and equipping students to thrive in an industrycharacterized by rapid technological advancements stand as pivotal objectives in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education. Motivation exerts a profoundinfluence on students across diverse academic fields. It is intricately intertwined with their levelof engagement in the subjects they are studying, the inherent complexities of their chosen careerpaths, the career opportunities they foresee, and the potential of being misdirected toward a fieldthey may not truly enjoy. To this end, understanding the key factors driving motivation is of
research and teaching within university settings. However, the workforce needs of aglobalized economy and students empowered by their agency to venture outside the traditionalacademic sphere into industry, entrepreneurship, consulting, and pre-college leadership, forexample, have led to the emergence of varied and non-traditional career paths. These pathschallenge the conventional norms and expectations of what it means to be an engineeringeducator.Despite the gradual recognition and tokenized celebration of these diverse career paths, asignificant gap exists in understanding the experiences of those pursuing them. The narratives ofPh.D. graduates in Engineering Education who choose non-academic careers are oftenovershadowed by the predominant
, otherassets can be used to leverage resources available to forge careers in engineering [2]. Studentsstudying engineering in the borderlands experience additional hardships when navigating highereducation, as they manage tensions across disciplinary expertise, culture, language, as well asphysical borders of state and nation [3]. In this work in progress paper for the EQUITY group inASEE, we offer counternarratives of student experiences as possible resources for social justicework in local departmental contexts. The questions that we pose in our session are: A) How can constructed counternarratives of student experiences guide departmental dialog about equity and inclusion? B) How can faculty and staff serve as co-conspirators in the
of Coding for the Future: A Case Study of the megaGEMS Coding AcademyAbstractGirls in Engineering, Mathematics, and Science (GEMS) is a free after-school club and summercamp for girls interested in exploring their career in various Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM) fields. GEMS is the outreach program for the Autonomous VehicleSystems Research and Education Laboratories. GEMS programs are designed to educate youngwomen about STEM by providing hands-on experiential learning in robotics, programming, andresearch [1]. GEMS is divided into two main programs: miniGEMS for rising fifth througheighth-grade middle school students, and megaGEMS for rising ninth through twelfth-grade highschool students [2]. miniGEMS
in research knowledge and skills, deeper relationships with mentors, and clarity andinsight into career paths. This work involves thematic analysis of interviews with GEAR-SRparticipants and highlights student voices, including those traditionally marginalized in STEM.The advantages of undergraduate research experiences (UREs) are widely recognized, leading tohigher student retention, a sense of belonging in their field, improved academic outcomes, and agreater likelihood of pursuing advanced degrees [1, 5, 6]. This positive effect can be even greaterfor traditionally minoritized students [7], including students who are Black/African American,Hispanic/Latino(a), American Indian, and Pacific Islander. However, finding and performingresearch
undergraduate researchers and not large ambiguousresearch aims that is more commonly done in graduate school training.STEM Research - Future ThinkingWe next sought to understand the impact of undergraduate research on ND and NT individualfuture career plans. Previous research has indicated that participation in undergraduate researchopportunities significantly increases the chance of individuals pursuing graduate school [23].With the desire to increase representation and diversity in graduate school programs, we soughtto understand if participation in undergraduate research impacts career plans differently from NDto NT individuals. Both ND and NT participants had similar low percentages for disagreeing andstrongly disagreeing that they received quality
make in people’s lives-Michelle Obama” she aspires to get the most out of what life has to offer.Corion Jeremiah Holloman, Alabama A&M UniversityLuke Childrey V, Alabama A&M University Luke Childrey is an undergraduate student at Alabama A&M University. He is currently working on a B.S degree in Mechanical Engineering. He has obtained knowledge in computational fluid dynamics through coursework and interning with the UTEP aerospace center. As a result of his work experiences, he seeks to gain more experience and a career in the aerospace industry.Mr. Mohamed Jamil Barrie, Alabama A&M University Mohamed J. Barrie is a Senior Electrical Engineering major at Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical
otherpopulations there was a higher than base salary for nondisabled professionals, and at least $9,000lower than base salary for disabled professionals. With the largest gaps in salary amongst femaleparticipants being disabled White women ($14,633) and amongst male participants being disabledAmerican Indian/Alaska Native men ($18,376). However, with Hispanic, Black, and AmericanIndian/Alaska Native women having the lowest base, disabled, and nondisabled salaries onaverage, the $13,732, $11,398, and $13,695 gaps between disabled and nondisabled pay has moreimpact than the gaps on higher salaries.Conclusion This work in progress demonstrates the necessity for considering intersectionality in ouranalysis of engineering career outcomes. While
students in STEM[8], [9], [10]. Additionally, first year mentorshipprograms have previously been implemented successfully in both the biomedical engineering andchemical engineering departments at UT [11], [12]. Peer mentorship programs, or programs thatmatch students at different stages of the same degree, are shown to positively affect graduatestudents’ academic, social, psychological, and career development [13]. Fostering this additionalform of mentorship can act as a safety net for students with insufficient institutionalizedmentorship (e.g. research advisor) which can reduce feelings of isolation. Developing a programfor peers, especially around the same identity, can form a sense of community, between mentorshippairs and across pairs [13]. A
of higher education remains underrepresented in the literature, this paper alsohighlights the need for more studies in this area.Mentorship is an important topic in STEMM education due to its role in a student’s professionalformation. Defined as “a professional, working alliance in which individuals work together overtime to support the personal and professional growth, development, and success of the relationalpartners through the provision of career and psychosocial support,” mentorship may “enhancestudent outcomes, experiences, and retention” and “help with workforce development byincreasing access, equity, and inclusion in STEMM” [1]. A mentorship relationship can lastanywhere from three months to a lifetime and is most effective when
mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Experiences of Engineering Students with Disabilities in the Accommodations ProcessBackground and MotivationStudents with disabilities attend higher education institutions, but the exact number is not clear.In the 2019-2020 academic school year, 21% percent of undergraduate students reported havinga disability, of which eight percent were formally registered as having a disability with theirinstitution (Postsecondary National Policy Institute (PNPI), 2022). These numbers are anunderestimation. Disabled students may not be
currently the director of the Cultural Competence in Computing (3C) Fellows program and the NSF-funded Alliance for Identity-Inclusive Computing Education (AiiCE). She also serves as senior personnel for the NSF-funded Athena Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female faculty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ’00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019
expect that there is more value added in additional upperdivision electives than adding the CS0 course into our respective programs.4.1 Instructor 1 Re�lection I began working at Loyola in January 2018 and continued until the end of June 2021. I was incharge of teaching coursework and overseeing programs in the continuing studies school. Therewas a BA Information Technology which was an applied CS degree as well as a CS certi�icate. Thestudent population at this continuing studies school is primarily adult learners looking to completecollege as well as those seeking career change and upskilling. My experiences running a non-pro�ittraining program for underserved individuals prior to starting my position at Loyola had taught methat those
-identification[2] M. Kotche, “Clinical Immersion Internship Introduces Students to Needs Assessment,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/clinical-immersion-internship-introduces- students-to-needs-assessment[3] M. Ong, J. M. Smith, and L. T. Ko, “Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 206–245, 2018, doi: 10.1002/tea.21417.[4] K. C. Thiem and N. Dasgupta, “From Precollege to Career: Barriers Facing Historically Marginalized Students and Evidence-Based Solutions,” Soc. Issues Policy Rev., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 212
to help practitioners navigate their careers, help practitioners betterunderstand their students and colleagues, and help administrators/mentors develop an asset-basedand systemic-based understanding of neurodivergence.References[1] H. B. Rosqvist, N. Chown, and A. Stenning, Neurodiversity Studies: A New Critical Paradigm. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.[2] A. Cuellar, B. Webster, S. Solanki, C. Spence, and M. A. Tsugawa, “Examination of Ableist Educational Systems and Structures that Limit Access to Engineering Education through Narratives,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, 2022.[3] T. Sorg, “Where are We, and Where to Next? ‘Neurodiversity’ in
create a standalone reference for students entering the workforce asearly career engineers. Each week, the students added an additional page to their manual basedupon the module for the prior week. Students were encouraged to include design frameworks,examples of positive and negative designs, and external resources. Every other week the studentsreceived feedback from a peer. On alternate weeks, the students received feedback from theinstructor. Students were expected to iterate on prior week’s submissions based upon thefeedback received. An excerpt from a representative handbook is provided in Figure 2.2.4.2 Design ProjectsStudents completed a semester long project in groups of two. The project was broken into twosummative evaluations focused
Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female faculty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ’00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the first Black woman to earn a Ph.D. in computer science at the university and 2019 Computer Science Hall of Fame Inductee.Shaundra Bryant Daily, Duke University Shaundra B. Daily is a Cue Family professor of practice in Electrical and Computer Engineering & Computer Science at Duke University and Levitan Faculty Fellow
changes. Since these stories were potentially sensitive or identifying innature, we explicitly invited participants to share any discomfort they felt, so that we couldremove or aggregate stories as needed.Preliminary FindingsDeveloping an Interest in ComputingRecognition from instructors was a key factor in spurring participants’ interest and identificationwith computing. For Diana, a high school Photoshop instructor first recognized her potentialaffinity for computing and encouraged her to take computing courses. For Kalani and Leyla,community college instructors were pivotal in developing their initial interest. Kalani’s highschool did not offer many computing courses—when she asked about majors and careers inSTEM, she was encouraged to “just
), Garcia, Elaouinate, and Tinoco. There were three other projectsled by JEDIs who did not participate in this study, and a handful of projects that Garcia,Elaouinate, and Tinoco explored but never saw through due to their limited capacity or shifts intheir interests.6.4.1. STEM Field Day Outreach InitiativeAll JEDIs, including the two who did not take part in this study, demonstrated excitement aboutK-12 outreach during the training process. So, when Garcia proposed hosting STEM field dayevents at local K-12 schools and community centers to engage students in fun STEM activitystations and expose them to STEM career pathways, everyone decided to take part. Garciaoriginally had this idea when they were outreach chair for SHPE at FIU, but they were
to Spread Inclusivity, which was particularly helpful for students whohad disabilities, those unfamiliar with the language courses were taught in, or the ones whosuffered from anxiety. Third theme: Including Student Interests in Engineering, helpful for allstudents and students who were unfamiliar engineering material. Fourth theme: Active LearningSkill Development for Marginalized Students, where underrepresented students had a way toengage more comfortably and learn career skills. Fifth theme: Inclusivity Pitfalls and Future, whichrevealed existing problems in engineering pedagogy framework and described places where itfailed underrepresented students. These findings are relevant and timely as engineering educationis growing and witnessing
advance solutions on broadeningparticipation in engineering spaces, both in college and the workplace.Kaitlyn Thomas: I am a heterosexual, white woman raised by two working-class parents in adouble-income household. Both parents are first-generation college graduates from the Midwest,and they raised me and my two siblings in Orange County, California. I graduated from a private,teaching-focused university in Texas with bachelor’s and master’s degrees in civil engineeringwith an emphasis on structural engineering. I also worked for three years as a structural engineerbefore going back to school and pursuing engineering education. My education and career inengineering took place in predominantly white, male settings. Because of the privilege
to better preparestudents for their future engineering careers, partly because of conflicting beliefs about thepurposes and methods of education [9]. For those who believe that current methods are mostlysuccessful, technical preparation takes precedence over contextualizing engineering knowledgein societal contexts. Learning to work within larger social issues occurs on the job and later inone’s career. Such prioritization of disciplinary knowledge in the curriculum is, however, oftenbased on a zero-sum calculus that assumes the time spent on societal context is time taken awayfrom core engineering knowledge. There is evidence this perspective is not fully correct [10].Other perspectives emphasize the need for more professional or
increased dropout rates in engineering—all of whichare affected by institutional and systemic pressures and not solely individual failures. The sixmain factors they found were: (1) race and gender, (2) high school preparation, (3) self-efficacyand self-confidence, (4) academic and classroom climate, (5) grades and conceptualunderstanding, and (6) interest and career goals. As they state so directly: It is also true that a significant proportion of engineering students leave because the engineering educational system has failed to show them that the engineering endeavor is profoundly human, has failed to make relevant the key scientific, mathematical, and engineering principles needed for mastery of engineering, has
Paper ID #41946Bridging the Equity Gap: Environmental Justice Education in K–16 for EngineeringTeaching and LearningDr. Monica Lynn Miles, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Monica L. Miles, Ph.D. is an early career Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo in the School of Engineering and applied sciences. Dr. Miles considers herself a scholar-mother-activist-entrepreneur where all her identities work in harmony as she reshapes her community. She is a critical scholar who seeks transformative solutions to cultivate liberated and environmentally just environments for Black
sustainability, leveraging her expertise to address pressing challenges in the field.Dr. Scott R Hamilton P.E., York College of Pennsylvania Scott Hamilton is a Professor of Civil Engineering at York College of Pennsylvania. He is a registered Professional Engineer and has both a MS and PhD in civil engineering and a Masters in engineering management from Stanford University and a BS from the United States Military Academy, West Point. He is a retired US Army Corps of Engineers officer who has had assignments in the US, Germany, Korea, and Afghanistan. During his military career he spent over 10 years on the faculty at the US Military Academy at West Point teaching civil engineering. He also served as the Director, Graduate