studentcompletion of tasks [21].In computer science, we often ask students to build larger programming projects over the span ofdays or weeks. As teachers, we know that students do not always have the skills to project andtime manage themselves well on these larger projects. Additionally, we know that trying toestimate how long it takes to plan, program, and test software projects is hard [22] and evensoftware organizations in industry find it challenging to deliver software on time [23]. To helpscaffold students on these larger projects, teachers often break projects up into milestones orseparate gradable deliverables.Benefits of Milestones in Programming ProjectsBy breaking these larger projects into distinct milestone assignments, teachers can more
Paper ID #43067Board 240: Developing Critically Conscious Aerospace Engineers throughMacroethics Curricula: Year 1Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson (he/him) is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His lab’s design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Their current projects include studying and designing
, engineering judgment, and problem solving.Dr. Mary McVee ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Elementary Teacher Professional Learning in Equitable Engineering Pedagogies for Multilingual StudentsAbstractThis paper provides an update on progress within our National Science Foundation projectcreating an engineering professional development model for teachers of multilingual students.The multi-year, design-based iteration research study aims to produce a model for teachers andschools in similar multilingual elementary schools and communities. Currently in year one, weprovide an update of our activities thus far and the theoretical background of our project. Wehope this model will
engineers and the need for representation of the nation’s rich diversity. Inparticular, scholars and activists call for improved education access, quality, and workforcedevelopment in rural Appalachian communities. Students from these communities face distinctchallenges in accessing higher education and pursuing engineering careers. The AppalachianRegional Commission has deemed it essential to invest in preK-12 education, engage youth incommunity activities, and cultivate workforce opportunities in fields like advancedmanufacturing. These activities are vital for strengthening economic resilience and broadeningstudents’ conceptions of what engineering is and who can do it. Project OverviewThis CAREER project
experiencing, that are preventing them from implementing or institutionalizing someimportant elements of their RED projects. The obstacles were identified and analyzed from fourperspectives, informed by Bolman and Deal’s (2008) four frame model for understandingorganizational challenges. In Bolman and Deal’s model, the four cognitive frames include: (1)the structural frame, which is focused on rules, goals, policies, and technologies of anorganization; (2) the human resources frame, which is focused on the needs and skills of thepeople in the organization, as well as the relationships between them; (3) the political frame,which is focused on the sources of power, conflict, and competition, as well as on allocation ofscarce resources; and (4) the
thematerial and receive helpful feedback outside of class and by cultivating a more inclusive learningenvironment. The goal of this project is to use SedimentSketch application to help close the gapbetween Hispanic and non-Hispanic students’ GPAs, situational interest in geoscience courses,and STEM career trajectories.Background and motivationThe Hispanic population in the USA has grown significantly over the last 30 years, becoming animportant ethnic group in our society. However, this minority group has been marginalized forsocial and economic reasons. In 2022, Texas A&M University (TAMU) was awarded the status ofan HSI (Hispanic serving Institution) serving 25% of the undergraduate student population(Hispanic). The enrollment in undergraduate
development of theassessment model see [1, 2, 3]. With funding from the NSF, the Buffalo State University modelwas expanded and designated as EvaluateUR. EvaluateUR has been shown to be a valuablelearning tool [4,5] with its key features summarized in Table 1.Table 1. Key features of the EvaluateUR method Students assessed in 10 outcome categories each defined by several components that include both content knowledge and outcomes critically important in the workplace. Option to add additional outcomes that reflect specific program-wide objectives. Before research/project begins, students answer open-ended questions to share their thoughts about the research process. To assess student progress, at the mid-point and end-of-research, all outcome
design project. TheInstructional Processor provides the base design, which can be modified to adapt to a new set ofspecifications. Students must modify the appropriate processor components and integrate theminto the data path. The control unit must also be redesigned to accommodate the newinstructions. A sample program is then tested via simulation of the updated VHDL model.The base processor is expanded by adding a serial communication interface, designed using aUART (universal asynchronous receiver transmitter). Next, a programmable timer and interruptsystem are added to the processor architecture. The enhanced FPGA microcontroller is testedusing a design example which gives students an in-depth look at both the internal details andexternal
negativelyshift students’ subjective judgement of their own ability. The research question was: To whatextent does participation in undergraduate research affect students’ self-efficacy and confidenceto succeed in undergraduate level academia/research? The Grand Challenges UndergraduateWater Science Communication Fellowship was created at an R1 Hispanic-Serving University inthe American Southwest in 2022 and is offered annually in the Spring semester. Students werepaired with a mentor who is conducting a water-resource related study at the University of NewMexico and were tasked with creating a communication project based on the mentor’s work.Example communication projects include infographics, songs, paintings, posters, time-lapsegraphs, 3-D models
theirfirst year – by being largely designed and taught by upper-division undergraduate students. Thestudents propose the learning outcomes for these First Year Design courses to target skills - bothtechnical and professional - that they identify as valuable when navigating theory-basedcoursework and practice-focused extracurricular activities. Student-teachers build their coursefrom a high-structure template centered in active and experiential pedagogy, where learners areinitially “set up” with content knowledge and skills practice before being “let go” to navigate theentire engineering design cycle on a team project. Through this peer-to-peer active learningmodel, we not only provide real-world context for what it means to be an engineer to our
manuscript introduces a lesson design in engineeringeducation to analyze and improve educational strategies, reflective practices, and instructionalmaterials.Assessment methods: This study outlines a lesson design utilizing the ArgumentationFramework to support first-year engineering students in overcoming conceptual challenges whiledeveloping engineering projects. This approach was implemented in an Engineering Technologyundergraduate course at a Midwestern university, whose curriculum covered foundational topicsin Energy Science. The task involved designing a zero-energy home using Aladdin software, asan integrated CAD/CAE platform for design and simulation. Students documented their analysis,inferences, and decisions in a design journal with
properties of synthetic oils. This was the first demonstration of the work ever done in this field and resulted in broad environmental and cost benefits, especially in energy storage and heat transfer applications. She has more than three years of experience teaching thermofluidic, mechanical design, and solid and structure courses and supervising senior capstone projects collaborating with industries such as Saint-Gobain, Klein Tools, and Parker. She also has served in leadership roles at the Society of Women Engineers and STEM advisory task force to represent diversity and inclusion and improve student success and retention for underrepresented students.” ©American Society for Engineering
ensure that students learning can perform effectively in a professionalsetting [5, 6]. Due to this factor, there have been several methods designed to aid in studentlearning especially in engineering education, such as active learning [7–11], project-basedlearning [12, 12–16], inquiry-based learning [17].Active learning has been aware of improvement of students’ affect toward engineering educationin support of meaningful engagement with computer engineering concepts and practices [7].Compeau et al. [8] developed an active learning pedagogy in engineering electromagneticscourse, in which engineering students are actively engaged in learning through specially designedactivities, followed by reflection upon. A teaching plan is elaborated in [9
on gene expression. He has a keen interest in new educational models especially in the area of innovation, experiential learning, and project-based learning. He currently serves as program director for the University of North Dakota’s Biomedical Engineering program and is actively developing an Innovation Based Learning methodology.Ryan Striker, University of North Dakota Ryan Striker is a life-long learner. Ryan has two decades of professional experience designing embedded electronic hardware for industrial, military, medical, and automotive applications. Ryan earned his BS and PhD in Electrical Engineering and his MS in Systems Engineering. He now teaches Biomedical Engineering at the University of North Dakota
of Science at FAU.Her research interests aDr. Hanqi Zhuang, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Hanqi Zhuang is a professor in Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Florida Atlantic University. His research interests are in Robotics, Computer Vision, and their applications, as well as Engineering Education. He ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Empowering Hispanic Students in STEM throughFinancial LiteracyABSTRACTThe session will report on successes of addressing financial literacy of students in a collaborativeDOE project between two state colleges and a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) university witha combined 140,000+ undergraduate students. The
results, creating an interface in which users can obtain real-time feedbackand analyze regions of interest. The framework improved efficiencies and enabled the decision-making process. By focusing on the results, the decision-making process was optimized throughreal-time feedback that also showed increased productivity. Zamora [15] utilizes a case study ofhydraulic machinery in the classroom to explore the integration of CFD as an educational tool. Inaddition to using CFD, the study explored the effectiveness of other methods such as MATLAB,project-based learning, tutor facilitation, and program extension. The study observed thechallenges students faced in learning a new program (due to challenges) as well as the additionaltime needed to learn
an engineering identity early in theirmatriculation can be significant drivers of attrition from technical fields. Previous researchsuggests that project-based learning builds students’ engineering/computing identity by piquingand developing student interest in engineering topics. Literature on the sense of belonging inengineering suggests that experiencing camaraderie within course-based teams, and particularlyhaving a clear purpose or role within the team, can promote that sense of belonging. The currentresearch project sought to implement evidence-based practices to enhance first-year students’identity and sense of belonging in engineering and computing, in the context of a two-semesterintroductory course sequence that integrates students
called Living with the Lab offers animmersive, hands-on, project-based course sequence that focuses on problem-solving andbuilding a strong academic foundation for engineering fundamentals. Equipment like millingmachines, soldering irons, and drills are all used within the course sequence. The classroomsetup is strategically designed to encourage collaboration through a six-person table layout.Feedback was received that female engineering students often felt intimidated when entering theclassroom and underconfident while using the equipment. A workshop that provided femalestudents advanced access to the equipment by working through multiple hands-on activitieswhile also making connections with female faculty, engaging with upper-level female
communication [14,15].The challenges of adequately preparing students for this demand in sociotechnical skillsets hasbeen studied by researchers both for general capstone design courses for engineers only and forthose that are multidisciplinary beyond engineering disciplines [9,16,17]. The “2015 Survey ofCapstone Design” [16] not only highlighted the ever-growing focus on technicalcommunications within capstone courses, but also outlined the ubiquitous challenge ofintentionally modeling capstone design courses to prepare students. In the survey however, theconcept of multidisciplinary is one that refers to the diverse kinds of engineering majors and howthey interplay with one another in capstone projects but does not include capstone design modelsthat
learning in engineering coursesAbstractFaculty traditionally have used a variety of individual and group-based learning activitiesincluding homework assignments, exams, projects, reflection papers, and presentations in aneffort to promote, enhance, assess, and evaluate students’ knowledge and learning. More currentresearch has suggested modifications to some of the historic assessment methodologies andtechnological advances that have potentially influenced the use of various assessmentapproaches. The authors pose the following question in this paper: How are faculty currentlyevaluating student learning and encouraging student success in engineering courses?This paper provides a summary of research into grading practices and then shares the results
commonmethods because it centers participants’ own understanding of their experiences and identity, co-constructed during dialog with us as researchers [18]. We also hoped that the poems wouldfunction as symbolic objects - that reflecting on their poems would allow participants to expressfacets of their identity that would be difficult to speak about directly without the poem. This issimilar to the use of photographs to facilitate conversation in photo voice methods [19], [20].PositionalityAlexis Gillmore: as a PhD candidate in the natural sciences, I have participated on a couplemultidisciplinary research teams where project work was highly individual. These isolatingexperiences made me interested in studying other ways that research teams collaborate
outcomes for the lecture section. The learning outcomes aremapped to ABET Student Outcomes [5].University catalog description: Students collaborate with faculty research mentors on an ongoingfaculty research project or conduct independent research under the guidance of a facultymember. This experience provides students with an inquiry-based learning opportunity andengages them as active learners in a research setting.Table 3: Course learning objectives for the department-wide one-credit lecture section of theundergraduate research course. The goal statements generally complete the sentence “Uponcompleting this course, students should be able to...” Student Assessment
comparatively low retention and graduationrates.The paper is organized as follows. Section II outlines the project’s aims and goals. In section III,we present the methodology, including the outline of assessment metrics, both qualitative andquantitative; the timeline of the project; and course descriptions and the philosophy behind thedesign of the integrated curricula. The first results are provided in section IV, followed by theirdiscussion in section V, which also includes the transpired project limitations and changes that weare planning to implement for the second cohort. The conclusions are given in section VI.II. MotivationThe primary motivation behind exploring co-teaching in interdisciplinary STEM courses in thisproject is to enhance student
eventual goal of ABET accreditation.The biggest limitation of the new program was space. Engineering is a hands-on discipline fullof lab- and project-based courses that require dedicated lab space, appropriate lab equipment, aworkshop with appropriate fabrication tools, computer labs with engineering software, studentproject “dirty floor” space, and faculty and staff office space. When the program launched in2013, the only dedicated space for Engineering was two faculty offices. An introductory designlab was held in a Physical and Chemical Sciences non-majors laboratory space, which offeredlittle in the way of fabrication tools or storage space for design projects. A MATLABprogramming course was held in a general computing lab on which the
purpose of keeping a record of course activities and providing resources to support studentlearning [7]. Past research has shown that syllabi, when properly analyzed, can be used to drawconclusions about the contents of a course and an instructor’s teaching methods [8]. The methodof analysis used in this project implements a Course Change Typology that has been developedas a part of a larger study and re-evaluated using feedback from two previous conferenceworkshops [9], [10]. In one study, the Course Change Typology was previously used to drawconclusions about ABET learning outcomes in engineering courses through course syllabi [11].The purpose of the current study was to use syllabi to track changes in engineering coursesacross five semesters
the Pacific. Her research interests are in biomicrofluidics as well as engineering education. Her recent projects have emphasized mentorship of women and underrepresented students and creating engaging learning environments that promote students’ sense of belonging, persistence, and success in engineering.Mary Kay Camarillo, University of the Pacific Mary Kay Camarillo is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific in Stockton. She specializes in environmental engineering and has worked on research in the areas of water reclamation, biomass energy, geothermal energy, oil and gas production, watershed modeling, use of technology to study environmental issues, and engineering
contaminants in engineered systems and sustainable developments for cementitious materials. I have published impactful articles and secured several external grants for projects from the EPA, NSF, and DoD. As a mentor and educator, I strive to adapt to each student’s needs and foster a collaborative environment.Dr. Sukjoon Na, Marshall University Since 2018, Dr. Sukjoon Na has been an assistant professor of Civil Engineering at Marshall University in West Virginia. With a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering earned from Drexel University, Dr. Na specializes in developing innovative and sustainable construction materials, coupled with expertise in failure analysis. His notable contributions include presentations at prestigious journals
, and RF filters. Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the breakdown oftopics covered in each of the first two courses. Figure 3: Topics in RF Course 1 Figure 4: Topics in RF Course 2 The third and final course in the program is the senior capstone project. The students arerequired to choose their projects in various areas of RF engineering. Each project group musthave between two and four people to work together. The restriction on the number of groupmembers to learn and encourage teamwork. The course requirements are illustrated in Figure 5. Figure 5: Course Requirements for Senior Capstone ProjectPossible areas of project topics can be: • RF Test automation • RF device performance improvement • A standalone
qualitative and mixed-methods research projects centered around diversity and inclusion in engineering. She will begin a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering with a focus on Engineering Education at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Fall 2024.Alexis Gillmore, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Alexis is a PhD student in soil science - they also teach interdisciplinary senior design and are pursuing a certificate in engineering education. Alexis is interested in developing participatory research strategies to make scientific knowledge that is useful and usable to those who need it. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Initial Explorations to Understand how our Research
, engineering and operations. His research interests include systems engineering, product design process and engineering education.Dr. Elizabeth A. Debartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, PhD is the Director of the Multidisciplinary Senior Design Program at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where students from Biomedical, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering work together on multidisciplinary projects. She is active in the national Capstone Design Community, and received her BSE in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science from Duke University and her MS and PhD from Purdue University.Shun Takai, Northern Illinois University Dr. Shun Takai is an associate professor