about the opportunities andchallenges available to them; this also relates to their identity work. For example, students maywonder whether they are being heard in the group and if they belong in a particular communityof practice. Content uncertainty includes questions about the ideas, approaches, or intended endresult of an activity. This type of uncertainty is similar to what Hartner-Tiefenthaler et al. refer toas epistemological uncertainty, which they define as a “subjective feeling of being unsure aboutthe content, process or outcome of a task.” (p. 21, 2018). We adopt the latter term,epistemological uncertainty, to reflect that questions about process can include questions aboutwhat counts as valuable ways of knowing and doing
, or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.References[1] H. Okahana, C. Klein, J. Allum, and R. Sowell, “STEM Doctoral Completion of Underrepresented Minority Students: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Participation in the Doctoral Workforce,” Innov High Educ, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 237–255, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10755-018-9425-3.[2] R. Sowell, J. Allum, and H. Okahana, Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools, 2015.[3] B. M. Gayle, D. Cortez, and R. Preiss, “Safe Spaces, Difficult Dialogues, and Critical Thinking,” ij-sotl, vol. 7, no. 2, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.20429/ijsotl
Significance of Scholarship Programs in STEMIntroductionIn this Work-in-Progress paper, we share our ongoing work with an NSF Scholarships in STEM(S-STEM) program related to an iteration of analysis that looked across specific aspects in amore summative manner than our typical analyses during the five years of the project that aremore formative. As the project will soon enter an extension into a sixth year to use existingscholarship funds, we took this opportunity to begin to reflect on overarching goals toward thedevelopment and submission of a new S-STEM proposal to continue this work. The StudentPathways in Engineering and Computing for Transfers (SPECTRA) program in the ClemsonUniversity College of Computing, Engineering
generated will be valuable for educationalpolicy, philanthropic support, and employer decisions, guiding strategic investments in designand fabrication studios to enhance workforce skills development. This study has two parts; thefirst employs qualitative methods, consisting of interviews and focus groups with over 48students, 15 alumni and 15 employers to identify common themes that reflect makerspaces’impacts on students’ careers. From this data, we aim to create a universal framework forassessing the link between makerspace experiences and career readiness across diverseinstitutions and studios. The second part of the iterative study will consist of the development ofa quantitative survey instrument utilizing this grounded, qualitatively
represents engineering and technical skills, economic feasibility, ethical considerations, andcultural sensitivity, which can be considered when studying potential solutions [3]. "The Village of Yakutia has about 50,000 people. Its harsh winters and remote location make heating a living space very expensive. The rising price of fossil fuels has been reflected in the heating expenses of Yakutia residents. In fact, many residents are unable to afford heat for the entire winter (5 months). A Northeastern Federal University study shows that 38% of village residents have gone without heat for at least 30 winter days in the last 24 months. Last year, 27 Yakutia deaths were attributed to unheated homes. Most died from
they need to be effective learners. A syllabus may reflect the instructor’sbeliefs and attitudes about the subject matter and students, making it a guide for the instructor aswell as to the students. Cullen and Harris argue that “a syllabus is more than an outline of course.It represents the mindset, that is the professor’s philosophy of teaching and learning as well ashis or her attitudes toward students, and conceptualization of the course [8].” Cullen and Harrisfurther argue that a review of course syllabi can reveal much about an instructor’s learner-centered practices and have developed a rubric for assessing learner-center qualities of coursesyllabi. Eslami, et al., analyzed undergraduate STEM syllabi and found students enrolled
with 10 GTAs. Participants selected forfollow-up interviews are GTAs who are teaching recitations. We did not include GTAs whoseprimary duties were grading and holding office hours but who were not in the classroom withstudents. These one-on-one semi-structured interviews were conducted roughly one semesterinto participants’ GTA experience. These interviews explore the techniques GTA’s use in theclassroom, their view of their role in the classroom and how it reflects their thinking aboutteaching, their own experiences as a student, and their experience participating in teachingrelated PD. We plan to interview the GTAs again after the completion of their first year to studyhow their teaching identity continues to evolve.In this paper, we report
assignments [16]. This is because assertiveindividuals are known for their propensity to foster constructive dialogue and win-winresolutions.Figure 4: Team Personality Traits Indicating Assertion and TurbulenceThirdly, our finding indicates that team effectiveness and success were assessed based on fivekey constructs of team success, the findings of which are outlined in Figure 5. The results showa strong consensus among team members, with over 95.0% agreeing that the team maintains anappropriate culture. Furthermore, 92.0% of respondents acknowledge the team’s activeinvolvement in setting task objectives, reflecting a proactive approach to goal setting that alignswith the principles of strengths-based leadership theory [17]. The leadership’s
of educational strategies— such asexperiential learning opportunities, events, internships, and first-year experiences—have beenshown to significantly benefit undergraduate student learning, engagement, learning, andretention [5]. For instance, high-impact programs significantly help learners reflect on theircharacter strengths and weaknesses and allow them to take control of their successes as learnersand engineering professionals [5].Although evidence demonstrates that leadership development programs commonly described asexpanding the collective capacity of organizational members enable groups of individuals towork together and engage effectively in a meaningful way both in leadership roles andprocesses, [6] they can also lead to a
having high academicexpectations. Participants mentioned how their parents hold high academic expectations bywanting straight A's, pushing them to have extracurricular activities, and prioritizing theireducation. As an example, one participant mentioned, “They definitely set a standard when I wasin high school and of course when I got to college." This reflects the authoritative tendency to 9establish high standards while being responsive. It was also common for parents to be highlysupportive by assisting with homework, involving themselves in school selection, and supportingeducational goals. This pattern of high expectations paired with high
document for their benefit; many students refer to their reports in otherclasses such as “Robotic System Integration” and their transition to industry.Student Survey ResponseThe responses from students following the completion of the PackML project wereoverwhelmingly positive. Many students not only acknowledged the project's significance butalso shared their newfound knowledge and experiences during job interviews. Remarkably,PackML was highlighted as a valuable skill, with employers expressing a preference forcandidates with PackML experience.A substantial majority of students demonstrated proficiency in implementing the PackMLapproach, reflecting the effectiveness of the project in imparting practical skills. The overallfeedback from students
solutions,career motivation, personal life attributes (e.g. persistence, adaptability), ethics, and professionalbehavior [3], [11]-[15].Particularly in engineering capstone senior design projects, activities with industry feedbackhave been identified as effective mechanisms to stimulate students’ motivation, improveprofessional skills, and to reflect on realistic contexts or limitations of proposed design solutions[16], [17]. Shah and Gillen [4] provided a systematic overview of university-industrypartnerships in capstone projects across engineering education and suggested identifying skillswith low performance indicators and improving those with additional focus in the curriculum.Although various ways of soliciting industry feedback on senior
the podium computer and starts the projector. The lab's structure was that UTAs spread around the classroom and assisted students with their coding practice. Students would raise their hands to get the UTAs' attention. Instructors also train UTAs to be proactive, ensure the group dynamic is going smoothly, and initiate questions if the group or an individual member has challenges. Figure 4 - UTAs walking around the students' tables and helping students.Figure 4 shows two female and two male UTAs, and the instructor interacted with students ateach table as they collaborated on coding and problem-solving tasks. Our observation noted thatthe students' table conversation and facial expressions reflect comfort
StatisticsThe descriptive statistics provide insights into the participants’ characteristics and perceptions inthe study. Cumulative GPA, a measure of academic performance, shows a mean of 3.63 (SD =0.350) out of 4.00, indicating that participants generally achieved high levels of achievement.Personality traits such as Extraversion and Task control, which were rated on a 7-point scale,reflect the participants’ tendencies in group settings. The mean of 4.52 (SD = 1.418) forExtraversion indicates a propensity to actively contribute in groups, while the mean of 3.69 (SD= 1.442) for Task control suggests a balanced approach to task delegation. The mean of 7.60 on a9-point scale (SD = 1.52) indicates positive perceptions of team members’ contributions
are able to revise with sufficient reflection and convert the score toa successful demonstration of mastery. Because of the strict grading of individual problems,multiple opportunities (two to five) must be available for most LOs, except those covered towardsthe very end of the semester.The Checkpoints are Canvas quizzes—partially auto-graded, partially manually graded—takenand submitted by students outside of class in an unproctored environment. To help maintainacademic integrity, we needed large banks of randomized questions. Building these Checkpointquizzes in a way that allows randomization but relatively efficient grading is a crucial part of asuccessful implementation of our grading scheme. Final course grades are based entirely on
to their team, which can help or hurt the team's productivity. The course instructor is not involved in most team interactions and, thus, is less equipped to judge the influence of individual students on team dynamics. Peer evaluation tools fill this gap by eliciting feedback from the people most familiar with the team (i.e., team members). This process informs the instructor about team dynamics and helps teams improve their dynamics and performance [17].To utilize peer evaluation opportunities to improve team performance and reflect on areas ofindividual growth, students must be familiar with desirable teamwork behaviors and must be ableto clearly communicate constructive feedback to their peers. Unfortunately, it is rare for peerfeedback
potential contributionsto the typology of effective teaching strategies. The study is anchored by a research question:what student-centered teaching approaches do exemplary engineering instructors employ topromote knowledge-building in their courses, and how do these approaches align with theirbeliefs about teaching?Data CollectionTo address the research question, the study employed the participatory action research (PAR)methodology, which prioritizes the invaluable input and expertise of participants. The PARapproach is best suited for this study because it actively improves social practices [10], involvingparticipants in designing data collection, reflecting on data, and testing identified practices intheir own contexts. A diverse group of
. One rater disagreedwith the other two raters on the interpretation of two codes, resulting in an interrater agreementscore of .80 (that is, among three raters, the number of actual agreements divided by the numberof potential agreements equaled .80). This result, while acceptable, prompted an immediaterevision to define the two suspect codes more clearly and establish complete interrateragreement.Results Among professional engineers, the ethical implications of the work are significant.Whether their output is buildings or bridges, or roadways, or sewage systems, or electrical grids,professional engineers play an important role in protecting the public. As Bert reflected, “Stopand think for a moment about the number of lives that the
: Encourage students to think creatively by expressing engineering concepts, principles, or experiences through poetic language and imagery. 2. Exploring Metaphorical Thinking: Introduce students to the use of metaphor, simile, and other figurative language techniques to convey complex engineering ideas in a vivid and imaginative manner. 3. Developing Communication Skills: Improve students' ability to communicate technical information effectively by practicing concise and expressive language, which can be valuable in writing reports, proposals, and presentations. 4. Encouraging Reflective Practice: Promote self-reflection and deeper understanding of engineering concepts by encouraging students to explore
electrical engineering course. The study is conducted in amultidisciplinary course, which includes students from various engineering majors, recognizingthe importance of interdisciplinary education which can better reflect the real-worldcollaboration and problem-solving skills needed in the semiconductor industry. Byunderstanding the current level of awareness and interest in semiconductors among engineeringstudents, we aim to identify areas of improvement to encourage and prepare the next generationof semiconductor professionals.Research QuestionsThe overarching aim of this study is to explore to what extent do students demonstrate theirexposure and motivation for semiconductor-related topics within the context of amultidisciplinary electrical
students had to use questions to prompt the AI to use wordsindicating that this construction project used the Lean methodology or similar ones. Throughoutthe process, it was demonstrated how students executed and acquired skills related to criticalthinking, reflection, problem identification, and solution seeking. Upon completion of theexercises, a survey was conducted on critical thinking and AI, and how they relate or assist. It wasdetermined that during the project, different skills were learned, such as interpreting and analyzinginformation, and using artificial intelligence as a learning tool. The significance of this study liesin the adoption of innovative pedagogical methods that engage students in the subject matter,thereby maximizing
. Theircommunication was also clear in supporting the team in executing project deliverables, includingmeaningful follow-up that articulated clearly what needed to be done.Leaders exemplifying effective communication was associated with thoughtful and calmcommunication style. Some participants reflected on less effective staff who were “aggressive[and] run very hot”. Other reflected that women especially needed to be calm and were implicitlyexpected by others to diffuse tension and maintain positive morale. Application of influenceOur conceptual framework looked at leadership in terms of the ways that influence was applied.In our interviews, some participants explicitly spoke about the need to influence or beinginfluenced by individuals without
will be able to understand how equity can be considered in community resilience-basedinfrastructure decision-making. 4) Students will be able to assess the potential impact of differentdecisions on various stakeholders in the community, including marginalized groups. 5) Studentswill be able to collaborate effectively with their peers to make informed and equitable decisionsbased on multiple criteria and perspectives. 6) Students will be able to reflect on their learningexperience and apply the knowledge and skills gained from the game to real-world situations.The concepts stemming from these objectives drive the entire game design and motivate choicefor game structure, components, actions, special roles, and scoring system. Additionally
engineering professoriate, and leveraging institutional data to support reflective teaching practices. She has degrees in Electrical Engineering (B.S., M.Eng.) from the Ateneo de Davao University in Davao City, Philippines, where she previously held appointments as Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Electrical Engineering. She also previously served as Director for Communications and International Engagement at the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, Lecturer at the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University, and Assistant Professor at the Department of Integrated Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. She holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia
' approaches, the strategies used, and challenges they faced. These discussions revealedseveral common strategies, which were subsequently supported by the instructor with additionallecture content describing the troubleshooting process (Figure 1), commonly employedtroubleshooting strategies, and the significance of domain knowledge.Module 1. Valley of the Kings: The first troubleshooting module was adapted from Michaeli andRomeike's [4] use of escape room tasks for teaching code debugging, reflecting the growinginterest in live escape rooms as training tools.In this module, students were provided with the coded map in Figure 2, featuring a highlightedroute, directional instructions in a legend, and directional arrows corresponding to the route
learning in your academic setting (pp. 93-110). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.[12] S. Freeman et al., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, May 2014, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111[13] S. Anwar and M. Menekse, “Unique contributions of individual reflections and teamwork on engineering students’ academic performance and achievement goals,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2020.[14] S. Anwar, "Role of different instructional strategies on engineering students' academic performance and motivational constructs," 2020.[15] A. I. Leshner, "Student-centered, modernized graduate
to advance equity and inclusion, and using data science for training socially responsible engineers.Muhammad Ali Sajjad, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York First year, first semester PhD student in Engineering Education at University at Buffalo. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in progress: stigma of mental health conditions and its relationship to conditions’ knowledge and resource awareness among engineering students.AbstractThis work in progress paper considers intergroup contact theory to explore how increasedawareness of mental health resources and heightened contact with people living with MHCsamong engineering undergraduate students reflect in lower
-Corps site program experience could be enhanced or modified based onperformance and perceptions of participants?” To answer it, we continued with the qualitativeportion of the study.QualitativeThe I-Corps Site training program has received overwhelming support and positive feedback foryears since its inception. Through coordination with the program director and availableresources, we can conclude that participant evaluations of the program are positive and mixed,and there are four challenges, or room for improvement, that participants reflected on after theprogram: (1) participant variation, (2) I-Corps’ role in entrepreneurship-innovation learningprocesses, (3) mentorship, and (4) time constraints. The following paragraphs providedescriptions
, our research usedexploratory classroom observations and consultations with STEM-ID developers to identify thecritical components of the STEM-ID curricula (Table 1). Subsequently, our originalimplementation research used the Innovation Implementation Framework to explore fidelity ofimplementation during the initial implementation of the fully developed curricula [15]. At thecommencement of the current project, we revisited the list of critical components with theproject team to confirm that, given curricula refinement and further data analysis, the originalcritical components still reflect the elements essential to achieving the desired outcomes of thecurricula.Table 1STEM-ID Critical Components Structural – Procedural Component
, students reported dedicating 5-6 hours on average to project tasks. This range is not reflected equally across each team, andsome individuals listed up to 18 hours of project activities during the final two weeks. Thecurrent project timeline also required the instructor to review and provide timely feedback whilemanaging the activity during the 2.5-hour lab. Individual and team reports were due by 5 PM theday preceding the lab period so the instructor could review the progress before the midafternoonlab. Students have also provided feedback that the presentation and report are valuable, but theyrequested a longer period of time between test day and the due date for presentation and report.The other major challenge associated with this project is