wind energy, particularly in the characterization of fatigue and ultimate loads for floating offshore wind turbine concepts.Dr. Maija A. Benitz, Roger Williams University Dr. Maija Benitz is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Roger Williams University, where she has taught since 2017. Prior to joining RWU, she taught at the Evergreen State College in Olympia, WA, after completing her doctoral work jointly in the Multiphase Flow Laboratory and the Wind Energy Center at UMass Amherst.Dr. Lillian Clark Jeznach, Roger Williams University Dr. Lillian Jeznach is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Roger Williams University. She teaches the first year curriculum as well as upper-level courses related to
Material Culture. It presents a configuration andtriangulation of ethnographic methods to reveal concealed relations of design, the designer’sethical and caring thought and practice, and how, if at all, design relationships were valued. Thismethodology was tested throughout three semesters with undergraduate students in acommunity-engaged Architectural Technology course.IntroductionIn August 2015, I began an ethnographic study at a large, urban, Midwestern University on how,if at all, concerns with ethics were expressed within an architectural technology course forinterior design majors. Entitled Commercial Construction, the course utilized community-engaged pedagogy. My research aimed to identify whether and, if so, how ethical thought
. Communicate effectively with stakeholders and broad audiences. 5. Work productively on diverse multidisciplinary teams.This training involves an individualized interdisciplinary curriculum, scaffolded by laboratoryrotations and hands-on workshops, a year-long community-engaged design project, and trainingin entrepreneurship, communication skills, and team science. Individualized curriculums aretailored to trainees to comply with the requirements of their home graduate degree programs.Our traineeship program began in the 2019-2020 academic year as a result of a National ScienceFoundation Research Traineeship award. This traineeship program is meant to prepare at least100 STEM graduate students to address major societal challenges within our local
about gender and thegender binary (per Caroline Perez and Cordelia Fine). Assignments in Race & Technologyinclude an “infrastructure exploration” [25] in which students plan and execute a local journeyinformed by readings from Langdon Winner, Rayvon Fouché, Simone Browne, and others, thenpresent their observations to their classmates in ways that facilitate further discussion. For thecapstone project in Race & Technology, students may choose to propose a redesign of either aspecific technology or a STEM curriculum, drawing on the course readings and discussions. Thereadings lists for both classes are included as Appendices A and B.The Gender & STEM course was developed and taught by Mary Armstrong, a scholar ofliterature and gender
engineering-specific disciplines even though Next Generation Science Standard haveplaced an emphasis on teaching engineering concepts and practices in the K-12 curriculum [2].The entire engineering community has been working to address this concern through STEM nightsas schools, activity days at museums, and active involvement in the community. These STEMnights are amazing; however, one challenge with these events is that they are geared towards alarger audience (e.g., >50 people per event) for a short duration (e.g., 15-60 min) and the briefcontact time may not be sufficient to truly inspire potential young scientists and engineers oreducate them about engineering and the engineering design process. Recent efforts have attemptedto overcome this
sponsoredresearch design projects or community service design-build projects.The capstone course consists of a project completed over two semesters, giving the students anopportunity to apply and integrate their civil engineering knowledge from multiple sub-disciplines in an open-ended project. Paramount to the capstone experience is the application ofthe engineering design process. By implementing the Steel Bridge and Concrete Canoecompetitions as a project in the capstone course, it ensures that the projects have dedicatedleaders, advisors, time, and resources to facilitate competing at a high level. The capstoneprogram includes both group and individual graded requirements broken down into coursedirected group deliverables (25%), individual ABET student
drastic, however, students in this course are challenged to explore understanding inventoryand supply chain models in an abstract manner. Integrating their knowledge built within thecourse, students are asked to write about a concept, model, topic, or issue pertaining todeterministic and stochastic inventory modeling.Creative Writing Assignments. The first poem-writing assignment required students to create an“I am” poem about themselves. This assignment allowed students to experiment and gain someexperience with the specific poetic form on a topic that is personal and well known to them. Thisassignment is due in the second week of the course to encourage creative thinking early on. Thesecond poem-writing assignment required students to create an
Paper ID #42419Leveraging Mathematical Modeling to Expand Measurement-Process Opportunitiesfor Engineering StudentsLuis E Montero-Moguel, The University of Texas at San Antonio Luis Montero-Moguel is a Ph.D. Candidate in Interdisciplinary Learning and Teaching specializing in STEM education at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). Luis holds an MSc in Mathematics Education from the University of Guadalajara and a BSc in Mechanical Engineering. Luis is an NSF-CADRE fellow. As part of his doctoral program, Luis has earned a Graduate Certificate in iSTEM Education and a Graduate Certificate in Engineering Education. With
also used Nearpod with engineering students for instruction purposes [8].While the goal of this case study was to increase motivation and academic performance, theinstruction was not tied to information literacy. Instead, Romero Rodriguez used the gamificationaspects of Nearpod to deliver instruction on the engineering curriculum to two of their threecourse sections, with the last section receiving instruction as traditional lectures. They found thevast majority (98%) preferred the gamification instruction used in Nearpod to the traditionalmethods. In addition, 91% of forty-seven students surveyed shared that lectures using Nearpodincreased their motivation for the course topics. The gamified group also had an increasedpassing rate and higher
Paper ID #44217Identifying the Skills and Student Activities that Influence Career Pathwaysfor Black vs. non- Black Engineering GraduatesD’andre Jermaine Wilson-Ihejirika P.Eng., University of Toronto D’Andre Wilson-Ihejirika is currently a PhD candidate at the University of Toronto within the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Practice (ISTEP). Prior to that she worked for many years as an engineer and project manager in the Oil & Gas industry. She is originally from Nassau, Bahamas, and completed her B.Eng in Chemical Engineering at McGill University and her MASc. from the Centre
Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Toyama, 2009, pp. 108-114.[13] Cecil, J., Krishnamurthy, R., Sweet-Darter, M., and Gupta, A Role of Immersive Simulation and Cyber Technology based Approaches in Supporting Learning and Curriculum Innovation, Proceedings of the 14th Annual IEEE International Systems Conference, Montreal, Canada, April 20-23, 2020.[14] E Richard, et al., "Augmented Reality for Rehabilitation of Cognitive Disable Children: A preliminary Study," in Virtual Rehabilitation 2007, 2007, pp. 102-108.[15] R. Colpani and M. R. P. Homem, "An innovative augmented reality educational framework with gamification to assist the learning process of children with intellectual disabilities
this investigation involvesassessing the potential impact of revising the assessment structure to integrate best practices.The key questions guiding this research are: 1. Does altering the final assessment structure significantly impact outcomes related to cognitive fatigue, considering variations in question timing—either in concentrated sessions or spread out over an extended period? 2. Can incorporating best practices into the assessment structure lead to distinct and potentially improved results?Literature ReviewAssessment StrategiesEducation employs a wide array of assessment strategies, and recent research sheds light on theireffectiveness and implications. Authentic assessment approaches
CircuitsIntroductionAt the University of Idaho, an intermediate circuits course is required before students can takejunior-level classes. However, most community colleges only offer a first course in circuits, sotransfer students are immediately behind in their academic progression. One way to address thisis to develop an online lecture course with a suite of labs that a student can perform beforecoming to the university, say over the summer, so that the student can be on-track for graduation.In addition, as the number of online courses grows, these labs can be used by students whocannot come to campus.In our curriculum, the intermediate electrical engineering lecture and laboratory course beginswith sinusoidal sources, then introduces the students to steady
-curricular programs can provide these opportunities outside of the packed engineering curriculumwhile offering outlets for students to develop a growth mindset, build self-awareness, and learn totake initiative and build ventures in real-world settings.Developing creative and dynamic engineers requires a multi-faceted approach to engineeringcurricula. Theoretical courses, hands-on activities, project based learning, teambuilding andleadership opportunities all need to be packed into an accredited curriculum. The challenge for allengineering educators is to provide sufficient and consistent opportunities for engineering studentsto explore new ideas and approaches, act upon those ideas and transform them into value for othersand themselves. A co
situations.The study highlights the critical deficiency in engineering education at preparing students forethical and professional responsibilities in the workplace. Students expressed that theirundergraduate and graduate programs overly emphasized technical skills while neglectingprofessional development, communication skills, and ethics training. We found that thesecurricular priorities affected students’ perception of the culture of academic engineeringdepartments and, subsequently, shaped their own professional values and understanding ofengineers’ duty to society.Despite a handful of students viewing ethics as an unnecessary distraction to their curriculum,the majority expressed a desire for more expansive professional and ethics training
one breath) and FEV1 (forced expiratory volume – the total amount of air exhaled in one second)which are the two indicators of breathing/lung issues. To do this, we will code the calculationsdescribed below:Starting with raw data values in volts: 1. Convert to meters/second. This process is described with the sensor’s specifications. 2. Multiply wind velocity (m/s) x area of tube that air is flowing through (m2) = volume of air flowing past a point per second (m3/s). 3. For volume of air exhaled in one breath: total volume from beginning of change in wind flow to end (m3) calculated with an integral. 4. For volume of air exhaled in one second: total volume of air exhaled in one breath (m3)/ /total time (s
Computer Engineering and a rich academic experience spanning six years, her overarching goal is to craft engineering learning environments and experiences in a way that intricately engages students on a cognitive level. In addition to her role as an engineer and researcher, Shabnam is an advocate and ally for fostering greater inclusion in STEM fields and beyond.Dr. Nicole P. Pitterson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Nicole is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Prior to joining VT, Dr. Pitterson was a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University. She holds a PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University and oth
) community impacts from project implementation. [4-6, 13,14]. Through support of an NSF IUSE Development and Implementation Tier grant, the C-EEEMis now in its second year for replication in two cities, Youngstown, Ohio and Louisville,Kentucky.By operating in the complexity of a real-world context and providing more personalized learningand professional skill building supporting personalized learning and professional skill building,the C-EEEM represents and example of the future of engineering education [15]. Nonetheless,the C-EEEM learning environment also supports a range of STEM and STEM-adjacentdisciplines. Through a careful curriculum that centers on community-driven, strategicallydeveloped projects in critical areas for these communities (e.g
theycan meet the energy demand of a growing population for both the short-term (5 years) andlong-term (100 years). In their analysis, the students first consider providing power throughlocally available natural gas and coal which has an expected finite lifetime based on the Hubbertcurve for coal and natural gas extraction. The first plan then for energy is to potentially use thesefossil fuel resources in conventional combustion power plants that follow thermodynamicscycles such as the Rankine, Brayton and Combined Cycles. The students are given specificationsfor existing power plants and are allowed to refurbish and or retrofit the components to predictenergy production. Their simulation analysis is done with a series of MATLAB® codes that
graduates and projected needed civil engineerscontinues to grow. With recent investment in infrastructure through the Infrastructure Investmentand Jobs Act, additional civil engineers will be needed to design, build, and maintain civilinfrastructure. An innovative summer course at Purdue University aims to decrease the spacebetween the needed civil engineers and students graduating with an undergraduate civilengineering degree by helping pre-college students understand what types of problems civilengineers solve. This one-week course focuses on exposing students to both the depth andbreadth of civil engineering and has explored various topics, including resiliency versussustainability, design for tomorrow’s loads and problems, the use of novel
. Roychoudhry, and V. Taranikanti, "Implementing a modified team-based learning strategy in the first phase of an outcome-based curriculum– Challenges and prospects," Medical teacher, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. e492-e499, 2012.[5] S. Lightner, M. J. Bober, and C. Willi, "Team-based activities to promote engaged learning," College Teaching, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 5-18, 2007.[6] A. C. Edmondson and J.-F. Harvey, "Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations," Human Resource Management Review, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 347-360, 2018.[7] L. Gratton and T. J. Erickson, "Eight ways to build collaborative teams," Harvard business review, vol. 85, no. 11, p. 100, 2007.[8] D
-Compete can be integrated either as part of a design course taught ina single semester or as a two-semester capstone course or used by a team advisor for designprojects conducted as an extracurricular activity. With the two options for implementing E-Compete, course instructors and team advisors can decide which option best serves theirparticular teaching/advising styles.The Baja SAE is a collegiate competition especially for engineering and engineering technologystudents. It requires students to design and build an off-road vehicle that will survive a range ofconditions that include rough terrain and (possibly) mud and water. Participating in thecompetition offers teams of students opportunities to explore real work situations as they
, group structure, high stakes tests) [26-28], instead offering opportunities to recover from poor grades (e.g., submit test corrections forpartial credit, drop their lowest score) and build a growth mindset [e.g., 29]. Instructors shouldalso consider hidden curriculum related to overwork [30-32]. If we imply that engineeringstudents should always be studying, this might contribute to poor mental health. It might alsodiscourage students from persisting in engineering to earn their degree or enter the engineeringworkforce. Alternatively, we can encourage students to develop a healthy balance which includesattending to the eight dimensions of well-being via an array of activities.References[1] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
development in civil engineering. The research questions intended tobe addressed through this study are outlined as follows: (i) How does participation in an integrative design project involving 3D printing with concrete influence students' understanding of engineering design processes? (ii) To what extent do projects incorporating emerging additive technologies like 3D concrete printing enhance students' skills in experimental design and material design concepts within a civil engineering curriculum? (iii) Given that prototyping is not commonly emphasized in civil engineering, what are students' perceptions of the value and relevance of prototyping in civil engineering after participating in the
thread requires further work, either to efficiently integrate inclusive teaching into theexisting reward system, or to fundamentally change what counts in engineering.ConclusionLet us conclude with a few comments about bridging the valley of neglect that we defined in theabstract to be the missing link that divides scholarly work about DEI from concrete changes thatbenefit students, employers, and the broader community. On the one hand, there is a phenomenalbody of literature informing the practice of engineering education in general, and inclusiveengineering education in particular. On the other hand, even at an engineering college where asizeable percentage of the engineering faculty volunteered for a three-year faculty learningcommunity
Paper ID #42047Gray Goldmine: Charting the Course to Engineering Literature’s TreasuresJamie M. Niehof, University of Michigan Engineering Librarian Nuclear Engineering & Radiological Sciences, Engineering Education, Robotics, Integrated Systems & Design University of Michigan aˆ C” Ann ArborSarah Barbrow, University of Michigan Sarah Barbrow is a librarian and the Assistant Director of the Engineering Library at the University of Michigan. She is a liaison to three departments: Computer Science and Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, and Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering. Sarah graduated with an MSI in
Paper ID #41554Board 398: Sustaining and Scaling the Impact of the MIDFIELD Project atthe American Society for Engineering Education (Year 2)Dr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan Lord is Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She received a BS from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and MS and PhD in EE from Stanford University. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of equity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She has won best paper awards from the Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE
certified as an EFL and ESL teacher as well as a School Principal. Ari’s research and language revitalization interests include Mikasuki, Salish Ql’ispe (aka Salish-Pend d’Oreille, Montana Salish, and Flathead Salish) and Safaliba. His ethnographic work documents situated practice in grassroots policy initiatives and school-based activism among the Safaliba in rural Ghana. His language documentation includes conceptual metaphors and formulaic language in Salish Ql’ispe and Safaliba. He also explores applications of task-based language teaching in the pedagogy of revitalization. His practitioner papers analyze integrated content and language instruction, academic English instruction for graduate students, and asset-based
in ways that reinforce existing power structures. This underscores theimportance of critically assessing educational materials for their role in upholding or challenginghegemonic narratives within the engineering discipline and broader society–an avenue that wewish to explore further.From an STS perspective, policy is considered an integral part of infrastructure, as it shapes thecontext of the specific places in which scientific and technological work unfolds. Policies dictatewhat is built, how it is used, who has access to it, and the norms of its use and conversely, theconsequences of a lack of transparent policy around how spaces are regulated. Yet, policies alsomust be translated and performed, and those performances are in part guided
those who did not answer correctly receiving aless difficult question. However, sometimes, when correct, a student interpreted a similarquestion as an indication they were incorrect the first time. We also describe differences in theways students negotiated uncertainty and how they engaged in the more extensive instructionaltools. This paper contributes both to how students conceptually engage with complex materialsscience content and how student-technology interactions can support or hinder learning.Keywords: conceptual learning, knowledge in pieces, adaptive learning module, think aloud,materials science.IntroductionEngineering educators are increasingly emphasizing the importance of students’ conceptuallearning [1]. At the same time, the