a lessonon data science and several laboratory exercises on topics of bioretention basins, wetlands,physico-chemical processes, and green roofs. The students’ performance in the projects steadilyimproved each year and grades for the course increased each year. The grades for the 2023 classwere significantly higher than the grades for the 2019 class, which was the first year the coursewas taught. We believe this is likely due to the addition of the experiential learning componentsto the class. The revised course received positive student comments in the course assessment,which indicated enhanced student interest and learning.Keywords – Ecological Engineering instruction, experiential learning, project-based learning,nbs, nature-based
). Environmental Justice in the 21st Century: Race Still Matters. Phylon,49(3/4), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3132626Caballero, G. W., Wells, E. C., Echols, S. A., & Peaslee, E. H. (2024). Environmental justicefrom the ground (water) up: coping with contamination in Tallevast, Florida. Local Environment,1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2325080Cutter, S. L. (1995). Race, Class and Environmental Justice. Progress in Human Geography,19(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F030913259501900111del Puerto, C. L., Cavallin, H. E., Perdomo, J. L., Barreto, J. M., Suarez, O. M., & Andrade, F.(2019, June). Developing a collaborative undergraduate STEM program in resilient andsustainable infrastructure. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference &
their advisors can lead to disparities intraining because the supervisor is mainly responsible for individual experiences, workplaceculture, and overall job satisfaction (Burt, 2019; Clement et al., 2020; Pyhältö, 2018; Scaffidi &Berman, 2011; Van Benthem et al., 2020; van der Weijden et al., 2016; Yadav et al., 2020).Postdoctoral scholars are exposed to high levels of stress due to significant scholarly outputexpectations, limited supervisory support, and low institutional oversight (Burke et al., 2019;Leshner, 2012; Small, 2012). To support the career advancement, wellness, and mentorship ofpostdoctoral scholars, institutions must enact policies and practices that ensure effectivepostdoctoral care, notably when advisor guidance and
Paper ID #42901The ICE Faculty Development Program (Integrating Curriculum with EntrepreneurialMindset) – Then and NowDr. Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University Andrew Gerhart, Ph.D. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Lawrence Technological University. He is a Fellow of the Engineering Society of Detroit and is actively involved in ASEE and the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. He serves as Faculty Advisor for the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Student Chapter at LTU, director of IDEAS (Interdisciplinary Design and Entrepreneurial Applications Sequence), chair of the First
., & Lanning, R. (2019, June). Engineering students’ perceptions of belongingness in civil engineering. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Cech, E. A. (2023). Engineering ableism: The exclusion and devaluation of engineering students and professionals with physical disabilities and chronic and mental illness. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(2), 462-487.Clouder, L., Karakus, M., Cinotti, A., Ferreyra, M. V., Fierros, G. A., & Rojo, P. (2020). Neurodiversity in higher education: A narrative synthesis. Higher Education, 80(4), 757- 778.Coghill, E. M. (2020). An Introduction to Neurodiversity. Supporting Neurodiverse College Student Success: A Guide for Librarians, Student Support
. Nemeth, Human Factors Methods for Design: Making Systems Human-Centered. CRC Press, 2004.[2] B. Friedman and D. G. Hendry, Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2019.[3] J. D. Lee, C. D. Wickens, Y. Liu, and L. N. Boyle, Designing for People: An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, 3rd edition. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017.[4] M. Lewrick, P. Link, and L. Leifer, The Design Thinking Toolbox: A Guide to Mastering the Most Popular and Valuable Innovation Methods, 1st edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, 2020.[5] H. A. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.[6] C. Zoltowski
(KEEN) and ASU Mentorship 360. For more information and additional shared content,go to https://engineeringunleashed.com/ .8. References[1] L. Bosman, B. K. Mayer and P. McNamara, "Promoting Entreprenuerially Minded Learning through Online Discussions," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, 2017.[2] A. M. Buerck, M. A. Trotz, E. Ortiz Carabantes and D. A. Delgado, "Integration of a Local Wicked Problem into the Environmental Engineering Laboratory Curriculum," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, 2019 .[3] L. DiBerardino, L. Funke and D. Mikesell, " Incorporating the entrepreneurial mindset into a system dynamics course," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition., Salt Lake City, 2018.[4] C
represented five initial partnering institutions andincluded IAs from both colleges of engineering and veteran resource offices. SVSM participantsincluded one White male, Air Force National Guard Servicemember studying mechanicalengineering and one Bi-racial Asian female, Army National Guard Servicemember studying civilengineering. Initial data and developing findings from both sets up participants are described in apaper published in the ASEE 2022 Annual Conference proceedings [17].2.2 Year 2 Brief SummaryIn Year 2 (Jul 2022-Jul 2023), the PI and graduate researcher worked with two undergraduatestudent researchers on project work over the course of 10 weeks in the summer of 2022 throughan NSF funded Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU
, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 163–171, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.577.[6] H. Nerz and L. Bullard, “The literate engineer: Infusing information literacy skills throughout an engineering curriculum,” in Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL: ASEE, 2006.[7] J. M. Williamson, N. Rice, C. Tenopir, J. Kaufman, C. J. Faber, and R. M. Ellestad, “Best Practices for Engineering Information Literacy Instruction: Perspectives of Academic Librarians,” in Proceedings of the 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Oct. 17, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/best
Content Access.[11] Huang, Y., Li, J., and Fu, J., 2019, “Review on Application of Artificial Intelligence in Civil Engineering.,” CMES-Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., 121(3).[12] Soldatenko, D. M., 2020, “Artificial Intelligence: Past, Present and Future,” Russ. Foreign Econ. J., (9), pp. 127–134.[13] Ubidia, J., Guerra, M. A., Viteri, V., and Murzi, H., 2022, “Understanding Student’s Perceptions of Cultural Dimensions in Construction Majors: Deconstructing Barriers between Architecture and Civil Engineering Students,” 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.[14] Acosta, J., Ubidia, J., Guerra, M. A., Guerra, V., and Gallardo, C., 2022, “Work in Progress: Collaborative Environments in Architecture and Civil Engineering
the number of times papers were cited. Additionally,analysis of co-occurrence of the keywords used in these 69 papers was performed.Frequency of articles published during the 2013-2023 periodThe distribution of the publications during the investigated timeframe (2013– 2023) shows thelargest number of papers were published in 2023, followed by 2022 and then 2019, before theonset of COVID-19 (see Fig. 2). Technological innovation in education systems has gained moresignificance than it did in the past according to the steady increase in the number of publishedarticles. The increasing awareness of AR's potential to transform the construction industrycaused a spike in published articles about the technology earlier in 2013, as Fig. 2 illustrates
Education Conference, Reno, NV.Ansari, F., Wang, J., Shelby, R., & Patten, L. A. (2013). A Follow-Up Study of a First-YearLeadership and Service Learning Module. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Atlanta, GA.Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Brent, R. Mobley, C., Brawner, C.E., & Orr, M.K. (2019). I feel like I’ve found where I belong”: Interviews with Black engineering students who change majors. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028429 .Curry, J. & Shillingford, M. A. (2015). The Journey Unraveled: Career and CollegeReadiness of African America Students
City, Utah, 2018.[8] W. H. Guilford, M. Keeley, B. P. Helmke, and T. E. Allen, "Work in Progress: A Clinical Immersion Program for Broad Curricular Impact," presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019. Available: https://peer.asee.org/33581[9] J. Kadlowec, T. Merrill, S. Sood, J. G. Ryan, A. Attaluri, and R. A. Hirsh, "Clinical Immersion and Team-Based Design: Into a Third Year," presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017. Available: https://peer.asee.org/28040[10] B. Bakka, H. G. Rylander III, M. K. Markey, and J. N. Savoy, "Towards scalable clinical immersion experiences for engineering students," presented at the ASEE
, (Baltimore , Maryland), ASEE Conferences, June 2023. https://216.185.13.187/42574. [9] E. Sanders, M. Goldstein, and J. Hess, “Course experiences that promote and inhibit human-centered design,” Int J Technol Des Educ, 2024.[10] D. G. Hendricks, C. Gunnarsson, and C. Birch, “Design and implementation of an engineering for social justice curriculum,” in 2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, (Crystal City, Virginia), ASEE Conferences, April 2019. https://peer.asee.org/31753.[11] J. S. Asgarpoor, M. Handley, A. L. Sarang-Sieminski, J. B. Slaughter, M. C. Pollock, H. Murzi, and M. F. Cox, “Embracing diversity, equity, and inclusion in our classroom and teaching,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual
ABET student success metrics to key elements of student well-being and success, and through an evaluation of the perceived usefulness of the framework, anunderstanding of the impact of each ABET student success metric on well-being and success canbe further developed.References:[1] J. Roy, “Engineering by the Numbers,” American Society for Engineering Education: By theNumbers, 15-Jul-2019. [Online]. Available: https://ira.asee.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2018-Engineering-by-Numbers-Engineering-Statistics-UPDATED-15-July-2019.pdf. [Accessed: 25-Nov-2023].[2] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-GraduationBenchmarks for Undergraduate Engineering Schools, Departments and Programs,” AmericanSociety for
onhuman subjects’ review board specifications in hopes that we can increase the number ofstudents willing to participate in the research component of this study. Interviews with studentsafter reviewing their survey results will also be completed to better understand any trendsidentified in the results.References[1] N. S. F. National Science Board, Higher Education in Science and Engineering, NSB-2019- 7.Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation, 2019.[2] United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook. US Department ofLabor, 2020.[3] V. Akondy and S. Murthy, “From Novice to Expert Instructional Designer: A TrainingBased on Cognitive Apprenticeship Model,” in 2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference
generate anawareness among faculty of the power they possess and the impact of their work, not only inresearch settings, but in the classroom, too.References[1] S. Ambrose and M. Norman, “Preparing engineering faculty as educators.,” Natl. Acad. Eng., vol. 36, no. 2, p. 25, 2006.[2] S. Baum and M. McPherson, “Improving teaching: Strengthening the college learning experience,” Daedalus, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 5–13, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1162/daed_e_01757.[3] D. M. Riley, V. Henry, and L. C. Leighton, “What makes faculty adopt or resist change in engineering education?,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2013, p. 23.1367.1-23.1367.20. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org
Secondary School Students’ Engineering Design Experiences”.[7] N. Salzman, G. Ricco, and M. Ohland, “Pre-College Engineering Participation Among First-Year Engineering Students,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2014, p. 24.992.1-24.992.8. doi: 10.18260/1-2--22925.[8] N. Salzman and M. Ohland, “Effects of pre-college engineering participation on first-year engineering outcomes,” in 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2015, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2015.7344360.[9] A. W. Johnson, S. Willner-Giwerc, P. T. Grogan, and E. E. Danahy, “Pre-college students’ use of systems engineering methods in design,” in 2016 IEEE Frontiers in
Critical Race Perspective. International Journal of Advanced Counselling, 43(3), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447- 021-09437-xBork, S. J., & Mondisa, J. L. (2022). Engineering graduate students’ mental health: A scoping literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(3), 665-702.Bork, S. J., Tuladhar, A., & Mondisa, J. (2019, June). Board 134: Methods for Conducting a Scoping Literature Review on Engineering Graduate Student Mental Health (Work in Progress). Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—32242Costa, A. C. D. S., Menon, V., Phadke, R., Dapke, K., Miranda, A. V., Ahmad, S., Essar, M. Y., & Hashim, H. T
. Gaspari, E. Natale, R. Perilli, and A. G. Stamopoulos, “The role of measurement and simulation in additive manufacturing within the frame of Industry 4.0,” 2019 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, MetroInd 4.0 and IoT 2019 - Proceedings, pp. 382–387, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1109/METROI4.2019.8792876.[39] Y. F. Zhao, S. Sun, P. T. Velivela, and N. Letov, “Challenges and Opportunities in Geometric Modeling of Complex Bio-Inspired Three-Dimensional Objects Designed for Additive Manufacturing,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 143, no. 12, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1115/1.4051720/1114474.[40] I. Fidan et al., “Innovative Delivery of 3D Printing,” 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual
. Accessed: Feb. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.maps.mla.org/Resources/Policy- Statements/ADE-Guidelines-for-Class-Size-and-Workload-for-College-and-University-Instructors- of-English-A-Statement-of-Policy[2] A. C. Estes et al., “The ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop: Assessing 20 Years of Instructional Development,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1758–1786, 2019.[3] C. Riley, S. L. Beaudry, and A. Bettencourt-McCarthy, “An Institutional Excellence in Teaching Workshop Adapted from the ExCEEd Model,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[4] A. Morse, “Application of the ExCEEd Teaching Model to Improve Graduate Teaching in Environmental Engineering Courses,” in 2009 Annual Conference &
applications. She is the founder and adviser for the Women of Aerospace student organization at MSU. Prof. Sullivan is an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. She is the recipient of the 2019 Hermann Oberth Award and the 2014 SAE International Ralph R. Teetor Educational Award. Prof. Sullivan is a member of the MSU Bagley College of Engineering Academy of Distinguished Teachers.Shuvam Saha, Mississippi State UniversityDr. Masoud Rais-Rohani, University of Maine Masoud Rais-Rohani is Richard C. Hill Professor and Department Chair of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Maine. He is also Professor Emeritus of Aerospace Engineering at Mississippi State University. He has taught
violations. She has published several papers, including ”Ch˘osunjok as a Marginalized Diaspora in South Korea” (The Taiwanese Political Science Review, 2019) and ”Politics of Memory in East Asia and Democratization of Memory in the Post-Cold War Era: Do the Wartime Memories of Jeju, Okinawa, and Nanjing Compete?” (Discourse 201, 2017, written in Korean).Dr. Davis Chacon-Hurtado, University of Connecticut Davis Chacon-Hurtado, Ph.D.,is an Assistant Research Professor at UConn. He co-directs the Engineering for Human Rights Initiative, which is a collaboration between UConn’s Office of the Vice Provost for Research, the College of Engineering, and the Human Rights Institute, to promote and advance interdisciplinary
of decision-making as one of the teaching competencies. This isdespite the fact that almost all modern engineering jobs require critical decision-making skillson an everyday basis [7]. The importance of decision-making for engineering students ingetting jobs is also evidenced by the National Employability Survey (India) of 2016 and 2019[11] and research by Deming [12] on the growing importance of decision-making skills forthe majority of jobs including the ones in the engineering field.This is where we find a gap in current engineering education where the majority of thecurricula do not take decision-making into account. This is due to various reasons including: Lack of perceived need for teaching skills such as decision-making: Many
, pp. 383–394, 2018.[3] A. G. Frank, L. S. Dalenogare, and N. F. Ayala, “Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 210, pp. 15–26, 2019.[4] D. Mckinsey, Industry 4.0 after the initial hype.” Where manufacturers are finding value and how they can best capture it. 2016.[5] S. Luthra and S. K. Mangla, “Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 117, pp. 168–179, 2018.[6] S. S. Kamble, A. Gunasekaran, and R. Sharma, “Analysis of the driving and dependence power of barriers to adopt industry 4.0 in Indian manufacturing industry,” Comput. Ind., vol. 101, pp
First-year Engineering Classrooms,” in Proceedings of the 2019 American Society ofEngineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019.Accessed: Dec. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/a-multi-institution-investigation-into-faculty-approaches-for-incorporating-the-entrepreneurial-mind-set-in-first-year-engineering-classrooms[17] R. Desing, R. L. Kajfez, K. M. Kecskemety, D. M. Grzybowski, and M. F. Cox,“Mapping Entrepreneurial Minded Learning with the Longitudinal Model of Motivation andIdentity in First-Year Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 2018 FYEE Conference, Glassboro,New Jersey, Jul. 2018. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/mapping-entrepreneurial
. Nathir Rawashdeh, Michigan Technological University Nathir Rawashdeh has been a faculty member in the Department of Applied Computing at Michigan Tech, since 2019. Prior, he was an Associate Professor in the Mechatronics Engineering Department at the German Jordanian University, where he spent 10 years. His industrial experience includes 5 years in software development. He was a senior software engineer in the Laser Color Science and Imaging Department, at Lexmark International, Inc. in Lexington, Kentucky, and with MathWorks, Inc. in Natick-Massachusetts working on software quality engineering for embedded DSP programming using MATLAB and Simulink. His research focus is on unmanned vehicle perception, image analysis
sustainable development as “Meeting the needs of the present83 without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” [8]. This 1“Safely managed drinking water and sanitation services: Drinking water from sources located on premises, free from contamination and available when needed, and using hygienic toilets from which wastes are treated and disposed of safely.”https://www.who.int/news/item/18-06-2019-1-in-3- peoplehttps://www.who.int/news/item/18-06-2019-1-in-3-people-globally-do-not-have-access-to-safe- drinking-water-unicef-whoglobally-do-not-have-access-to-safe-drinking-water-unicef-who ASEE 2024 84 definition reflects an ongoing process that
,” Front Public Health, 2022 Mar 29;10:850172. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.850172.[2] N. Anderson, K. Potočnik, and J. Zhou, “Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State- of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework,” Journal of Management, 40(5), pp. 1297–1333, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128[3] K. M. Y. Law, and S. Geng, “How innovativeness and handedness affect learning performance of engineering students?” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), pp. 897–914, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9462-3[4] M. Barak and M. Usher, “The innovation profile of nanotechnology team projects of face-to- face and online learners,” Computers &