-responsive-images-connect- studentsFramework. (n.d.). New York State Education Department. https://www.nysed.gov/crs/framework#:~:text=The%20Culturally%20Responsive- Sustaining%20%28CR- S%29%20Education%20Framework%20is%20intended,and%20achievement%20through%20the %20cultivation%20of%20critical%20thinking.Fuhrman, R. (2020, September 15). Learning to recognize and celebrate students’ cultural experiences. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/learning-recognize-and-celebrate- students-cultural-experiencesGay, G. (2010). Culturally Responsive teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. Teachers College Press.Gay, G. (2018). Culturally Responsive teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice, Third
study is guided primarily by the concepts of Teacher Noticing and Teacher Beliefs. Thesetwo concepts inform our research questions and guide our analysis and findings. First, TeacherNoticing originated from Sherin et al.’s [12] book that conceptualized how a teacher’s noticing-ability in the classroom impacts the dynamic teaching and learning processes. Initiallyconstructed, ‘noticing’ is an ephemeral phenomenon. It happens instantaneously and under thenoise of other, more conscious, mental processes. This construct stems from two psychologicalconcepts: Teachers have selective attention to notice a situation in the classroom, then enactprofessional knowledge-based reasoning. However, beyond just in-the-moment, a teacher’slesson plan
is finding hires with knowledge in thisarea of design. Most engineers graduate with a degree in civil or architectural engineering, wherethe design courses are mostly focused on concrete, timber, steel, and masonry. However, mostfaçade materials are made up of glass, aluminum, vinyl, stone, cold formed steel, and wood.Although literature in the form of codes and standards exists for materials such as cold formedsteel (AISI S-10, 2016) [7], glass (ASTM E-1300, 2016) [8] and aluminum (Aluminum designmanual, 2020) [9], lack of any formal coursework or a textbook that compiles the design of thesefaçade materials, makes it more challenging for engineers working in façade design consulting.Table 1. Design and construction companies working on
, “Impactof Hot-Carrier Degradation on Drain-Induced Barrier Lowering in Multifin SOI n-ChannelFinFets with Self-Heating,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 67, No. 5, May 2020[9] T. Brown, G. Dogiamis, Y. Yeh, D. Correas-Serrano, T. Rane, S. Ravikumar, J. Chou, V.Neeli, J. Koo, M. Marulanda, N. Guankar, I. Hwang, H. Chandrakumar, J. Bates, Z. Tuli, Q.Yu, M. Weiss, J. Rangaswamy, C. Nieva, D. Frolov, T. Kamgaing, Y. Nam, H. Braunisch, S.Rami, “A 50-Gb/s 134-GHz 16-QAM 3-m Dielectric Waveguide Transceiver SystemImplemented in 22-nm FinFET CMOS” IEEE Solid-State Circuits Letter, Vol. 4, pp. 206- 209,Oct. 2021.[10] A. Kumari, D. Bhatt, “Ultra Wideband Low Noise N-path Direct Conversion Receiverfor 5G-advanced and 6G Wireless System” IEEE
.[9] D. A. Tillman and S. A. An. Guitarmakers on the border: Bilingual elementary students learning math by designing and building guitars. In Hunter-Doniger, T. (Ed.), STEAM Education: Transdisciplinarity of Art in the Curriculum. NY, NY: National Art Education Association, 2020.[10] A. Riegler. “Constructivism,” in Paradigms in Theory Construction, Springer, 2012, pp. 235-255.[11] J. M. Applefield, R. Huber, and M. Moallem. "Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding." The High School Journal, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 35-53, 2000.[12] S. M. Jones and E. J. Doolittle. "Social and emotional learning: Introducing the issue." The Future of Children, pp. 3-11, 2017.[13] J. Sweller
facilities/buildings. ● Become familiar with their mentor(s)’s first-hand experiences as an engineering student. ● Recall reasons and motivations for studying engineering. Materials Slideshow Presentation Activities Beginning of Session: Introduction: (5 min) ● Mentor introduction to the mentee(s) - name, major, class standing, hobbies, interests. ● Mentee introduction. ● Share the objective of the program: “During this program, you will learn about UT engineering, the different engineering majors that you can study, the college application process, and the many scholarships and
identity development.AcknowledgementsThis worked is supported by the Department of Engineering and King’s InternationalFoundation at King’s College London. The views expressed are my own.References[1] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, “Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year students’ engineering role identities and future-time perspectives,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 362–383, 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20324.[2] A. Patrick and M. Borrego, “A Review of the Literature Relevant to Engineering Identity,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p. 26428. doi: 10.18260/p.26428.[3] M. S. Ross, J. L. Huff, and A. Godwin, “Resilient
, and P. S. Fodor, "Mixing Optimization in GroovedSerpentine Microchannels," (in English), Micromachines-Basel, vol. 11, no. 1, Jan 2020, doi:ARTN 6110.3390/mi11010061. 7. A. D. Stroock, S. K. W. Dertinger, A. Ajdari, I. Mezic, H. A. Stone, and G. M.Whitesides, "Chaotic mixer for microchannels," (in English), Science, vol. 295, no. 5555, pp.647-651, Jan 25 2002, doi: DOI 10.1126/science.1066238. 8. H. A. Stone, A. D. Stroock, and A. Ajdari, "Engineering flows in small devices:Microfluidics toward a lab-on-a-chip," (in English), Annu Rev Fluid Mech, vol. 36, pp. 381-411,2004, doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122124. 9. B. S. Hosker, "Demonstrating Principles of Spectrophotometry by Constructing aSimple, Low
impartial perspective grounded in factual evidence. Ultimately, this endeavor seeks221 to empower students to become conscientious engineers equipped with the ethical principles and222 interdisciplinary mindset necessary to tackle the complex socio-technical issues of our time. In223 the future, we plan to evaluate the effectiveness of the class from the students’ perspective. ASEE 2024224225 Acknowledgements226227 Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those228 of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of UConn.229230 References231232 [1] “Generating Power.” United Nations, United Nations, www.un.org/en/climatechange
Performance on Robotics and Programming Tasks,” JITE:IIP, vol. 15, pp. 145– 165, 2016, doi: 10.28945/3547.[3] G. Potvin et al., “Disciplinary Differences in Engineering Students’ Aspirations and Self- Perceptions,” in 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2013, p. 23.438.1-23.438.11. doi: 10.18260/1-2--19452.[4] B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the numbers,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/ publications/14_11-47.pdf[5] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton, “Persistence, Engagement, and Migration in Engineering Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 259–278
Navajo Nation HumanResearch Review Board (protocol # NNR- 22.460).6. ReferencesAISES. (2023). Seeding Innovation. https://www.aises.org/content/seeding-innovationCampbell, T., McKenna, T. J., Fazio, X., Hetherington-Coy, A., & Pierce, P. (2019). Negotiating coherent science teacher professional learning experiences across a university and partner school settings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(2), 179–199.Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54.Datnow, A., Guerra, A. W., Cohen, S. R., Kennedy, B. C., & Lee, J. (2023). Teacher Sensemaking in an Early Education Research–Practice Partnership
inparticipant count each year but never approaching the hoped for participation rate of 100 studentsa year. IDEA Team participants added insight from the students’ perspective, sharing that thecompeting allure of alternative opportunities, such as employment, which offer greater financialincentives competed and won over an interest in joining the summer STEM programs.Additionally, reflections highlighted the prevalence of divergent interests among male students,with a notable inclination towards sports activities, presenting scheduling conflicts with STEMclub participation.Table 1: Cohort 1's 2020-2021 summer camp attendance.Despite the challenge of not reaching as many students as intended, one co-PI of theCISTEME365 program shared how the organizing
” byour university’s IRB committee. References[1] S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. (4th ed.) London:Pearson, 2020.[2] A. Vaswani et al, "Attention is all you need," in 31st Conference on Neural InformationProcessing Systems (NIPS), 2017.[3] R. Toews, "Transformers Revolutionized AI. What Will Replace Them?" Forbes, 2023.Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/robtoews/2023/09/03/transformers-revolutionized-ai-what-will-replace-them/.[4] T. Wu et al, "A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential futuredevelopment," IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 10, (5), pp. 1122-1136, 2023. DOI:10.1109/JAS.2023.123618.[5] E. A. Vogels, "A
Paper ID #42367Board 350: Preliminary Results from Community Colleges Collaborating inSTEMDr. Melanie B Butler, Mount St. Mary’s University Dr. Melanie Butler is the Principal Investigator for C3STEM: Community Colleges Collaborating in STEM, which is an S-STEM Track 2 National Science Foundation grant that has established pre- and post-transfer support, co-curricular, and career development activities for supporting recruitment, retention, and student success in STEM. She is a professor of mathematics in the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at Mount St. Mary’s University.Rosina BolenDINA YAGODICH
-12 organizations to incorporate engineering practices in classrooms as they incorporate Next Generation Science Standards into their curriculum. Pat has served as co-PI on NSF S-STEM and STEP grants. Pat is currently serving as the chair for the Washington Council on Engineering and Related Technical Education (WCERTE). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Preparing Early Engineers through Context, Connections, and CommunityAbstractThis NSF-IUSE project began in fall 2022 and features cross-disciplinary collaboration betweenfaculty in engineering, math, history, English, and physics to design, pilot, and assess a newlearning community approach to welcome precalculus level students
infrastructure management and transportation systems, and transportation engineering education. She teaches aDr. Frederick Paige, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Frederick (ˆa CœFreddyˆa C) Paige is the Assistant Director of the Virginia Center for Housing Research and an Assistant Professor at Virginia Tech in the Vecellio Construction Engineering and Management Program. Dr. Paigeˆa C™s main scholarship goal is toDr. Philip J. Parker P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville Philip Parker, Ph.D., P.E., is Program Coordinator for the Environmental Engineering program at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville. He is co-author of the textbook ”Introduction to Infrastructure” published in 2012 by
&G) 2022/23 U.S. Higher EducationGrant titled- Data-driven Approach to Problem Solving in Engineering Education Using Greenhouse GasMitigation Experiments and Simulations and by VentureWell Grant ID-25827-22. Any opinions, findings,conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the funding agency.References[1] A. Mehta, "A COP where the world finally faced up to the need to wean itself off fossil fuels," Reuters, 15 December 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/cop-where-world-finally-faced-up- need-wean-itself-off-fossil-fuels-2023-12-15/. [Accessed 28 March 2024].[2] R. Jalli, P. P. Kumar, R. S. Nuvvula
, includingthose outside engineering, allowing for comparison to our interdisciplinary-listed course. A tablesummarizing these offerings is shown in Table 1. Details relevant to these offerings followchronologically. Analysis for the courses are in the Analysis section. Table 1. Summary of course offerings including quarter course was held, course code(s), number of students initially enrolled and number of students enrolled after withdrawal deadline Quarter Course Course Code(s) # Students initially # Students enrolled after Offered enrolled withdrawal deadline Winter 2022 ASCI 10/ENGR 35 30 17 Fall 2022
values displayed • True RMS values determined • Accuracy is within 5% of voltage using a digital scope as the standard • Data collection: o Minimum of 10 samples/cycle over full frequency range o Minimum of 10 cycles over full frequency rangeBased on the data collection requirement, both the sample rate (fs) and number of samples (#s)can be determined as follows. 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 • 𝑓𝑓𝑆𝑆 = 𝑓𝑓𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 ∗ 10 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 = 100𝑘𝑘𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑓𝑆𝑆 100𝑘𝑘𝑠𝑠𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 • 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 (𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀
decrease in pass ratemay mean that the students who make it through the new first-year sequence are slightly strongerthan they were under the old sequence and may be better prepared for later courses involvingprogramming or CAD.References [1] Brooks, R. H., “First-year engineering program curriculum redesign,” ASEE 2021 Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, 2021. [2] Brockman, J., Fuja, T., and Batill, S., “A Multidisciplinary Course Sequence For First Year Engineering Students,” 2002 Annual Conference, 2002, pp. 7–69. [3] Weitzen, J. A., Rashid, M. M., Johnston, S., Maase, E. L., and Willis, D. J., “A Methodology for Restructuring Our First-year Introduction to Engineering Sequence at University of Massachusetts, Lowell,” 2015 ASEE
Project ELEVATEleadership team must incorporate training related to team science, including team formation.They must also develop transition and conflict management plans and clarify roles andresponsibilities for each committee and its members. 8. Acknowledgments This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No.#2149995, #2149798 #2149899 from the Division of Equity for Excellence in STEMin the Directorate for STEM Education. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.[1] D. L. Gillian-Daniel, W. G. Troxel, and S. Bridgen, “Promoting an Equity Mindset
Physical Science (S) 2 (8.33%) Social Science (S) 3a (12.5%) Technology (T) 0 (0%) Engineering (E) 15 (62.5%) Mathematics (M) 4a (16.67%) Prior Research Experience No 12 (50%) Yes 12 (50%) a one student had dual majors of Mathematics and Social ScienceThere was a total of five themes that
discipline (i.e., civil, nuclear), 3) total Ph.D.'s granted between 2014 and 2017 forthe program, and 4) engineering college. Graduate programs were also sorted by size based onthe number of doctoral degrees granted: small (1-6 doctorates), medium (7-19 doctorates), orlarge (19-225 doctorates). To overcome limitations with existing datasets, the research teamconducted purposive sampling with minority-serving institutions and institutions whose highestdegree awarded is a master’s to capture the broad range of GPD experiences. Overall, 45Graduate Program Directors or Chairs were contacted over multiple rounds with a focus onensuring diverse participation across the criteria outlined previously. In the end, 9 elected toparticipate in the semi
student success," 2013.[5] D. Henriksen, M. Henderson, E. Creely, A. A. Carvalho, M. Cernochova, D. Dash, T. Davisand P. Mishra, "Creativity and risk-taking in teaching and learning settings: Insights from sixinternational narratives," International Journal of Educational Research Open, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.1-11, 2021.[6] N.R. Kuncel, S. Hezlett, and D. Ones, "Academic performance, career potential, creativity,and job performance: Can one construct predict them all?," J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 102, no. 3, pp.599-616, Aug. 2010.[7] P. C. Wankat, R. M. Felder, K. A. Smith and F. S. Oreovicz, "The scholarship of teaching andlearning in engineering," in Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning:Exploring Common Ground, vol. 1
acareer. The effectiveness study on the student-facing presentation is currently being repeated in aYear 3 (2023) study. Future work includes analyzing data between control and treatment groupsand across years. We also aim to grow the network of faculty who share these resources topromote more students to join the teaching profession and inspire young minds.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Dr. Jared Breakall, the Mines chemistry course instructors, GFO presentationfacilitators, and research participants. This material is based upon work supported by theNational Science Foundation under DUE-Grant Nos. 1821710 & 1821462. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthor(s) and do not
with multidisciplinary teams allowingstudents one-on-one interaction while working on real projects enables them to negotiate theirparticipation with peers, resulting in a deeper integration of the involved disciplines. Boundary objects play a critical role in how interdisciplinary collaboration occurs, and the coursemust offer and promote concrete boundary objects (e.g., software, procedures, knowledge) from eachdiscipline. Although some software may be predominantly used in the new CoP environment, instructorscan highlight alternative boundary objects that enable students to accomplish the tasks required in thecourse. ReferencesAlmeida, L. M. de S., Becker, K. H., & Villanueva, I
, “The equivalence of theorem proving and the interconnection problem,” SIGDA Newsl., vol. 5, p. 31–36, sep 1975. [6] E. Beyne, “The 3-d interconnect technology landscape,” IEEE Design & Test, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 8–20, 2016. [7] D. Sylvester and K. Keutzer, “Rethinking deep-submicron circuit design,” Computer, vol. 32, pp. 25–33, 1999. [8] M. Zhu, J. Lee, and K. Choi, “An adaptive routing algorithm for 3d mesh noc with limited vertical bandwidth,” in 2012 IEEE/IFIP 20th International Conference on VLSI and System- on-Chip (VLSI-SoC), pp. 18–23, 2012. [9] S. Das and D. K. Das, “Steiner tree construction for graphene nanoribbon based circuits in presence of obstacles,” in 2018 International Symposium on Devices
Paper ID #41979Decolonizing Stakeholder Analysis for Engineered SystemsDr. Shamsnaz Virani Bhada, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Shamsnaz S. Virani, Assistant Professor of Systems Engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute, earned her Ph.D.in industrial and systems engineering from the University of Alabama, Huntsville. She also holds a M.S. in human factors engineering from Wright State University, Dayton.Sarah E. Stanlick, Worcester Polytechnic Institute ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Decolonizing stakeholder analysis for engineered systemsAbstractIn systems
. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102011.[8] C. Kenny, “Why Do People Die in Earthquakes? The Costs, Benefits and Institutions of Disaster Risk Reduction in Developing Countries,” The Costs, Benefits and Institutions of Disaster Risk Reduction in Developing Countries (January 1, 2009). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no. 4823, pp. 1–42, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813- 9450-4823.[9] E. Hausler, “Building earthquake-resistant houses in Haiti: The homeowner-driven model,” Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 91–115, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1162/INOV_A_00047.[10] D. Félix, A. Feio, J. M. Branco, and J. S. Machado, “The role of spontaneous
. Bailey, and D. Fitch, ‘Evaluating Learning Outcomesand Assessing Social Work Skill Development: Comparing Online vs. In-Person Education,’ J.Technology in Human Services, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 47-57 2022, doi:10.1080/15228835.2021.1997693.[9] M. Cooper, E. Cardenas-Vasquez and A. Frye, “Why Would Some Students Prefer toWatch Lecture Recordings Rather than Attend Class? A Follow-Up Study” oral presentation,AIChE National Meeting, Orlando, FL (2023).[10] M. Andrasik, S. Frey, and M. Meheret Endeshaw, ‘Qualitative Methods: Coding & DataAnalysis CFAR SPRC Qualitative Methods Workshop Series’.https://depts.washington.edu/cfar/sites/default/files/uploads/core-program/user70/QualitativeMethods Workshop_Coding_05-2014.pdf (accessed Feb. 23, 2023