style in noway reflects an engineer’s requirement in their job which includes teamwork and multi-disciplineproblem solving skills [1]. Project-based learning (PBL) is a part of a pedagogical practice thatinvolves a wide range of engineering requirements methods. However, this learning method hasnot been holistically implemented [2]. To help with this issue, ABET, in its most recent guidanceis pushing for more PBL which research has shown as key and most prevailing attribute amongsuccessful graduate engineers within the industry [1]. The prevalent method for teaching inengineering disciplines is the “Chalk and Talk” approach. The instructor will lecture and thestudent will be a passive learner, not a student centered method [1]. These authors
that fails to adequately address current industry needs. Additionally,hands-on training, crucial for understanding the practical implications of securing interconnectedsystems, is often lacking in conventional lecture settings. This deficiency inhibits students fromgaining essential practical skills in identifying and mitigating cybersecurity risks within CPS andIoT environments, leaving them unprepared to tackle real-world challenges in the field. As aresult, there is an urgent need for innovative educational strategies that prioritize experientiallearning and reflect the evolving demands of the cybersecurity landscape within EE programs.On the other hand, the cybersecurity industry is grappling with a significant workforce gap, adilemma
education, any designed learning outcomes must be measured for successfulstudent comprehension. Redman, Wiek, and Barth recommend identifying which reason whichtools should be used and how to connect learning outcomes with the tools used with apsychometric model. Tools vary from student self-assessment, reflective writing, case studies,focus group interviews, performance observation, conventional testing, and regular coursework[15]. These varying methodologies of tools can offer insights into how competent students are inthe realm of sustainability, so those selecting tools should be holistically assessing the topics ofsustainability. For example, one such tool, the Sustainability Matrix, aims to interpretcompetences in resource consumption, design
abroad participation. The international diversity of a major has not been explored previously in relation to study abroad participation, but we Percentage of US Citizens thought it might be related either by encouraging participation by US citizens or lowering participation since non-US citizens are already studying abroad at Purdue University. Study Abroad Participation We included each year individually in the correlation matrix to for each academic year see whether each year’s study abroad participation is in the data set reflective of the total
similar proportion of LCOEenrollment as men constituted in CHHS. This difference in perception between colleges couldindicate that these perceptions disproportionately discourage women from pursuing engineeringrelated careers relative to men pursuing health and human services careers, which could explainthe relative low participation of women in engineering compared to other countries. Consideringthat these responses are only from students who are already pursuing degrees in these colleges, itis possible that these perspectives were developed while in the degree programs and may notaccurately reflect perspectives held by individuals at the time of selecting a major.Because differences exist between the proportion of Black/African American and/or
plan which needs to beaccepted by the unit’s executive committee. (The executive committee consists of the tenuredfaculty in the unit, excluding those tenured faculty holding certain administrative roles.) Thisallows a faculty member and the executive committee to agree upon a plan of work that bestsuits the skills and interests of the faculty member, while allowing the unit to satisfy its staffingneeds. Most of these five-year plans will closely reflect the standard workload policy of the unit,but some may adjust the distribution of the work of a faculty member between teaching,research, and service as deemed appropriate. Ideally, a comprehensive PTR conducted by a unitwill be based upon how well the faculty member met the five-year plan as
revisions and expansions to the lab environment. For instance, in the case of anotherelectronics course that utilizes different versions or manufacturers of instruments, developers caneasily extend the virtual lab to accommodate these new requirements with minimal changes. Thisprimarily involves updating the graphical model to reflect the different appearances of the newinstruments. Additionally, the physical model may be modified if there is a need to adjust thesimulation of the instruments’ physical behaviors, such as their interactions or movements withinthe virtual space. The functional model often remains unchanged, as the core functions of similarinstruments in electronics labs typically stay consistent. Figure 3 illustrates the three types
students to explore and innovate, as reflected in theirheightened level of collaboration. The findings emphasize the significance of integratingexperiential learning methods into environmental engineering education to enhance activeengagement and skill development among students. Importantly, these results hold broaderimplications for educational practices, highlighting the crucial role of hands-on, experientiallearning methodologies in nurturing collaborative skills vital for the future success ofengineering professionals. The limitation identified was the use of a single group for thisexperimental study as well as the small sample size.AcknowledgementThis study is part of the work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant
” learning. Bourke [5] provided an insight on the relationship between the class sizes andteaching practices in Australian math classes. The author profiled the faculty teaching small classesto adopt teaching methodologies, like those found in classes with higher ability students, rangingfrom more follow-up questions, homework assignments, oral tests, and direct interaction withstudents with limited nonacademic procedural arrangements.This paper reflects the cumulative years of teaching experience, encompassing both satellite andmajor university campuses. The satellite campus provides equal opportunities to students fromdifferent backgrounds to come together, learn from one another and feel more sheltered andsupported in their academic pursuits. The
research.IntroductionDespite decades of efforts to broaden participation in science, technology, engineering andmath (STEM) fields, most professionals in these generally high-paying, high-statusoccupations continue to be white men. In the United States, the STEM job-growth rateoverall is more than twice the average rate for the total workforce [1, p. 201], with most jobopenings in computer science and engineering (CS&E) [2]. The limited representation ofwomen in these fields is apparent: Women comprise just 28 percent of workers in science andengineering fields overall, and even less in CS&E fields [3].These labor-force dynamics also reflect trends in U.S. higher education: Although women’spostsecondary attainment rates exceed men’s, women remain
as an upward stair-like pattern. The widthof the horizontal steps is determined by the number and distribution of graded activitiesthroughout the course, while the height reflects the weights of these assignments and activities.A student's struggle in a course can be visualized by the difference between their cumulativenormalized and possible score curves. This difference tends to increase over time, particularly forat-risk students, indicating a steeper decline in performance. Additionally, this data allows forcomparisons between the progress of an average at-risk student and an average passing student.Figure 1 (bottom) displays such progressions side by side, with averaging resulting in smoother,almost linear curves, while maintaining
working on CO2 adsorption must examine the system and decide if they need to use a vacuum line, an external CO2 analyzer, or piping rated for their experimental pressures to ensure their experimental work area is safe at all times. 6. Allowing the creation of tangible products and artifacts: The project culminates in a poster session for which teams also prepare a summary of their approach to safety. This safety summary detailing their learning and their safety procedures in the laboratory is the final safety product developed from the courses. Students also reflect on the strategies their pursued to mitigate/minimize risks. Additionally, as required by the PjBL framework, knowledge is created by students
. The involvement of high-profile governmental entities highlights the national importance placed on quantum education.[9]. These efforts by both private and public sectors reflect a growing recognition of theimportance of quantum education and its pivotal role in preparing a skilled workforce for thefuture. As with cybersecurity initiatives led by NICE and NSF, Quantum educational initiativesneed to learn from the failures of preparing cybersecurity workforce [10], adapt well designframeworks and accelerate educational initiatives to bridge the current skills gap and ensuringthat the workforce is ready for the challenges and opportunities of the post-quantum era. Wepropose that there is no need to ‘redesign the wheel’.Incorporating Quantum
program. Students participating in the summerresearch abroad program expressed a positive and enriching experience. They took pride inlearning about diverse cultures and languages. The program enhanced their confidence andresearch skills, providing valuable insights into applying classroom knowledge in a lab setting.This encompassed the practical application of skills (presentation skills, knowledge of software),the transformation of academic concepts into concrete research projects, and an enhancedunderstanding and confidence in navigating the research process. Some students aspired to workand live abroad, viewing their developed technical, linguistic, and social skills as valuable assetsin their STEM career paths. Students reflected that their
, and engagement variables. Mediators explain the observed relationships betweenpredictors and outcome variables. Two studies assessed students’ motivation as a compositemultidimensional construct comprising of student scores on task relevancy, self-determination,self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation together and named it motivation [31],[35]. The results from their study show that need for cognition was an important construct andthat its effect was mediated by students’ motivation. Similarly, researchers have also examineddeeper processing strategies, such as reflective thinking, are associated with the level ofcognition necessary for conceptual change learning [38]. Our analysis revealed that mostmediational processes of
5 19 6.20 8.83 Very 37 80 46.25 37.20 Total 77 215 ~97 ~100Not all students answered all of the questions, so the totals for each question are unique. Thepercentages reflect the answers to the specific survey question. As well, not all students whoresponded to this question were online learners. The table above is included to show opinions ofthe importance of online course offerings. Of these respondents, 42.5% of returners elected toenroll in coursework, while only 25.6% of direct pathway did.Respondents were asked how confident they were to complete
subsequent sections along with a brief overview of the participants in thestudy.ParticipantsAll students enrolled in both sections of the Engineering Fundamentals course as collegestudents (n = 29) were invited to participate in this study, and of those 29 students, 27 returnedthe necessary consent form for participation. Of the students who gave consent to participate, allthose who remained in the class long enough to complete at least the first exam were offered theopportunity to complete the survey for the study, which resulted in 25 total participants. Thiscutoff was set to ensure student feedback reflected commentary from those who had enough timein the course to be able to speak to how the course’s structure impacted them. Of the
the problems are solvedby the instructor to assist their own attempt at similar homework problems. It is also possible thatstudents review the example videos that are directly connected to the upcoming exams. In Figure2(b) for Nano, there is a gradual decrease in the number of views as the videos cover thefundamentals of material science up to video number 15. The views climb immediately whenmore applied content is discussed, ranging from materials characterization to synthesis. ForNano, there are no example videos where students have to refer back to how the instructorapproached a problem. Therefore, the patterns observed here reflect the type of course content.Figure 3 presents similar data but now with views based on a unique viewer. These
Paper ID #43833The Value of Participating in the Grand Challenges Scholars Program: Students’Perceptions Across Three YearsAmy Trowbridge, Arizona State University Amy Trowbridge is an Associate Teaching Professor and co-Director of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering. Her teaching focuses primarily on first year engineering students, and she is interested in curricular and co-curricular experiences that broaden students’ perspectives and enhance student learning, and the use of digital portfolios for students to showcase and reflect on their experiences. Amy has
in a classroom context. A couple of usefulquestions that an engineering educator might address when considering students’ neuro diversity: a) How should an educator respond to the needs to train students to solve complex, multidisciplinary engineering problems in an academic setting? b) What we do know thus far is the fact that assessment strategies such as quizzes would not be effective in measuring or reflecting students’ level of tackling new challenges? 8 Duong-Tran et al.Referring back to Section 3, we also note that the thickness of e and f arrows indicates theeffectiveness of a multidisciplinary engineering education system in
framework was often cited by students as a positive example of transfer.Others benefitted from taking the lead in their learning and reflecting on the material. Thesestudents found what worked for them in terms of transfer:“What I figured out about myself is I learn best through, like, evidence learning and examplelearning where I go through and essentially like, will diagram out problems of being like, okay,now solve this, or this is how the book solved it. How did we get to each line? What...whatprinciple is this applying? What equations am I using? Why do we move on to each step? And Iwill, like, do that for different systems until I understand the overall ideas of why.”This theme draws attention to the importance of transferring all types of
lacks detail and only explains the client’s problem in the mostgeneral terms: [Midterm submission] Multinational quick service restaurant and coffee shop [Client A] aims to improve their outdated back of the house storage model for restaurants around the country to reflect current offerings. This model needs improvement because [Client A] does not believe they are building enough storage in new restaurants to accommodate the restaurant’s size and sales. They also want to ensure the back of house takes up necessary space - they want to avoid over allocating storage in a restaurant that does not need it, and conversely want to ensure they do not under allocate storage in restaurants that may need to
to cater to diverse learning needs better. The findings of this study can informpolicies and practices aimed at fostering inclusive educational environments, supporting STEMstudents with ADHD, and enhancing educational outcomes.AcknowledgementsWe would like to acknowledge Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP), the HigherEducation Research Institute (HERI), and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Inaddition, this research is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (2043430). Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] “NIMH » Attention-Deficit
course is highly groupbased and has three projects throughout the semester. The first two projects are small in scopeand is focused to help students learn the design thinking process. The final capstone project is 8weeks long is where students work on solving an open-ended engineering grand challenge. Thefinal deliverable for the course includes a functional prototype for the problem space the studentsare working on, and a final presentation related to the same. There are multiple low stakeassignments in the form of quizzes, reflections and fieldworks embedded throughout the courseadding to their final grade. Since Spring 2020 with the onset of COVID-19, the course alsofollows a HyFlex modality where students are given the autonomy to attend
Perception ItemsFigure 4: Bar graph representing the frequency of responses of the six perceptions. P1-TheArduino, M1K, M2k or others provided opportunities to practice content; P2 - The useof Arduino, M1K, M2k or others reflected course content; P3 - The use of Arduino, M1K, M2kor others was relevant to my academic area; P4 - The use of Arduino, M1K, M2k or othersreflected real practice; P5 - The time allotted for Arduino, M1K, M2k or others use wasadequate; P6 - The use of Arduino, M1K, M2k or others suited my learning goals 120 100 97 96 89
publication are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture orNational Science Foundation.References 1. W.J. Mitsch, “Ecological engineering: a new paradigm for engineers and ecologists,” Engineering within Ecological Constraints. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 111, 1996.2. W.J. Mitsch, “What is ecological engineering?” Ecological Engineering, 45, 5-12, 2012.3. J. L. Martin, V. Maris, and D. S. Simberloff, “The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(22), 6105-6112, 2016.4. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Data science for undergraduates
) program under award number 2130515 to Rice University via a subaward to TheUniversity of Texas at Dallas and under award number 2130328 to Prairie View A&MUniversity. The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References [1] L.N.P Campbell Lauren, E.M. Torres, S.J. Zaccaro, S. Zhou, K.N. Hedrick, D.M. Wallace, C.R. Luning, and J.E. Zakzewski, “Examining multiteam systems across context and type: A historiometric analysis of failed MTS performance,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol 13, 2022. DOI=10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813624 [2] R. Asencio and L.A. DeChurch, Assessing collaboration within and
research. This disconnect frequently results in exhortations that reflect thepast and ignore the progress that has been made to date.This paper comprises a case study of a successful and long-standing Women and MinorityEngineering Program at NC State University from the perspective of the program director. It willdiscuss a theoretical framework for the components of a complete program and how the variouspieces of the framework map to practice.Background “In a comprehensive study of successful programs and practices in minority serving institutions, intentionality, that is a “calculated and coordinated method of engagement…to effectively meet the needs of a designated population” was the common thread that distinguished
engineering disciplines and real-world ethical challenges. • Character formation and the role of virtues such as curiosity, humility, and discernment were discussed as to how to embed these character traits through projects or problem-based learning that allowed for ethical learning outcomes to be achieved. • Faculty worked to ensure the ethical principles across both courses were distinct, yet complementary to the learning performed in the prior courses. 6. Implementation Assessment: • Ethical modules were implemented in the expanded set of courses to gauge their impact. • Ongoing assessments, student feedback, and faculty reflections were collected
overall weight of the design but also reduces the exposedmetal surface area not covered by plants. Additionally, the bends in the troughs facilitateefficient substrate retention, promoting conducive conditions for robust plant growth whileoptimizing spatial efficiency.In conclusion, the analysis of patents related to vertical gardening has provided invaluableinsights that have profoundly influenced the design and development of the botanical wallproject. The transition from 3D-printed pots to troughs for plant containment, inspired by patentssuch as US8141294-B2 and CN101553108B, reflects a strategic shift toward cost-effective andmanufacturable solutions. Moreover, the structural integrity evaluation guided by patent findingshas informed