Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zachary Del Rosario, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Jin Ryu; Erika Saur

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

(S < 29) 31 (~57%) Neglected (29 <= S < 31) 12 (~22%) Reversed (31 <= S) 11 (~20%)The results above suggest that, for practicing engineers making decisions with data presented intabular form, targeting the consequences of variability is relatively difficult: Whereasengineering students readily targeted variability in scenarios with “everyday” variability (>90%of individuals targeted), in this pilot only ~57% of participants targeted variability correctly. It ispossible that the ~20% of participants with “reversed” responses were attempting to targetvariability, and that in a more deliberate setting (i.e., in the workplace), they would have

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Lee Kouo, The Johns Hopkins University; Jeanette Chipps, The Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

autism spectrum disorders during the transition to adulthood. J. Autism. Dev. Disord. 41 (5), 566–574. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1070-312. Kouo, J. L., Hogan, A. E., Morton, S., & Gregorio, J. (2021). Supporting students with an autism spectrum disorder in engineering: K-12 and beyond. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities. 24(11).13. Ehsan, H., & Cardella, M. E. (2019). Investigating Children with Autism’s Engagement in Engineering Practices: Problem Scoping (Fundamental). Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 15027–15043.14. Steinbrenner, J. R., Hume, K., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowell, S. W., Tomaszewski, B., Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yücesoy-Özkan, S., & Savage, M

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 8

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Kane, Utah State University; Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University; Angela Minichiello, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] D. F. Lohman, “Spatial Ability and G.” 1993.[2] K. S. McGrew, “CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research,” Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004.[3] H. B. Yilmaz, “On the Development and Measurement of Spatial Ability,” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–96, Mar. 2009.[4] C. Julià and J. Ò. Antolì, “Enhancing Spatial Ability and Mechanical Reasoning through a STEM Course,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 957–983, Dec. 2018.[5] M. Stieff and D. Uttal, “How

Conference Session

Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) in Construction Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sooin Kim, Wayne State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

are based on a201 student sample from Engineering Technology Division at Wayne State University. It would be202 interesting to further validate the effectiveness of BIM education for improving students’203 communication skills in other engineering disciplines, programs, or institutions.204205 References206 [1] S. Bhattacharya and G. Pant, “Digital transformation in AECO industry: impending207 dilemma in the Indian context,” J. Organ. Change Manag., 2023.208 [2] B. Bradley, “Global BIM Survey: U.S. market is maturing as advances wake imaginations.”209 Accessed: Feb. 03, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://agacad.com/blog/global-bim-survey-u-210 s-market-is-maturing-as-advances-wake-imaginations211 [3] J. Du, D

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) Technical Session: Engineering Leadership Competencies and Skills

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anuli Ndubuisi, University of Toronto; Philip Asare, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

-making andconflict management practices thereby enhancing productivity. In addition, support systems forinclusivity and accountability such as the responsibility matrix, team building ice breakers oractivities, and action items trackers facilitated trust management and relationship building [24].Furthermore, team management artefacts such as project schedule(s), task list(s), meeting notes,procurement and budget tracker(s) supported students’ efficient time management practices.While the project schedule facilitated planning of design project activities, the task listsfacilitated work transparency; meeting notes enabled progress tracking of tasks, and theprocurement tracker allowed for cost transparency of design project purchases. The

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University; Xue Jia Xie, Singapore University of Technology and Design; Jeffrey D Radloff, The State University of New York at Cortland; Michael Jin Khoo

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

stakeholders as well as teachers.Keywords: Integrated STEM, STEM education, preservice teachers, perceptionsIntroductionSTEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) integration is a dynamic andinnovative educational strategy (Li et al., 2020). Integrating STEM fields is essential forsolving complex problems in the information age (Chai, 2018). In contrast to the tendency inK-12 education to treat S, T, E, and M as separate disciplines, integrated STEM educationcombines these subjects to represent real-world contexts (Aguirre-Muñoz et al., 2020;Baptista et al., 2023). This student-centered and integrative approach enables students toconfront practical challenges by drawing insights and skills from both STEM and non-STEMfields. For instance

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill Davishahl, Western Washington University; Audrey Boklage, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

culturewith a focus on better supporting traditionally underrepresented students. Subsequent researchwill explore how student participation in these types of engagement activities correlate to thedevelopment of an inclusive makerspace and engineering education culture.Acknowledgement – This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation S-STEM program under Grant No. 1834139. Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. Galaleldin, F. Bouchard, H. Anis and C. Lague, "The impact of makerspaces on engineering education," in Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tuncay Aktosun, The University of Texas at Arlington; Yolanda Parker, Tarrant County College District; Jianzhong Su, The University of Texas at Arlington

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #41087Board 406: The Transformation of a Mathematics DepartmentProf. Tuncay Aktosun, The University of Texas at Arlington Dr. Aktosun is a professor of mathematics at the University of Texas at Arlington. His research area is applied mathematics and differential equations with research interests in scattering and spectral theory, inverse problems, wave propagation, and integrable evolution equations. He is involved in various mentoring and scholarship programs benefiting students. He was the GAANN Fellowship Director in his department during 2006-2022, he has been the NSF S-STEM Scholarship Director in his

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 5

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trevor Franklin, Cornell University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

. Bilec, A. Dukes, A. Nave, A. Landis, and K. Parrish, “Developing and Sustaining Inclusive Engineering Learning Communities and Classrooms.” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, 2022.[3] D. T. Rover, M. Mina, A. R. Herron-Martinez, S. L. Rodriguez, M. L. Espino, and B. D. Le, “Improving the Student Experience to Broaden Participation in Electrical, Computer and Software Engineering,” in 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2020, pp. 1–7.[4] L. Long and J. A. Mejia, “Conversations about Diversity: Institutional Barriers for Underrepresented Engineering Students,” J. Eng., vol. 105, no. 2, 2016.[5] M. E. Matters, C. B. Zoltowski, A. O. Brightman, and P. M. Buzzanell

Conference Session

DSA Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiang Zhao, Alabama A&M University; Mebougna L. Drabo, Alabama A&M University

Tagged Topics

Data Science & Analytics Constituent Committee (DSA), Diversity

MSIPP DE-NA0003980.The authors are thankful to the support of the DOE/NNSA program manager and the colleaguesat participating universities and national labs. Special thanks to Dr. Stephen Egarievwe atMorgan State University for his constant support and collaboration.References 1. J. Kennedy, P. Abichandani and A. Fontecchio, “An initial comparison of the learning propensities of 10 through 12 students for data analytics education,” IEE Frontiers in Ed- ucation Conference, Oklahoma City, OK, pp. 916-918, 2013. 2. Hirsch, D. D. (2013). The glass house effect: Big Data, the new oil, and the power of analogy. Me. L. Rev., 66, 373. 3. Iqbal, R., Doctor, F., More, B., Mahmud, S., & Yousuf, U. (2020). Big data analytics

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 3 - Diversity

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

tuition and other funding purposes, studentsenrolled in the 3+2 Program are treated as undergraduate students, and thus they are eligible forfunding as they work on multiyear projects with undergraduate students.Note that the project described here does not entirely fit the VIP Program definition from the VIPConsortium [15]. Namely, students may take research credits which are graded S/U. If they takethese credits as Independent Study, then they are graded A-F. Also, Senior Seminar is graded S/Uwhile Senior Design Project is graded A-F. So, there is a mix of grading types that was agreedupon by the program faculty.Moreover, stipends to fund participating students are secured through grants. About $2000 perstudent team for a senior design project

Conference Session

Charting Inclusivity: Advancing Diversity, Equity, and Technology in Engineering and Computing Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tyrine Jamella Pangan, Tufts University; Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

up disproportionate space 6 (0.42%) *Not coded as either inclusive or 967 (68.39%) marginalizing Inclusive Moves(1) Encouraging sharing. One way students increased the participation of other students was by encouraging sharing, which we define as proactively putting out an open-ended call for others’ input. To be coded as an encouraging sharing move, a student’s utterance had to go beyond simply asking for affirmation or refutation of an idea they themselves had stated. For example, when working on a problem about a firefighting hose, S made an encouraging sharing move when they put out a call for a peer’s idea: S: Yeah. What do you think Abe? What should we do?(2) Acknowledging

Conference Session

Mathematics Division (MATH) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julia Spencer, University of Virginia; Megan Ryals, University of Virginia; Gianluca Guadagni, University of Virginia

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics Division (MATH)

forTeaching and Learning Ordinary Differential Equations: A Systemic Literature Review andBibliometric Analysis,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 745, Mar. 2021, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070745.[5] S. Arslan, “Do students really understand what an ordinary differential equationis?,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 7,pp. 873–888, Oct. 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2010.486448.[6] C. L. Rasmussen and K. D. King, “Locating starting points in differential equations: arealistic mathematics education approach,” International Journal of Mathematical Education inScience and Technology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 161–172, Mar. 2000, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/002073900287219.[7] C. L

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 7

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Rohde, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sai Paresh Karyekar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Liangliang Chen, Georgia Institute of Technology; Yiming Guo, Georgia Institute of Technology; Ying Zhang, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

to student success in engineering education,” EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 368–381, 2017.[5] M. Scheidt, A. Godwin, E. Berger, J. Chen, B. P. Self, J. M. Widmann, and A. Q. Gates,“Engineering students’ noncognitive and affective factors: Group differences from clusteranalysis,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 343–370, 2021.[6] S.-M. R. Ting and R. Man, “Predicting academic success of first-year engineeringstudents from standardized test scores and psychosocial variables,” International Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2001.[7] B. F. French, J. C. Immekus, and W. C. Oakes, “An examination of indicators ofengineering students’ success and persistence

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 5 - Remote, Virtual, and Digital Realities

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fernando Merida, University of Florida; Sindia M. Rivera-Jiménez, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Research Investigations in the Context of Design Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chijhi Chang, Purdue University; Robert P. Loweth, Purdue University ; Kelley E. Dugan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

layout of conducive learning environment, foster community the study space engagement, and establish a smooth educational transition between high school and college.Internal budget analyses indicate that [University] will 1 5 $2 is too small to beneed to raise undergraduate tuition by $2 to fund the consideredstudy space maintenance.[University]’s preferred furniture supplier says that 1 5 Limited impact ondesks and chairs for the study space are on 6-month the physical layout ofbackorder. the study spaceStudent organizations, including sororities and 4 3 Student

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session 2 - Educator's experience and perspective

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yuliana Flores, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington; Soraya Grace Barar; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

prep weeks. Week 4's preparationconsisted of Paige and Gabby splitting up the work of creating a new set of slides and theirinstructor notes. Like the prior weeks, the expectation was to use AUT 2020's slides but not evenwatching the Zoom recording for AUT 2020's Data Visualization lecture helped the team feelconfident in delivering the content. The data does not provide information as to why the videowas unhelpful. As a result, Paige and Gabby did research on the topic to understand datavisualization (data type/measurement scale, nominal/ordinal/quantitative, etc.). This led to Paigeand Gabby updating the visualization examples using postcards from previous students. All threeeducators acknowledged the amount of work required for week 4 and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rahman Tashakkori, Appalachian State University; Jennifer R. McGee, Appalachian State University; Cindy Norris, Appalachian State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #43077Board 188: A Legacy of Success: The High Achievers in STEMDr. Rahman Tashakkori, Appalachian State University Rahman Tashakkori received his PhD in Computer Science from Louisiana State University in 2001. He serves as the Lowe’s Distinguished Professor of CS and director for LSAMP and S-STEM programs at Appalachian State University.Dr. Jennifer R. McGee, Appalachian State UniversityDr. Cindy Norris, Appalachian State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Legacy of Success: The High Achievers in STEM Abstract - There are well-known and widespread

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Junior Anthony Bennett, Purdue University; Jason Morphew, Purdue University; Michele W. McColgan, Siena College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)

’ Understanding of Electromagnetism,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 543–566, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1080/09500690500339613. [3] B. T. Christensen and C. D. Schunn, “The role and impact of mental simulation in design,” Appl. Cogn. Psychol., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 327–344, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1002/acp.1464. [4] Learning to Think Spatially: GIS as a Support System in the K-12 Curriculum. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2006, p. 11019. doi: 10.17226/11019. [5] N. S. Newcombe and T. F. Shipley, “Thinking About Spatial Thinking: New Typology, New Assessments,” in Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity, J. S. Gero, Ed., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015, pp. 179–192. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9297

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division (COED) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Reeping, University of Cincinnati; Aarohi Shah, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

program. {problem_description} Buggy Program: ```{buggy_program} ``` Can you fix the above buggy program?” Instructors may find theseprompts useful to share with students to model using LLMs responsibly.Moving away from programming, Arndt [38] delves into the application of LLMs in explainingconcepts from system thinking and system dynamics, in addition to creating visualizations suchas causal loop diagrams (a model showing causal relationships between variables with +'s and –'sto denote the direction of the relationship). Leveraging the ability of tools like ChatGPT to writescripts in Python (and other languages), it was found that creating such visualizations waspossible by running the output outside of the LLM's interface – albeit with

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 18

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Kane, Utah State University; Marlee Jacobs, Utah State University; Rosemary Yahne, Utah State University; Wade H. Goodridge, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

components ofspatial ability which may aid in the creation of more complete training.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1712887. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] K. S. McGrew, “CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research,” Intelligence, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004.[2] D. F. Lohman, “Spatial Ability and G.” 1993.[3] A. Ramful, T. Lowrie, and T. Logan, “Measurement of Spatial

Conference Session

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 6

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aadithyan Vijaya Raghavan, Cleveland State University; Chansu Yu, Cleveland State University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)

4 shows the snippet ofkeywords extracted from a document [21], along with their score (S). Score (S) is based onkeyword features (term casing, term position, term frequency normalization, term relatedness tocontext, term different sentence) and is computed by the YAKE! Algorithm [31]. Lower the valueof S, the more significant the keyword [31].Third. To eliminate similar keywords, we employed a de-duplication process based on similarityalgorithms such as Levenshtein similarity [35], Jaro-Winkler [36], and Hamming Distance[37, 38, 39]. We used Levenshtein similarity because it works on the principle of the minimumnumber of single-character edits required to change one word into the other [38].For example, take a group of similar keywords like

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Toluwalase Opanuga, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

highlighted the need for a more consistent SDL assessment inengineering education. Of the SDL assessment scales discussed, Cadorin et al.’s [21] SRSSDLwas considered suitable for the validity current study for two reasons. First, its items alignedwith the skills to be examined in engineering students as part of a larger study that explores theimpact of metacognitive learning strategies on their self-directed learning. Second, it had beenwidely used in nursing education and its validity has been confirmed in related disciplines [48,60]. Examining the SRSSDL’s validity in a different setting- engineering education, wasnecessary to ascertain its suitability for the SDL assessment of engineering students.III. MethodsA. Instrument DesignCadorin et

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah L Rodriguez, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Taylor Johnson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Yeny Jimenez, Miami Dade Community College; antonio delgado

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

experiences of HSCC students.References[1] S. Lunn, M. Ross, Z. Hazari, M. A. Weiss, M. Georgiopoulos, and K. Christensen, “How Do Educational Experiences Predict Computing Identity?,” ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, p. 12:1-12:28, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1145/3470653.[2] S. Rodriguez, C. Lu, and D. Ramirez, Eds., “Creating a Conceptual Framework for Computing Identity Development for Latina Undergraduate Students,” in An Asset-Based Approach to Advancing Latina Students in STEM: Increasing Resilience, Participation, and Success, 1st ed., New York, NY : Routledge, 2021. | Series: Routledge research in STEM education: Routledge, 2020. doi: 10.4324/9781003002758.[3] G. A. Garcia, A.-M. Núñez, and V. A. Sansone, “Toward a

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anna Stepanova, Texas A&M University; Saira Anwar, Texas A&M University; Christina Belanger, Texas A&M University; Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

lessons, activities, assessment, outreach, andpedagogical practices. It will enable instructors to teach students in their courses and assignresearch projects. We envision that virtual learning will continue to be in high demand. In thefuture, the FossilSketch can be implemented across the nation in undergraduate science, biology,and paleontology classes. This application has great potential to be developed into an onlineversion of the course (MOOC).1 AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant “Improvingundergraduate student critical thinking and ability to solve environmental problems with fossilrecords through FossilSketch application” #2337105.References[1] A. Stepanova, C. Belanger, S. Anwar, C

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jeff Knowles, Oregon State University; Stephanie Adams, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

processes around EBIP-implementation. We hope that this model will facilitate moreeffective mentoring and training programs.References[1] A. Brooks, K. Heath, S. Brown, H. Dominguez, P. Shekhar, and J. Knowles, “One Size Does Not Fit All: Understanding how Faculty Implement Evidence-Based Instructional Practices in Their Engineering Courses,” presented at the IEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE), IEEE, 2022.[2] A. Brooks, J. Knowles, E. Clement, S. Prateek, and S. Brown, “Are All ‘EBIPs’ Created Equal? An Exploration of Engineering Faculty Adoption of Nine Evidence-Based Instructional Practices,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2023[3] J. Knowles, A. Brooks, E. Clement, P. Shekhar, S. Brown, and M. Aljabery, “A Qualitative Exploration of

Conference Session

Transgression, Conflict, and Altruism

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna Tonn, Boston College; Avneet Hira, Boston College

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

Press.Blacklock, J., Johnson, K., Cook, R., Plata, N., & Claussen, S. (2021, July). Faculty interpretations of sociotechnical thinking in their classrooms: Techniques for integration. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 4). Sage.Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York, NY: Basic Books.Bronfenbrenner, K. (2023, December 4). For labor unions, 2023 was the year of the strike—and big victories. The Wall Street Journal.Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education?. Science, Technology, & Human

Conference Session

Equity and Belonging

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Figard, Arizona State University; Abimelec Mercado Rivera, Arizona State University; Marcus Melo de Lyra, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)

specificity without the formalized structure required by asystematic review (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Borrego et al., 2014; Grant & Booth, 2009;Samnani et al., 2017). ScLRs are particularly useful for quickly mapping out key concepts,existing literature, and evidence to identify gaps in current research defined by a specificresearch question (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Samnani et al., 2017). Our study used Arksey andO’Malley’s (2005) ScLR framework (Figure 1), which recommends a five-stage protocol forconducting a scoping review: (1) identify research question(s), (2) identify relevant studies, (3)select relevant studies, (4) chart the data, and (5) summarize and report the results. Figure 1further details the process used in our

Conference Session

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD) Technical Session: Innovative Approaches to Teaching & Developing Engineering Leadership

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kim Graves Wolfinbarger, University of Oklahoma; Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division (LEAD)

. Mumford, S. J. Zaccaro, K. Y. Levin, A. L. Korotkin, and M. B. Hein, “Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 245-287, 1991, doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(91)90016-U.[3] F. J. Yammarino, E. Salas, A. Serban, K. Shirreffs, and M. L. Shuffler, “Collectivistic leadership approaches: putting the ‘we’ in leadership science and practice,” Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 382-402, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1754- 9434.2012.01467.x.[4] D. V. Day, P. Gronn, and E. Salas, “Leadership capacity in teams,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 857-880, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ursula Nguyen, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Deepika Menon, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Minji Jeon, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Amanda Thomas, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

try to minimize the amount of pepper flakes (used to represent pollutant fertilizer) in a cup of water while maximizing the amount of water remaining through the use of planning, collaboration, and two tools.” Build the Best Bridge “We are having students design and build a bridge and having them (Grade 2) look at the problem of building a structure strong enough to hold many pennies.”RQ2: What features are present in their engineering design activities? We utilized Moore et al.’s (2014) FQEE to address the second research question. Inparticular, we focused only on the Processes of Design (POD) and Issues