opportunities for outreach or did not find a right match with theorganizations that provided such opportunities; (2) outreach was considered insignificantcompared to their coursework. There was a general attitude that outreach was not “technicalenough” for engineers and the benefits of community service were not apparent enough tostudents; (3) it was hard to train mentors that were capable of teaching science and engineeringconcepts to a younger audience.We believe that community service builds strong, empathetic leaders. With this in mind, wetackled this design problem like engineers would and specified the user needs of students likeourselves, our k-12 mentees, and the university—our primary stakeholders. After manybrainstorming sessions, we
mind, Sharlene conducts teacher professional development that not only teaches content, but models strong science pedagogy so that elementary school teachers can experience for themselves the power of inquiry-based and open- ended learning. Sharlene received her B.A. in Biology and Psychology from Cornell University, her M.S. in Biopsychology from the University of Michigan, and her M.A.T. in Science Education from Tufts University.Christine M Cunningham, Museum of Science Page 22.667.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Exchange—Engineering is
. Write at least two sentences; 2) List atleast three words/phrases that come to mind when you think of an engineer; and 3) From yourperspective, what kind of activities you think are typical of an engineer? Fifteen minutes weregiven to the students to complete this part of the test. All written responses were transcribedverbatim into a spreadsheet.Data analysisDrawings and open-ended responses were analyzed by two researchers (i.e., the last author and adoctoral student, which is the first author). Following the procedure described by Oware et al.4,an inductive data analysis approach was utilized to code the drawings and written responses.After reading and rereading the questionnaire responses and discussing their impressions of theentire data
know the better”, “ Just to “Figure out how things work”Knowledge learn”, “So they know and be open minded”Fun “They may like it”Future Career “It’s a good field”, “An idea of what to become”, “A degree is good” HS – “No” Example quotes LS – “No” Example quotesAge “She will not understand”, “She’s 4” “Too young, but artifacts are important!”NOTES: Answers to open-ended questions provided by 21 out of the 22 HP, and by 9 out of the 9 LS that respondedpositively; and by 2 out of the 6 HS and 1 LS that responded negatively.Through the Engineering Questionnaire (EQ) parents were asked whether they engage in a
this research is emerging, it could provide a spring board to additional researchstudies. The research could include a larger sample of students from diverse schools using Page 22.1520.20distinct engineering curriculum. Different schools and different pre-engineering programs couldbe included. Undoubtedly, students from other pre-engineering curricula would have uniquelanguage, techniques, and themes. The results from this research provide a foundation for newresearch that would further elucidate students’ habits of mind and action. References1. Atman, C.J., D. Kilgore, and A. McKenna
’ objectives or users’ needs while satisfying a specified set of constraints. This definition promotes engineering design as a thoughtful process that depends on the systematic, intelligent generation of design concepts and the specifications that make it possible to realize these concepts. Design problems reflect the fact that the designer has a client (or customer) who, in turn, has in mind a set of users (or customers) for whose benefit the designed artifact is being developed. The design process is itself a complex cognitive process. (27 p. 104) In Towards a Vision for Engineering Education in Science and Mathematics Standards(2009), Sneider and Rosen provide a list of nine “Big Ideas” that
projectswith the “objects of the world” (nature = enhances the creativity of the mind of the youngengineer”). Furthermore engineering activities for Pre-K students were usually categorized in theterm “building objects through models,” discovering materials”, “junior builders”GreekIn this search the researcher used the Google and the Yahoo search engines. The search startedwith the words “δραζηηριόηηηες μητανικής για παιδιά” (engineering activities for kids). Thissearch led to just one result. The researcher, having been employed in the Greek educationalsystem for a series of years, was familiar with the fact that the term “Τετνολογία” (Technology),was the one main one used by the Ministry of Education Life Long Learning and ReligiousAffairs (MELLLRA
each stage, the engineerchecks to ensure that the Need and Constraints are met. For example, some problems naturallyarise from evaluation, but do not really need to be solved to meet the need.Since Practice was the priority curriculum, the Engineering Design Process was taught,practiced, and repeated in several novel applications of increasing complexity. This scaffoldedstudents' experiences, helping them develop mastery of the practice.The units of the course had been set up at first with Core content in mind, starting withStructures and Materials, then moving on to Machines and Mechanisms, followed by Hydraulicsand Pneumatics, and ending with Electricity and Electronics. Students built on the knowledgeand skills of previous units.After
American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Involving Parents Can Improve Girls’ Perceptions of Engineering CareersMiddle school girls who participated in a recent engineering technology activity with aparent emerged with more positive attitudes about engineering than girls who workedwithout a parent.The activity, making a diode, was conducted by instructors at Illinois Valley CommunityCollege as part of a National Science Foundation-supported project1 designed to increaseinterest in engineering technology careers. The students who participated were the sixththrough eighth grade girls enrolled in a rural junior high, which has a high percentage oflow-income families. The girls were randomly divided into
their mind toadvance past what is currently possible and their creativity has been stoked by the inspiringliterature and complementary activities. For example, instead of a roller coaster, a skateboardroller coaster (Fig. 4A)! Instead of a typical car, a water-driven, jet-operated, car with vibratingseats (Fig. 4C). These kids are ready to advance the field of engineering!ConclusionsThe purpose behind the development and use of Engineering Elephants is not mastery of allengineering concepts, but to introduce children to the idea of engineering and problem solvingand encourage them to begin to imagine all of the things that they could potentially create.Results from integrating Engineering Elephants into 3rd grade classrooms show that
Page 22.1036.2mainstream K-12 education, not merely as an elective or extracurricular activity. We haveposited that engineering: (1) presents opportunities for students to acquire critical 21st centuryskills, such as problem-solving, creativity, innovation, and teamwork; (2) provides relevantproblems and contexts which will motivate students to more deeply learn and apply science andmathematics; (3) promotes habits of mind, such as analytical thinking, that can be applied acrossa variety of problems, disciplines, and contexts; and (4) is a misunderstood and little-knowncareer path that provides opportunities for intellectually and financially rewarding careers thatcan help society and improve quality of life.The 2010 report Strengthening STEM
AC 2011-315: MODAL ENGAGEMENTS IN PRECOLLEGE ENGINEER-ING: TRACKING MATH AND SCIENCE CONCEPTS ACROSS SYMBOLS,SKETCHES, SOFTWARE, SILICONE AND WOODMitchell J. Nathan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Mitchell J. Nathan, BSEE, PhD, is professor of Educational Psychology, with affiliate appointments in Curriculum & Instruction and Psychology at the University of Wisconsin - Madison, and a faculty fel- low at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research (WCER) and the Center on Education and Work. Dr. Nathan studies the cognitive, embodied, and social processes involved in STEM reasoning, learn- ing and teaching, especially in mathematics and engineering classrooms and in laboratory settings, using both quantitative
AC 2011-2287: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AS NOVICE DESIGNERSNathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nathan Mentzer is an assistant profession in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Nathan was a former middle and high school technology educator in Montana prior to pursuing a doctoral degree. He was a National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) Fellow at Utah State University while pursuing a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction. After graduation he completed a one year appointment with the Center as a postdoctoral researcher.Kyungsuk Park, Utah State University
, social, and mathematical phenomena.Engineering: Ability to keep in mind parameters of the project while creating aUnderstanding solution.ConstraintsEngineering: Generate an idea for testing based on knowledge of what might workCreating (from math or physics, for example, or even other things that exist - aHypotheses bridge in your neighborhood, something found in nature or even experience).Engineering: Figure out what must be done at certain time points in order to meet aProject deadline.ManagementEngineering: Use Use of computer aided tools for creating and modeling the project.of Software forDesign
boys are more often encouraged toexplore hands-on activities than girls, and where gender stereotypes in computer games aimed atyounger learners appeal more to boys than to girls. Alice Parker, an engineering professor at theUniversity of Southern California, also notes the importance of engaging female learners withengineering at a young age: “It’s important to reach them in middle school because in highschool, attitudes and preferences about career choices are already becoming entrenched, and itbecomes more difficult to change their minds.”6 To be most effective, engineering education at the middle school level (and all levels)must not only engage learners, but also support deep, intentional learning. Deep learningconnotes an
/math principles. This further fostered the mind set required for the evaluation of thedesign which the teachers then mimicked with their Upward Bound students.Results and Discussion One of the goals of the professional development workshop was to build teacherknowledge and skills in areas needed to successfully implement the curriculum. As an initialstep, the INSPIRES team and the external evaluation team generated a list of skill areas felt to beneeded by teachers to successfully implement the module. The skill areas include: Pedagogy Engineering design process Comfort/skill with tools Math and science content knowledge The evaluation and project teams developed measures for each of these areas
datarepresentative of the participants’ understanding of materials science, our other measures ofSTEM teaching attitudes and practices (comfort, efficacy, pedagogical discontentment, andinquiry implementation) relied more on the perceptions and state of mind of the participants.The dynamic and situational nature of affective states should be taken into consideration wheninterpreting our results. The collection of these data using a delayed post design may revealdifferent results and is an excellent direction for future research. Further, how the teachersinternalize and apply their knowledge in practice is likely to be a very fruitful direction forfurther investigation.Conclusion Materials science is an excellent example of an engineering field that
schools is in its early development. The report, Engineeringin K-12 Education, recently released by the National Academy of Engineering and NationalResearch Council6 provided a very insightful view of engineering education in K-12. The reportclaimed three principles for K-12 engineering education. First, it believed K-12 engineeringeducation should emphasize engineering design. Second, K-12 engineering should incorporateimportant science, mathematics, and technology concepts and skills. Finally, K-12 engineeringshould align with 1) systems thinking, 2) creativity, 3) optimism, 4) collaboration, 5)communication, and 6) attention to ethical considerations to promote engineering “habits of mind”(pp. 4-6). In summary, the report concluded there is no
learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.9. International Technology Education Association. (2002). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: Author.10. Childress, V., & Rhodes, C. (2008). Engineering student outcomes for grades 9-12. The Technology Teacher, 5(7), 5-12. Page 22.1508.1311. Childress, V., & Sanders, M. (2007). Core engineering concepts foundational for the study of technology in grades 6-12. In R. Custer (Ed.). Professional development for engineering and technology: A national symposium, February
hands-on activities impact mathematics learning and investigating the development of adaptive expertise through cooperation with the VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Educational Technologies. Research interests include the role of active learning strategies (e.g., hands-on activities and invention) in development of mathematics concepts, dynamic development of concrete & symbolic understanding of mathematics concepts, design & implementation of curricula and technologies that promote good math learning, and examining effectiveness of curricula and technologies in classrooms using experimental & observational methods.Pat Ko, University of Texas, Austin With degrees in electrical
the STEM Collaboratory. Taylor has built a large network of professional educators, education researchers and science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) professionals who actively collaborate to improve science education for K-University in San Diego County.Adrienne Marriott, San Diego Science Alliance Program Manager, STEM Professionals With Class Page 22.1323.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 STEM Professionals With ClassProject IntroductionBy all accounts there is a great need to improve STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering
connection with course concepts. “I like the opportunity to do hands-on things. It helps ideas we’re talking about in class come to life and makes me more excitedabout what we are learning.” Preparing demonstrations and presentations for high schoolstudents also increased commitment to engineering. “Talking about engineering with highschool students has made me more excited about engineering.” Finally many of the Page 22.1581.13undergraduate students stated that the program had a strong impact on their career plans. Asignificant number of students who had not planned on attending graduate school changed their minds and are now working on advanced
wide variety of engineering programs developed for K-12 education, most exhibit acommon set of characteristics but differ in the scope and approach to packaging the content. Ourproposed ICE-HS curriculum complements existing programs by providing a flexible frameworkfor selecting, adapting and integrating such materials, and it also follows the principles outlinedby the National Academy of Engineering8.The three general principles of the National Academy of Engineering8 include emphasis ondesign; appropriate math, science and technology content; and engineering habits of mind. Thedesign process is the main trait of engineering by identifying and solving problems. Mathematicsand science concepts serve as the foundation to understand engineering
AC 2011-628: CLASSROOM TEACHER - ENRICHMENT TEACHER PAIRS:CO-TEACHING AS A MEANS TO IMPLEMENT ELEMENTARY ENGI-NEERING EDUCATIONPamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University Dr. Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue is an Assistant Professor of Science Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She began her career as process engineer, taught high school physics and pre-engineering, and has been involved in both Project Lead the Way and Project FIRST robotics. She was a Hub Site Partner for Engineering is Elementary (EiE) through their National Dissemination through Regional Partners program. As a pre-service teacher educator, she has added engineering to her elementary and early
, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, CivilEngineering, Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and Math. CSULA faculty train fellows through apreparation course and workshops in order to improve communication, collaboration, andteaching skills. Furthermore, a strong partnership between CSULA, LAUSD, local industry, andminority serving organizations such as Great Minds in STEM and MESA has been established inorder to achieve program goals. Broader impacts include increasing the number ofunderrepresented minority students who pursue college degrees and careers in STEM and tostrengthen the research and teaching skills of the graduate fellows. At the time these demonstrations and activities were performed, the program consisted ofeight fellows
AC 2011-1052: COMPARISON OF TWO CURRICULUM MODELS FORMAPPING ENGINEERING CORE CONCEPTS TO EXISTING SCIENCEAND MATHEMATICS STANDARDSMike Ryan, CEISMC - Georgia TechBrian D. Gane, Georgia Institute of Technology Brian Gane is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Psychology at Georgia Tech and a research assistant at CEISMC. His research focuses on skill acquisition and instructional design.Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Marion Usselman is Associate Director for Federal Outreach and Research for Georgia Tech’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing. She has been with CEISMC since 1996 managing programs, interacting with K-12 schools, and assisting Georgia Tech faculty in
AC 2011-1229: USING SPACE-INSPIRED EDUCATION TOOLS TO EN-HANCE STEM LEARNING IN RURAL COMMUNITIESAllison Anderson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Allison is a PhD student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She received her undergraduate degree from the University of Southern California in Astronautics Engineering, and two masters degrees from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the Technology Policy Program.Guillermo Luis Trotti, Trotti & Asssociates, Inc. Guillermo Trotti Gui Trotti is an internationally recognized architect and industrial designer. His design thesis entitled ”Counterpoint: A Lunar Colony” is part of the
AC 2011-2312: IMPLEMENTATION OF MINI-LECTURES IN DREAM:RIGOR IN AN INFORMAL, DESIGN BASED HIGH SCHOOL MENTOR-ING PROJECTZhao Chad KongAngie Martiza Bautista-Chavez, Rice UniversityAndres J Goza, Rice UniversityRachel Jackson, Rice UniversityKurt Kienast, Rice UniversityMr. Sam OkeJuan A Castilleja, The Boeing CompanyBrent C Houchens, Rice University Brent C. Houchens is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Rice University. Page 22.814.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Implementation of Engineering Mini-Lectures in DREAM: Rigor in an Informal, Design Based High
and instruction. The central location acts similarly to „hackerspaces,‟ a physical location providing a common place for like-minded thinkers to collaborate onprojects. The goal of the paper is to report on a novel collaboration among home, public, andprivately schooled students within the context of a US FIRST team. Along with the collaborationhands-on modules are developed and taught by partnering engineers in collaboration with collegefaculty. The model applies the constructionist learning theory with structured preparation for thecompetition. In addition the paper presents issues and solutions to implementing an innovativeopportunity for home, public, and privately schooled students. This initiative lays thegroundwork for future endeavors
AC 2011-2751: TEACHER TRAINING AND STEM STUDENT OUTCOME:LINKING TEACHER INTERVENTION TO STUDENTS’ SUCCESS IN STEMMIDDLE AND HIGH SCHOOL CLASSESGisele Ragusa, Ph.D., University of Southern California Gisele Ragusa is an associate professor in the Viterbi School of Engineering and the Rossier School of Education at the University of Southern California. She has expertise in engineering education, precollege engineering and in assessment and measurement. Page 22.1370.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Teacher Training and STEM Student Outcome: Linking Teacher