AC 2011-534: USE OF A PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE SIMULATION INA FIRST YEAR INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING COURSENaomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison Naomi C. Chesler is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering with an affiliate appointment in Educational Psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics and cardiac function as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities.Cynthia M D’Angelo, University of Wisconsin - Madison Cynthia D’Angelo, Ph.D. has a background in physics and science education. She has always been inter- ested in improving science instruction and most
: Brain, Mind and School Expanded Edition 3Adding It Up4, Strengtheningthe Linkages Between the Sciences and Mathematical Sciences 5 have shown that with focusedintervention strategies many of the students can enjoy productive academic and professionalexperiences. Similar to the United States another argument can be made that there are regions inthe world that have huge pools of nontraditional students that could be actively engaged inproviding engineering goods and services of benefit to their infrastructure and society at large 6. While an overarching goal of the efforts at our institution is to prepare and retain studentsin STEM and to improve the preparation of students for careers in engineering, the strategyemployed in this work is to
on the mentalrepresentation of the desired structure. “Human thought has a definite function; it provides aconvenient small-scale model of a process so that we can, for instance, design a bridge in ourminds and know that it will bear a train passing over it” 6. Just as engineers may build a scalemodel of a bridge to be able to test its properties more easily and then make predictionsconcerning the necessary properties of the full-size bridge, so the mind performs a similarfunction by constructing a mental model that is used to process information and makepredictions. From this foundation, Johnson-Laird went on to construct his theory of cognition.He states: “The theory of mental models is intended to explain the higher processes of
Page 22.205.3 liberal education to solve general and non-engineering problems in the broad society,where an analytical mind may matter more than the traditional engineering skill set.This paper starts by highlighting ABET program outcomes to lay the groundwork forhow learning objectives map to what students say in their end of semester reflectivememos. Next we describe the overall approach and methodology for collecting andorganizing the “lessons learned” from student reflective memos. This will be followedby a summary of the data collected along with observations and interpretation. We willconclude with a discussion and analysis of how we interpreted what students are tellingus in their
/math principles. This further fostered the mind set required for the evaluation of thedesign which the teachers then mimicked with their Upward Bound students.Results and Discussion One of the goals of the professional development workshop was to build teacherknowledge and skills in areas needed to successfully implement the curriculum. As an initialstep, the INSPIRES team and the external evaluation team generated a list of skill areas felt to beneeded by teachers to successfully implement the module. The skill areas include: Pedagogy Engineering design process Comfort/skill with tools Math and science content knowledge The evaluation and project teams developed measures for each of these areas
of problem- solving skills they will need later in their program or in practice. They do not lead to the habits of mind that, whether the students become engineers or not, are such valuable contributors to work and citizenship. (p. 48) Engineering educators have recognized the importance of developing open-endedproblem solving skills and efforts to integrate open-ended problem solving experiences acrossthe engineering curriculum are not new (Incropera & Fox, 1996; Mourtos, Okamoto, & Rhee,2004; Woods et al., 1997). Woods (2000) notes that the literature is full of problem solvingstrategies, but that few have been supported by research evidence. Several studies of engineeringdesign have found that experienced
AC 2011-2460: STUDYING THE IMPACT ON MECHANICAL ENGINEER-ING STUDENTS WHO PARTICIPATE IN DISTINCTIVE PROJECTS INTHERMODYNAMICSMargaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Margaret Bailey is Professor of Mechanical Engineering within the Kate Gleason College of Engineer- ing at RIT and is the Founding Executive Director for the nationally recognized women in engineering program called WE@RIT. She recently accepted the role as Faculty Associate to the Provost for Female Faculty and serves as the co-chair on the President’s Commission on Women. She began her academic career as an Assistant Professor at the U. S. Military Academy at West Point, being the first woman civil- ian faculty member in her
learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.9. International Technology Education Association. (2002). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: Author.10. Childress, V., & Rhodes, C. (2008). Engineering student outcomes for grades 9-12. The Technology Teacher, 5(7), 5-12. Page 22.1508.1311. Childress, V., & Sanders, M. (2007). Core engineering concepts foundational for the study of technology in grades 6-12. In R. Custer (Ed.). Professional development for engineering and technology: A national symposium, February
AC 2011-2056: EMOTIONAL INDICATORS AS A WAY TO INITIATE STU-DENT REFLECTION IN ENGINEERING PROGRAMSJoachim Walther, University of Georgia Joachim is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is one of the leaders of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, and educational psychology. His research interests span the formation of students’ professional identity, the role of reflection in engi- neering learning, and interpretive research methods in engineering education. He was the first international recipient of the ASEE
for the problems they deal with.” A mechanicalengineering professor believed, “Engineers approach design logically, whether it works or notand that designers approach design aesthetically, whether it looks good or not and how userfriendly it is. But they both should have both in mind.”On the topic of selecting a solution one product/industrial design professor stated that,“engineers explore a few varieties to find an acceptable solution that is dependable. They like toknow for sure something will work.” Additionally, this professor felt that, “Industrial designersare trained to find the problems and then to find the solutions that are „plausible‟ based oncurrent and emerging technologies.” Likewise it was also stated by one participant, “In
noparticular degree in mind, and only 42% of the balance earned a degree in their initial intention.He thus concluded that there is considerable migration within an institution and that thismigration is a result of different factors that initially led students to their choice of major. Hefurther concludes that of the most capable students there is no difference in completion ratesbetween women and men and that the persistence to graduation of those students who reach the“threshold” (defined as completing entry-level courses) in engineering are higher than in mostother fields. Adelman (op cit) defines “curricular momentum” as a phenomenon that begins inhigh school and carries through into college and is related to academic success in requiredcourses
use of impromptudesign exercises across the engineering curriculum. The paper concludes by describing a pilotstudy on impromptu design exercises being conducted by the authors.1. Mind the gapThe call for more design experience in engineering curricula draws attention to a problem indesign education that engineering educators have noted for quite some time. Traditionalengineering programs lack curricular coherence when it comes to design. Students typicallyhave design experiences during introductory coursework (or “cornerstone” courses2) as freshmenand then again later as seniors during capstone projects or seminars. Thus, design experiencescomprise disjointed bookends in students‟ college careers. Their sophomore and junior years aredevoted
, Dimensions and Units2. Electrical Concepts and Components3. Digital Systems4. Electrical Engineering Tools and Communication Systems5. Fiber Optics6. Electronics7. Power Systems8. National Electrical Code9. Data Analysis10. Computer Engineering11. Ethical Issues in EngineeringA main consideration while preparing these topics was that the focus of the course was not tomake the students understand all the details from each topic. Instead, the objective was to exposethe students to these topics by keeping in mind that most of them do not have knowledge oncalculus and differential equations. Based on the amount of exposure that the student will receiveon each of the topics, either two
AC 2011-2229: BRINGING SMART MATERIALS APPLICATIONS INTOA PROJECT-BASED FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSEKristi J Shryock, Texas A&M University Kristi J. Shryock is a Lecturer and Director of Undergraduate Programs in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University. She received both a B.S. and M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M and received her Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering at Texas A&M in May 2011. Her research work focuses on engineering education.Dr. Kaushik Das, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TXStephen Oehler, Texas A&M UniversityJacques C. Richard, Texas A&M UniversityDr. Dimitris C. Lagoudas, Texas A&M
datarepresentative of the participants’ understanding of materials science, our other measures ofSTEM teaching attitudes and practices (comfort, efficacy, pedagogical discontentment, andinquiry implementation) relied more on the perceptions and state of mind of the participants.The dynamic and situational nature of affective states should be taken into consideration wheninterpreting our results. The collection of these data using a delayed post design may revealdifferent results and is an excellent direction for future research. Further, how the teachersinternalize and apply their knowledge in practice is likely to be a very fruitful direction forfurther investigation.Conclusion Materials science is an excellent example of an engineering field that
AC 2011-1372: IMPLEMENTING AN EFFECTIVE SUPPORT MODELFOR INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNINGDeborah L. Helman, University of Wisconsin, Madison Deborah Helman is the Director of Wendt Commons, which provides teaching, learning, information and media services in the College of Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Prior to assum- ing responsibility for this new organization, she led the staff of the CoE’s Wendt Library in providing engineering library services.Ryan J. Kershner, University of Wisconsin, MadisonDiana Wheeler, MA-LIS, University of Wisconsin, MadisonAmy L Kindschi, University of Wisconsin, Madison Amy Kindschi, MLS, Head of Faculty and Student Services at UW
service-minded engineers, and assist communities-in-need through engineering; and• Improve the image of engineers in the eyes of the general public, through promotion of service projects.1. IntroductionOver the last few years, concerns have escalated among many national organizations thattechnical expertise is no longer solely sufficient for the development of future engineers 1, 3, 4, 46.Additionally, in the United States engineering programs continue to struggle to attract students, Page 22.979.2especially women and minorities, despite decades of strategies to change these patterns. Theneed for a “paradigm shift” is recognized; one that
AC 2011-1292: ASSESSING ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ READINESS TOCOLLABORATE SUSTAINABLE DESIGN: AN OPEN ACCESS INSTRU-MENT FOR EXPERIMENTATIONLinda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State University Linda Vanasupa is a professor of materials engineering and co-director of the Center for Sustainability in Engineering at the California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo.Dr. Qiong Zhang, University of South FloridaJames R. Mihelcic, University of South Florida Dr. James R. Mihelcic is a Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering and State of Florida 21st Century World Class Scholar at the University of South Florida. He also directs the Peace Corps Master’s International Program in Civil & Environmental
AC 2011-418: INTERNATIONAL CO-OP EXPERIENCE AT THE BASEOF THE ECONOMIC PYRAMID FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTSJohn Farris, Grand Valley State University John Farris is currently an associate Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand Valley State University (GVSU). He earned his Bachelors and Masters degrees at Lehigh University and his Doctorate at the University of Rhode Island. He has 12 years of college engineering teaching experience as well as 3 years of industrial design experience. His teaching interests lie in the product design, first year design, design for manufacture and assembly and manufacturing processes. Dr. Farris is also involved in the development and delivery of a new
schools is in its early development. The report, Engineeringin K-12 Education, recently released by the National Academy of Engineering and NationalResearch Council6 provided a very insightful view of engineering education in K-12. The reportclaimed three principles for K-12 engineering education. First, it believed K-12 engineeringeducation should emphasize engineering design. Second, K-12 engineering should incorporateimportant science, mathematics, and technology concepts and skills. Finally, K-12 engineeringshould align with 1) systems thinking, 2) creativity, 3) optimism, 4) collaboration, 5)communication, and 6) attention to ethical considerations to promote engineering “habits of mind”(pp. 4-6). In summary, the report concluded there is no
. Otherconcepts come to mind—public health and safety, quality, usefulness, efficiency, cost/risk/benefit analysis, environmental harm, truthfulness, trustworthiness, loyalty and so on which arecommon in all engineering professional ethics.Many of these concepts are sometimes confusing and conflicting. Engineering math cannot beused to solve these problems to get the right answer. So, how we can help students to deal withethical disagreement, ambiguity, and vagueness? It is always part of real life that somedisagreement and uncertainty can be expected and should be tolerated, but majority’s view is theacceptable one although in many cases it may not be true (Harris et al 1996).There are additional goals of teaching ethics as well. Teaching ethics can
undergraduatetechnology and engineering curricula. The approach can be introduced in one classsession, with additional mentoring offered as needed. If time and resources allow,students can be coached through the proposed strategies over the course of a semester.Educators should keep in mind that it takes a long time for Google to “forget”information posted online, and that it takes time to see the results of the social mediaapproach proposed here. The senior year of college is a time when students are motivatedto change their online behavior, but ideally, social media literacy for online identitymanagement should be taught early, before damage is done, and while enough time isavailable to invest in building both a positive online identity and a professional
AC 2011-1667: INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH EXPERIENCE FOR EN-GINEERING STUDENTS IN CHINA IN THE AREA OF FUEL CELLSXia Wang, Oakland University XIA WANG (wang@oakland.edu) is an assistant professor in the department of MechanicalEngineering at Oakland University. Her research and teaching interests lie in the areas of fluidmechanics and heat transfer, with an emphasis on fuel cell technology. She is program director of the NSF IRES program at Oakland University.Laila Guessous, Oakland University Laila Guessous, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the department of mechanical engineering at Oakland University (OU) in Rochester, MI. Her research and teaching interests lie in the areas of fluid mechanics and heat transfer
AC 2011-575: INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS WITH PURPOSE: COMPEN-SATE, SUPPORT, AND CHALLENGE CHEMICAL ENGINEERING STU-DENTS IN AN INTRODUCTORY THERMODYNAMICS COURSEDan Cernusca, Missouri University of Science & Technology Dr. Dan Cernusca is Instructional Design Specialist in the Department of Global Learning at the Mis- souri University of Science and Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree in Information Science and Learning Technologies in 2007 from University of Missouri, Columbia. He also holds a B.S. and a Ph.D. from the University of Sibiu, Romania with a specialization in manufacturing technologies and respec- tively cutting-tools design. His research interests include Design-Based Research in technology-enabled
engineering curricula faces barriers that must be overcome. Thefactors impeding assimilation of virtual labs in engineering education are both perceptual as wellas substantive in nature. Physical labs are used as one of the primary means of providing hands-on experience to engineering students. In the mind-set of many present day engineeringeducators, hands-on experience is better gained in the physical domain as compared to hands-onexperience obtained in the virtual domain through virtual laboratories. This is due to the widelyheld view that physical labs provide a window to real world while virtual labs are just animitation of the real stuff – merely a computer-based simulation and visualization of the realworld. To some extent this view is
AC 2011-165: ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO ASSESSING MILITARYTRAINING FOR ADVANCED PLACEMENT INTO ENGINEERING ANDTECHNOLOGY PROGRAMSKevin James Wainwright, BC Institute of Technology Kevin Wainwright a faculty member in the School of Business at the British Columbia Institute of Tech- nology in Vancouver, B.C., Canada. BCIT has over 50,000 full and part time students and is the second largest post-secondary institute in the province of British Columbia Kevin has his Ph.D. in economics from Simon Fraser University where his fields of specialization were mathematical economics, industrial organization, law and economics, and environmental economics. He is co-author of the book, Fundamen- tal Methods in Mathematical
. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2008; 2008-2883.7. Tranquillo, J., & Cavanagh, D. (2009). Preparing Students for Senior Design with a Rapid Design Challenge. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, June 2009; 2009-1917.8. TeachEngineering Resources for K-12. http://teachengineering.org. Accessed January 2011.9. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Page 22.1596.10
AC 2011-2354: NEW PERSPECTIVES ON TEACHING INNOVATION TOENGINEERS AN EXPLORATION OF MENTAL MODELS OF INNOVA-TION EXPERTSEden Fisher, Mustafa Biviji, Indira Nair, Carnegie Mellon University Eden Fisher is the Director of the Masters Program in Engineering and Technology Innovation Manage- ment (ETIM) and Professor of the Practice at Carnegie Mellon University. Dr. Fisher holds a BS in Chemistry from Princeton University and a Ph.D. in Engineering & Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon. She worked in technology innovation for over 20 years at ALCOA. Indira Nair is Vice Provost and Professor Emeritus in Engineering and Public Policy at Carnegie Mellon. She has a Ph.D. in Physics from Northwestern University and has
AC 2011-1639: CHALLENGES AND BENEFITS OF ESTABLISHING ANENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS CHAPTER AT WWUForrest Alden Copeland, Western Washington University While completing his undergraduate degree in Manufacturing Engineering Technology, Forrest Copeland helped establish the Engineers Without Borders student chapter at Western Washington University in 2006. Copeland completed his degree in 2009 and graduated as the Engineering department’s outstanding senior. He also received the Presidential Scholar Award due, in part, to his work with the Engineers Without Borders student club. Shortly after graduation, Copeland traveled with four other students and one professional to conduct an assessment trip in Guatemala for the
hands-on activities impact mathematics learning and investigating the development of adaptive expertise through cooperation with the VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Educational Technologies. Research interests include the role of active learning strategies (e.g., hands-on activities and invention) in development of mathematics concepts, dynamic development of concrete & symbolic understanding of mathematics concepts, design & implementation of curricula and technologies that promote good math learning, and examining effectiveness of curricula and technologies in classrooms using experimental & observational methods.Pat Ko, University of Texas, Austin With degrees in electrical