Asee peer logo
Displaying results 271 - 300 of 347 in total
Conference Session
Capstone Design II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susannah Howe, Smith College; Mary A. Moriarty, Smith College; Apurva Errabelli
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
separating the technical skills versus the process related skills. (S4) Page 22.1543.10 We actually made a list on paper to write down what goes in each category … We split up our map into different areas of transferability. (S2) We decided to just get a bunch of colors and shapes and kind of throw them in the middle. (S6)Interestingly, several of the students commented that their process of making the map was areflection of their overall team process throughout the project: We each shouted different things at each other and said ok so what do we want to see, and then we just kind of went for it. … that
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Tuba Pinar Yildirim, University of Pittsburgh; Karen M. Bursic, University of Pittsburgh; Natasa Vidic, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees
pattern among engineering students.However, it is possible that the MEAs did not require much iteration during solution.We also investigated the time that students allocated to different phases of a model building ex-ercise (namely, the initiation, problem solving and finishing phases). Generally speaking, weobserved that allocating equal amounts of time to each problem solving phase is most beneficial.Specifically, we observed that in general, the students who earned the higher grades devoted ap-proximately the same amount of time to each of these three phases: Understanding the problem and searching for a solution, Solving the problem, and Evaluating and writing up the results.These “balanced workers” who put more emphasis on the
Conference Session
Active and Project-Based Learning
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John S. Lamancusa, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Laura L. Pauley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
(including how tofire a team member), and member roles. Examples of previous contracts are provided on whichto build. The very act of writing a team contract forces students to think about potentialproblems and their consequences. The contract is their first line of defense and helps them dealwith many problems internally. Since we have instituted the contract, team problems requiringinstructor intervention seem to have decreased.It is critical to quickly identify team problems which might adversely impact the team’sperformance and which might require instructor intervention. However, students are extremelyhesitant to report team problems to the instructor because they do not want to get their peers “in-trouble”. The team situation must usually be
Conference Session
BME Courses and Learning Activities
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jorge E. Bohorquez, University of Miami; Ozcan Ozdamar, University of Miami; Jonathon Anthony Toft-Nielsen, University of Miami
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
give immediate feedback to the students. Allobservations are collected and logged in a lab report after each session. In later labs, focus shifts to the microcontroller, specifically the 8051 modelmicrocontroller. Lab work shifts from building physical circuits to writing segments of code.Many students find programming portions of the course to be less immediately rewarding if theyare only manipulating digital values internal to the chip. In order to help ease the shift, as welland give students immediate physical feedback, the instructors for the class built a speciallydesigned test board. Each board was fitted with a port where the AT89C8051 microcontrollercould be plugged into after programming. Included on the board were a number of
Conference Session
Ethics in different disciplines
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diana Bairaktarova, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Demetra Evangelou, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
chosen representing both individualachievement (summative)18 and assessments to assist student learning (formative).18 Two kindsof summative individual assessments will occur in this course. On the first day of the course eachstudent will be presented with a short case to identify ethical dilemma, to name possible courseof action, and to evaluate the consequences of actions taken. Then again on the last day of classthe same case will be discussed with each student and the same questions will be asked. This willprovide students with a measure of progress in the areas of the content. The reflection journalsthat students will write throughout the semester will also act as a kind of informal summativeassessment. Grading will measure a student’s
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship Faculty Development
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Douglas E. Allen, Bucknell University; Steven B. Shooter, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
AC 2011-1863: BIG: UNITING THE UNIVERSITY INNOVATION ECOSYS-TEMDouglas E. Allen, Bucknell UniversitySteven B. Shooter, Bucknell University Steve Shooter, Ph.D., P.E. is Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Bucknell University where he has taught for design, innovation and robotics for 16 years. He has published over 90 peer-reviewed papers and been PI or Co-PI on grants from NSF, ONR, NIST, ARDEC in addition to industry. As a registered professional engineer he also consults extensively with industry on design projects and formulation of innovation strategies. Page 22.287.1 c
Conference Session
Assessing Student Learning
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James E. Bluman, U.S. Military Academy; Kathryn Purchase, U.S. Military Academy; Christopher Thomas Duling, U.S. Military Academy, West Point, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
topic. Students in Connor-Green’sclasses reported that they studied more consistently and came to class better-prepared, “Studentsappear to articulate their ideas more readily and clearly after writing their quiz responses, whichraises the level of class discussion.”8 However, Connor-Green did not realize any increase in thegrades of students who took scheduled quizzes.Literature Review: Other considerations On the other hand, Lowman 9 argues against frequent in-class quizzes because they canincrease anxiety about coming to class and can decrease the amount of learning that occurs inclass following the quiz. “…too frequent testing is costly in class time and in teacher time spenton grading; it also leads to an overemphasis on external
Conference Session
Certifying Teachers in Engineering or Integrated STEM
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
AnnMarie Thomas, University of Saint Thomas; Jan B Hansen, University of Saint Thomas; Sarah H. Cohn, Science Museum of Minnesota; Brian Phillip Jensen, University of St. Thomas
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
remotely operated vehicle). (SeeFigure 9) Figure 8: (a) buoyancy lab, (b) Stokes’ law lab Figure 9: Styrofoam cup that has been submerged in approximately 3,000 meters of water, next to a comparison cupEngineering and Society (3 hour unit)The goals for this unit are for the students to:  Understand the societal and environmental impacts that engineering and its products can have  Be able to identify both positive and negative impacts of engineered systems  Discuss the ethical obligations of engineersIn preparation for this unit, students were asked to choose an invention and write a briefhistory of it. They were then asked to list 3-5 positive aspects of this
Conference Session
Innovative Instructional Strategies and Curricula in ECE I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Bedrich Benes, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
peer evaluated by students in the classroom. Students are asked todiscuss the disadvantages of the presented method, such as weaknesses and possible extensions.The presentation allows showing the theoretical knowledge gained in the class in the context ofits practical applications to the contemporary CG scientific problems. An example of a studentproject is an implementation of Floyd-Steinberg dithering algorithm, or an implementation of a3-D static field defining an implicit iso-surface.Here we report students’ perceptions of their learning in the course and their perceived transferof such concepts and skills into practical situations. Focusing on student gained skills, theyreported a moderate perception of having learned the latest CG
Conference Session
Civil Engineering Education and Workforce Development Challenges
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Steven D. Hart, U.S. Military Academy; Ledlie Klosky, U.S. Military Academy, West Point; Joseph P. Hanus, U.S. Military Academy; Karl F. Meyer, U.S. Military Academy; Jason Allen Toth; Morgan Reese, U.S. Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
West Point and recipient of ASEE’s 2010 National Outstanding Teaching Medal. Dr. Klosky writes regularly about engineering education, covering topics ranging from classroom tech- niques to curricular reform. Much of this work is focused on the use of internet communications and social networks for educational purposes.Joseph P Hanus, U.S. Military Academy Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Hanus is the acting Chair of the Civil Engineering Department at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his BS from the University of Wisconsin - Plat- teville; MS from the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; and PhD from the University of Wisconsin - Madison. He is an active member of ASEE and is a registered
Conference Session
Biological & Agricultural Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
lourdes gazca, American University, Puebla, Mexico; Aurelio Lopez-Malo, American University, Puebla, Mexico; Enrique Palou, American University, Puebla, Mexico
Tagged Divisions
Biological & Agricultural
reading assignments.In addition, students are encouraged to write brief reflective journal entries to further solidify andreinforce their own understanding, and demonstrate that improved understanding for animproved quiz grade3.Food Chemistry (IA-332) is a course that is offered for students of sixth semester of FoodEngineering. This course was redesigned following the HPL framework to further promote aninteractive classroom while integrating multiple formative assessments by means of Tablet PCtechnologies4. It is a course that uses active and cooperative learning in everyone of its meetingsand activities. The grading scheme includes individual and group quizzes, individual and groupproblem-based exams, journal writing, peer assessments and the
Conference Session
Engineering Design in Pedagogy
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kyungsuk Park, Utah State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education, K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
and passing judgment on a possible or planned solution to theproblem. Evaluation (EVAL): Comparing and contrasting two (or more) solutions to theproblem on a particular dimension (or set of dimensions) such as strength or cost. Decision(DEC): Selecting one idea or solution to the problem (or parts of the problem) from among thoseconsidered. Communication (COM): The participants’ communicating elements of the designin writing, or with oral reports, to parties such as contractors and the community. Other: None ofthe above codes apply. See table 1.Table 1Coding Scheme and Description Code Description of Code Problem Definition (PD) Define what the problem really is, identify constraints
Conference Session
Curricular Innovations in College-Industry Partnerships
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Josh Tenenberg, University of Washington, Tacoma
Tagged Divisions
College Industry Partnerships
retains full responsibility for all academic aspects ofthe course: planning and writing the syllabus, developing the assignments and examinations, andassigning grades. The practicing professional joins the faculty member in the classroom orremotely via electronic communication on a regular basis, interacts directly with the students,and provides feedback on a sample of the student work. Targeted courses are those tied closelyto professional practice. In these courses, students produce tangible representations of authenticpractice, which serve to mediate the interaction between students, the teacher, and the practicingprofessional.Instantiating the modelI have instantiated Industry Fellows three times with three different industry fellows in
Conference Session
Integration of Liberal Education into Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
seminal work left unread by engineers dabbling in phenomenology and existentialism.(20) Aswith some great works, the actual writings of Husserl on philosophy are as revealing as how heoutlines previous philosophies to differentiate himself. Husserl argues that there are fourimportant revolutions in history of thought: Socratic/Platonic arguments based on logos and itssubsequent development into scientific thought; the Cartesian revolution; the transcendentalrevolution of Kant, whereby the only source of necessity is subjectivity and thus followsknowledge; and finally, the phenomenological revolution, which incorporates the form of andcontent of acts of knowing into a subjective framework. Descartes, according to Husserl’s history, believes
Conference Session
Issues and Answers in Mathematics Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amelito G. Enriquez, Canada College
Tagged Divisions
Mathematics
theirpersistence from one semester to the next. Table 8 is a comparison of the persistence rates ofCañada students and 2009 Math Jam participants. Over the last several years, a study of firsttime fall semester Cañada students shows persistence rates of 55% for the following springsemester, 38% for the fall of the following year and 32% for the spring semester of the secondyear. For the 2009 Math Jam participants, the corresponding persistence rates were 93% forspring 2010, and 76% for fall 2010. At the time of writing this paper, the spring 2011enrollments had not been completed. With much higher persistence rates, the degree-completion and transfer rates for these students are expected to be much higher as well.Two important variables that are commonly
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Technical Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University; Theresa Vitolo, Gannon University; Scott Steinbrink, Gannon University; Barry J. Brinkman, Gannon University
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
“StudentOrganizations and Leadership Development” (SOLD) office and the “Student Success Center”(SSC) that are each available to all GU students having the desire to partake of the servicesoffered. The SEECS seminar utilizes SOLD and the various resources of the SSC in order toprovide content that job- and graduate education-seeking students may need, as well as needededucation in skills required to succeed at Gannon.The SSC houses the university Math Center and the Writing Center, each of which provides freetutoring for students choosing to use those resources. In addition, the SSC fosters ExperientialEducation and general career development activities. SEECS makes great use of these latterresources. In particular, we have utilized the SSC staff to provide
Conference Session
The Best of Design in Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eckehard Doerry, Northern Arizona University; Bridget N. Bero, Northern Arizona University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
considerations for future courses of this sortin European higher education: • Adaptation to semester dynamics. Project-based courses typically build in intensity, peaking in a flurry of effort shortly before the final deliverable; this intensity requires even more effort in a large interdisciplinary team. Placing the final deliverable at the end of the term (its logical place) interferes with the unique dynamics of European higher education, where the last weeks are increasingly devoted to studying for all-important final exams. Design courses must be planned and scaled accordingly, by moving up the final deliverable, and planning lower intensity (e.g. reflection, report writing) activities in the final
Conference Session
Expanding the Borders of Engineering Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sandra Ingram, University of Manitoba; Anita H. Ens, University of Manitoba; Marcia R. Friesen, University of Manitoba
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative & Experiential Education
Manitoba, Winnipeg Canada, R3T 5V6; telephone:(1) 204.474.9698; e-mail: Sandra Ingram@umanitoba.ca.Anita H Ens, University of Manitoba Anita Ens is a Ph.D. candidate in Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning in the Faculty of Education at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada. She has over 15 years of experience working with adults in adult education and postsecondary settings, with particular focus on learning strategies and writing pedagogy. Influenced by the social, cultural, and relational aspects of learning, her research interests include collaborative writing, sustainability in education, and diversity in learning groups.Marcia R. Friesen, University of Manitoba
Conference Session
New Research & Trends for Minorities in Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State University; Christopher Dawson, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
outlined in thispaper that involve everyone in promoting diversity will help promote visibility of your minoritystudents. In addition, encourage these students to run for leadership positions and to apply forawards and scholarships. Offer to write letters of recommendation and give feedback onresumes, personal statements, etc.Seminars to help students learn to market themselves are extremely valuable. Consider invitingin a career counselor from the career center to talk to your minority student organizationseparately from their interactions with the student body. As mentioned before, backgrounds andcircumstances can be different for minority students. Within a large room, some students willnot want to speak up with questions, thinking that others
Conference Session
Aerospace Curriculum and Collaborations
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Valana L. Wells, Arizona State University; Jenefer Husman, Arizona State University; Praveen Shankar, Arizona State University; Wen-Ting Chung, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
an external reviewer for doctoral dissertations outside the U.S. She publishes regularly in peer-reviewed journals and books, and has held both elected and appointed offices in the American Psychological Association (APA) and the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Dr. Husman was a founding member and first President of the Southwest Consortium for Innovative Psychology in Education. She currently serves as the elected Co-Coordinator of the Motivation Special Interest Group of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.Praveen Shankar, Arizona State University Praveen Shankar is a lecturer of mechanical and aerospace engineering in the School for Engineering of
Conference Session
Recruitment, Retention, and First-Year Programs in ECE
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eric A Freudenthal, University of Texas, El Paso; Art Duval, University of Texas, El Paso; Sarah Hug, University of Colorado, Boulder; Alexandria Nicole Ogrey; Kien H. Lim, University of Texas, El Paso; Catherine Tabor, El Paso Independent School District; Rebeca Q. Gonzalez, UTEP-Graduate Student and EPISD-Teacher; Alan Siegel, New York University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
the process, iMPaCT introduces these students, who often have no priorexposure to imperative programming, to the basics of computational thinking motivated by problemsthey understand and care about.The original semester-length Jython-based iMPaCT course[5] has been decomposed into a network ofthreaded sequences of educational modules suitable for inclusion within conventional mathematics andscience courses. The overarching idea is to teach very lightweight computing that begins with adeclaration-free language to write dots on a raster display. iMPaCT, which is an approximate acronym Page 22.1159.2for Media-Propelled Computational
Conference Session
Engineering Technology Design I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert Edwards, Pennsylvania State University, Erie; Michael Lobaugh, Pennsylvania State University, Erie
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
for students in other fields. There are several general types ofseminars in use today. These range from general information about the school (known asextended orientation types) to discipline specific, pre-professional types. All of them offeradvantages for first year students trying to get acclimated to college life. In addition toadvantages for the students, other positive outcomes have been shown to result from having aformal first year program for students. For example, improved peer connections, increased useof campus services, and increased out of class faculty/student interaction have been attributed tothese programs.Almost half of the first year seminars are offered as one credit courses. It can be challenging todesign a course with
Conference Session
FPD VII: Innovative Curriculum Elements of Successful First-Year Courses
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Barbara Elizabeth Carruthers, The Ohio State University; Paul Alan Clingan, The Ohio State University - EEIC
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
somewhat routine, and students learnedwhat to expect from these types of problems.In addition, a lecture was added to the course curriculum outlining the basic statistics required tostate a confidence level for experimental results. Each student was required to write a MATLABscript calculating a significance level for each confidence level. These programs were used tostate the confidence level of their experimental results. The course structure itself was helpful inthe discussion of validation and verification of CFD results – by solving for experimental andcomputational results in parallel, students were able to identify potential pitfalls of using eitherapproach as the “correct” solution.Open-Ended Design Using CFD SoftwareThe CFD portion of the
Conference Session
K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shamsnaz Virani, University of Texas, El Paso; Iris B. Burnham, Burnham Wood Charter School District; Virgilio Gonzalez, University of Texas, El Paso; Miroslava Barua, University of Texas, El Paso; Elaine Fredericksen, Ph.D., University of Texas, El Paso; Sally J. Andrade, Andrade & Associates, Inc., El Paso, TX
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
Alabama at Huntsville, where she taught undergraduate courses in industrial and systems engineering and served as the faculty advisor for the In- stitute of Industrial Engineering local student chapter. At RIMES, she is involved in developing graduate courses and exploring research opportunities in systems engineering. She has written research proposals to National Science Foundation, Locked Martin Aeronautical, Raytheon Energy Systems, Texas Higher Education Board, and Texas High School Project. She conducts research with a local charter high school assessing the attitudinal changes in high school students in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math. She has published in several peer-reviewed journals and conferences
Conference Session
SE Capstone Design Projects, Part II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Radu F. Babiceanu, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Daniel Rucker, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Hussain M Al-Rizzo, University of Arkansas, Little Rock; Seshadri Mohan, University of Arkansas, Little Rock
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering, Systems Engineering
academic achievements he won the nomination by the University of New Brunswick as the best doctoral graduate in science and engineering. Since 2000, he joined the Systems Engineering Department, Uni- versity Arkansas at Little Rock where he is currently a tenured Professor. He has published over 35 peer- reviewed journal papers, 70 conference presentations, and two patents. He won the UALR’ excellence awards in teaching and research in 2007 and 2009, respectively. His research areas include implantable antennass and wireless systems, smart antennas, WLAN deployment and load balancing, electromagnetic wave scattering by complex objects, design, modeling and testing of high-power microwave applicators, design and analysis
Conference Session
Graduate Education and Undergraduate Research in ET
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wei Zhan P.E., Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
factors. This paper only discusses specific consideration for the tworesearch projects.4.2. The results and the benefitsAfter these REU projects, one of the student researchers became more interested in pursuing acareer in research related to STEM. He decided to change his major to pursue a BS degree fromElectrical Engineering and possibly obtain a graduate degree. He has applied for anundergraduate research scholarship from the Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation. Itis clear that through the projects the student researchers improved their communication skills,including presentation skills and technical writing skills. They also made significantimprovements in working effectively with faculty and graduate students and with peers on
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jay McCormack, University of Idaho; Denny C. Davis, Washington State University; Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow; Howard P. Davis, Washington State University; Michael S. Trevisan, Washington State University; Susannah Howe, Smith College; Javed Khan, Tuskegee University; Patricia Brackin P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Paul R. Leiffer, LeTourneau University; Phillip L. Thompson, Seattle University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees
) solution assets6. Each assessment instrument consists of a student writing assignment and ascoring rubric for instructors. In order to facilitate the management of multiple studentassignments, assignments to large numbers of students, and assignments of significant size, aweb-based system was developed for both student and faculty use where students log into thesystem to complete each given assignment. When submitted, instructors can log into the systemto see the student responses and provide feedback through web-forms that consist of theappropriate scoring rubric and comment boxes. The teamwork and professional developmentassessments have been more thoroughly tested. Instructional modules are not yet created for thedesign process and solution
Conference Session
EM Program Design
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary A. Viola, School of Engineering, Tufts University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
moral challenges. • Know how to address and reason through moral issues; how moral reasoning is different from reasoning in general. • Be familiar with several moral theories and how they can be used as tools in moral decision-making process. • Increase their self-awareness and desire to understand the broader world we live in. • Better understand their beliefs, ethical views and predispositions as well as their ‘way of knowing’. • Learn the value of self-reflection and improve their skills in reflective writing. Page 22.3.11III. Module 2: Art of Leadership: Influence, Empowerment
Conference Session
"Green" Topics in Architectural Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ahmed Cherif Megri, University of Wyoming
Tagged Divisions
Architectural
faculty and the Board of Advisors and will be implemented with the annual assessment cycle. The main point of these standards is that the evaluation of students’ performance will based on samples of work in three categories of students: those in the upper 75 percentile, those in the 50 – 75 percentile and those below the 50 percentile populations. Thus the assessment results compiled are based on course performances and grades, exams, projects, presentations of students, and writings as required in some courses. Furthermore, each course specifically addresses the learning outcomes and relation between the course and the Program outcomes, the methods used for the evaluation of students’ performance
Conference Session
Modeling and Problem-Solving
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Morris M. Girgis, Central State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
-solving skills. The test is a outcomes hybrid style of multi-choice and write-up questions.9. Oral Presentation At the end of the project, students present Assessing learningand Final Report their findings to their peers and submit a outcomes written final report.10. Post-project Get feedback and comments from the Assessing learningQuestionnaire students on benefits and pitfalls of the outcomes project. Page 22.159.7 Table 3. Active Learning Project OutlineIV