AC 2011-1070: A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR REMOTE LABORATORYEXPERIMENTSClaudio Olmi, University of Houston Claudio Olmi is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at the University of Houston. He received his B.S. and M.S. degree in Computer and Systems Engineering from the University of Houston. He specializes in System Integration of hybrid Mechanical and Electrical systems with focus on Software Programming, Analog and Digital Hardware Design, Internet Technologies for Remote Operations, Dig- ital Controls, and NI LabVIEW Programming. Olmi worked in projects using Smart Materials applied to Civil and Mechanical Structures for in laboratory and remote operations from where he published 2 journal papers
AC 2011-514: USING A LIVING-BUILDING LABORATORY (BUILDINGAS A LABORATORY) AS A FLUID MECHANICS LABORATORY PROJECTIN THE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUMJason K Durfee, Eastern Washington University Professor DURFEE received his BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. He holds a Professional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington Uni- versity he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, professional ethics and piano technology. Page 22.1601.1
, NSFinitiated several major initiatives to promote new STEM curricula. One initiative was theCalculus Reform Movement11. According to studies funded during the movement, students feltmore positive about calculus and perceived they were better prepared12,13,14,15. However, littledata has been generated to support assertions that reform efforts have had a significant impact ondownstream engineering courses16. Manseur, et al.17 reported that little progress has been madein mathematics education in engineering. They admitted that teaching needs to be different, butthey were not sure how to accomplish this. “Furthermore, engineering faculty members stillreport there are disconnects between the knowledge that students gain in mathematics coursesand their
ofimpacts and collisions [6].The impact process between a ball and a hard surface involves a change, albeit temporary, in theshape of the ball [1]. A frame-by-frame study of the pictures of bouncing tennis balls obtainedusing high-speed cameras (2000 frames per second) in our laboratory demonstrated that thisprocess consists of four separate and distinct phases: initial contact, deformation of the originalshape, restitution and recovery of the shape of the ball, and separation and takeoff [6]. Page 22.218.2In general, impulses that act on the ball during the deformation phase are different in magnitudeand direction from those that arise during
game called EduTorcs for teaching Numerical Methods and for teaching DynamicSystems & Control. In the former case, we found that students learning numerical methods witha video game learned the material more deeply, as measured by a concept map assessment9. Inthe dynamic systems & control class, we found that students who learned with video game-basedhomework and laboratory exercises scored significantly better on concept tests10. Furthermore,using a technique known as the experience sampling method, we found students learningdynamic systems & control with a video game are significantly more engaged11. Furthermore,these students were much more likely to take the more advanced dynamical systems & controlcourse as a technical
AC 2011-615: TEACHING DYNAMICS WITH A DESIGN PROJECTSDavid R. Mikesell, Ohio Northern University David R. Mikesell is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at Ohio Northern University. His research interests are in land vehicle dynamics, autonomous vehicles, and robotics. He joined the faculty in 2007 after work in automotive engineering at Ohio State (MS 2006, PhD 2008), six years designing automated assembly machines and metal-cutting tools for Grob Systems, and four years’ service as an officer in the U.S. Navy. He holds bachelor degrees in German (Duke 1986) and Mechanical Engineering (ONU 1997).John-David S Yoder, Ohio Northern University John-David Yoder received all of his degrees (B.S., M.S
AC 2011-691: OVERARCHING PROBLEMS IN SOPHOMORE MECHAN-ICS COURSESShawn P Gross, Villanova University Shawn Gross is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova University, where he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in structural engineering and engineering mechan- ics.David W Dinehart, Villanova University Professor Assistant Chairman, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringJoseph Robert Yost, Villanova University Joseph Robert Yost is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Villanova Uni- versity, where he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in structural engineering mechanics and designAleksandra Radlinska, Villanova University
AC 2011-190: EMPLOYING ANIMATRONICS IN TEACHING ENGINEER-ING DESIGNArif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University ARIF SIRINTERLIKCI received B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Istanbul Tech- nical University, Turkey, and a Ph.D. degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering from the Ohio State University. Currently, he is a Professor of Engineering as well as Co-Head of Research and Outreach Cen- ter at Robert Morris University in Moon Township, Pennsylvania. His teaching and research areas include rapid prototyping and reverse engineering, robotics and automation, bioengineering, and entertainment technology. He has been active in ASEE and SME, serving as an officer of the ASEE Manufacturing
AC 2011-1176: USING ACTIVE LEARNING IN TEACHING ELECTRO-MAGNETICSMadeleine Andrawis, South Dakota State University Dr. Madeleine Andrawis is Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at South Dakota State University (SDSU) since January 1992. She has also been the Coordinator of the Teaching Learning Center at SDSU from July 2002 till May 2010. Dr. Andrawis earned her Ph.D. from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in December 1991, and her M.S. from SDSU in 1983. Over the years, Dr. Andrawis has published and gave many presentations in the areas of electrical engineering, teaching effectiveness, the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, the use of instructional
. Page 22.588.6Conclusions This work describes the results of integrating an ethics case study in Senior UnitOperations Laboratory over a two year period. The data obtained from post course surveysrevealed several findings. First, students feel that learning ethics is important, and that casestudies were a useful tool in doing so. Second, we need to consider if teaching ethics is useful,because it is often a function of how students are raised. Finally, choosing the “right” personnel(i.e. one that is engaging and possesses a relevant industrial background) for this project isimportant for delivering a positive experience for students.References[1] American Institute of Chemical Engineering , AICHE Code of Ethics, Accessed January 18,2011
presented. Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for implementing this teachingmethodology are described.Introduction and BackgroundThis project was conducted to develop new teaching methodologies that emphasizeunconventional learning styles for an engineering laboratory environment as well as toincorporate technology for enhancing communications in classroom settings. The projectincludes assessment of methods for enhancing teaching and learning in geotechnical engineeringlaboratory courses. Teaching methods incorporating novel use of video technology are beingdeveloped to promote learning by stimulating a broader variety of learning styles than istypically used in conventional engineering laboratories. Learning-style-specific assignmentshave
AC 2011-2062: SPIRAL LABORATORIES IN THE FIRST-YEAR MECHAN-ICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMDebra J. Mascaro, University of Utah Debra J. Mascaro is the Director of Undergraduate Studies in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. She holds a B.A. in Physics from Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter, MN and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She teaches freshman design and senior-/graduate-level classes in microscale engineering and organic electronics.Stacy J. Morris Bamberg, University of Utah Stacy J. Morris Bamberg is an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Utah. She received her S.B. and S.M. in Mechanical Engineering
,often only one or two. Each instructor has high teaching loads of four or more courses persemester. Faculty have little time for course or laboratory development. There is limitedlaboratory support staff and budgets to buy and maintain equipment. While many communitycolleges exist, the relentless teaching demands on the faculty and geographic separation tend toresult in community college engineering faculty working in a state of relative isolation. Anyeffort to attract students into engineering careers and promote technological literacy for non-engineers through community colleges must contend with these challenges.Topics Cited as Appealing by Non-Engineering StudentsEngineering faculty teaching technological literacy courses for non-engineers
AC 2011-710: INDIVIDUAL DATA ACQUISITION AND EXPERIMENTA-TION IN UNDERGRADUATE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LABORA-TORIESDaniel Dickrell, University of Florida Page 22.861.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Individual Data Acquisition and Experimentation in Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering LaboratoriesIntroductionUndergraduate teaching laboratories in mechanical engineering curriculum are traditionallygroup-oriented courses with activities centered on large, singularly-purposed experimentalapparatus. This is often caused by the cost and maintenance support of the experiments and
AC 2011-2530: LAB@HOME: REMOTE LABORATORY EVOLUTION INTHE CLOUD COMPUTING ERAHamadou Saliah-Hassane, University of Quebec in Montreal Professor Saliah-Hassane is a senior researcher at the Inter-university Research Center (LICEF), and member of the Ordre des ingnieurs du Qubec (OIQ); of the IEEE (Member of the Administrative Com- mittee of IEEE Education Society (- 2010), Communication Society and Computer Society); of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). He teaches informatics and computer networks at Tl-universit, a Distance Education University of University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM). Profes- sor Saliah-Hassane has a PhD in Computer Aided Analysis and Design from the Electrical and Computer
AC 2011-896: ASSESSING AND UPDATING AN UNDERGRADUATE THERMO-FLUIDS LABORATORY COURSEGregory J. Michna, South Dakota State University Gregory Michna is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at South Dakota State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2006, held positions as a Lecturer at Iowa State University and as a Post-Doctoral Research Associate at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and joined the faculty at SDSU in 2009. He teaches courses in thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, and energy systems. His main research interests lie in the areas of thermal management of electronics and two-phase heat transfer.Stephen Gent
contamination 5. Second, experimental protocols dependent on using cells generally requirelonger periods of time compared to the commonly used three-hours time periods for traditionallabs 9. Third, the cost of the equipment needed to run the experiments is generally an impedimentto have duplicates or triplicates that would allow for multiple experiments to be carried out bythe students at the same time in a teaching laboratory. Current examples on cellular engineering laboratories are largely found in the chemicalengineering curricula where educators in that field have paid special attention to prepare theirstudents to take leading roles in the biotech and bioprocessing industries 10-12. However, most ofthese labs are biochemical in nature and
University Page 22.1654.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Using Virtual and Remote Laboratory to Enhance Engineering Technology EducationAbstractEnhancement of teaching, laboratory and human development by virtual and remote laboratorydesigns cannot be over-emphasized. In this paper, progress made in the development of a Virtualand Remote Laboratory (VR-Lab) for Engineering Technology is presented. Authors have usedprevalent technology to develop new Virtual and Remote Labs for Direct Current and DataCommunications experiments. The VR-Lab system framework
appropriate material available for faculty attempting to teach these courses. Incourses for engineering majors there is a well-developed body of course material available in theform of textbooks, laboratory projects, and assessment materials. A need exists for andappropriate range of course materials for general education engineering courses.On the issue of technological literacy, the potential role of existing introduction to engineeringclasses should not be overlooked. Due to their limited prerequisites introduction to engineeringcourses have the potential to be general education courses open to all students. In addition, thesecourses have the possibility of exposing engineering students to a broader range of technologicaldevices and issues than
AC 2011-1505: INNOVATIVE SHAKE TABLE LABORATORY INSTRUC-TION: IMPLEMENTATION AND ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARN-INGAlyn Marie Turner, University of Wisconsin-Madison Alyn Turner is a graduate student in the Department of Sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her research interests are in education policy evaluations, social stratification and inequality, and sociol- ogy of education.Sandra Shaw Courter, University of Wisconsin, Madison Sandra Shaw Courter is co-PI for ”Deployment and Integration of Shake Tables Using the NEES Cyber- infrastructure.” She is Professor Emeritus in the Department of Engineering Professional Development and Wendt Commons: Teaching and Learning Services. Her area of research is
Communications: ERRL," Proceedings of 18th Annual IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), 2007[4] M. Cabrera et al., "GILABVIR: Virtual Laboratories and Remote Laboratories in Engineering. A Teaching Innovation Group of Interest," IEEE Education Engineering (EDUCON), 2010, pp. 1403-1408[5] S.K. Esche, C. Chassapis, J.W. Nazalewicz, D.J. Hromin, "A Scalable System Architecture For Remote Experimentation," Proceedings of 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2002[6] J. Machotka, Z. Nedic, "The Remote Laboratory NetLab for Teaching Engineering Courses," Global Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.10, No.2, 2006, pp. 205-212[7] Jezernik K., Rojko A., and Hercog D
for signal processing experiments,” in Proceedings of IEEEICASSP, vol. 3, may 1998, pp. 1849–1852.[9] A. Spanias et.al., “Development of a web-based signal and speech processing laboratory for distancelearning,” ASEE Computers in Educations, vol. X, no. 2, pp. 21–26, jun 2000.[10] V. Atti and A. Spanias, “On-line simulation modules for teaching speech and audio compressiontechniques,” in Proceedings of IEEE Frontiers in Education, vol. 1, nov 2003, pp. T4E–17–22.[11] M. Yasin et.al., “On-line laboratories for image and two-dimensional signal processing using 2D J-DSP,”in Proceedings of IEEE ICASSP, vol. 3, apr 2003, pp. 785–788.[12] T. Thrasyvoulou et.al., “J-DSP-C, a control systems simulation environement: labs and assessment
,”ASEE Computers in Education Journal, pp. 21-26, vol. X, no.2, April-June 2000.[5] A. Spanias, and V. Atti, "Interactive on-line undergraduate laboratories using Java-DSP," in IEEE Trans. onEducation Special Issue on Web-based Instruction, pp. 735-749, vol. 48, no. 4, Nov. 2005.[6] V. Atti, and A. Spanias, "On-line simulation modules for teaching speech and audio compression," in Proc. ofIEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE-2003), pp. T4E-17 - T4E-22, vol. 1, Nov 5-8, 2003, Boulder.[7] V. Atti, A. Spanias, C. Panayiotou, and Y. Song, "Teaching digital filter design techniques used in high-fidelityaudio applications," in Proc. of ASEE-2004 Conference, June 20-23, 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah.[8] M. Yasin, L. J. Karam, and A. Spanias, ”On-line
Page 22.502.12 2010.7. H. Arslan. “A Wireless Communication Systems Laboratory Course.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Engineering Education & Training, April 9-11, 2007, Kuwait.8. C. B. Dietrich, F. E. Kragh, S. M. Hasan, C. Aguayo Gonzalez, A. A. Adenariwo, H. I. Volos, C. C. Dietrich, D. L. Miller, J. Snyder, S. H. Edwards, J. H. Reed. “Implementation and Evaluation of Laboratory/Tutorial Exercises for Software Defined Radio Education.” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, 2010.9. H. Arslan. “Teaching SDR through a laboratory based course with modern measurement and test instruments.” Proceedings of the SDR Forum Technical Conference, November 2007.10. S. Bilen. “Implementing
the IEEE Cincinnati Section, and in 1997 he received the IEEE Professional Achievement Award. He has held several research and management positions in industry working for such companies as Battelle’s Columbus Laboratories, Rockwell International, and Claspan Corporation. He joined the University of Cincinnati in 1985.Max Rabiee, University of Cincinnati Max Rabiee earned his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Kentucky (UK) in 1987. He has taught electrical engineering and electrical engineering technology courses full-time & part-time for 28 years; and he is currently Professor and ECET Program Chair in the School of Electronics and Computing Systems in the College of Engineering and
projects designed for a junior levelundergraduate communications course. The course is traditionally a lecture course with nolaboratory component. The authors aim to add a laboratory component to the course to helpstudents to better understand and analyze the theory taught in lectures. The laboratory componentis structured by following effective teaching strategies which aids reinforcement and retention ofinformation.Background and MotivationAn introductory communications course is the essential foundation to learn advancedcommunications topics. At Missouri University of Science and Technology, the Electrical andComputer Engineering (ECE) department offers a junior level undergraduate course:Communication Systems I. The course is presently a three
their mentors, otherparticipants, and graduate and undergraduate student researchers at the host institution.2.2 Teaching/research/mentoring The faculty team used the Paideia method in developing the instructional and researchpart of the program. Paideia14 method includes three techniques: didactic teaching, coachingwith scaffolding, and seminar opportunities for independent proficiency. The organization ofthe 10-week research program consists of a two-week technical tutorial followed by an eight-week research project with weekly seminars and weekly meetings between student team andtheir mentor. The technical tutorials and hands-on laboratory, such as introduction to analog and digitalcommunications, introduction to software defined radio
AC 2011-1513: TEACHING DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS USING THE MOUSEFACTORYDouglas H Timmer, University of Texas, Pan AmericanMiguel Gonzalez, University of Texas, Pan American Dr. Miguel A. Gonzalez serves as the Associate Dean and Director for the School of Engineering and Computer Science in the University of Texas Pan American’s College of Science and Engineering. He has a significant amount executive industry experience where he held managerial and executive positions including President and CEO of a large Citrus processor. Throughout his experience, Dr. Gonzalez’ pro- fessional and academic activities are focused on an overall mission to provide opportunities for student involvement by developing and maintaining a
size.Commonly accepted and literature proven methods of instruction are commonly applied withinthe course. Use of “clickers” is common both as formative assessment and as a teaching tool.Resources supporting an emphasis on conceptual learning, such as publication of conceptualquestions online, are increasing. Problem based learning approaches are common, as arelaboratories. Many programs are utilizing improved simulations of laboratories to obtain learningoutcomes similar to laboratory exercises. Active learning approaches are widespread and varied,and those who use them are satisfied that they are effective.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank all of the instructors who completed this survey; the departmentchairs who passed on the request
AC 2011-369: TEACHING SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS IN ELECTRON-ICS LECTURE COURSESDavid Braun, California Polytechnic State University David Braun received the Ph.D. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of California at Santa Barbara in 1991. From 1992 to 1996, he worked for Philips Research Laboratories in Eindhoven, The Netherlands, on semiconducting polymers for display applications. He joined California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo in 1996 and is now a Professor in the Electrical Engineer- ing Department. See www.ee.calpoly.edu/faculty/dbraun/ for more information. He teaches courses in electronics, solid-state electronics, polymer electronics and sustainability. He holds