attended a teaching workshop in summer 2009, but the workshops had distinctdifferences.Known to many in the ASEE, the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI) has convenedThursday–Saturday prior to the ASEE Annual Conference since 1991. 1 The application of thematerial is biased toward engineering education, yet a few instructors from other areas (e.g.,physics, math) also attend. The content for the NETI focuses around four core areas: Page 22.1415.3understanding students (both their learning process and their hangups), course planning andassessment, developing teaching strategies, and other professional concerns. A recent paper by theworkshop
theundergraduate engineering curriculum are: (1) an authentic performance task in the form of ascenario and prompts to elicit the ABET professional skills; (2) establishment of initial reliabilityand validity of the measurement instrument – the Engineering Professional Skills Rubric (EPSRubric) (Appendix A); and (3) a dedicated community of 40+ engineering faculty using directassessment to evaluate the efficacy of their own programs, and to plan and implementimprovement at both course and program levels.The EPSA method is a discussion-based performance task designed to elicit students’ knowledgeand application of the ABET professional skills. In a 45-minute session, small groups of studentsare presented with a complex, real-world scenario that includes
and engineeringconcepts and skills. We identified four areas of analysis for each of the three curricula.From the student materials, we analyzed the planning materials, activities andassessments. From the teacher training materials, we looked at what teachers werepresented with at the official summer training institutes (Table 1). Our content analysisfocused on examining the content of the materials. We recorded the number of NCTMmathematics standards specifically connected to the engineering curriculum for each unit(Prevost et al., 2009). Page 22.1318.4 3Table 1: Materials for Analysis
circuits will serve as framework for future lab-based online courses. In this paper, our summer 2010 course implementation is thoroughly described. Problemswith technology and pedagogy used in the summer 2010 implementation of online electricalcircuits are examined and possible solutions are presented. These findings, along with previousstudies in online education, were used to develop a pedagogical framework for an online lab-based course. Plans for the summer 2011 online course and proposed pedagogical frameworkwill be introduced. 2. Introduction The only online school of engineering courses currently available at BinghamtonUniversity are recorded by the school’s EngiNET program. This program provides lowresolution, low
andstudied by students during the course of learning and instruction. Work on assessing theenacted curriculum was done to create a dependent variable for use in research onteachers‘ content decisions11. In contrast to the intended curriculum, which depicts theidealized classroom experience, as stated in the printed teacher and student textbooks, theenacted curriculum is empirically established. Observations show that the enactedcurriculum is dynamic – it often deviates from the intended plan and varies from teacherto teacher and classroom to classroom based not only on the teacher‘s actions, but also onthe student needs. Students generally learn what is presented in the classroom and maymiss elements that were intended to be incorporated by the
agree that students should not have access to the problem solutions.Homework helps students prepare for engineering employment and practice where they areexpected to solve new problems on their own. As students spend time and struggle throughsolving new problems they develop a deeper understanding of the subject matter. Page 22.512.2Students have always been interested in gaining access to the solutions of their homeworkassignments. Copies of solutions to homework assignments and exam were collected andhanded out to students planning to take the same course in the future.A decade or more before, all solution manuals were in a hard copy format
to fill out a short evaluation form to provide information on student performanceduring their internships. Although supervisors were diligent about providing evaluations werequested, a sense of uneasiness remained about assessment of these internships.Our continuing concern about granting academic credit (and a grade) for internship work aboutwhich we had little knowledge led to development of a new plan to assess students duringinternships.A Different ApproachDuring faculty discussions on how to deal with this issue, we agreed that the internship is a veryimportant part of our students’ education. The question that arose was “Why?” What do theseinternships add to the required coursework that is so valuable? Put another way, what are
intellectuals, that the territory of the Empire must expand to provide resources and markets. By the 1920s, a clear hierarchy of technical schools served a hierarchy of employment. Formally it drew ideas and plans from the Prussians who were building a hierarchy of technical schools. But while the Prussians were expanding the population of those who could emancipate German spirit via Techniks (Downey and Lucena 2004), the Japanese were expanding the population of those who would increase strength through exports and military hardware. The elites completed six years of elementary school, four years of middle school, three
. The anticipatedconstrained knowledge by teachers of scientific inquiry and engineering design and the likelybenefits to student learning from engagement in these processes provide the justification forassuring that teachers understand inquiry and design and are prepared to apply them effectivelyand appropriately as instructional approaches. The parallels and differences between scientific inquiry and engineering design asapplied to instructional methods are summarized in Table 1. The process flow of “Planning,”“Observation and Testing,” and “Reflection and Communication” build on the work by Bedwardand colleagues who explored the integration of design into elementary curriculum.15Table 1: Comparing Inquiry Based Science and Engineering
Assistant Educational Coordinator for the National Nanotechnology Infrastruc- ture Network (NNIN) and works at the Nanotechnology Research Center at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology. Her job includes planning, developing and implementing educational outreach programs in nan- otechnology and representing the NNIN Education and Outreach office at local and national conferences and meetings. She also helps to oversee programs such as the NNIN Research Experience for Teachers and Research Experience for Undergrads at Georgia Tech. Before joining NNIN and Georgia Tech, Joyce was a National Board Certified Teacher who taught science in grades 9-12 for thirty years. During her years of teaching she served on many local and
defining the problem space is to gatherpertinent data, delineate the overall goal, and create an initial plan or “next steps.” The designerthen moves from the problem space to the solution space8. However, the process may move back Page 22.1520.3and forth between the problem and solution spaces iteratively as new insights or constraints aregained. Engineering design typically entails the resolution (trade-off) of the designer’s goal,natural and physical laws, and the criteria set forth by clients or other external parties15. Theexternal criteria are often constrained and associated with resources, such as capital or time9. Jonassen16 further
that helps both students and teachers visualize difficult or abstract concepts.From the online curriculum, each day’s lesson plan, master notes, and supplemental materials areeasily accessed by the teachers.Professional DevelopmentEstablishing and building relationships with individual teachers and administrators in schoolsystems throughout our region is the most critical component to all of our K12 educational Page 22.1419.5outreach programs. During the summer of 2010, 26 teachers from 14 regional schools joineduniversity faculty for a two-week professional development workshop held at Louisiana
engineering "Grand Challenges" lately developed by the National Academy ofEngineering enter a long historical tradition of such epically scaled to-do lists, dating back to theprofession's origins in the mid-nineteenth century. The mission statements, codes of ethics, and,later, lists of so-called grand challenges that have issued from engineering societies have servedthe dual function of directing engineers' work and supporting particular cultural roles for thesebodies of experts. Almost all such plans, regardless of period or sponsoring body, have alsoblended highly practical aims of industrial and infrastructural development with more inchoateprojects of societal uplift. The Grand Challenges of the NAE, currently playing a formative rolein many
criticalsubsystem.Oral Progress Reports: As individuals, students provide a five minute presentation that updatesthe course participants on the status of their team's project. A question and answer periodfollows the presentation.Semester 2Project Status Reports: As individuals, students write and review a one page technical report thatsummarizes the status of their project.Milestone Demonstration: As a team, students manufacture and present a prototype of a criticalsubsystem.Final Test Plan: As a team, students develop a test plan for their system that assures all systemdesign requirements have been met if the system passes all tests.Video: As a team, students develop a five minute video that summarizes their entire project.Poster: As a team, students create a
involvesstudying and analyzing active learning tools and techniques, along with the assessment methodsfor determining their efficacy. When Felder investigated learning and teaching styles in engineering education duringthe late 1980s, there was quite a response from the community [10]. Felder sought to explaincommon pitfalls in engineering classrooms and propose a plan to improve engineering educationas a whole. Drawing on the research of Kolb, Myers, and Piaget [11], Felder looked toimplement educational psychology research for his own practical purposes and for direct use inthe classroom. He recognized divergences between the way most engineering students tend tolearn and the way most instructors tend to teach. As early as the 1990s, engineering
fallsemester, the projects are staffed; teams develop a complete problem/project description, developa project schedule, and complete a formalized design process to select a solution to the problem.During the second semester, the students do detailed design of their chosen solution, create amanufacturing plan (make/buy decisions and component manufacturing), and complete aprofessional level prototype. Deliverables include an extensive design report, engineeringdrawings and the prototype.Staffing teams with students from a variety of engineering education programs with distinct skillsets yields significant benefits for both the students and project solution quality. In addition tothe mix of technical skills, the students have a mix of professional
shown in Tables 5 and 6. Page 22.1313.8 Cohort 2009 2010 2011 & Data Cohort Cohort Beyond Plans Number of Students (School of 26 39 50 Engineering) (planned) Number with C or better in College 26 of 26 39 of 39 --- Algebra Number with C or better in 21 of
previouslyseen by all of the students, start up costs are minimal since students with experience using the toolshelp their classmates to learn them. As a result, the less experienced class members increase theirproficiency over the whole term. The instructor should also help to identify the target audience at the school for the visualizationtool. This should be done in collaboration with another instructor so that the students have a readyset of students who can act as subjects for a practical user study. The decision about the intendedaudience is important because it helps the students determine an appropriate test plan and keeps the Page
Educator Award. In January 2010, Liz stepped down as Director of the E- SHIP Minor to help define expansion plans for undergraduate entrepreneurship education across Penn State. Liz is co-Director of the Lion Launch Pad, a new student-centric on-campus business incubator. Liz is also involved in NSF-funded research, supporting both PFI and IEECI grants, and is the incoming Program Chair for the ASEE Entrepreneurship Division (2010-2011). Since 2006, Liz has been involved in developing the ASME Innovation Showcase (I-Show), which pro- vides a platform for top collegiate student teams to compete for seed money and attend 4-day business start-up workshops with the goal to commercialize their product idea. In the three I
of discrete event systems, production planning and control, industrial information systems, data analysis and knowledge discovery, and engineering education research. He has taught courses in the areas of systems modeling and analysis, information systems design, production planning, facilities design, and systems simulation. He also co- authored the 2006 Joint Publishers Book-of-the-Year textbook, Design of Industrial Information Systems, Elsevier. Address: Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave ENB118, Tampa FL 33620-5350; telephone: (+1) 813.974.5590; e-mail: ayalcin@usf.edu
were eight (8) students in the course and they were asked to fill out a questionnaire that is used in many courses in CEAS using a five-point Likert scale (strongly disagree = 1, disagree = 2, neutral = 3, agree = 4, and strongly agree = 5). The results are shown in Table 1 where the response for the students in Nanoscale Devices is compared to the responses by students in many other courses in CEAS. It can be seen that the responses of the students in Nanoscale Devices were quite positive, especially when compared to responses for other courses in the CEAS. For example, students responded favorably when asked to rate the course (question 5). Students were less favorable regarding the planning of the
settings. His technical expertise spans applied quantitative methods, strate- gic planning, technology evaluation, and organizational assessment. Prior to joining the Systems and Information Engineering faculty at UVa, Dr. Smith was as a Senior Scientist at Science Applications In- ternational Corporation (SAIC) where, during his twenty-plus years tenure, he led numerous studies and analysis in a variety of application domains, including transportation operations, transportation security, national security, manufacturing, and health care. Prior to his employment at SAIC, Dr. Smith was a member of the Industrial Engineering faculties at the University of Missouri and Oregon State University. Dr. Smith earned his
techniqueswill have to be created or existing techniques adapted to fill that void.Finally, it will be necessary to test the clarity and effectiveness of this classification schemeand its application in practical settings. We have supplied a recommended process for usingthe new classification scheme in Section 4, but further vetting inside and outside the designclassroom will be required. Plans for testing the efficacy of the scheme and its application inboth academic and corporate settings are under development.References[1] Benyus, J. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: HarperCollins.[2] Christensen, C. M., Anthony, S. D., Berstell, G., and D. Nitterhouse (2007). Finding the right job for your product, MIT Sloan
of these hires were justified by the strongengineering student enrollment numbers, produced by the existence of ABET-accredited degreesin the four major disciplines. Benedictine College has entered a memorandum of understandingwith UND, has established articulation agreements with each of the four UND engineeringdepartments, and has completed three semesters of offering both on-site engineering and DEDPcourses to BC students. Moreover, dual-degree programs have been published in the BC CourseCatalog for each of the four major engineering disciplines. After its first year of the agreementwith DEDP, the Fall 2010 BC engineering program enrollment consisted of ~20 sophomores andjuniors and ~25 freshmen.Five-Year, Dual-Degree ProgramThe plan for
. Threesections of the course contained a total of 36 students. The University is co-educational, so mostclasses are a combination of a few males and predominantly females ranging from freshmen toseniors. Most of the students are non-native English speakers from diverse countries, and all ofthem are, or plan to become, design majors. Course Activities. Over the past several years, the teaching strategies and assignmentrequirements for MATH 131 have evolved to accommodate students‟ generally non-Americancultures, their English-as-second-language (ESL) needs, and their individual learning andinformation-processing preferences. After administering and evaluating learning style preferenceand brain hemispheric preference tests, the professor uses
graduate and undergraduate engineering students. Job and long-termcareer opportunities for recent graduates involved with the energy program are also discussed.Lastly, a discussion is included regarding what changes and additions that are planned for theenergy program at Lawrence Tech to keep the program vibrant and adapting to the ongoingknowledge and understanding needs of today’s engineering graduates.1) BackgroundIn the early spring of 2003 Lawrence Technological University (also known as Lawrence Tech)submitted a proposal to NextEnergy (a nonprofit corporation created by the State of Michiganwith the mission to support and promote alternative energy within the State of Michigan) andwas awarded one of five $100,000 grants in early summer 2003
curricula have not stressed theimportance of improving student creativity skills.The design process has become a fundamental aspect required to attain a desirable output interms of quality and functionality when developing a product. According to Ulrich2, “A productdevelopment process is the sequence of steps or activities that an enterprise employs to conceive,design, and commercialize a product.” Same principle applies to the design process which isused to build a product by generating ideas and concepts according to customer specifications.The design process described in the book Engineering Design3 is covered in four main phasesbeing the planning and task clarification, conceptual design, embodiment design and detaildesign. During the
reported at the 2010 ASEE National Conference [4]. Those interested in the details of thefinal plan can look at the 2010 summary paper, which describes the curriculum as we are nowdelivering it. For the course Infrastructure Engineering, there were two key evolutions between2008 and 2010. First, the course was given considerably greater definition, including theaddition of a course description and course objectives and power generation and distribution aswell as network modeling were added to the course content. Second, it was decided thatInfrastructure Engineering would become the second course in our 3-course engineeringsequence, which is taught to non-engineers, mostly humanities majors. This second decision wassignificant in that it basically