"resource acquisition" as a top priority. The Senior Design Project Class, which isa two-semester long course, with a total of four credit hours, can be viewed as a servicelearning class, depending upon the project chosen by the select student group. It doescontain a substantial amount of education about ethics, ergonomics, economics, sociologyand liberal education principles, in addition to rigorous engineering subject matter. Thestudent groups are encouraged to appreciate the realities of socio-economic impact oftheir chosen project. In many cases, the project will have to be addressed with a strongwill to succeed and necessarily require coalitions of volunteerism, industry sponsoredfunding and donated resources. The author has utilized
in the School of Engineering and Engineering Technology at LeTourneau University, where he has taught since 1979. He is currently co-developer of the program in BioMedical Engineering. He received his B.S.E.E. from the State University of New York at Buffalo and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from Drexel University. Prior to joining the faculty at LeTourneau, he was involved in cardiac cell research at the University of Kansas Medical Center. His professional interests include bioinstrumentation, digital signal processing, and engineering ethics. Email: paulleiffer@letu.eduPhillip L Thompson, Seattle University
, (c) an ability to design a chemical engineering system, component, or process to meet desired needs, 90% (d) an ability to function on an inter-disciplinary team, (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems, (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, 80% (g) an ability to communicate effectively, % of responding departments (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global societal context, 70% (i) an
force, which has traditionallybeen measured using atomic force microscopy (AFM), is measured using tribometry techniques.Education ResearchMy research interest broadly addresses the assertion that Chemical Engineering education mustbe revised to address a new generation of student. This student is information rich, technologysavvy, and must be trained to address the consequences of globalization. Thus, the education wereceived as students may not be the best way to approach this group. To this end, we haveperformed research on engineering ethics, the use of social networking, and video learning in aneffort to address the new skill set and resources available to our students
appropriate knowledge and skills to identify, formulate, analyze and solve complex engineering problems. CEAB 3.1.3 is the ability to conduct investigations of complex problems. CEAB 3.1.4 is the ability to design solutions for complex, open-ended engineering problems. CEAB 3.1.5 is the ability to create, select, apply, adapt, and extend appropriate techniques, resources, & modern engineering tools. CEAB 3.1.7 is the ability to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, and to give and effectively respond to clear instructions. CEAB 3.1.10 is the ability to apply professional ethics and equity. ACRL 1 is the determination of the nature and extent of the information needed; ACRL 1.3 is developing a working
. D An ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectives. E An ability to function effectively on teams. F An ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems. G An ability to communicate effectively in writing. H An ability to communicate effectively orally. I Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning. J An ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities. K Respect for diversity and knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and global issues. L A commitment to quality, timeliness, and
the extent possible, as prescribed by the first Fundamental Canon of theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers’ (ASCE’s) Code of Ethics. 10“Incorporating Sustainability into Alternative Analysis” Module for Professional Practice.This course introduces students to key aspects of their senior design project and fills gaps in thecurriculum to prepare the students to become practicing engineers. The module for this coursefocuses on sustainability in existing projects and evaluating the potential impacts thatengineering solutions may have on sustainability.Senior Project Module and Checklist. The Senior Project module covers sustainableengineering concepts in more depth. In particular, it emphasizes quantifying sustainabilityindicators/metrics over
/Continuous/Major Change o Thinking Both Critically and Creatively - Independently and Cooperatively Curiosity and Desire to Learn - For Life (Show initiative, Inquire & Learn) o Seeking Advice and Forming Daily Questions to Discover New Insights. o Commitment to Quality, Timeliness, and Continuous Improvement o Understanding Basic Project and Risk Management and Continuous Improvement Concepts (like LEAN+) Ethical Standards and Professionalism o Operate in Accordance With Acceptable Business, Societal, and Professional Norms o Maintain the Highest Level of Integrity, Ethical Behavior, and Professional Competence o Understand and Applies Good Personal JudgmentAt the ASEE Annual
reflective memos and how this information can be used to help makeimprovements to capstone pedagogy and to the engineering curriculum in general.Learning Objectives and OutcomesABET program outcomes call for students to demonstrate an ability to “(c) design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability,and sustainability”. We view this program outcome as central to engineering practice.First and foremost, the end results of engineering are system designs that come from thedesign process. The results of engineering design are ever present in virtually every facetof society and the connections between how engineering
, leadership, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Prior to joining BYU, Gregg worked for Becton Dickinson, a Global Medi- cal Technology Company (1995-2006). In this capacity he worked as a product development engineer, quality engineer, technical lead, business leader and program/project manager managing many differ- ent global projects. Gregg received his PhD in Educational Leadership and Higher Education from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln with a Master of Technology Management degree and a BS in Manufac- turing Engineering Technology, from Brigham Young University. Gregg also is a Professional Associate Instructor for IPS Learning and Stanford University where he teaches the IPS course Project Management
, the topics covered in the content assessment were discussed in both years. Pre and Post Content Assessment Questions and Value 1. (1 pt)What is the difference between a memo and a letter? 2. (4 pts)List four of the steps in Quality Function Deployment 3. (1 pt)According to the Code of Ethics for Professional Engineers, what is the first duty of an engineer? 4. (4 pts)List at least four of the steps in the engineering design process. 5. (3 pts)List at least 3 items that should be included in a monthly progress report. 6. (1 pt)A design review should occur during what phase of a project? 7. (1 pts)What is a Work Breakdown Structure? How is it used
, A.S.M.E. Press, The Giver, Lois LowryLearning Objectives: 1. The student will demonstrate the ability to function as an engineer in an industrial environment. (ABET: a, d, e, f, g, h, j, k, l) 2. The student will demonstrate an understanding of professional ethics. (ABET: f, g)Topics Covered:Because every co-op site and every co-op period is different it is not possible to list topics in thesame way that is possible for lecture/lab classes. Students will gain the topical coverage requiredfor them to perform in the industry into which they have been placed. Many students do gainsignificant design experience (ABET c and d) however it will be different for each student andsince it will be delivered by a co-op employer, difficult for the
evaluate new information. 6. Contribute to effective project management (e.g., through the use of Gantt charts). 7. Effectively communicate with others in a team, fulfilling one's individual role in the project and in interfacing with customers. 8. Employ principles of effective communication. 9. Employ ethical practices in all aspects of the design process. Page 22.898.8 10. Reflect on aspects of design and the design process.For many students who are beginning the capstone design class, this is their first significantdesign experience. As such, the first quarter of the capstone is more structured than the secondand focuses on
and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young Uni- versity. He holds a Professional Engineer certification. Prior to teaching at Eastern Washington University he was a military pilot, an engineering instructor at West Point and an airline pilot. His interests include aerospace, aviation, professional ethics and piano technology.Martin W. Weiser, Engineering and Design Department, Eastern Washington University Martin Weiser earned his BS in Ceramic Engineering from Ohio State University and his MS and PhD in Materials Science and Mineral Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley. He joined the Mechanical Engineering department at the University of New Mexico where he taught Materials
over the years as a natural evolution...Diversity 1.0 was about compliance and abiding by government regulations. Diverity 2.0 revolved around ethics, morality and social responsibility. Today, Diversity 3.0 is about business integration and globalization...and, ultimately, producing increased employee productivity and new revenue streams. 27Whether competitive anxiety is the basis of diversity reform efforts, or invoked by diversityadvocates because they believe it to be so for corporate leaders and economic policy makers, it isnonetheless a priority which subordinates inclusion to performance and productivity. Sufficientindustrial productivity, or profits, are of course culturally determined and have not
with the Third Street Community Center’s after school program, which has a science andengineering focus.The students who enroll in the Renewable Energy Engineering class are passionate about makinga difference in society through engineering. One purpose of the service learning project is tobuild on this passion, giving them a tangible way to get involved while they are students. Theproject fosters an ethic of civic engagement among the engineering students. This engagementwith the community should enhance their engagement with learning and increase their dedicationto engineering.13 The positive effects of integrating service-learning in the curriculum includeimproved retention and graduation rates particularly among underrepresented groups
Page 22.1439.5 in the appointment)TA-Student Relationship: In this section the facilitators talk about the roles, responsibilities,boundaries and ethics of being a TA and how they pertain to their relationship with the student.During this section, groups are split into small teams that look at various scenarios that couldpresent themselves while being a TA. The three scenarios deal with a TA who is beingoverworked during office hours and via emailed questions, a student offering a bribe, and teammembers not working well together. There are generally six groups, so two groups discuss eachscenario. Each group records their thoughts on large sheets of paper, which are then attached tothe wall. One group explains
focusing on teamwork.Course Details – InstructorsThe TOP method was applied to the Construction Scheduling and Project Control course. Inorder to understand the suitability of TOP for this course, the course description is providedbelow:Construction Scheduling and Project Control ―provides a discussion on the theories, principles,and techniques of construction planning and scheduling with an emphasis on time management,costs, and resources through the preparation and analysis of network schedules.‖The objectives of student leaning for this course include: (1) understanding and describing theprocess of construction project planning, scheduling and control, and ethical issues involved inthe construction scheduling process, (2) developing a Gantt
schools need to comply with ABET Inc.Our accreditation agency now requires proven technical as well as broader educational outcomesin their Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.Following are relevant ABET’s Criterion 3, Program Outcomes which must be met foraccreditation.(a) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(d) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams(f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility Page 22.1173.4(h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic and environmental and societal context(i) Recognition of
,consideration of taxes, public works, and manufacturing costs as related to economic solutions ofengineering proposals. Principles of engineering ethics are presented as related to cost analysis.With a prerequisite of completed sophomore standing, ENGR 315 is a junior-level course for allour School of Engineering Technology (SET) Bachelor of Science majors that include: Architectural Engineering Technology Page 22.1628.2 Civil Engineering Technology Computer Science Electrical Engineering Technology Mechanical Engineering Technology Mining Engineering TechnologySome of the specific ENGR 315 content areas of interest
Preparation) 1 2 3 4 5 (Excellent Preparation)b) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as analyze and interpret data;(Little Preparation) 1 2 3 4 5 (Excellent Preparation)c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, healthand safety, manufacturability and sustainability; Page 22.1427.7(Little Preparation) 1 2 3 4 5 (Excellent Preparation)d) An ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams;(Little Preparation) 1 2 3 4 5 (Excellent Preparation)e) An ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems;(Little
Description: An introduction to the science, technology, procedures, and laws of acquiring and analyzing evidence from digital media and computing devices. Current forensics tools will be surveyed, and case studies will be assigned and presented in class. Prerequisite(s): COSC 4313, or consent of instructor. Lec 3, Lab. 1, Cr. 3. End-of-Course Outcomes: 1. Follow correct procedures when collecting and handling digital evidence. 2. Apply computer science skills to access, analyze, and interpret digital evidence. Page 22.561.7 3. Exercise ethical and legal behavior when examining digital evidence. 4. Work with law officers and
are reinforced by mass media9 and by curricula and in class activities that may notinclude girls’ preferred learning styles,3 which centre around collaboration and relationships3.Students hold views that scientists are men,7 that males are better at STEM fields8 and havenegative notions of females in these fields.1As students view STEM fields to not encompass collaboration, connection, and care,2 asignificant number of girls choose not to go into them for careers.5 However, these conceptionsare questionable as the STEM careers, for example the field of engineering, in fact requirecollaborative work, which is embedded in an ethic of care. The researchers conceptualize care ascollaborating with others in the development of solutions to societal
AC 2011-18: DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A COM-PREHENSIVE NANOTECHNOLOGY FUNDAMENTALS LAB FOR EN-GINEERING STUDENTSNael Barakat, Grand Valley State University Nael Barakat, PH.D. P.Eng. is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering and Chair of Mechanical Engineering at Grand Valley State University, MI. He is also a Fellow of the ASME and the Committee on Ethical Standards and Review (CESR). His interest and research work is in the area of Dynamic Systems, Robotics, NEMS, Engineering Ethics, and Engineering education.Lihong (Heidi) Jiao, Grand Valley State University LIHONG (HEIDI) JIAO Lihong (Heidi) Jiao is currently an Associate Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand
learning practices into their class periods.• Provide in-class assessments (e.g. minute papers, muddiest point evaluations).• Provide out-of-class activities (e.g. homework assignments).• Address selected cross-cutting themes.A total of 20 cross-cutting themes were included. To reinforce these important concepts, theywere each revisited in at least two modules. The themes were: analysis vs. design; sustainabili-ty; public financing; societal impact; ethical considerations; economic impacts; historical pers-pective; security; constructability; political considerations; systems approach; maintenance andrehabilitation; planning; forecasting/modeling; operations; access; risk; teamwork; link to morecomplex material; and interrelationships
the undergraduate curriculum) in terms ofcredit hours in these programs ranged from 74.0% to 89.8%1. Core courses make up89.8% of the credit hour requirements at the University of British Columbia (UBC),which until 2010 was the only institution in British Columbia (B.C.) to offer anaccredited program in Civil Engineering. There is therefore limited opportunity to takespecialized and advanced optional technical structural engineering courses in the typicalCanadian undergraduate civil engineering program and in B.C. specifically.The practice of Professional Engineering in Canada is self-regulated by Provincial andTerritorial associations. Each of the associations’ Code of Ethics are modeled on those ofEngineers Canada, which contains an
project. All projects, which satisfy ABET’s design-related criteria foraccrediting engineering programs1, are sponsored by either government or industry. Theycommence at the beginning of fall quarter (commonly last week of September) and end at theend of spring quarter (commonly second week in June.) Students work in teams of three to five,are supervised by a faculty advisor, and are encouraged to work closely with the liaison engineerfrom the sponsoring company.Typically, the senior design course requirements include working on the assigned project,reporting on progress in oral and written format, writing final project report, learning andassessment of basic design process, learning engineering ethics, building knowledge ofcontemporary issues
disability and aging. Day 3 Technical Aspects of Disability and Aging introduces a wide range of assistive devices as well as the Participatory Action Design paradigm for designing such devices. Introduction to Research Methodology covers basic statistics and research design and process including institutional approval and ethical use of human subjects. Day 4 Technical Writing and Oral Presentations analyzes the components of a sample conference paper and provides hands-on exercises to enhance students’ skills. Ethics Forum is organized by Pitt OEL and aimed to provide an opportunity for students to Week 3 consider ethical practice in research through
contribute money to environmental organizations I would sign a petition in support of tougher environmental laws I would take a job with a company I knew was harming the environment Page 22.235.4Another instrument, developed by Forsyth, Nye and Kelley, measures the ethic of caring[15].This 10-item scale is a 9-point scale ranging from completely disagree (1) to completely agree(9). Their testing of this unidimensional scale revealed a high internal consistency as measuredby Cronbach alpha (α=0.85). It is intended to indicate the ethic of caring. The items are listed inTable 2.Table 2. Items from the Ethic of Caring Scale by
resources for a solution, implementinga solution, and review; however, for most engineers, design connotes a broader, moreencompassing landscape.Popper12 claims “All life is problem solving!” and hence all humans solve problemscontinuously. ABET, Inc. lists problem solving as a separate educational outcome from design inthe a-k outcomes, stating that students must have: “(c) an ability to design a system, component,or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability and (e) an abilityto identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems”5.Although we have stated that, in the engineering domain, problem solving is often