AC 2011-2792: DUAL CAREER PANELAdrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Michigan Tech having moved from Mississippi State University in Jan 2010, where she was a tenured Associate Professor. She received her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 2003 and B.S. from Michigan Technological University in 1998. Adrienne’s research interests include electrokinetics and the development of biomedi- cal microdevices. She earned a 2007 NSF CAREER award; her group has published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Lab on a Chip, and had an AIChE Journal cover. She is an active men- tor of undergraduate
AC 2011-698: EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM-BASED STEM PROJECT LEARN-ING TO RECRUIT MINORITY HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS TO STEMJean Kampe, Michigan Technological University DR. JEAN KAMPE is currently department chair of Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Techno- logical University, where she holds an associate professorship in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering. She received her Ph.D. in metallurgical engineering from Michigan Tech, M.Ch.E. in chemical engineering from the University of Delaware, and a B.S. degree in chemical engineering from Michigan Tech. She was employed as a research engineer for five years at the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC, and she held an associate professorship in the
endeavors with modeling and prototyping/testing. The hatchery would providean environment that fostered the proclivities of like-minded students to exploreinnovative activities.Future StepsThe Bucknell Innovation Group has moved forward on several initiatives. Faculty plan toincorporate exercises and modules on innovation in their spring 2011 classes. A newcourse called Impact: Exploring Innovation Across the Disciplines will be team-taught inspring 2011 to students in engineering, arts and sciences. This class has a professor fromengineering and from management as the leads, but it also includes faculty from art,theater and dance, music, English and classics who will give guest lectures and supportprojects. BIG will form teams to move
University Press, 2008.20. Rogoff, Barbara. The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press, 2003.21. Rose, Mike. The mind at work. Viking, 2004.22. Salomon, Gavriel. Distributed Cognitions. Cambridge University Press, 1997.23. Schwartz, Barry. The Dark Side of Incentives: They consistently backfire when efforts to boost bonuses override moral considerations. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_47/b4156084807874.htm?campaign_id=rss_null 12 Nov 2009 (downloaded 8th July 2010)24. Sheppard, Sheri, Kelly Macatangay, Anne Colby and William Sullivan. Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field, Jossey-Bass, 2009.25. Shulman, Lee. ―Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in
undergraduate management and industrial engineering curricula. Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall.4. Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., Light, D., Heinze, C., & Rivas, L. (2005). Creating an evaluation framework for data-driven decision-making. EDC Center for Children and Technology, USA.5. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. B. & Cocking R.R. (Eds). (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D.C. National Academy Press.6. Anderson W. A., Krathwohl D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, R. E., Mayer, P. P., Raths, J. R. & Wittrock, M. C. (Eds.). (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley
engineering, the quality(feasibility) of these ideas also needs to be taken into account. In engineering education research,a number of techniques are implemented to enhance ideation and develop creativity. Theyinclude 6-3-5 brainstorming, morphological analysis3, transformational design using mind-mapping4, design by analogy5, principles of historical innovators6, and various combinations of Page 22.1268.2the aforementioned techniques7. Developing an ability to innovate has been approached throughimprovisation8 and the theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ)9-11.In engineering education, there are a few engineering design textbooks covering TRIZ
AC 2011-1999: EXAMINING THE DEVELOPMENT OF SKETCH THINK-ING AND BEHAVIOURDiarmaid Lane, University of LimerickNiall Seery, University of Limerick Page 22.663.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Examining the Development of Sketch Thinking and BehaviourAbstractResearch (Lane et al., 2010b, 2010c), concerning the development of expertise in freehandsketching among students within an Initial Technology Teacher Education (ITTE)programme provides significant indicators that sketching is a teachable skill. Analysing andreporting on any development in sketching expertise can sometimes be difficult and becomesubject to
realize a deeper link from lab activities and reallife, especially in their work in engineering. This connection to the real world helps drive a deepunderstanding of physical laws for practical-minded students.The foundation of Crash into Physics relies on the computer based measurement interface toconnect mechanical lab tools with immediate computer display of results. This is the origin ofthe RealTime Physics approach, and enables the learning cycle; prediction, observation,comparison, analysis, and quantitative experimentation. The emphasis is moved from tasks likerecording and plotting, to reflection on the results and their interpretation. This permits timemultiple runs, trials, and exploration before pursuing more rigorous quantitative
, he would not go so far as to say that the needs of society are overruled bythe needs of the individual or even in continuous conflict. Vygotsky’s observations stemmedfrom cultural change in Russia during his lifetime. He noticed change in what would then becalled the developmental learning pathways of individuals based on grand scale societal changes.Thus, the societal impetus was responsible for changing lifelong learning habits and the minds ofindividuals. In the engineering education community, many efforts are spent on developingphenomenographical approaches to problems, but almost none are spent on phenomenological orexistential approaches to problems. The issue at hand may be two-fold: first, phenomenographyas a research
AC 2011-1252: TECHNIQUES FROM WORKSHOPS ON TEACHING: IM-PLEMENTING THE CONCEPTS AND EVALUATING OUR APPROACHESMichael Foster, George Fox University Michael Foster received a B.S. in engineering from Messiah College and M.S. and Ph.D degrees in me- chanical engineering from Drexel University. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Mechanical En- gineering at George Fox University. His research interests include control systems education and ther- mal/fluid science applications.Justin R. Vander Werff, Dordt College Justin Vander Werff joined Dordt’s engineering faculty in the summer of 2008. He is a licensed pro- fessional engineer (P.E.) in Iowa, Idaho, Indiana, and Missouri. He has taught Structural Analysis, Soil
undergraduateeducational practice. The three dimensional model of innovation has broad applicability,including to the refinement of Engineering, science, and technology education practice itself. Page 22.154.13Bearing in mind that purposeful innovation is most effective when supported on all three axes,and that innovation happens in the space created between all three, we look forward the future ofEngineering, science, and technology education, in the innovation space.As we continue to pursue the goal of better preparing Engineering, science, and technologygraduates to function effectively in the contemporary innovation environment, we envisiongeneral
the School of Engineering and Technology at AAMU, the distribution of studentsbased on gender is 76% male and 24% female. AAMU has set a priority to provide low-incomestudents with higher education and ensure their success through retention, graduation, andadvancement.AAMU is located in Huntsville, Alabama, which is known internationally as a center ofaerospace and defense technology. Huntsville is considered as a leader in high-tech research,engineering services, information systems design and in the manufacturing of computingequipment, telecommunications, space vehicles and rocket propulsion, and attracts some of thegreatest minds in the world. It is the home of more than 50 Fortune 500 companies. Theseindustries and government agencies
AC 2011-2124: WOMEN AND ALANA STUDENTS’ RETENTION ANDPROGRESS TOWARDS STEM DEGREES AT A PREDOMINANTLY LIB-ERAL ARTS INSTITUTIONSuzanne Keilson, Loyola University Maryland Suzanne Keilson currently serves as Associate Dean of Loyola College of Arts and Sciences at Loyola University Maryland. She is a member of the Engineering Department where she teaches courses in Introduction to Engineering, Signal Processing, and Electric and Magnetic Properties of Materials. Her research interests include auditory signal processing, universal and sustainable design, design education and STEM education especially for underrepresented groups. She has a Ph.D. in Applied Physics from Columbia University, New York.IRAH MODRY-CARON
exhibiting work and receivingfeedback. Initially, it is challenging for people to not separate themselves from their work.Students in engineering, psychology, and business may find this particularly uncomfortable. Attimes, students will take feedback on their work personally. However, with repetition andpractice, this occurs less. It is a valuable skill in any profession to be able to take criticism withan open mind and use it to better their skillset.To get the cross-disciplinary group experience started, the students are divided into groups andgiven a one day project. They are given a problem to brainstorm and solve. An example of theproblem would be, “In groups of three, brainstorm 15 concepts in the next hour for water
AC 2011-152: TEACHING CAD MODELING USING LEGODerek M Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University Derek Yip-Hoi has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan. He has broad experience in CAD/CAM and geometric and solid modeling from research and teaching experiences at UM and the University of British Columbia. Currently he coordinates the CAD/CAM instruction in the Engineering Technology Department at Western Washington University.Jeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University Jeffrey L. Newcomer is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering Technology at Western Washington University. He received B.S. (1988) and M.Eng. (1989) degrees in Aeronautical Engineering, a M.S. in Science and
performed by gender.BackgroundSpatial skills are important for a variety of careers. Smith (1964)1 identified at least 84 careerareas for which spatial skills are important. Spatial skills, and in particular the ability to rotateimages in one’s mind, are especially important for technical fields such as engineering (Maier,1994)2. Studies have shown that spatial visualization skills are a factor in the success ofengineering students. Gimmestad (1989)3 found that students’ spatial visualization skills were astronger predictor of success in an engineering design course than math ACT scores orexperience in a high school shop or drafting class. Blasko et al. (2004)4 found that incomingspatial skills predicted 20 % of the total variance in course grades
from pursuing engineering.Why is this situation worth examining? To quote William A. Wulf, former president ofthe National Academy of Engineering, “Our profession is diminished and impoverishedby a lack of diversity.”Keeping those thoughts in mind it is important to examine the historical theories andframeworks that will help us not only understand why these students do not pursueengineering, but to also develop interventions to improve the alarming statistics thathamper engineering diversity.Research QuestionWhy don't minorities persist or even consider pursuing an engineering degree? WilliamA. Wulf, former president of the National Academy of Engineering, expressed theimportance of diversity in engineering when he said, “We need to
recovery plans. In remarks by President Barack Obama on the AmericanGraduation Initiative, a top priority is to ensure that the U.S. has the highest percentage ofcollege-educated workers in the world.10 However, to make excellence truly inclusive, qualitymust drive commitment to college completion.3The implications of LEAP on the engineering and technology higher education community leadsto the following question: What is the purpose of liberal education and how should it permeateour curricula? Newman’s approach to liberal education is that of “enlargement or expansion ofthe mind,” a process in which university education helps students develop skills necessary forintellectual expansion.11 Heywood12 introduced the idea of engineering literacy being
other classmates, and participate in live feedback sessions.Internet-based learning also bears in mind students with various learning styles andphysical disabilities. There are many positive implications of internet-based learning suchas a means to interactively present and disseminate curricula through courseworkmanagement tools such as Blackboard. It also promotes collaboration and continuingeducation for full time employees, i.e. “learning anywhere, anytime.” 1 Students areencouraged to expand their knowledge of the material being taught through media,images, animation and streaming audio/video.Internet-based engineering education is an accepted practice throughout the United Statesand abroad. There are interesting ethical and societal
AC 2011-354: THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION FOR FEMALE ENGINEER-ING STUDENTS IN MEXICO. CULTURAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THEIRRETENTIONCarmen G Villa, Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City Carmen Villa works at the College of Engineering at Universidad Panamericana in Mexico City. She re- ceived a B.Sc. degree in Computer Science Engineering from Tec de Monterrey in Mexico City; a D.E.A. in Computer Science from the INPG in Grenoble, France; and a Ph.D. in Educational Administration and Human Resource Development from Texas A&M University. Her interest in education has grown out of her more than 15 years of teaching experience and her passion for equity in higher education. Her research interests include underrepresented
. Rayess, “Developing entrepreneurially minded engineers by incorporating technical entrepreneurship case studies,” Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, vol. 2, 2011, pp. 10-27.[8] H. Petroski, The essential engineer: Why science alone will not solve our global problems, Knopf, 2010.[9] “Building an entrepreneurial pathway one campus at a time,” Community College Entrepreneurship, vol. Spring/Summer, 2009, pp. 5-6.[10] M.E. Porter, K. Schwab, and A. Lopez-Claros, Eds., The global competitiveness report 2006-2007, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.[11] Building a science, technology, engineering and math agenda, Washington, DC: National Governors Association, 2007.[12] J. Pecquet, “Medical innovation pitched as key to
AC 2011-997: ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT UNDERSTANDING IN PHYSICS:AN INTEGRATED QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHTeresa L. Larkin, American University Teresa L. Larkin is an Associate Professor of Physics Education and Faculty Liaison to the Pre-engineering Program at American University. She received her Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with emphasis in Physics and Science Education from Kansas State University. Dr. Larkin is involved with Physics Educa- tion Research (PER) and has published widely on topics related to the assessment of student learning in introductory physics and engineering courses. She has been an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and the American
explicitly considered and mentioned. As such, it is likelythat engineering faculty are not used to formulating theoretical frameworks, which maycontribute to a lack of familiarity with understanding the role of these frameworks in educationresearch. 4 3 Mean Rating 2 1 Q1.1* Q1.2* Q1.3* Q1.4* Q1.5* Q1.6* 4 Extremely familiar Q1.1 How engineering research and educational research are different 3 Very familiar Q1.2 How engineering research and educational research are similar 2 Somewhat familiar Q1.3 Designing research questions with educational issues in mind 1
boys are more often encouraged toexplore hands-on activities than girls, and where gender stereotypes in computer games aimed atyounger learners appeal more to boys than to girls. Alice Parker, an engineering professor at theUniversity of Southern California, also notes the importance of engaging female learners withengineering at a young age: “It’s important to reach them in middle school because in highschool, attitudes and preferences about career choices are already becoming entrenched, and itbecomes more difficult to change their minds.”6 To be most effective, engineering education at the middle school level (and all levels)must not only engage learners, but also support deep, intentional learning. Deep learningconnotes an
AC 2011-2414: UW GENOM PROJECT: A SUCCESSFUL UNDERGRAD-UATE RESEARCH PROGRAMAllison Kang, University of Washington Allison Kang has a background in Biochemistry and Public Health Genetics and is currently finishing up her PhD in Science Education. Her dissertation research focuses on the impact that undergraduate research programs (URPs) have on ethnic minority students’ scientific efficacy and how the programmatic elements of URPs impact student interest and experience in science and engineering. Page 22.1659.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 UW GenOM Project: A
example of this legacy. And one engineering faculty memberexplained to us what was a distinguishing feature: “ . . .first of all, the legacy, obviously Howardhas so many great minds that came out of Howard . . . that [students] come to Howard to get outof all whatever prejudice . . .They are really themselves. Howard gives that. There is somethingabout Howard.” One of the first observations at MIT is that the student population is diverse. Researchersdo not notice an imbalance between males and females. Pursuing diversity and excellence aretwin goals of MIT Admissions. One administrator describes the first hurdle for applicants; hestates that students have to be able to get though the multiple calculus classes. “It doesn’t matterif they
Page 22.205.3 liberal education to solve general and non-engineering problems in the broad society,where an analytical mind may matter more than the traditional engineering skill set.This paper starts by highlighting ABET program outcomes to lay the groundwork forhow learning objectives map to what students say in their end of semester reflectivememos. Next we describe the overall approach and methodology for collecting andorganizing the “lessons learned” from student reflective memos. This will be followedby a summary of the data collected along with observations and interpretation. We willconclude with a discussion and analysis of how we interpreted what students are tellingus in their
/math principles. This further fostered the mind set required for the evaluation of thedesign which the teachers then mimicked with their Upward Bound students.Results and Discussion One of the goals of the professional development workshop was to build teacherknowledge and skills in areas needed to successfully implement the curriculum. As an initialstep, the INSPIRES team and the external evaluation team generated a list of skill areas felt to beneeded by teachers to successfully implement the module. The skill areas include: Pedagogy Engineering design process Comfort/skill with tools Math and science content knowledge The evaluation and project teams developed measures for each of these areas
of the sites of this inquiry that are themselves theoretically important: theinstitutions‟ (1) approach to engineering education and (2) commitment to gender parity. Inengineering education, the pedagogical debate revolves around the sequencing of “learning” and“doing” engineering and is succinctly articulated in MIT‟s emblematic motto: mens et manus,mind and hands.iv Pedagogical models focus on the sequence of training minds and hands.Engineering education at MIT and UMass begins with the premise that one must learn (science)before one can do (engineering), “learn then do.” Smith and Olin, by contrast, begin with thepremise that it is best to “do and learn” (science and engineering) at the same time.v Althoughboth MIT and UMass have long
AC 2011-2764: UNCOVERING THE ROLE OF EMOTION IN ENGINEER-ING EDUCATION WITHIN AN INTEGRATED CURRICULAR EXPERI-ENCENadia N. Kellam, University of Georgia Nadia Kellam is an Assistant Professor and engineering educational researcher in the Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering at the University of Georgia. She is co-director of the CLUSTER research group. Her research interests include interdisciplinarity, creativity, identity formation, and the role of emotion in cognition.Tracie Costantino, University of GeorgiaJoachim Walther, University of Georgia Joachim is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is one of the leaders of the Collaborative