that sparks passionate conversations within the academic community. The basic issueslie in assessing the information content of data, their interpretation in terms of actions and thederivation of a quantitative model to connect it all. The complexity of the problem increasesimmensely when one is confronted with (large) statistical variations between action and resultsand the loss of sacred information about the individual when aggregating the data. When theassociated actions reflect on the student’s future career, as is the typical teacher grading problem,the translation of the student knowledge and performance into a single grade presents a modelingas well as an ethical challenge. On the other hand, when the action is to adjust the curriculum
Applied Thermodynamics Nuclear Inst. & Measurement Electric Power Generation & Transmission Fluid Mechanics Applications Radiation Biology & Safety Nuclear Reactor Theory Engineering Ethics Reactor Engineering Design & Operation Page 22.1502.19 Table 2.0 Bachelors of Science in Applied Science and Technology General Requirements Nuclear Engineering Technology
AC 2011-242: WRITING CHALLENGES FOR GRADUATE STUDENTSIN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYJoy L Colwell, Purdue University, Calumet (Tech) Joy L. Colwell, J.D., is an Associate Professor of Organizational Leadership and Supervision and Director of Graduate Studies at Purdue University Calumet. She regularly teaches graduate courses in Leadership and Ethics and the Directed MS Project for the MS in Technology program at PUC.Jana Whittington, Purdue University Calumet Jana Whittington has a Ph.D. in education with a specialization in instructional design and online learn- ing. Additionally Jana has a MA in studio art and humanities, BFA in painting, and AA in graphic design. She has taught a variety of courses for 15+ years
Page 22.1508.5the study had to do with engineering ethics and the grounding of engineering within its broadersocial and cultural contexts. Social constructivists (for example, Bijker, Hughes, & Pinch15) notethat engineering activity and outcomes are fundamentally a function of social values, needs, andpriorities. Thus, while ideas such as ethics, values, and social norms are not considered to beengineering concepts, they can serve as essential contexts within which engineering ideas andconcepts take on meaning. Engineering design does not occur within a vacuum. Designoutcomes are a direct reflection of the context within which they were developed. Finally, considerable discussion centered on the viability of an engineering ontology
study suggests that students who are exposed to enquiry - based learningdevelop early confidence that results in better performance in subsequent years of study [13].Surveys of industry and university alumni consistently point to the importance of design,communication and teamwork skills, but more importantly, students’ ability to make soundjudgments in conditions of technical, commercial and sometimes ethical uncertainty. Industryvalues student learning in rich contexts, and they acknowledge the value of supportingextracurricular student teams.The incorporation of rich, contextual components is desired, but not at the expense ofengineering science fundamentals. This presents a conflict between retaining this essential
): 1. Professionalism/Work Ethic (80.3%) 2. Teamwork/Collaboration (74.7%) 3. Oral Communications (70.3%) 4. Ethics/Social Responsibility (63.4%) 5. Critical Thinking/Problem Solving (57.5%) 6. Information Technology Application (53.0%) 7. Written Communications (52.7%) 8. Diversity (52.1%) 9. Lifelong Learning/Self Direction (42.5%) 10. Creativity/Innovation (36.3%) 11. Leadership (29.2%)• HSE student participants are strongly motivated to pursue STEM careers, are more likely to enroll in and complete post-secondary education and training in STEM, and enter the STEM workforce in greater numbers than do non-HSE
BusinessOne of the main components of the new program was the development of the STESE graduatecourse. To develop the course sequence, the authors worked closely with faculty members whoare part of a burgeoning entrepreneurship program within the COB. Course content that isspecific to global sustainable enterprises was developed in consultation with faculty memberswho were actively involved in the GSSE program and in the entrepreneurship certificate programfor undergraduate students [11]. Specifically, in its first offering, course content for the STESEcourse was culled and/or course syllabi were shared from the following existing courses withinthe COB, which span from the 200 to the 600 level: Social, Ethical, and Regulatory Issues in Business
) Systems Thinking Systems Thinking - What Engineers Bring to the Game (Key Competency) Global Perspective Working and Leading within a Global Value Chain (Facing Business Realities) Innovation On the Job Innovation, Creativity and Risk Taking (Facing Business Realities)• Expected learning outcomes: o Effective demonstration of eight competencies o Understand the theory behind the practice of management o Demonstration of communication skills rhetorically, interpersonally , and in writing o Self-knowledge—character, communication, ethics, innovation/creativity, skills in economics, marketing, teamwork, global awareness/world view, project planning
mechanics, including nonlinear structural analysis, computational mechanics, and biomechanics. He is also active in engineering education and engineering ethics, particularly in mechanics education and appropriate technology. At UPRM Papadopoulos serves as the coordinator of the Engineering Mechanics Committee, which man- ages the mechanics courses taken by all engineering majors. He also co-coordinates the Social, Ethical, and Global Issues (SEGI) in Engineering Program and Forums on Philosophy, Engineering, and Technol- ogy.Vincent C. Prantil, Milwaukee School of Engineering VINCENT C. PRANTIL Vince Prantil is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the Mil- waukee School of Engineering. Dr. Prantil
potential demand for the graduates.Seventy-nine companies responded to the online survey which was administered during thesummer of 2009. Figure 3 shows the type of industry for which the respondent worked.Figure 3. Type of Industry For Which the Respondent WorkedThe Table 4 shows the summary of the skills desired by the companies grouped into threecategories identified as important: personal, technical and conceptual. Interestingly, the highestscoring personal skills were ability to adapt and ethics, followed closely by the ability tocollaborate. Security and infrastructure/networking were the top rated technical skills employerswere looking for, while problem-solving abilities were the top ranked conceptual skill employersvalued. A theme among
participants for professional success in the engineering field.Current ProgramOur current program consists of three seminars--Modern Teaching Techniques, AdvancedTeaching Techniques, and the Academic Profession--together with a 10-hour mentored teachingexperience. Participants also have the option of completing additional mentoring hours andearning a PFF certificate from the associated university-level PFF program. Since most of ourPh.D. students do little teaching during their time at UC, the program was designed to providebasic skills for organizing class materials, delivering content, and evaluating students, exposureto active learning techniques, discussion of engineering-related topics such as project and teammanagement, ethics in engineering
Page 22.863.3 EGR 100 – Freshmen Design Resumes, email, short engineering focused reports, engineering writing demands, problem solving, speaking, ethics, and orientation to the university/college/majorsSoph.Year ME 201 – Thermodynamics Student communication survey, refresher for past grammatical expertise Tools: MS Word, Email, WWWJuniorYear ME 332 – Fluid Mechanics ME 371 – Machine Design I Laboratory Reports: (Approx. 9 @ 4-6 pages each) Short Technical Reporting Brief narrative of procedure, measured data, deduced and Design Analysis Reports (2 @ 4-6 pp. analyzed data, plotted results with
, and even the measurementscale.2,4 Preliminary work on this project, completed with Yokomoto, examined students’ abilityto assess their performance in Statics and Engineering Ethics.5 In the case of the preliminarystudy, however, students were asked to rate their performance in Statics prior to taking the finalexam and no other factors were considered. This study indicated that there were mild correla-tions between performance and self-assessment (enough to warrant further study).The present study looks to see if comparing students’ self-assessments to performance acrossmultiple problems shows any more correlation than was found in the one question to oneproblem work of Sarin and Headley.1 The analysis is based upon data collected in the
classes and engineering. That is, it is important to create linksbetween non-technical courses and the engineering thought process in order for the student tounderstand how non-technical topics (economics, entrepreneurship, business modeling, ethics,political science, psychology, and global competitiveness) affect an engineer’s job. For example,an engineer can use a basic knowledge of psychology to learn how to empathize with the end userof a product. This in turn will help the engineer become more creative by understanding how hisdesign is perceived by other people. The downside is that the introduction of non-technicalcourses is constrained by credit hours. If a department wishes to pursue this option, it must decidewhat portions of its current
Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Louisville, KY.[5] Stern H. P. E., Marcus, A. B. (2002). Short, Instructional Modules for Teaching Ethical and Societal. Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Southeastern Section Annual Meeting, Gainesville, FL.[6] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations during the 2010-2011 Accreditation Cycle, Retrieved Dec. 24, 2010 from: http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010-11%2 0EAC%20Criteria%201-27-10.pdf[7] Learning Outcomes for the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at Iowa State University. Retrieved Dec. 24, 2010 from: http
, G (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education : Foundations for success. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.[6] Colwell, J. L. and Jenks, C.F., (2005). “Student Ethics in Online Courses: Some Case Histories,” ASEE IL/IN SectionalConference, DeKalb, IL.[7] Mehrabian, A., Buchanan, W.W., Rahrooh, A., “Course Transformation from Live/Synchronous to Remote/Asynchronous using Technology”, X International Conference on Engineering and Technology Education -INTERTECH'2008, Santos, Brazil, Mar. 1-5, 2008.[8] Wild, I., “Moodle Course Conversion: Beginner’s Guide,” PACKT Publishing, 2008. Page 22.726.6
schools is in its early development. The report, Engineeringin K-12 Education, recently released by the National Academy of Engineering and NationalResearch Council6 provided a very insightful view of engineering education in K-12. The reportclaimed three principles for K-12 engineering education. First, it believed K-12 engineeringeducation should emphasize engineering design. Second, K-12 engineering should incorporateimportant science, mathematics, and technology concepts and skills. Finally, K-12 engineeringshould align with 1) systems thinking, 2) creativity, 3) optimism, 4) collaboration, 5)communication, and 6) attention to ethical considerations to promote engineering “habits of mind”(pp. 4-6). In summary, the report concluded there is no
to determine a program’s compliance with many ABET criteria. ABET’s Criterion 3states, in part, that a student should be able to design a system, component, or process to meetdesired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political,ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.5There has been at least one conference solely dedicated to the scholarship of capstone design inengineering. It was first convened at the University of Colorado in June of 2007 under the nameNational Capstone Design Conference. There were over 170 participants from industry anduniversities throughout the United States and a few other countries. This conference was focusedon improving the capstone or senior
entrepreneurs instead of just workers, the outlook of engineering could bepromising and rewarding. The last cause that should be addressed to make sure that engineeringgraduates know what exactly it means for them to practice engineering throughout the realworld. The university faculty need to instill not only book smarts, but also working under timeconstraints, correcting problems without assistance, dealing with the increasing amount ofpolitical pressures, ethical training, and understanding their obligation to the general public asprofessional engineers. Each course should have its own practical contents in place to helpstudents grow in each one of these categories and help them become well-rounded graduates.Due to this, it is only natural for the
in computing ethics, software project planning, software requirements analysis, teambuilding, design patterns, and software processes analysis. These cases were helpful in teaching“small-scale” software and computing topics, and students were motivated and seemed to enjoythis type of learning activity. However, the case studies addressed issues ranging over a disparateset of problem domains, software engineering practices, and scenario elements; this resulted instudents learning about software engineering practices in bits and pieces - there was very littlecoupling between the case studies and hence no accumulation of scenario experience thatallowed progress toward more substantial and complex problems.The SRS Inspection Case Module (and
twice per week basis. Thecourse modules developed for the SSED course are Introduction, Teamwork, Project Life Cycle,Scope and Concept of Operations, System Architecture, System Hierarchy and Work BreakdownStructure, Analytical Hierarchy Process, Requirements–Basics, Requirements–Writing,Requirements-Configuration and CM, Functional Analysis, System Synthesis, Design,Interfaces, Margins, Technical Performance Measures, Cost, Risk, Technology, Trade Studies,Reliability, Verification, Technical Reviews, Schedule, Management, and Ethics. All modulesare available to the students on the course website and remain available to them in the capstonedesign course.Space Systems Laboratory (SSL) The SSL is a one semester-credit-hour laboratory course
presentations,engineering ethics, and teamwork. But it does so in the context of a simulation of realengineering processes and practices. As such, it covers important supplementary topics that oftenare not covered in introductory courses such as keeping a design notebook, time management,and interacting professionally with clients and employers.Game Mechanics Game play is conducted in a computer simulation of the Nephrotex professional office. Thesimulation follows the workflow of an introductory engineering design course in which studentswork in design teams with a design advisor and meet with real clients to develop and propose asolution to a real design problem. Game play takes place face-to-face during class time, butstudents are able to access
inengineering; (2) engineering faculty insights into planning professional development programs;and (3) how engineering faculty/CTL partnerships can facilitate supportive learningenvironments for students.1. Student learning issues in engineeringContent issues which could be addressed in the classroom include the need for students to beable to: solve open ended interdisciplinary problems; engage in deep learning that leads toretention and transfer of knowledge; apply design skills; integrate knowledge and transferknowledge across different courses; work on diverse teams; and develop ethical frameworks fordecision-making.Structural issues inherent in engineering undergraduate education include the adequacy of labs,facilities, infrastructure, and space
Detroit, MI Senior Lecturer Full-time IE 4850 Engineering Economics, IE 6840 Project Management, IE 6490 and IE 7490 Sys- tems Engineering, IE4800 Senior Design, and BE1200 Design in Engineering instructor. Support EMMP (Engineering Master’s Management Program) Leadership Projects. Serve on Faculty Review Commit- tee. Co-Author for MINDSET (High School Math textbook) Critical Path Method chapter. Author for Value Added Decision Making (Master’s level Engineering Decision & Risk textbook) Ethical Decisions Chapter. Project Manager / Launch Leader for Global Executive Track PhD in Industrial Engineering. Member, ISE Lecture Capture Task Force, ISE Undergraduate Program Committee, College of Engineer- ing Climate
• Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose • Understand the economic, legal, and social issues surrounding the use of information, and access and use information ethically and legally vShuman’s analysis also reflects the thinking of the self-directed learning community, vi and Cervaro vii , forexample, found that engineers engage in ‘informal learning’ activities, i.e., self-directed learning, much morefrequently than formal learning activities, such as seminars and workshops.In an instructional setting, one would like to understand the skills and attitudes of students, so appropriatecontent can be provided. Assessing these skills and attitudes often is time consuming, time that librarians don’thave in a curricular
2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00EGT 320 Robotic Systems and Material Handling 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00EGT 340 Applied Dynamics 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00ENGD080 Writing Lab 2010-2011 Not Transferred 1.00ENGD090 Writing Workshop 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00PHI 194 Global Ethical Viewpoints 2010-2011 Not Transferred 3.00AELP000 Non-Credit/American English Lang 2010-2011 Not Transferred 0.00CHE 120 General Chemistry I 2010-2011 D Transferred 3.00CHE 120L General Chemistry I Lab
. Ramírez, UPM animal or plant housing proposed above. Materials used in the construction, type of energy supplied, management of waste produced…instrumentation – Measurement: Strain G. Vox, UBbasic measurements (stresses and pressures Á. Ramírez, UPM inference) temperature. Device: Strain gauges, semiconductors, RTDs, thermocouples, thermistors. Application: Structural (animal or plant housing)engineering ethics
department initiated an independent research propositioncourse for all first year PhD candidates. Student performance in this spring semesterthree unit course was treated as a graduate qualifier exam, and both students and facultyhave been supportive of this requirement, as summarized earlier1. Over the last decade, our first year approach to research education hasbroadened. Peter Kilpatrick added a one unit fall course, Introduction to Research, aprofessional development course including research ethics, presentations, andpublications. While these two courses were satisfying as stand-alone efforts, recentfaculty and graduate student sentiment pushed for an earlier engagement of student withresearch advisor, PhD committee, and research itself
example, a laboratory on controls typicallyrequires sophisticated and expensive machinery, precise sensing equipment, and computingresources. Simulating these mechanisms in Processing vastly decreases the cost of equipment(students can perform the laboratory assignment on their home computers) and increases thepossibilities for exploration, as the system under control can be perturbed by forces of arbitrarycomplexity, extensive and sophisticated instrumentation is possible, and there exists nomachinery to maintain, wear out or break, removing many stumbling blocks from the laboratoryexperience.As the educational field should adopt the “First, do no harm” principle from medical ethics, anydemonstration or simulation should not mislead the student
on Education of Undergraduates in the Research University: New York, 1998.12. Diefes-Dux, H.A., P.K. Imbrie, and T. Moore. First-Year Engineering Themed Seminar: A Mechanism for Conveying the Interdisciplinary Nature of Engineering. in Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 2005. Portland, OR.13. Naidu, S., M. Oliver, and A. Koronios, Approaching Clinical Decision Making in Nursing Practice with Interactive Multimedia and Case-Based Reasoning. Interactice Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer- Enhanced Learning, 2(3), 1999.14. Herkert, J., Engineering Ethics Education in the USA: Content, Pedagogy, and Curriculum. European Journal of