). Analyzing the contextual, motivational, and conceptual characteristics of teaching faculty in regard to the use of learner centered approaches in teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA.2. Rando, W., & Menges, R. (1991). How practice is shaped by personal theories. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 45, 7-14.3. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education 37(1), 57-70.4. Jarvis-Selinger, S., Collins, J. B., & Pratt, D. D. (2007). Do academic origins influence perspectives on teaching? Teacher Education Quarterly
building, renewable energy, and sustainability initiatives in architectural education and the built environment over the past 20 years during her tenure as an architecture department faculty member at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo. In the mid-1990’s, she was part of a design-engineering team that produced a feasibility study for a campus biological solid waste and wastewater treatment facility at Cal Poly, and worked as a consultant with Sasaki and Associates on a Sustainability Master Plan for California State University, Monterey Bay. She participated in the Vital Signs Building Case Study Project throughout its 10-year lifespan. This NSF and Energy Foundation funded curriculum project set standards and provided
Work? A Review of the Research,” J. Engr. Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004.8. R. F. Pease and S. Y. Chou, “Lithography and Other Patterning Techniques for Future Electronics,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 248-270, Feb. 2008.9. D. Helms, E. Schmidt, and W. Nebel, “Leakage in CMOS Circuits – An Introduction,” Proceeding of the 36th European on Solid-State Device Research Conference (ESSDERC 2006), pp. 399-402, 19-21 Sept. 2006.10. G. Bourianoff, “The future of nanocomputing,” IEEE Computer , vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 44- 53, Aug. 2003.11. M. Haselman and S. Hauck, “The Future of Integrated Circuits: A Survey of Nanoelectronics,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 11-38, Jan. 2010.12
and suggest anincrease in student self-taught learning.The national ASCE concrete canoe competition, as it is currently conducted, is based on what Page 23.314.4was initially a series of local concrete canoe races. Races were first held in the 1960’s on alocal-level as intramurals. In the 1970s the first regional competitions were held, and in 1988,ASCE with sponsorship provided by Master Builders, Inc., organized the first nationalcompetition in East Lansing, Michigan. In the last decade this competition has even expandedinto European nations.[8] With 24 consecutive years of experience at the national level, theconcrete canoe competition
Hispanic and White Youth into College,’’ Pew Hispanic Center, Nov.2005. [Online]. Available: pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID=56, Last Accessed on January 5, 2013.7. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012, [Online]. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/c2/c2h.htm,Last Accessed on January 4, 2013.8. A. T. Jeffers, A. G. Safferman, S. I. Safferman, “Understanding K-12 Engineering outreach Programs,” Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, pp. 95-108, April 2004.9. J. Gilley, J. Begolly, “Great Progress, Great Divide: The need for evolution of the recruitment model for womenin engineering,” 2005 American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition,Portland, OR.10. D
benefits to the Small-to-MediumEnterprise (SME) sector, and of particular interest in this study, micro-manufacturers inregional settings.The statistics captured on innovation often provide a mixed view on the greater benefitsin the form of increased productivity and higher value for the goods and services weproduce. Though the value of statistical information and analysis is beneficial, it doesnot provide an in-depth view of the effects and benefits on small businesses, theirowner(s) and the resultant innovation outcomes. Specifically, most research undertakenin evaluating the outcomes of innovation policy often do no more than broad and insome cases, industry specific statistical analyses, surveys and short interviews. Thequestion may be posed
. (2003, June). Evolution in the design and construction of stadiums. Retrieved from http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/29561/52724916.pdf?sequence=16. Grant, M. (1995). Gladiators. New York: Barnes and Noble.7. Roman Colosseum architecture. (2012, January 3). Retrieved from http://romancolosseum.org/ roman- colosseum-architecture/8. Purpose of the Colosseum. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.roman-colosseum.info/colosseum/purpose- of-the-colosseum.htm9. Awning at the Colosseum. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.roman-colosseum.info/colosseum/ awning-at-the-colosseum.htm10. Brown, S. (2007, August 15). The Roman arena. Archaeology. Retrieved from http://archive.archaeology. org/gladiators/arena.html11. Slater
. 2010. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/05/AR2010090502817.html. Last Page 23.254.16 Retrieved September 26, 2012. 3. S. Provasnik, D. Kastberg, D. Ferraro, N. Lemanski, S. Roey, and F. Jenkins, Highlights From TIMSS 2011: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth- and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context (NCES 2013-009). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC, 2012. Part I: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013009_1.pdf. Last
performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 101-124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 5. Miller, R.B., DeBacker, T., & Greene, B. (1999). Perceived instrumentality and the incentive value of academic tasks. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26, 250-260. 6. Wigfield, Allan L., and Jacquelynne S. Eccles. 2002. "Motivational beliefs, values, and goals." Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-32. 7. VanderStoep, S., Pintrich, P. R., & Fagerlin, A. (1996). Disciplinary differences in self-regulated learning in college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 345–362. 8. Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2000). Wanting to have versus wanting to be: the influence of instrumentality on
in front of the class. The classdeliverables for the Measure phase, which are summarized in Table 4 was due during the fifthweek of the class. Deliverable Description CTQ Matrix Define the customers Capture the voice of the customers Translate the voice(s) to the customer need(s) Kano Model Rank the customers’ needs based on level of priority Must haves More is better and delighters Page 23.957.8 As is process
- tor member of Telematic Laboratory of UNED (Telelab) in systems of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Nowdays is working for Innovation and Technological Development Centre of UNED (CiNDETEC). He is an expert in Learning Management Systems (LMS) and Web development appli- cations. Currently, he is collaborating in a research project of Open services integration for distributed, reusable and secure remote and virtual laboratories (s-Labs).Mr. F´elix Garc´ıa Loro Page 23.962.2 Industrial Engineering degree from the Spanish University for Distance Education (UNED). Assistant teacher in Wind
, participants spent morethan 100 minutes on the playground design task, much longer than the 17 minutes allotted to thepre-service teachers in the episode analyzed for this study. Therefore, here we consider just thefirst 19-minute subset of the data from Atman et al.’s (2007) study. In their first 19 minutes withthe playground design problem, the expert engineers spent a substantial amount of time ongenerating ideas and analyzing their feasibility. They also transitioned often to the activity ofinformation gathering, and spent as much time gathering facts and data as they did generatingideas or defining the problem. In fact, most of their instances of information gathering appear tostem from or lead to problem definition efforts. The expert engineers
for Undergraduate Engineering and Computer Science Studies and more recently as the Associate Chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. He has developing interests in international education and has a faculty appointment at Pyongyang University of Science and Technology, DPRK. Page 23.1054.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Scholarships for Academic Success Program: A Final ReportAbstractThe primary goal of the Scholarships for Academic Success (SAS) Program, funded through anNSF S-STEM grant, was
prepared and given resources necessary to run a successful workshop. ● Only evaluated or research-based practices that work with diverse students are presented. Evidence of effectiveness is provided for all recommended practices. ● Presented examples and resources are easily used and adapted without ongoing support or instruction. ● Inclusion of success stories by energetic high school teachers (local if possible) using recommended practices. ● Active learning components; e.g., group problem solving to facilitate workshop ice breaker activities. ● Sessions including: ○ Current conditions and need for computing in high school. ○ CS1-type course(s) that promotes more and diverse computing majors
review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, pp. 1845-1862, 5// 2012.[4] S. A. Waage, "Re-considering product design: a practical “road-map” for integration of sustainability issues," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 15, pp. 638-649, // 2007. Page 23.1152.14[5] W. H. Vanderburg, "On the measurement and integration of sustainability in engineering education," Journal of engineering education-Washington-, vol. 88, pp. 231-236, 1999.[6] S. J. Grimberg, T. A. Langen, L. D. Compeau, and S. E. Powers, "A theme-based seminar on environmental sustainability improves participant satisfaction in an
in critical thinking, in mathematical reasoning and analysis, a firm grounding in scientific and engineering methodologies and knowledge to address the complex, multidisciplinary, and multidimensional problems that humanity faces now and will in the future. Of course, educators in all fields are actively trying to change and be more effective. However, most engineering schools have not gone through fundamental changes since 1970’s. Although engineering is fundamentally pragmatic, hands-‐on, and project and application driven, engineering education has been drifting away from that approach since 1970-‐80s. By the end of 1980’s most major
. Kjeang, N. Djilali, D.Sinton, Microfluidic fuel cells, Journal of Power Sources 186, 353-369, 20097. N. Damean, P.P.L. Regtien, M. Elwenspoek, Heat transfer in a MEMS for microfluidics, Sensors and Actuators,A 105, 137 – 149, 20038. W. Lee, W. Fon, B. W. Axelrod, M. L. Roukes, High-sensitivity microfluidic calorimeters for biological andchemical applications, Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 106 (42) 18040; doi:10.1073 /pnas.0910433106, 20099. L. Wadsö, A. L. Smith, H. Shirazi, S. R. Mulligan, T. Hofelich, The Isothermal Heat Conduction Calorimeter: AVersatile Instrument for Studying Processes in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, J. of Chemical Education, 78 (8
about entire near-space mission On-the-spot design of ballooning mission to explore Venus (done in 1980’s by USSR!) Submit “Rev. C” of Team Project Doc. – includes Flight Data Analysis, Lessons Learned Public exhibit of payloads, flight photos/video, data analysis, team project documentation Course evaluations, wrap-up discussion of opportunities – “Where do we go from here?”Student Payloads – Hardware and ExperimentsHere are the contents of a handout giving an overview of the main payload-build assignment:A. Required basic components • Payload box, built from materials provided (it must be light (no more than 2 lb before rigging), strong (survive potentially-rough flight and landing), and thermally insulating
role and gain energy internally. The second category describes how a personprocesses information. A person who process data with their senses is referred to as a Sensors(S) and a person who sees where data is going in the future are called an iNtuitor (N). TheSensor versus iNtuitor category is an interesting area of study when it comes to engineeringeducation, because professors are historically intuitors while most engineering students aresensors49. The third category for MBTI preference describes the manner in which a personevaluates information. Those who tend to use a logical cause and effect strategy, Thinkers (T),differ from those who use a hierarchy based on values or the manner in which an idea iscommunicated, Feelers (F). The final
1566 1433 8104 (All) 1293 1266 1378 1366 1626 1503 8432One can see that overall, engineering student-athletes are very few, and that their numbersdecrease dramatically at 13 or 14 semesters of enrollment, which indicates they tend to graduatein 5 years just like the majority of GT students.1.2 W (“Withdraw”) GradeTo aid in visualizing the results, “heat maps” have been used in Excel to best indicate the mostimportant results, and in each case, have been constructed for an entire table’s data (not row byrow).We first look at how many students receive 1,2,3,… W grade(s) in that cohort: Page 23.976.8Table
, the issue of distributing electricityaccess to rural communities. The boundaries on this issue can range from access to academicopportunities, improvements and/or creations of newer innovations, to access to economicopportunities and/or improved medical care, where these arguments are made either in thecontext of present day inequalities or put in the context of historical and ongoing inequalitiesfaced by citizens in rural communities. Another challenge stems from the relative value of theitem to individuals. The policy debate that arises is grounded in how much relative value will bederived from the individual(s) receiving the item(s). Sticky questions often arise as to whether aparticular group needs one item more than another (e.g., access
biologically determined.11 One cannot choose not to participate in gender and one cannotchoose not to participate in the “doing” of masculinity or femininity, as those are the onlychoices offered in our society. Gender identity is something everyone has and it is a dynamicvariable which shifts and changes depending upon the different contexts and environments.Gender is not essential or natural; it is the various acts of gender that create gender. Gender is aperformance; it is what someone does, not who s/he is.12There is a societal position that supposes several irrefutable concepts regarding gender, includingthe beliefs that there are two genders (masculine and feminine) and biological sex organsdetermine gender.13 Dividing society into the binary
barriers to a smoothacademic path. However, even for the most well-prepared students, mentoring opportunities willbe lost by using only the prescriptive style in all situations. The developmental advising stylecontrasts with prescriptive advising in that it is interactive and focuses on the growth anddevelopment needs of the student, and is based on student development theory.The 70’s saw much significant research into student development theory, giving rise to theconcept that higher education personnel should support students as they developed into adults.Student development theories include psychosocial-identity formation theories such as the workof Chickering 18, cognitive development theories, including the work of Kohlberg 19, and
by promoting reflection and self-explanation of themathematical procedures.IntroductionStatics, the study of objects and systems in equilibrium and the forces that act upon them, is afoundational subject present in most engineering curricula, but many students struggle to learnand succeed in statics courses. Statics is a “threshold concept” in engineering in that mastery ofthis area can serve as a “conceptual gateway” that opens up “previously inaccessible way(s) ofthinking about something” [1]. However, many statics courses have a high failure rate, and manystudents who pass still have difficulty conceptualizing important topics and may have trouble infollow-up courses [2-4]. As students develop from novices to experts in threshold topics
mentor over the course of the program. Theresults of the different questions are summarized in Table 4, and the data are presented as themean +/- the standard deviation.Due the limited population size, the groups were compared solely by their means, the standarddeviations were not considered when comparing the groups. Group 1 was fairly satisfied withtheir mentor contact time, while Group 2, the less satisfied group, reported they were “somewhatsatisfied” with the amount of contact with their mentor. In contrast, Group 2 (1-2) respondedmore positively to all three questions collectively when compared to Group 1’s (≤1) collectiveresponse. Overall, both groups provided responses that were more positive than neutral; thisfinding suggests that all
oof art (educattion)and envirronmental en ngineering, with w an apprreciation for aesthetics aand the compplex relationshipsbetween people, objeects and placces on the on ne hand, and training in ssustainable ddesign andnatural syystems on thhe other. Givven the diverrsity of fieldss under the S STEM and S STEAMumbrellaas, it is evident that the coourse describ bed here connstitutes a paarticular takee on STEAM Meducation n. We argue that this uniique combin nation of art eeducation, eenvironmentaal engineerinngand landsscape architeecture provid ded a valuab ble standpoinnt from whicch to generatte