Paper ID #6716Collaborative Development of Internet-Accessible, Interactive, Medical Imag-ing Teaching Courseware and Application to Undergraduate CurriculaDr. Weizhao Zhao, University of Miami Dr. Weizhao Zhao’s fields of study include medical imaging and image processing, image-guided surgical intervention, medical imaging simulation for BME training. At the University of Miami, Dr. Zhao has been the director of the Bioimaging Laboratory; the co-director of the Medical Physics Graduate Program; and an associate professor of Biomedical Engineering, Neurology and Radiology.Ann G Bessell PhDDr. Nurgun Erdol, Florida Atlantic
Paper ID #7187Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project to Develop a Teaching Tool: MiniCNC MillDr. Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University (Engineering Technology)Dr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng.) Page 23.802.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013Interdisciplinary Senior Design Project to Develop a Teaching Tool: Mini CNC MillAbstractThe desired current set of skills required of modern engineers and technologists has been steadilyexpanding. In addition to familiarity with manual machining and fabrication techniques
would interact with students during the in-class implementation of the MEA. Theywere not involved in the assessment of student work on MEAs. Due to a change in instructionalfacilities, that grew the laboratory size from 32 to 120 students, the number of instructors neededin the laboratory space to facilitate active learning and open-ended problem solving changed.This was not a unique change, as other universities are also employing UTAs for various reasons(e.g. large enrollment, financial, retention) to perform an array of teaching duties.14,16 By Spring2010, UTAs responsibilities shifted to include assessment of student work on MEAs. This hadthe benefit of reducing GTA workload but also raised concern over the preparation UTAs wouldneed to
Paper ID #7413A Hybrid Approach to Teaching Materials Science Using POGIL and ActiveLearning ActivitiesDr. Eunice Yang, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown Dr. Eunice Yang received her doctorate in mechanical engineering from the Pennsylvania State University in 2006. She is currently an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh Johnstown campus. She has taught courses in Mechanical Measurements, Mechanical Measurements Lab, Materials Science, Stat- ics, Dynamics, Matlab, Fluid Dynamics, Strength of Materials Lab, Engineering Design, and Autodesk Inventor. Her current research interest lies in the area of
Paper ID #6268FlowVisual: Design and Evaluation of a Visualization Tool for Teaching 2DFlow Field ConceptsMiss Man Wang, Michigan Technological UniversityMr. Jun Tao, Michigan Technological UniversityDr. Chaoli Wang, Michigan Technological University Dr. Chaoli Wang is an assistant professor of computer science at Michigan Technological University. His research focuses on large-scale data analysis and visualization, high-performance computing, user inter- faces and interaction, and computer science education. He received B.E. and M.E. degrees in Computer Science from Fuzhou University, China, in 1998 and 2001, respectively, and
Paper ID #6402Incorporating New Trends and Teaching Methodologies: Improving State ofEngineering Education In PakistannDr. Salahuddin Qazi, State University of New York, Institute of Tech. Salahuddin (Sala) Qazi holds a Ph.D., degree in electrical engineering from the University of Technology, Loughborough, U.K. He is a full Professor (Emeritus) and past chair in the School of Information Systems and Engineering Technology at the State University of New York Institute of Technology, Utica. Dr. Qazi has published several articles, book chapters in the area of fiber doped amplifiers, wireless security, MEMS based wireless
Paper ID #7874Factors That Help and Hinder Teaching Assistants’ Ability to Execute TheirResponsibilitiesFarshid Marbouti, Purdue University, West Lafayette Farshid Marbouti is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interest is first-year engineering and specifically using learning analytics to improve first-year engineering students’ success. He completed his M.A. in the Educational Technology and Learning De- sign at Simon Fraser University in Canada, and his B.S. and M.S. in computer engineering in Iran.Kelsey Joy Rodgers, Purdue University, West Lafayette Kelsey
Paper ID #7026Illustrating Rotating Principal Stresses in a Materials Science CourseProf. Somnath Chattopadhyay, Georgia Southern UniversityDr. Rungun Nathan, Penn State Berks Dr. Rungun Nathan is an associate professor in the division of engineering at Penn State Berks. He got his B.S. from University of Mysore, DIISc from Indian Institute of Science, M.S. from Louisiana State University and Ph.D. from Drexel University. He has worked in the area of Electronic Packaging in C- DOT (India) and then as a Scientific Assistant in the Robotics laboratory at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. He worked as a post
eLearning environmenthave been of great interest to the teaching faculty of institutes of higher learning. The use of sucha platform for educating students in the various disciplines of engineering has, in particular,triggered much interest. In fact, many academic institutes are now turning to online engineeringas the panacea to combat the issue of low enrollment. This latest trend has led to significantstructural changes worldwide in engineering education. However, this shift to the eLearningenvironment has failed to successfully solve issues relating to quality, effectiveness, and thefeasibility of conducting online laboratory experiments. The rapidly changing technologicallandscape has also forced educators to devise, implement, and later
Paper ID #7080Using the Processing, Properties and Characterization of Brass to Teach theDifferences Between Crystal Structure and MicrostructureMs. Anastasia Micheals, San Jose State University Anastasia Micheals teaches in the Materials Engineering department at San Jos´e State University, and manages the SEM Laboratory for the SJSU Materials Characterization and Metrology Center [MC]2, where she performs and directs research and materials characterization. She holds an M.S. in Materials Science and Engineering from Stanford University. Outside the classroom, she consults in materials failures due to processing and
Delco Electronics as a subsidiary of General Motors Hughes Electronics). Dr. Wagner is a Professor and Chair of the Dynamic Systems and Controls Group at Clemson. His research interests include nonlinear and intelligent control systems, dynamic system modeling, diagnostic and prognostic strategies, and mechatronic system design. He has developed the multi-disciplinary Rockwell Automation Mechatronics Educational Laboratory which features hands-on robotic, programmable logic controller, electronic, and material handling experiments. He is a former As- sociate Editor of the ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control and IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, respectively. Dr. Wagner is a licensed
Paper ID #5982Innovations in Nano Materials Education through International Collabora-tionsDr. Ajit D. Kelkar, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Ajit D. Kelkar is a professor and chair of Nanoengineering department at Joint School of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering. He also serves as an associate director for the Center for Advanced Materials and Smart Structures. For the past twenty five years he has been working in the area of performance evaluation and modeling of polymeric composites and ceramic matrix composites. He has worked with several federal laboratories in the area of fatigue, impact and finite
chosen to create a new way to define whichstudents used active learning that was based on specific active learning teaching methods and notself-reported perceptions. While there are a range of teaching methods that could have been Page 23.136.13chosen for this analysis, this new definition for active learning use is based on approaches thatare relatively easy for graduate students to implement, yet would require some amount ofpreparation time in order to fully develop the activity. Further, the selected teaching methodsreflect those approaches that were most applicable to the discussion and laboratory environmentsand not necessarily for those
Paper ID #6148How to Write a Textbook in Ten Easy StepsDr. Barry Dupen, Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne Dr. Dupen is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW). He has nine years’ experience as a metallurgist, materials engineer, and materials laboratory manager in the automotive industry. His primary interests lie in materials engineer- ing, mechanics, and engineering technology education. He is also an experienced contra dance caller
Paper ID #7130Muddiest Point Formative Feedback in Core Materials Classes with YouTube,Blackboard, Class Warm-ups and Word CloudsProf. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is a professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, capstone design, and introductory materials engineering. His research interests are evaluating conceptual knowledge, miscon- ceptions and their repair, and conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge
teaching position at the University of Florida. Dr. Bondehagen is a member of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), the American Water Resources Association (AWRA) and American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). Her current research interests are in engineering education and contaminant transport/remediation.Dr. Yusuf A Mehta, Rowan University Dr. Mehta is an Associate Professor at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rowan University. Dr. Mehta has extensive experience in teaching pavement materials and pavement systems. Dr. Mehta has published several technical and educational papers in leading professional organizations
Paper ID #5862A new motivation and perspective on teaching simulation and design: Thedevelopment of a dynamic process model in conjunction with an operatortraining simulator (OTS)Dr. Richard Turton P.E., West Virginia University Dr. Richard Turton, P.E., has taught the Senior Design course at West Virginia University for the past 27 years. Prior to this, he spent five years in the design and construction industry. His main interests are in design education and process modeling. Page 23.82.1
Paper ID #6766Efficient and Effective Instruction in Process Simulation Across the ChemicalEngineering CurriculumDr. Rebecca K. Toghiani, Mississippi State University Dr. Rebecca K. Toghiani is an associate professor of Chemical Engineering at MSU. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. all in Chemical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Columbia. She re- ceived the 1996 Dow Outstanding New Faculty Award and the 2005 Outstanding Teaching Award from the ASEE Southeastern Section. A John Grisham Master Teacher at MSU, she is an inaugural member of the Bagley College of Engineering Academy of Distinguished Teachers
concepts and data analysis very well. Overall, less than fiveout of ninety students could define soil liquefaction before the module. Afterwards, almost allstudents could describe causes and effects of liquefaction, but like in other teaching settings,students showed different levels of interest. Some answered questions without raising their handswhile others sat quietly and watched events unfold. In any case, it is advisable for the instructorto come up with different incentives to encourage equal student participation.During both lecture and laboratory sessions, visual aids were found to be effective in relayingnew concepts to students. YouTube videos were used and students seemed to relate tomultimedia form of presentations.Sustainability
their implementation into three collaborative courses, Introduction toNondestructive Evaluation and Structural Health Monitoring (NDE), Design for theEnvironment (DfE), and Green Buildings: Design and Construction (GB), that have beendesigned to enhance the learning of sustainability concepts. Pre- and post-assessment surveyswere administered to assess changes in student perceptions of sustainability concepts andapplications over a four-year period. Survey results present changes in perceptions ofsustainability concepts and applications over time as a result of the active and experientiallearning units and classes. The concurrent teaching of these sustainability units and classes atUPitt and ASU enhanced student collaboration within and across
Paper ID #7217Use of Studio-based Learning in a Material/Energy Balance ClassDr. Richard L. Zollars, Washington State University Dr. Richard Zollars is a professor in and associate director of the Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering at Washington State University. He received his Ph.D. from the University of Colorado. He has been teaching engineering for 35 years. His interests are learning styles, colloidal/interfacial phenomena and reactor design.Dr. Christopher Hundhausen, Washington State University Dr. Chris Hundhausen received the B.A. degree in Math/Computer Science from Lawrence
Infrastructure Research Group (IRG). She also completed a teaching certificate and was actively involved with the Center for the En- hancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) at Georgia Tech. Her academic interests focus on two primary areas of sustainable transportation: (1) community-based design and planning and (2) strategic planning and policy development. Dr. Barrella is also interested in investigating how to best integrate these research interests into classroom and project experiences for her students.Mr. Thomas A. Wall, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Caroline R. Noyes, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Michael O. Rodgers, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Michael Rodgers is a research professor in the Georgia
authors are grateful to Mr. Chad Seeley who is the Laboratory Associate at USM. Hisassistance in the manufacture of the experimental devices that were built in the course of thisresearch is greatly appreciated. 12. References 1. N. Randall and M.Ghorashi, “Design, Manufacture, Simulation and Experimentation of Several Tools to Assist in Teaching Strength of Materials and Statics Courses,” 119th ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 2012, Paper number: AC 2012-2971 (2012). 2. J.E.Corter, S.K.Esche, C.Chassapis, J.Ma and J.V.Nickerson, “Process and Learning Outcomes from Remotely-operated, Simulated, and Hands-on Student Laboratories,” Computers & Education, 57 (2011) 2054-2067. 3. A. Ayob
/Champaign under the direction of Prof. Nick Holonyak, Jr. Her areas of research include design of optoelectronic materials, devices, and systems; optical spectroscopy; high heat load packaging; and electrical engineering pedagogy.Mr. Justin Adam Cartwright, Virginia Tech Page 23.842.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Lab-in-a-Box: Strategies to Teach Online Lab Courses While MaintainingCourse Learning Objectives and OutcomesThe Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech has institutedseveral nontraditional on-campus laboratory courses during the
Paper ID #7994Work In Progress: Adapting Inexpensive Game Technology to Teach Princi-ples of Neural Interface Technology and Device ControlDr. Benjamin R Campbell, Robert Morris University Dr. Campbell is an assistant professor of engineering at Robert Morris University, where he advises biomedical engineering students. Prior to that he worked as a laser engineer at the Penn State Electro- Optics Center, specializing in ultrashort pulse laser micromachining research. Dr. Campbell is also on the board of directors for the Pennsylvania Governor’s School for the Sciences Campaign, a nonprofit dedi- cated to providing free
midterm exams. As a result thestudents do not put a uniform effort in learning during the course but, under pressure from theirother courses, apply themselves to the EFW course for only a short period of time just before theexams, resulting in an uneven and incomplete learning.To overcome the problems described above we are developing a conceptually novel one-semester EFW course for engineering junior undergraduate students and establishing a newundergraduate EFW laboratory. This course is a four credit-hour lecture/lab course (three credithours are for the lecture component and one credit hour for the lab component of the combinedcourse). A novel style of teaching this EFW course is based on the interactive approach –experiment – theory
in a pair of looselyconnected undergraduate Aerospace Engineering courses that integrate teaching and research.The first one-third of each course is devoted to conventional lectures and/or laboratory exerciseswith computer interfaced data acquisition systems. The latter two-thirds focus on design andresearch projects in Aerospace Engineering with a few lectures interspersed. The teachingmethod has some unique characteristics: i) Undergraduates gain a research experience byworking in small groups of two or three students supervised by a volunteer graduate studentresearch mentor, ii) The particular research project is developed by the course instructors and thevolunteer graduate student research mentor in advance of the course as one related
General Mo- tors, and Xerox, and is a registered professional engineer in New York. He has thirty-five years experience teaching design related courses, and has developed expertise in the areas of robotics, and micro-robotics. He is currently working on the locomotion of micro-robots with micro-sensors and actuators, and on artificial muscles and sensors using electroactive polymers.Dr. Michael G. Schrlau, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Dr. Michael Schrlau is an assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the founding director of the Nano-Bio Interface Laboratory (NBIL) at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Dr. Schrlau is interested in several aspects critical to the
Paper ID #7863Just-in-Time-Teaching with Interactive Frequent Formative Feedback (JiT-TIFFF or JTF) for Cyber Learning in Core Materials CoursesProf. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of engineering education design, capstone design, and introductory materials engineering. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, misconceptions and their repair, and conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept In- ventory for assessing
Paper ID #7260Initial Development of the Engineering Genome Project–an Engineering On-tology with Multimedia Resources for Teaching and Learning EngineeringMechanicsDr. Edward J. Berger, University of Virginia Ed Berger is currently the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Programs in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. He is also Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. He teaches mostly sophomore mechanics courses. Page 23.753.1