Paper ID #8689Higher Technological Education and British Polict Making: A lost opportu-nity for curriculum change in engineering educationDr. John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin John Heywood MA MSc LittD (Dublin) M.Litt (Lanacaster). Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College – The University of Dublin and formerly Professor and Director of Teacher Education in the University (1977 – 1996). In addition to a higher doctorate he is the holder of a Masters degree in engineering education (MSc). He is a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Educa- tion, a Senior
reflections isthat “doing something” was at the forefront of Watt’s mind, a more seasoned professor amongus, who was aware of other groups she’d been involved with that never moved past the planningstage. Bernal, though--our newest faculty member and an engineer--took for granted that theprogram would come to fruition. While the seasoned communication professor was impressedthat “we took the idea from inception to implementation in one year,” the new engineeringprofessor hadn’t considered one year to be a particularly quick timeframe. A related key traitthat all three share is accepting the need to do things “on the fly”; for instance, we agreed from
published on various aspects of communication in sociotechnical systems, including the use of sentence-headline design for PowerPoint slides. Page 24.1007.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Problem Framing as a Teachable Skill: A Practical Approach to Teaching Leadership CommunicationIn the preface to the 2011 edition of Leading Minds: An Anatomy of Leadership (1995/2011),Howard Gardner notes “the explosion of interest in the topic of leadership” (p. xv) that occurredbetween the two editions of the book.4 The Engineering Leadership Constituent
and share their technical recipes with those interested. Done outsidethe confines of established engineering education curricular activities, Making comes from animaginative, creative mind-space and is a shareful practice. Making is defined by a do-it-yourself ideal and is historically rooted in efforts likePopular Mechanics magazine who demystified everyday stuff for hobbyists and the Whole EarthCatalog: Access to Tools5 who surveyed everyday tools for the counterculture movement of the1960s. Additional real-world touchstones are the growth of Radio Shack stores and the 1980stelevision program MacGyver where the lead character would resolve each episode’spredicament by fashioning an escape plan out of found objects6. Technology and
Paper ID #9931Living With Contradiction: Cultural Historical Activity Theory as a Theo-retical Frame to Study Student Engineering Project TeamsMr. Michael L Jones, Faculty of Information, University of Toronto Michael Jones is a doctoral candidate in the Faculty of Information, University of Toronto and professor of Communication, Culture, Information and Technology at Sheridan College, Oakville ON. Michael’s research interests are in project-based learning in technology education, with his dissertation looking at how Formula SAE engineering student project teams engage information management contradictions
p 1). Education is then, “the acquisition of theart of utilisation of knowledge” [4 p 6]. Looked at from the perspective of Whitehead’s formalphilosophy engineering and technology are creative activities. The stage of “romance” is notonly one of discovery but of creative exploration [8] It is a view that fits well with what anengineer seeks to do. Page 24.375.3 2 Stage 1: Romance: The stage of first apprehension (a stage of ferment). Education must essentially be a setting in order of a ferment already stirring in the mind: you cannot educate the mind in vacuo. In our conception of
Paper ID #10069Immersive Experience Impact on Students’ Understanding of DesignMs. Antonette T. Cummings P.E., Purdue University Antonette Cummings is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and
Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Prof. Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette Patrice M. Buzzanell is a Professor in the Brian Lamb School of Communication and the School of Engineering Education (courtesy) at Purdue University. Editor
Paper ID #9740Evaluating the Effects of Non-Anonymity on Student Team-Member Evalua-tionsMr. Taylor Robert Smith, Brigham Young University Taylor Smith has a Bachelor of Science and a Master’s degree from the civil and environmental engi- neering program at Brigham Young University. For his graduate studies Taylor’s classwork and technical emphasis were in geotechnical engineering; however, his Master’s Thesis was non-technical and he ex- amined and tested ways to improve performance through the use of peer feedback. More particularly, he evaluated the effect that having students conduct team member evaluations non
Paper ID #10385Exploring Student Sustainability Knowledge using the Structure of ObservedLearning Outcomes (SOLO) TaxonomyDr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Prior to joining the faculty at The Citadel, Dr. Watson earned her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She also has BS and MS degrees in Biosystems Engineering from Clemson University. Dr. Watson’s research interests are in the areas of engineering education and biological waste treatment. Specifically
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.2 Gelmon,S.B. (2000). How do we know that our work makes a difference? Metropolitan Universities, 11(2), 28-393 ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. (2010). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2008- 09%20EAC%20Criteria%2012-04-07.pdf.4 Schuburt, T. F., Jacobitz, F. G., & Kim. E. M. (2012). Student perceptions and learning of the engineering design process: an assessment at the freshmen level. Research in Engineering Design, 23, 177-190. DOI 10.1007/s00163-011-0121-x5 Carberry A
Paper ID #9982Student Perceptions of Project Mentoring: What Practices and BehaviorsMatter?Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com
Paper ID #9693Comparison of Questioning-based and Reasoning-based Design ApproachesDr. Ang Liu, University of Southern California Dr. Liu is a Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow and Manager of Viterbi iPodia Program at University of South- ern California.Dr. Stephen Y. Lu, University of Southern California Dr. Lu is the David Packard Chair in Manufacturing Engineering, Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Computer Science, and Industrial and Systems Engineering, and Director of Viterbi iPodia Program, at University of Southern California
Paper ID #10109Adventures in paragraph writing: the development and refinement of scal-able and effective writing exercises for large enrollment engineering coursesMs. Rebecca Rose Essig, Purdue UniversityDr. Cary David Troy, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ph.D., Stanford University, Civil and Environmental Engineering (2003) Assistant Professor, Purdue Uni- versity, School of Civil Engineering (2007-present)Prof. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Assistant Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an
Education Annual Conference & Exposition2010: Louisville, KY.11. Atman, C.J., D. Kilgore, and A. McKenna, Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed-Methods Study of Engineering Designers Use of Language. J. Eng. Educ., 2008. 97: p. 309.12. Vygotsky, L., Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. 1978, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.13. Harre, R., Personal Being. 1984, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.14. Cheville, Transformative Experiences: Scaffolding Design Learning Through the Vygotsky Cycle. Int. J. Eng. Educ., 2010.15. McVee, M.B., K. Dunsmore, and J.R. Gavelek, Schema Theory Revisited. Rev. Ed. Res., 2005. 75(4): p. 531-566.16. Smith, K.A., et al., Pedagogies of
Paper ID #10569The Professional Guide: A Resource for Preparing Capstone Design Studentsto Function Effectively on Industry-sponsored Project TeamsDr. R. Keith Stanfill, University of Florida B.S., M.E., and Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering University of Florida Dr. R. Keith Stanfill is the Director of the Integrated Product and Process Design Program and an Engineer for the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering. His interests include technology transfer, entrepreneurship, product development, design education and Design for X. Dr. Stanfill has over ten years’ industrial experience with United
and Braun (2010) observed that many dyslexicstudents innately approach problems from a three-dimensional perspective2. So when a dyslexicstudent is presented with an unfamiliar object, he may have a natural ability and predisposition toexamine the object from various angles and perspectives in his mind, without ever movinghimself or the object. The ability to reason three-dimensionally may lead a dyslexic student to beable to view the opposite side of an object in his mind, based on observations concerning thefront of the object and his previous knowledge. This special reasoning skill is extremely usefulin engineering. Language, however, is two-dimensional; the tendency to reason in threedimensions can lead a “b” to look like a “d”, “p” or “q
. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Meagan worked as a engineer for Texas Instruments, including three co-op rotations, before returning to school to earn her doctorate. She has earned a B.S. in Computer Science from Texas Woman’s University, and a Masters of Electrical Engineering from Texas Tech University. In addition, Meagan has developed secondary curriculum in STEM for Learning.com and Scientific Minds, and worked as a research consultant for Texas Instruments Education Technology in exploring the K-12 Engineering Education market opportunities. As a researcher, Meagan’s current work is focused on closing the gender gap in engineering, improving STEM career counseling, equipping STEM
encourage students to pursue STEM pathways. This conclusion is one of thefirst steps in overcoming a national dilemma. However, it is important to keep in mind programscreated for middle school students should not only be exciting but also meaningful where thestudents learn the core STEM concepts. It is the meaningful experience, not the “fun”experience, that keeps students engaged with STEM later in life2.Incorporating engineering in the K-12 classroom has been found to provide students withmeaningful applications and connections to content which students might not have otherwisemade. Engineering exposure at the middle grades can build critical thinking and problem solvingskills, and it can also help students connect to ideas that they would
Paper ID #10910Capturing evidence of metacognitive awareness of pre-service STEM educa-tors’ using ’codifying’ of thinking through eportfolios (Research-to-Practice)– Strand: OtherMr. Patrick Rowsome, University of LimerickDr. Diarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Diarmaid is a Lecturer in Technology Teacher Education at the University of Limerick. His research interests are in the areas of freehand sketching, cognition and spatial visualization. He is currently Director of Membership of the Engineering Design Graphics Division (EDGD).Dr. Seamus Gordon, University of Limerick Head of Department Design and Manufacturing
in design. International Journal of Engineering education, 24(2), 226- 233. 12. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies p 427-441. 13. LIFE Center (2005). "The LIFE Center's Lifelong and Lifewide Diagram". Retrieved from http://life- slc.org/about/citationdetails.html 14. Nourbakhsh, I., E. Hamner, E. Ayoob, E. Porter, B. Dunlavey, D. Bernstein, K. Crowley, M. Lotter, S. Shelly, T. Hsiu, and D. Clancy. (2006). The personal exploration rover: Educational assessment of a robotic exhibit for informal learning venues. International Journal of Engineering Education 22 (4): 777-791. 15. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological
Paper ID #10494Analysis of Design Process Knowledge Task Responses: Statistical Approachesto Uncover Patterns (Research)Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica E. Cardella is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University and the Director of Informal Learning Environments Research for INSPIRE (the Institute for P-12 Engineering Research and Learning). She has a BSc in Mathematics from the University of Puget Sound and an MS and PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of Washington. Her research focuses on: par- ents’ roles in engineering education; engineering learning
Paper ID #9815Translational Engineering Skills Program (TESP): Training innovative, adap-tive, and competitive graduate students for the 21st century work forceDr. Elena Nicolescu Veety, North Carolina State University Elena Veety received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, in 2011. Her research focused on liquid crystal polarization gratings for tunable optical filters and telecommunications applications. Since 2011, she has been a Teaching Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University. Currently, she is the Assistant
. Selected strand providers submitted a syllabus, lesson plans,alignment to STEM learning standards and practices, and material lists for a classroom “kit” ofup to $250 of supplies required to implement their curriculum for each of the strand participants.The supplies were provided to each strand participant using additional funding provided bybusiness and industry. The strand providers also submitted a content/subject knowledge testaligned with the STEM concepts taught in their strands, which were vetted, modified for clarity,and used to pre and post-test their participants.The i-STEM strands focused on integrated STEM and included elements of scientific inquiry,engineering design, mathematical modeling, 21st Century skills 21, hands-on/minds-on
require significant research and development as best practices aredeveloped and refined. In this paper we focus on the third in that list: integrated curricula.Combining content from multiple disciplines in a meaningful way is no easy task, and it isimportant to ensure that the essential aspects of each of the different content areas are not lostthrough the process of integration. With that in mind, in this study we examine the engineeringcontent in 10 curricular units developed for use in science classrooms to teach science andengineering content through engineering design challenges. These curricula were developed bypracticing science teachers who were attempting to add engineering and mathematics content totheir middle school science courses
tours 3) Become familiar with the demands and expectations of college-level courses 4) Receive credits for 3 units of required UA engineering coursework at significantly reduced tuitionPre-College, engineering programs have been shown to attract students to engineering and otherSTEM careers (11, 12, 13), therefore, the way one designs and delivers the curriculum is important.Our goal is for our teachers to offer varied, hands-on projects in their engineering classroomsthat are practical, but also community minded, artful, or even musical. The types of workengineers do in the real world is vast, so the introduction to engineering course must go beyondthe stereotypical. ENGR 102 HS presents engineering as a helping
21 Schnittka, C.G. (2009). Save the penguins engineering teaching kit: An introduction to thermodynamics and heat transfer. Downloaded from http://www.auburn.edu/~cgs0013/ETK/SaveThePenguinsETK.pdfSchnittka, C.G. (2012). Save the sea birds engineering teaching kit: An introduction to solar energy, force, and motion. Downloaded from http://www.auburn.edu/~cgs0013/ETK/SaveTheSeaBirdsETK.pdfSchnittka, C.G., & Bell, R.L. (2011). Engineering design and conceptual change in the middle school science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1861-1887.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Paper ID #9918Development of an Integrated Curriculum for Educating Engineers aboutNanotechnology: End-of-Life Management of Nanomaterial-Containing WastesDr. Charles E. Pierce, University of South CarolinaDr. Nicole Berge, University of South Carolina Page 24.422.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Development of an Integrated Curriculum for Educating Engineers about Nanotechnology: End-of-Life Management of Nanomaterial-Containing WastesIntroductionThe rapid development of
Paper ID #8868The use of metacognitive writing-to-learn prompts in an engineering staticsclass to improve student understanding and performanceDr. Saryn R. Goldberg, Hofstra University Dr. Saryn R. Goldberg is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering in Hofstra University’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Dr. Goldberg received her Sc.B. in Engineering with a focus on materials science from Brown University, her M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering with a focus on biomaterials from Northwestern University, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering with a focus on biomechanics from Stanford University. At
with their grade level “Launcher” lessons, involve about 50 hours of totalSTEM exposure. Each EYE Module requires a combination of 6 to 8 hours of class time and 1)addresses an engineering design challenge around issues related to National Academy ofEngineering’s (NAE) Grand Challenges for Engineering8; 2) fosters the development of an“engineering habit of mind;” 3) integrates technology and other resources to engage and meet theneeds of diverse middle grades students, and 4) deepens understanding of mathematics andscience content, with an emphasis on mathematics. The Modules are not a complete engineering,technology or STEM curriculum; rather they are a supplement to and in support of the existingmathematics and science curriculum. They are a