Page 24.528.5well as the reduced ethical concerns regarding their isolation (compared to embryonic stem cells)made them an attractive cell reservoir for applications of tissue engineering and regenerativemedicine, including for cartilage repair 29. We selected the bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived MSCs for several instructional and practical reasons: i) they are the best characterized ofall adult MSCs, ii) they manifest different potency for chondrogenesis 30, 31, iii) they differ intheir availability, abundance, and morbidity associated with their isolation methods 32, 33, and iv)are available commercially. This comparative analysis will provoke the students to furtherexplore why MSCs from different sources have distinct requirements
evidence to support that their program is meeting ABET outcomes A through K[25, 28-29].Engineering programs strategically locate capstone design courses within the last year ofundergraduate engineering studies, where students can apply the fundamental technicalknowledge gained in previous courses in an authentic real-world context. Several institutionshave identified Capstone Design as an ideal place for teaching professional skills, which aretypically not emphasized earlier in the curriculum [30]. Howe’s Capstone Design survey of 232engineering institutions showed that the five most common topics taught were: writtencommunication, oral communication, engineering ethics, project planning and scheduling, anddecision making. Only 48% of the survey
sophisticated engineering software package/tool for design or computation; (4)addressing engineering ethics and societal context in addition to the engineering math andscience; and (5) understanding of the "engineering roadmap" regarding engineering education(specifically addressing opportunities at Tufts University) so students could recognize theavailable pathways beyond the first semester.“Simple Robotics” is an evolution of a previous course14 taught throughout the last decade thatleverages the LEGO MINDSTORMS robotics toolset (originally RCX and more recently theNXT) as well as the LabVIEW graphical programming environment to introduce students to avariety of engineering topics: from mechanical and structural to electronics and computerengineering
programs minimally expectedoutcomes of a technological education. ABET introduced the revised outcomes for EngineeringCriteria 20001 to drive changes in engineering education practice—such as promoting more sub-stantial education in communication and ethics—but many programs’ and institutions’ ap-proaches to the ABET requirements have now become codified, and administrators now exam-ine proposed changes to curriculum or pedagogy, asking whether they pose any risk to continu-ing accreditation. Programs that have been successfully placing graduates into desirable jobsmay be similarly constrained by their own success. Such factors can reinforce an institutional
grade to advance in their studies. For those students,the bridge program successfully advanced their math education by at least a semester.From Figure 3, the results for the bridge program students in College Algebra are muchmore varied. First, it is clear that bridge program students who did not improve theiroriginal math placement tend to not get a grade of C or better in their first attempt inCollege Algebra, as over the four years only 1 of 7 students accomplished that. As such,there may be a problem with the work ethic of students who did not improve their mathplacement, or these students have fundamentally reached their mathematical abilities andcannot complete the work in Math 116 successfully. Participation in the bridge programappears
Paper ID #8790Assessing Metacognition During Problem-Solving in Two Senior ConcurrentCoursesMiss Sheila Reyes Guerrero, Universidad de las Am´ericas Puebla Sheila Reyes Guerrero is Science, Engineering, and Technology Education Ph.D. Student at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. She teaches Databases, Networks & Telecommunications, Contem- porary Ethics, Basic computer, Internet protocols, Legal Aspects of Information Technology Information Technologies, Foundations of educational technology.. Her research interests include faculty develop- ment, outcomes assessment, and creating effective learning
) to 100 (high). The Engineer of 2020 survey asksstudents to provide self-ratings from 1 (Weak/None) to 5 (Excellent) for the following fouritems: 1) Knowledge of contexts (social, political, economic, cultural, environmental, ethical, etc.) that might affect the solution to an engineering problem; 2) Knowledge of the connections between technological solutions and their implications for the society or groups they are intended to benefit; 3) Ability to use what you know about different cultures, social values, or political systems in developing engineering solutions; and 4) Ability to recognize how different contexts can change a solution. More details about these
frequently by those respondents who had indicated multiple“extremely important” variables were: high school grade point average, math standardized testscore, comprehensive standardized test score, and the quality of the high school course load.Notably, students’ track records in calculus, physics and chemistry were ranked a bit lower thanthe overall quality of the high school course load. These variables will be used in the next phaseof our ongoing research to quantify the pool of engineering admissible students by demographicbreakdown.The math and physics high school participation rates by females and students from historicallyunderrepresented ethic and racial minority groups represent a significant barrier to equity,challenging engineering’s
multidisciplinary Capstone Design projects is also suggested.KeywordsMultidisciplinary, capstone design, senior design, electric drive control systemIntroductionLike many universities in the country, Capstone Design is a culminating course offered toundergraduate students in several disciplines at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Studentswork in teams to design, build, and test prototypes with real world applications. At the end ofeach semester students showcase their efforts at the “Capstone Design Expo”. Three of theimportant outcomes of this capstone experience involve learning about professional ethics,teamwork skills, and design methodologies1. Traditionally, at the Georgia Institute ofTechnology, Capstone Design is monodisciplinary with teams
local industry on an actual mission that will be launched intospace.I. IntroductionEngineering and computer science programs often require a culminating senior design project.Several of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditationoutcomes1 are best demonstrated in the context of such a project. These include: • The ability to design a system, process or component to meet desired needs • The ability to function on a multidisciplinary team • The ability to communicate effectively • The understanding of professional and ethical responsibilityAt California State University, Northridge (CSUN) engineering and computer science studentsare assigned to work on group design projects during their senior year
of engineering students a force in the worldaround them. The structure of the courses within a department could expand to all requiredcourses as in the following. The communication elements in each course are shown below.EGR 100 – Intro to Engineering Design (Freshman)Resumes, email, short engineering focused reports, engineering writing demands, problemsolving, speaking, ethics, and orientation to the university/college/majorsME 201 – Thermodynamics (Sophomore)Student communication survey, refresher for past grammatical expertiseME 332 – Fluid Mechanics (Junior) ME 371 – Machine Design ILaboratory Reports: (Approx. 9 @ 4-6 Short Technical Reportingpages each) Design Analysis Reports (2 @ 4-6
Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Ms. Ming-Chien Hsu, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ming-Chien Hsu is a doctoral candidate of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She was an elec- trical engineer working on semiconductor devices before stepping into the realm of education research. Her current research explores and characterizes learning experiences in engineering such as design and interdisciplinary learning.Dr. Monica E Cardella, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica Cardella is an Associate Professor of Engineering
., E. Douglas, and W.J. Hilson Jr. (2008) Qualitative research basics: A guide for engineering educators.West Lafayette, IN.24. Rayne, K., T. Martin, S. Brophy, N.J. Kemp, J.D. Hart, and K.R. Diller. (2006) The development of adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2):165–73. Page 24.707.14
University of Louisville in Educational Administration with a cognate in urban education. Dr. Feldhaus spent 20 years as a classroom teacher, principal and district administrator in public education. His research interests include P-12 STEM education, STEM workforce education, post- secondary STEM education discipline based research, engineering technology recruitment and retention, and engineering ethics. Page 24.734.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 1Increasing Female Participation in Engineering: Evaluating POWER
largest privately held construction firms in the nation. Its success is theresult of a strong work ethic and industry knowledge combined with innovation andcollaboration. The GC in cause is a recognized builder of one of the world’s largest aquarium,which is a model of project efficiency, superior quality, and exceptional service from start tofinish. The calculated stadium expansion project duration is approximate to 10 months. ThisStadium Expansion Project includes many key players. The University’s Athletic Foundation isthe owner of the project. There are also two major subcontractors handling concrete work andstructure pertaining to development of stadium expansion
already been shared with aresearch team exploring high school students’ pathways to engineering.Second, the researchers’ experiences with recruiting participants provides a contribution to theengineering education community. Our team explored a variety of approaches for recruitmentand found that using a third-party recruitment firm was the most expedient approach. For othersto follow this approach, however, they would need to work closely with their IRB to determinethe most appropriate and ethical process. Our team also found that sharing the study flyer withdifferent groups’ e-newsletters was an effective recruitment strategy.Third, while we generally received more screening survey responses from boys than from girls,this difference was
the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (UWM). Papadopoulos has diverse research and teaching interests in structural mechanics, biomechanics, appro- priate technology, engineering ethics, and engineering education. He is PI of two NSF sponsored research projects and is co-author of Lying by Approximation: The Truth about Finite Element Analysis. Pa- padopoulos is currently the Program Chair Elect of the ASEE Mechanics Division and serves on numerous committees at UPRM that relate to undergraduate and graduate education.Dr. Aidsa I. Santiago-Rom´an, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez CampusDr. Genock Portela-Gauthier, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus
group is responsible of only one designcomponent: architecture, structure, HVAC or Lighting/electrical. An office standard prepared by thedepartment of civil and architectural engineering is distributed over the students.This course teaches the student how to prepare a final set of discipline specific construction documents,including engineering calculations production drawings, and specifications. The student will discusscontracts, ethics, and construction administration as they relate to the project.Autodesk Revit 2013 is pivotal in system design. This program allowed students to layout the architectureplans, sections and elevations of the architecture plans, structural, ductwork, piping, lighting fixtures,power panels, power and lighting
in your organization. Wiley, 2012.[21] K. A. Ericsson and H. A. Simon, Protocol analysis verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.[22] D. Kilgore, C. J. Atman, K. Yasuhara, T. J. Barker, and A. Morozov, “Considering Context : A Study of First-Year,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 321–334, 2007.[23] D. H. Jonassen and Y. H. Cho, “Fostering Argumentation While Solving Engineering Ethics Problems,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 680–702, Oct. 2011.[24] N. Genco, K. Holtta-Otto, and C. C. Seepersad, “An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Undergraduate,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 60–81, 2012
in each year of study. This sequence of courses is expected toinculcate skills in engineering design and development, use of analysis tools, development ofprofessional and communication skills, understanding of professional behavior, business ethics,commercial constraints, project management, team work skills, etc. Teaching these skills is verychallenging in other engineering classes that are generally focused on delivering a lot of content.Having a chain of PBL courses allows the integration of the content learnt in other courses intoprojects and hands-on activities at different levels during the four years of engineeringcurriculum.The learning outcomes identified for the introductory course discussed in this paper are asfollows: 1
Perry, William G (1999) Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme, Jossey-Bass Publishers.3 Lenhart, Amanda, Purcell, Kristen, Smith, Aaron and Zickuhr, Kathryn (2010) Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults, Pew Internet & American life Project.4 Yardi, Sarita (2008) ‘Whispers in the classroom’. Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected, pp. 143–164.5 Costa, Cristina, Beham, Guenter, Reinhardt, Wolfgang and Sillaots, Martin (2008) ‘Microblogging in technology enhanced learning: A use-case inspection of PPE summer school 2008’, in Proceedings of the 2nd SIRTEL’08 Workshop on Social Information Retrieval for Technology
entrepreneurship and innovation. Theserecruitment efforts have led to a recent increase of engineering and computer science studentsparticipating in the E-scholars program and the Business Plan Competition.The second major effort was a curricular review during 2011-2012 of the four ABET-accreditedundergraduate programs: mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering, andcomputer science. The curricular review assumed that future leaders and innovators will need abroad technical foundation with opportunities to gain competency in design (disciplinary andmultidisciplinary), real-world problem-solving, communication, ethics and professionalism,global and multicultural understanding, innovation and entrepreneurship, teamwork, computing
potential long term impact.ConclusionThe STEM SLC students significantly performed better in the MATLAB class as the passing rateis 73% vs. 44% in the non-SLC. The fact that the students in the SLC met daily together in theirclasses created not only a bond of friendship, but of work ethic as well. They motivated eachother on a daily basis in addition to the faculty reminding them of their work daily. Thisimpacted their attendance, their participation, and the completion rate of the overall work.The association of all topics across all three classes made the classes more connected. Studentsdid not feel they had three segregated classes, but possibly saw it as one class only. The mini-projects, although specific to each faculty, connected the topics
withinrealistic constraints such as economic, X X X Xenvironmental, social, political, ethical,health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary X X X X Xteams(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solveengineering problems(f) an understanding of professional and X X X X Xethical responsibility(g) an ability to communicate effectively X X X X X(h) the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering
realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability” and (k) “an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering toolsnecessary for engineering practice.”The Technology: Inexpensive 3D Printers using Fused Deposition Modeling The 3D-printing lab consists of two UP Plus 3D printers, two Replicator 2 printers, threeReplicator 2X 3D printers, and one Thing-O-Matic 3D printing kit (not used). The inexpensive3D printers use FDM rapid prototyping process where a small diameter nozzle deposits heatedplastic filament first onto the build surface and then in subsequent passes onto the previouslayers thus fusing the layers and creating plastic objects
engineering problem,but rather, an optimal or acceptable solution leading to a final design, presented as the bestpossible balance between technical as well as non-technical constraints. These non-technicalconstraints typically involve economics, politics, social and environmental issues, ethics, etc.And, while professional practitioners generally accept this understanding of design, students, byand large, tend to interpret the engineering design process as an unambiguous and clearly definedprocess supported by rigidly applied principles and processes of “the scientific method.”Undoubtedly, the start of any design course should be preceded by exposure to design thinkingand related processes. The paper reviews the role of design in engineering
development.AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank the students who have participated in this workshop and shared theirfeedback, which has helped the authors to learn in many ways. This research has receivedclearance by the Research Ethics Board of the University of Windsor, REB# 14-035.References[1] J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land, 2005, “Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning,” Higher Education, 49(3): 373–388.[2] F. Marton and R. Säljö, 1976, “On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process*,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1): 4–11.[3] J. B. Biggs and K. F. Collis, 1982, Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy (structure of
not offer this type of information to their undergraduate students. However, theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires that graduates be able “todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability.”5-8The topic of sustainability has become ubiquitous. It is part of corporate strategy, consumerchoice processes, university initiatives, engineering, and technology programs within thebusiness discipline. This moves toward more sustainable business practices and education is adirect result of an increasing awareness of the significant green manufacturing covers a
ethics skills and the ability to work with people of differentbackgrounds. Nair et al. (2009) reported that the results of the 2007 Monash UniversityEmployer Survey concluded that there is a need to have a clearer understanding of essentialgeneric and professional attributes of engineering graduates to ensure quality in higher education,and that colleges and universities need to collaborate more closely with industry to re-design orre-align its educational programs with the competencies required by the employers.On the other hand, in 2006, the results of a survey conducted by the Association of AmericanColleges and Universities (AAC&U) among employers, indicated general agreement thatcolleges and universities should place more emphasis in