Paper ID #9032A Coastal/Ocean Engineering Graduate Project: Evaluation of HurricaneProtection ConceptDr. Robert W. Whalin, Jackson State University Robert W. Whalin, Ph.D., P.E. is Professor of Civil Engineering College of Science, Engineering, and Technology, Jackson State University. He serves as Director, Coastal Hazards Center of Excellence, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Dr. Whalin led the new School of Engineering through a highly successful accreditation evaluation by the ABET. He oversaw completion of design, con- struction and occupation (in 2009) of a new 90,000,000 square foot
studentsfor future software engineering courses. The two concepts are integrated developmentenvironment (IDE) and basic software testing. We observed the students’ progress and found thaton average students can program similar projects 80% faster after learning and using the twosoftware engineering concepts. 1. Introduction Introductory software programing is an important first-year course that brings students to thedoor step of the CS major, which we consider as a CS1 course based on the definition given in[1]. It is also a requisite course for many students majored in Science, Technology, Engineeringand Math (STEM). The majority of the curriculum of this course is to teach a specificprograming language without any introductory concepts of
curriculum which previouslyincluded no common engineering courses taken by all of the engineering students.During the 2012-2013 academic year, three first-year engineering courses designed to providestudents with a hands-on experience with engineering and with a link between engineering andthe required mathematics and science courses were introduced. The three courses consist of anintroduction to engineering course called Engineering Foundations and a two-course sequencecalled Engineering Models I and II, which introduces students to MATLAB® as a computing toolfor solving engineering problems. All three courses are required for all engineering andengineering technology majors, are 2 credit hours, and meet once a week for lecture (55 minutes)and once
Paper ID #8411Industry Based Senior Projects and the Four Pillars of Manufacturing Engi-neeringDr. Christopher P. Pung, Grand Valley State UniversityDr. Hugh Jack, Grand Valley State University Dr. Hugh Jack is a registered professional engineer currently teaching Product Design and Manufacturing at Grand Valley State University. His areas of interest include automation, controls, and robotics. Page 24.741.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Industry Based Senior Projects and the
programs, a critical first step is to understand the entrepreneurialinterests and characteristics of undergraduate engineering students as compared with studentsmajoring in business. Comparing these two groups of students suggests some of the ways thatbusiness-based courses might be modified for an engineering audience. In addition, someentrepreneurship programs are designed to service engineering and business majors;understanding how these students compare in terms of entrepreneurial interests andcharacteristics would allow for a better designed course for both groups of students. Nabi et al.have reported that business students showed higher entrepreneurial intent than did engineeringand technology students, based on their survey of undergraduate
these issues.Development and Growth of Design Thinking in a Team EnvironmentAll aspects of design is being recognized and taught today in most institutions as a team processwith socio-technological dimensions.(13) One practical reason is that ABET general engineeringcriteria target the social aspects of engineering education at several levels. In addition to criterion3(c), “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs,” criterion 3(d)addresses the need to function on multidisciplinary teams, criterion 3(f) social and ethicalresponsibilities, criterion 3(g) communication skills, and criterion 3 (h) addresses global andsocial impact. Constructivist theories of learning, irrespective of the subject matter
hardware platform. Bymaintaining the same Arduino form factor, we are also able to take advantage of a number ofexisting shields that allow us to carry out a variety of missions. Page 24.1171.2High altitude balloons have been used in several educational institutions for teaching students inthe area of STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Math) and Iowa State University (ISU)is no different. High altitude balloon flights allow our aerospace engineering students to design,build and fly spacecrafts that will experience near space conditions at a fraction of the cost of afull space based mission. We are able to use this to educate students by
problem is solved. It is acomplex process that depends on and influences students’ understanding about themselves asthinkers and learners, and usually precedes and follows cognitive activity. Butler found that astudent’s understanding of a learning activity is grounded in productive metacognition abouttasks associated with students’ thoughtful planning, self-monitoring, and selection of appropriatestrategies to accomplish task objectives [1]. Metacognitive skill plays a particularly critical rolein real-life or open-ended tasks, such as solving ill-structured design problems.Metacognition is critical to the self-evaluation of one’s knowledge and abilities [2], which isessential in mathematics [3, 4], science [5, 6], technology [7, 8], engineering
Department of Applied Information Technology in the Volge- nau School of Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. He studies the use of informa- tion and communication technologies (ICT) for engineering learning and knowledge sharing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He is a co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Ed- ucation Research (CHEER), Cambridge University Press (2014). He can be reached at ajohri3@gmu.edu. More information about him is available at: http://mason.gmu.edu/˜ajohri3 Page 24.1110.1 c American Society for Engineering
benefits.As technologies advance, fields become increasingly interdisciplinary, and globalizationcontinues, the need for engineers to be adaptive experts continues to grow.169 The majority ofeducational programs develop routine expertise but fail to address adaptability.169-172 Other fieldshave attempted to ameliorate this deficiency by integrating training, specifically in unpredictableenvironments that offer opportunities to adapt by linking previous knowledge to currentsituations.173,174 Most adaptive expertise studies within engineering have been in bioengineeringand related areas63,74,99-101,103,104,175,176 and have employed the previously mentioned HPL StarLegacy technique,100,101,104,171,176 challenge based instruction,170 and design scenarios
] Byers, Seelig, Sheppard, and Weilerstein. “entrepreneurship: Its role in engineering education”. The Bridge. National Academy of Engineering, 43(2), 2013. [9] Rover. New economy, new engineer. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 2005.[10] Schumpeter. The Theory of Economic Development. Transaction Publishers, 2004.[11] Wei. Engineering education for a post-industrial world. Technology in Society, 2, 27.[12] Nichols and Armstrong. ngineering entrepreneurship: Does entrepreneurship have a role in engineering educa- tion?”. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 45(1):134–138, 2003.[13] Kreiwall and Mekemson. Instilling the entrepreneurial mindset into engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 1, 2010
Page 24.16.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Breadth First Introductory Course in Electrical and Computer Engineering Abstract As technology continues to advance and competition within the global economy becomes fierce, it is increasingly important that engineering students can not only select the proper equations, perform the correct computations/simulations and build circuits correctly, but also possess an appreciation for the variety of knowledge areas within their field of study. In an effort to better prepare electrical and computer engineering students, the Electrical and Computer Engineering
Institute of Technology in Hoboken, NJ where he got his PhD in Engineering Management with a focus on Risk Management of Global Sourcing ProjectsDr. Dale S Deardorff, Rocky Peak Leadership Center Page 24.165.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Implementation of Continuous Improvement in Instilling Innovative Thinking in The Entrepreneurship Curriculum for Engineers S. Jimmy Gandhi, California State University, Northridge Dale Deardorff, Rocky Peak Leadership Center Lewlyn Rodrigues, Manipal Institute of
universities have been introducing cornerstone design courses, using hands-on projects,looking for real-world challenges and problems to meet the many objectives named above.These reflections were deliberately gathered at the end of the first year, as students are decidingon majors, and have the projects most fresh in their minds as influencing their decision. Indeveloping their version of a cornerstone course at McMaster University, it was noted, “Theobjective of the Cornerstone is to instill in first-year engineers enjoyment from learning,motivation to continue learning, and genuine intellectual curiosity about the engineering in theworld around them.” 1 And, from the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden, “The purpose ofcornerstone projects is to
equitable participation of all group members.DiscussionOverall, through an emphasis on engineering design in an Introduction to Engineering course, Iwas able to introduce my students to the design process of an engineering project, facilitate theirdevelopment of creativity and innovation skills, utilize state-of-the-art technologies such as 3Dprinting and Arduino microcontroller platform, and allow them to get a taste of different fields ofengineering such as mechanical, electrical, computer, environmental, etc. At the end of thecourse we had a survey and discussion session. We discussed questions like the most difficultaspect in the projects, the biggest problem encountered, the most beneficial part, the mostenjoyable experience, which project
Paper ID #9469Events that Promote Engineering Students’ Intrinsic Motivation to LearnKathryn F Trenshaw, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Kathryn Trenshaw is currently a Postdoctoral Research Associate at Brown University’s Sheridan Center for Teaching and Learning. She received her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Mis- souri in 2009, her M.S. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2011, and her PhD in Chemical Engineering, also from Illinois, in 2014. Her research interests include science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education
to implementing engineering lessons for aminimum of two years. They attended a week-long academy where they learned abouttechnology, the work of engineers, and the engineering design process. They were prepared toimplement a series of introductory engineering lessons (i.e. What is technology?, What isengineering?, Introduction to the engineering design process) and one Engineering is Elementary(EiE) unit15, consisting of four lessons. After a year of implementation, teachers attended a three-day follow-up academy designed to answer teachers’ questions and provide further support anddevelopment. Teachers had discretion over when they taught the lessons and to what extent they
Paper ID #8941Optimizing linguistic diversity in highly multicultural engineering design teamsDr. Sara T. Scharf, University of Toronto Dr. Sara T. Scharf earned her Ph D in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology at the Uni- versity of Toronto in 2007. Her current role as a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute for Multidisciplinary Design and Innovation at the University of Toronto builds on her expertise on the phenomenon of mul- tiple independent inventions in science, as well as in teaching technical subjects in highly multicultural workplaces.Mr. Jason A. Foster, University of TorontoProf. Kamran
education.Engineering in Washington state is particularly vital. The state of Washington ranks firstnationally in its concentration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)jobs, but between 2012 and 2017 approximately 30,000 jobs in Washington will go unfilled dueto the lack of qualified STEM candidates3. To help fill this deficit of qualified employees andnarrow the income achievement gap, the Washington STate Academic RedShirt (STARS) inEngineering Program was conceived to increase the number of engineering and computer sciencegraduates from the University of Washington and Washington State University.“Redshirt” programs are common in athletics; in these programs, an athlete is given a year toprepare to compete in athletics at the
include 1) many high school students being unfamiliar with engineering and notknowing any engineers and 2) students who are considering a career in engineering (but notdecided) not reporting an interest in engineering as a career choice. Recommendations forstakeholders are provided based on the findings.IntroductionResearch on persistence in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) fields suggeststhat factors such as role models, exposure to STEM careers, and interests in STEM fieldsinfluence K-12 students toward career choices in these fields. Of these, interests have beenbroadly cited as a particularly important influence on STEM career choices (e.g., 1, 2). However,research focused specifically on underrepresented groups often reports
Ethics, pro- fessionalism, and Education. Dr. Barakat is currently the chair of the Technology and Society (T & S) Division and the ASME district B leader. He is the current secretary/treasurer of the ASEE Ethics Division. Page 24.69.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Model for Engineering Ethics Education Leveraging Workplace Experiences through a Co-op ProgramAbstractEducating engineering student about professional ethics involves multiple challenges. Thesechallenges can be extrinsic such as finding a proper place, timing, and quantity
and performance.1 The study results showed asignificant inverse correlation between faculty distance (approachability and accessibility) andother constructs measured such as self-efficacy, academic confidence, and critical thinking.The living situation (on-campus, commuter, etc.) has a significant impact on students’persistence.4 Many studies support the positive benefits of participation in a living-learningcommunity. Soldner et al.5 state that participation in a science, technology, engineering, or math(STEM) living-learning community “have the capacity to enhance the quality of students’ peerand faculty interactions and deepen their sense of social support” (p. 330). However, somestudies found only small positive relationships between
. However, in the past year, the minorhas transitioned to a university-wide minor with two clusters housed in the College ofEngineering. The entrepreneurship minor currently has five clusters, which are open to studentsof any major. Two of these clusters are housed within the College of Engineering (Technology-Based Entrepreneurship and Social Entrepreneurship).At the university, first-year students who intend to major in engineering are given a designationof ENGR. They are not formally admitted into a specific engineering major until the end of theirsophomore year. Students can formally choose a minor after their formal major is selected.However, students can begin to take courses towards the minor prior to their major selection.ParticipantsIn
. Hayden, D. & Holloway, E. (1985). A longitudinal study of attrition among engineering students. Engineering Education, 75, 664-668.17. McMaster, J. (1996). Desired attributes of an engineering graduate. Proceedings of the AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Technology Conference, New Orleans, LA.18. Osipow, S. H. (1999). Assessing career indecision. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 145-154.19. Imbrie, P. K., & Lin, J-J. (2006). Work in progress: Engineering students’ change in profile over the freshman year across male and female samples: An neural network approach. Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA.20. Reid, K. & Imbrie, P. K. (2009
Paper ID #9993Work-in-Progress: Developing Online Graduate Courses in Electrical Engi-neeringPetr Johanes, Stanford UniversityLarry Lagerstrom, Stanford University Larry Lagerstrom is the Director of Online Learning for the School of Engineering at Stanford University. He has eighteen years of experience teaching engineering and physics classes, including in blended and MOOC formats. He holds degrees in physics, mathematics, interdisciplinary studies, and history. Page 24.1396.1 c American
Paper ID #9513Engineering Student Motivation and Perceived Metacognition in LearningCommunitiesCourtney June Faber, Clemson UniversityDr. Sarah Jane Grigg, Clemson University Dr. Sarah J.Grigg is a lecturer in the General Engineering Department at Clemson University. Her research interests involve factors influencing problem solving such as cognitive processes, metacognition, and mental workload.Adam Kirn, Clemson UniversityMrs. Justine M. ChasmarDr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clem- son University, with a joint appointment
Paper ID #9044Engineering Students’ Perceptions of the Future: Implications for StudentPerformanceAdam Kirn, Clemson University Adam Kirn is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. He grad- uated with a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2008, and a M.S. in Bioengineering from Clemson University in 2012. Adam uses mixed-method techniques to ex- amine student motivation, knowledge transfer, and problem solving. His research focuses on connecting students’ motivations across time scales to learning and actions taken toward pursuit of engineering
Paper ID #9524Expert Innovators and Innovation Education: Mental Models in PracticeDr. Eden Fisher, Carnegie Mellon University Eden Fisher is Director of the Masters Program in Engineering & Technology Innovation Management (E&TIM) and Professor of the Practice at Carnegie Mellon University. She earned an A.B. in Chemistry from Princeton University and a Ph.D. in Engineering & Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon University. Her experience includes over twenty years in industrial technology planning and innovation management.Dr. Indira Nair, Carnegie Mellon University Indira Nair retired from Carnegie Mellon
Paper ID #10926The Fusion and Conflict Between Engineering Education and General Edu-cation in China After 1949Dr. Zhihui Zhang, Chinese Academy of Sciences Assistant professor ,Institute for History of Natural Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. main re- search topics: engineering education; philosophy of engineering.Xiaofeng Tang, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Xiaofeng Tang is a PhD candidate in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Page 24.1218.1
Paper ID #10353Gathering and synthesizing information during the development of user re-quirements and engineering specificationsIbrahim Mohedas, University of Michigan Ibrahim Mohedas is currently a Ph.D. candidate in mechanical engineering at the University of Michigan. His research focuses on the design of medical devices for resource limited settings, particularly related to the use of design ethnography in developing these technologies. He received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2011.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Research Scientist