Science Foundation. As part of this validation study, the team ofresearchers has applied EPSA to test groups of students at Norwich University, the University ofIdaho, and Washington State University. A faculty member from Norwich University who ispart of the project team introduced other Norwich University faculty to the EPSA method. Thispaper describes how the EPSA scenarios and the EPSA rubric are being implemented in the“Ethics” section of a senior level “Professional Issues”.EPSA Customization at Norwich UniversityIn the Fall 2013 semester the EPSA Method was incorporated into two sections of NorwichUniversity’s EG450-Professional Issues. The EPSA method was utilized during two classperiods each followed by an all-hands review. In the first
occurduring the design, collection, analysis, and discussion phases. Some even argue that the extent ofmixing in a research project directly relates to the quality of the research.4 & 11 Collecting,analyzing, and discussing the qualitative and quantitative strands of a study through mixing canstrengthen a study when one set of data is inadequate, can provide further insight if needed toexplain an observed phenomena, can allow exploratory findings need to be generalized, or canhelp explain contradictory findings.8Like the Crede and Borrego6 article, our research initially emerged from the final project of adoctoral level methodology course taught by the second author. Following the class, the projectwas pursued further as the findings seemed
box and functional models before first sharing and iterating with their team members and then sharing and iterating as a class. During the course, students individually generate a black box and functional model for the course project as homework. Feedback is provided on their homework, and using the feedback, students then work as a team to arrive at revised black box and functional models for the course project. It is this revised team functional model that becomes the basis for morphological matrix based concept generation and function-based failure analysis. 20• Mechanics & Materials: In the mechanics and materials course, students taught from Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing and Design, 21 are
as IEEE Transactions, IIE Transaction, Journal of Manufacturing Systems and others. He has been serving as a principle investigator of many research projects, funded by NSF, NASA, DoEd, and KSEF. He is currently serving as an editor of Journal of Computer Standards & Interfaces.Dr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University (Eng.)Dr. Paras Mandal, University of Texas, El PasoDr. Eric D Smith, University of Texas, El Paso Eric D. Smith is currently an Assistant Professor at the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), working within the Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering Department. He earned a B.S. in Physics in 1994, an M.S. in Systems Engineering in 2003, and his Ph.D. in Systems and Industrial Engineering
. Page 24.1359.6Week 5: Teams and Scaffolding. Given that many engineering curricula have substantial team-based instruction (e.g., laboratory sessions, group projects), we explored the potential benefitsand challenges of incorporating team-based activities into circuits courses. Before the session,each participant completed a team-maker survey and read one of two assigned articles6,7 oneffective student teams. An initial presentation discussed challenges associated with formingteams, turning groups of students into interacting teams, assessing students individually whenthey work in teams, and dealing with social and intellectual differences among students. Via apoll and break-out group activity, participants shared their prior experiences with
instructor is asked to map a course outcome to a particular studentactivity/evaluative component. Examples include a particular problem on an exam, a homework,a project report etc. This approach is consistent with the notion of direct assessment andleverages the fact that the instructor is going to evaluate the chosen component irrespective ofthe assessment need, since it contributes to the course grade. The instructor is also asked to set acriteria that reflects the demonstration of the particular outcome. For example the instructor,having chosen a homework on uncertainty analysis as the activity to reflect ability to applyknowledge of mathematics and engineering, may set the criteria for attainment as a 75% score onthe HW. This criteria is
create a foundation for more efficient implementation ofcritical thinking in the future. To answer these questions and help students learn moreeffectively, gaining student input and understanding student perspectives is necessary.Thus, in this paper we seek to provide an initial exploration of what critical thinking is in theengineering classroom. This research paper examines the meaning and enactment of criticalthinking for engineering undergraduate students. We address the following research question:How do undergraduate engineering students perceive and enact critical thinking?MethodologyThis study is the pilot phase of a larger project aiming to understand critical thinking for studentsand faculty in humanities and engineering. Since this is
have already been inefficiently implemented hence, aneed to go back and rework some of the implementation.Another major challenge is the support for multiple screen sizes. Although the HTML5-basedlaboratories can work on various devices another limitation is the multiple screen sizes. It is achallenge to design images that will likely fit into screens when different platforms are used.Future WorksThe work is an ongoing project thus the pH measurement and Ohms law lab are yet to bedeveloped. Also work is still being done to handle compatibility on various screen sizes.The authors focused on the development of laboratories for lower level Science andEngineering subjects as these are the subjects in which there are the largest number ofstudents
Engineering’s Leadership Minor at Purdue University. She also serves as the Executive Director of the International Institute for Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). She ob- tained a B.S. in mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt Univer- sity. Her teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in STEM education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of graduate students for diverse careers and the development of reliable and valid engineering education assessment tools. She is a NSF
actualize the drive forlifelong learning in engineering programs. In this grant-funded research project, once-a-weekquiz was given in class to ask students to solve one problem. Quizzes were graded with nodetails. Without given solutions, students were then asked to conduct reflective self-correctionson each quiz that they did not receive full credits. It was possible to increase their quiz scores upto full points if students successfully completed the required tasks. The following data werecollected for analysis: two rounds of a perception survey related to the learning of physics and a Page 24.591.2survey particularly designed for reflective
of Beams B3A and B3Bmust be coped to meet the top-of-steel-elevation requirement, often specified in design. Thisspecific refers to the necessity to have the top face of the beams and the top face of the girders onthe same elevation so that roof deck and floor decks can be placed on them. From the authors’teaching experience, the coping detail in particular, is difficult for students to comprehend from2-D sketches.One way to remedy this problem is to take students to actual construction sites. Although this is agood approach, it is a major challenge to find construction projects that are nearby and installingconnections that coincides with the topic being taught at the time. Additionally, liability issuesmay also arise and prevent the
Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Prof. Elizabeth C. Kisenwether, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkD. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University D. Jake Follmer is a first-year Ph.D. student in educational psychology at The Pennsylvania State Univer- sity. He received his M.S.Ed. in 2013 from
competenciesrequired to innovate in the workplace. Contextual learning environments such as work-basedlearning, internships, case-based learning, and project-based learning were found to be the mosteffective classroom practice for developing innovation competencies with undergraduatestudents[10].Case-based instruction for innovation theoryLecture-based instructional methods often leave students unengaged, uninspired,[11] and canpresent topics without applying contextual meaning[12]. Because of the inherent passive style oflecture-based instruction, students are missing out on the opportunity to be active participants intheir own learning which could affect learning outcomes[12, 13]. More active instructionalmethods, such as case-based instruction, have
arrangements, I only have a single experience to share, but that may bea result of its unsuccessful outcome. At one point, I worked to get a faculty co-op positionapproved on my engineering team. The concept was that we would bring in a professor duringhis or her non-teaching term (most likely during the summer), and we would have them workside-by-side with our regular engineers on whatever projects we were already working on. Weviewed this as a high-end version of a student co-op. Presumably, the faculty member would beable to hit the ground running regarding many of the tasks we were working on. There would beopportunities for the faculty member to learn how we did things in our organization, and theycould recognize and suggest improvements to the
Brownsville Bill Elliott holds a BS degree from The University of Mary Hardin-Baylor (UMHB) and MPA from Texas State University. He has four decades of administrative management experience on the university campus and in health care education. Prior positions include Director of Admissions and Financial Aid at UMHB in Belton, TX; Director of Education for the Valley Baptist Health System, Harlingen, TX and currently Page 24.327.1 he is the Coordinator for Special Projects with the Office of the Dean, College of Science, Mathematics and Technology at the University of Texas at Brownsville. He has experience in
] For example, Wankat & Oreovicz [9] discuss preparation for aperformance in the classroom. They make vivid comparisons between stage directions andlecture notes, between a dress rehearsal and classroom preparation, between voice projection in atheatre and voice projection in a classroom, and the list goes on. Lowman[5] also draws similarparallels. In fact Lowman makes the statement that, “college classrooms are fundamentallydramatic arenas in which the teacher is the focal point, like the actor or orator on stage.” In hisjournal article titled “The Teacher as Actor,” Harris[10] explores speech, pantomime, andcharacterization and shows how these traditional acting concepts are applicable to college
relationship with retention and satisfaction rates.Many students enter the program with little knowledge on some of the engineering disciplinesoffered at Quinnipiac University. Some are cognizant of their unawareness. Throughout thesemester, the students go through several lessons on each of the four disciplines as well as ahands-on project. By the end of the course, the strong majority of the students are aware of thenature of each of the four engineering careers.Due to the small size in the current data set, we are not able to draw any other statisticallysignificant conclusions. However, our analysis does provide support for some of our hypothesis.One such example is the course further strengthening the students’ interest in the major of theirchoice
, drafting or even homefixing projects. It is important to note that K-12 science educators are capable and well-trained todeliver all the desired skill sets listed above, however they are asked to prepare students forexams rather than ensure the development life-long learning skills. Often they are required to doso with very limited resources. The results are shortcomings evident in college students whoeither lack an overall interest in engineering and science or simply do not have the required skillsto compete and become successful in today’s global and technologically-advanced marketplace.In turn, this can be considered as a threat to national growth and competitiveness in both theeconomic and defense sectors, which eventually will impact the
problems related to determine the impacts of a, c, e pollutants upon the environment 5 411 Calculate and describe the impact of anthropogenic emissions on the a, c, e oxygen content in natural aqueous environments 6 411 Describe the impact of anthropogenic sources on water and air quality a, c, f, h, j, k 7 411 Describe the relationship between community sustainability, global f, h, i, j climate change, environmental impacts, economic projects, and fossil fuel emissions 8 411 Develop
academic programs and the needs ofthe graduates and industry. The academic programs are heavily oriented towards control theory,board-level electronics, interfacing and microprocessors supplemented with laboratoryequipment, such as the inverted pendulum, and projects, such as Lego robots5-7. But industrialapplications require mechanical engineers to design machines with multiple axes that executecomplex, high speed, high precision coordinated motion using sophisticated motion controllers.In this paper, we present overview of a new course and its laboratory developed in partnershipwith industry. The course aims to teach “the fundamentals” while focusing on industrial motioncontrol technology and multi-axis machines. The course was offered for the
backgrounds.Workforce studies have shown that the number of students being educated in STEM (science,technology, engineering, and math) cannot meet projected demands [1]. Also, the currentenrollments in engineering are not diverse, especially among women, blacks, and Hispanics [2].On a related issue, a recent survey of engineers in industry indicates a compelling need forengineers to have strong communication skills [3]. To address these challenges, Pennsylvania State University created the EngineeringAmbassador Program: a professional development program for undergraduate engineeringstudents with an outreach mission to middle and high schools. The development mission is toenrich the communication and leadership skills of engineering undergraduates
meetings: student leadership meetings, sub-team meetings, and the independent studymeeting. In addition to the observations, some archival data from both research sites wascollected to further supplement the interview data. Specifically, information packets, brochures,DVDs, and summary reports regarding the lab were collected. This information was used tobetter familiarize and contextualize the type of environment that the lab creates for students.The learning site was investigated through two phases of analysis. The first phase of dataanalysis employed an open-coding procedure on interview transcriptions to allow emergingthemes to take precedence. After discovering student autonomy (e.g. project ownership,intentional self-education, self
actively involved in the entrepreneurial process of establishing new companies. Since arriving at Charlotte I co-founded and I am the Chairman of the Board for PiES, Project for innovation, Energy and Sustainability, a non-profit green business incubator that incubated seven companies. I am a Fellow of Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (IEEE), Institute of Physics (FInstP), and the International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE). Page 24.1142.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 2014 ASEE Annual Conference
specifically on implementing, evaluating, conducting outreach for and promoting the sustainability of education digital libraries. Prior to establishing a consulting practice, Giersch worked in the private sector conducting market analyses and assessments related to deploying technology in higher education. She received a M.S.L.S. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Dr. Flora P McMartin, Broad-based Knowledge, LLC Flora P. McMartin is the Founder of Broad-based Knowledge, LLC (BbK) , a consulting rm focused on the evaluation of the use and deployment of technology assisted teaching and learning. Throughout her career, she as served as an External Evaluator for a number of NSF-funded projects associated with
evaluate Cycle tion. Transformation 1: Connecting faculty in a Community of Practice community of practice. Figure 1: The “Pyramid of Change”, showing the three levels of transformation that form the objectives of this project; each layer supports the transformations above.ineffective in promoting the adoption of evidence-based practices 1;8 , long-term strategies thatfocus on changing faculty beliefs, motivation, and institutional culture have proven effective 1;8
renewable and alternative power generation processescontinue to be explored, coal is expected to remain a primary solution for electricity needs fordecades to come. Figure 1 illustrates the projected growth of coal consumption by Organisationfor Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)2 member nations as well as non-OECDnations.3 China and India are among the prime drivers for the increase in coal consumption bynon-OECD nations as their large populations and growing standard of living fuel the demand forcheap electricity.Figure 1 – World coal consumption by region, 1980-2040.3 Page 24.1219.2 The increase in coal power in other nations and
variety of settings in spacecraft design and survivability and reliability. He has led programs in experi- mentation, modeling, and simulation of radiation effects in electronic systems. He has been involved with six separate space-based radiation effects experiments over the last 20 years: 1) RadFx-1,-2,-3: A series of CubeSat Based Radiation Effects Testbeds (PI), 2) Microelectronic and Photonics Test Bed (Instrument Card PI), and 3) Combined Release and Radiation Effects Satellite (Investigator), 4) Living With a Star – Space Environment Testbed (mission definition and requirements). As a NASA civil servant, Robert was the lead radiation effects systems engineer for several NASA spaceflight projects, including the
presented in this paper are those of theauthors and do not necessarily represent those of the NSF.References[1] Lovell, M. D., Brophy, S. P., and Li, S. (2013). “Challenge-Based Instruction for a Civil Engineering DynamicsCourse,” Proceedings, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, June 23-26, 2013.[2] CTGV, Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, Page 24.1273.10instruction, assessment, and professional development, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum[3] R. J. Roselli and S. P. Brophy, “Effectiveness of challenge-based instruction in biomechanics,” J. Eng. Educ.,vol. 93, no. 4, pp
facilitator then guides students through the creation of amind map of the ASSIST center. Students work together to understand and graphically depictthe entire ASSIST system including the numerous connections between the center’s researchthrusts, individual research projects, industry partners, test beds, and how all of these fit into themission and vision of the center. Some outcomes of this activity are: • Knowledge and Skills: Systems level understanding of the center. Experience with mind mapping as a systems visualization tool. Mind mapping software skills. (Xmind). • Products: Systems level mind map of the ASSIST center showing relevant connections between projects, thrusts, test-beds, industry, etc. • Ideas: Potential
from the criticaland sometimes-subtle dimensions of social justice.5 Design cases that involve, for example,“design for the other 90%”6 or designing for people with disabilities redirect attention toquestions of design for social justice. This paper identifies and briefly describes four forms ofdesign: design for technology, HCD for users, HDC for communities, and design for socialjustice. The paper explores how social justice has been enacted—or neglected—in specificdesign contexts within engineering education, and how it can be further integrated in each ofthese forms of design education.This paper is part of a broader project to integrate social justice across three components ofengineering curricula—engineering design, engineering sciences