contribute substantively to their value of the need for life-longlearning, and using their engineering education for making adifference in the lives of others. By approaching K-12 students withopportunities to creatively understand and apply engineering design, we believe their potential Page 24.769.8for preparing, preservering and performing as future engineers is greatly enhanced.Assessment rubrics are being designed to quantitatively assess the impact on students in a pre-and post- assessment approach. These instruments will be used in our spring and summer 2014outreach activities with planned
through Interdisciplinary Research and Scholarship,” in Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 100 (1)2011, No. 1, p. 9, and Litzinger, T.A., “Engineering education centers and programs: A critical resource,” Journal ofEngineering Education, 99 (1) 2010, 3-4.6 Research Internships in Science & Engineering (RISE) see https://www.daad.de/rise/en/.7 UROP International, see http://www.rwth-aachen.de/go/id/wmy/lidx/1/.8 See DAAD Undergraduate Scholarship at https://www.daad.org/undergrad.9 Compare with values of an international research experience as described in Chang, Y., Atkinson, D., Hirleman,Dan E., “International Research and Engineering Education: Impact and Best Practices,” Online Journal for GlobalEngineering Education http
VT Engineering Com- munication Center (VTECC). She received her PhD in Linguistics from the University of Chicago and a B.A. in English from the University of Georgia. Her research interests include interdisciplinary collabora- tion, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e- portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. Her teaching emphasizes the roles of engineers as communicators and educators, the foundations and evolution of the
broader impacts goals. For example, a module aimed at 5th to 9th grade students demonstrates the behavior of piles in improved and unimproved clays23. Another research project developed a full online course on wood design with virtual laboratories aimed at undergraduate and graduate students, and practicing professionals16, 17. These curriculum and learning materials illustrate the potential of earthquake engineering as a context for learning and demonstrate how research can be integrated with and used to support formal education.Informal Education Informal settings such as museums offer excellent venues for communicating social, cultural and scientific information, correcting misconceptions, and transforming attitudes and
/administrative commitment.13Despite the diversity in types of pedagogical strategies, the research on the impact of theseapproaches for students’ preparedness for global workforces has been limited.7 In contrast,however, researchers have identified many challenges associated with the implementation ofinternational experiences in engineering programs: limited capacity of an already content-fulland highly sequenced curriculum, high costs to implement globally focused programs, and therisk of delaying graduation when international experiences are included as a degreerequirement.7, 14 These challenges indicate that a more comprehensive and integrated approach toenhance development of global preparedness in engineering students is necessary to meet
program at University of Maryland has been practicing the multi-year,multidisciplinary concept for a number of years now.28 As seniors in high school, students areidentified as candidates for the program when they apply to UMD and express interest inperforming undergraduate-team research. As freshmen the students develop a research topic thatcould have a societal impact, usually in the vein of science and technology. Their sophomoreyear, the teams develop a research proposal based on an approved research question and performa literature review. In the third year, students are encouraged to study abroad and continue toperform research on their approved topic. In their final year, students are required to write athesis as a team and present their
understanding innovation in engineering professionals and students, and she is collaborating with a team at Purdue to create a tool to measure innovativeness among engineers.Dr. Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Kathryn Jablokow is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME. Dr. Jablokow is the architect of a unique 4
. Handelsman J, Ebert-May D, Beichner R, et al. Scientific Teaching. Science. 2004;304(5670):521-522.13. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). Innovation with Impact: Creating a Culture for Scholarly and Systematic Innovation in Engineering Education. Washington, DC: Author;2012.14. National Research Council. Discipline-Based Educational Research: Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press;2012.15. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC2012.16. Hora MT
at Syracuse University from 2006 to 2007. He is currently working as an assistant professor in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department at Texas A&M University at Kingsville. His current research interests include adaptive array processing, signal processing, and smart antennas.Prof. Reza Nekovei, Texas A&M University, Kingsville Dr. Reza Nekovei is a Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Texas A&M University- Kingsville. He has many years of experience in developing graduate and undergraduate programs. Prof. Nekovei is currently co-PI for two NSF projects related in teaching by design research and development, one in Nanotechnology (NSF-NUE) and another in Robotics
Paper ID #9494Assessment of a New University-Wide Entrepreneurship and Innovation Mi-norMr. Philip M Reeves, The Pennsylvania State University Philip Reeves is a graduate student in the Educational Psychology Department at Penn State. He is work- ing with faculty to evaluate a new university-wide entrepreneurship and innovation minor as a graduate assistant for the Leonhard Center for Enhancement of Engineering Education.Dr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of
(CoE), Engineering Education Innovation Center (EEIC)at The Ohio State University has conducted an engineering service-learning program inHonduras. The program consists of three components: preparation, implementation, andevaluation. These components are aimed to introduce and teach students the concepts ofhumanitarian engineering through a practical, real-world, hands-on experience. During the firststage, the students assess needs in collaboration with in-country partners, and then research,design, develop, prototype, test and document their chosen projects. In the second stage, thestudents implement and execute these projects. Finally, the students evaluate their designs anddocument their results as well as make recommendations for future
that following asolution can help their understanding, research has shown that engineering students performbetter on homework and exams when they did not have solution manuals available whencompleting the homework25. An additional conclusion from this study was that students who didnot have access to a solution manual asked more questions of the instructor during office hoursthan students who could reference a solution manual. An additional study with engineeringstudents showed inconclusive results regarding whether graded vs. un-graded homeworkcorrelates with exam scores26. Further benefits of well-designed homework have been reportedto include improvements in student preparation for class, out of class interactions betweenstudents and the
aspects of the flipped and blended learning environments.Ms. Jacquelyn E. Borinski, Georgia Institute of Technology Jacquelyn E. Borinski will receive a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2014. She is the External Vice President for the Georgia Tech Chamber Choir and volunteer with the Georgia Aquar- ium. Her research interests include pediatric device design and human-robot interaction. She is an Under- graduate collaborator with Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta designing interactive teaching modules for math and science using the patient’s condition as motivation. She was awarded a Women in Engineering Scholarship from Axion BioSystems.Kimberly Danielle Haight, Georgia Institute of TechnologyMs
, “Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.),” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2011. 5. Felder, R. M., D. R. Woods, J.E. Stice, and A. Rugarcia, "The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work." Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2000, pp. 26-39. 6. Fink, L. D. "A self-directed guide to designing courses for significant learning," University of Oklahoma, 2003, pp. 1-35. 7. Frank, M., and J. Kasser, “Assessing the Capacity for Engineering Systems Thinking (CEST) and Other Competencies of Systems Engineers,” in “Systems Engineering – Practice and Theory,” InTech 2012. Available online at: http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/32624/InTech
materials science and engineering from Stanford University (1991 and 1987) and her B.S. degree in metallurgical engineering from the Michigan Technological University (1985).Dr. Lizabeth T Schlemer P.E., California Polytechnic State University Page 24.1037.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Relational versus transactional community engagement: An experience of the benefits and costsAbstractLearning through community engagement (CE) is widely considered a high-impact practice withthe potential benefit of accelerated cognitive development, deeper
and Engineering Design at Penn State University. A graduate of Ohio State University (Ph.D., Electrical Engineering), Dr. Jablokow’s teaching and research interests include problem solving, invention, and creativity in science and engineer- ing, as well as robotics and computational dynamics. In addition to her membership in ASEE, she is a Senior Member of IEEE and a Fellow of ASME. Dr. Jablokow is the architect of a unique 4-course mod- ule focused on creativity and problem solving leadership and is currently developing a new methodology for cognition-based design. She is one of three instructors for Penn State’s Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Creativity, Innovation, and Change, and she is the founding
Paper ID #8743Review of a First-Year Engineering Design CourseDr. Lydia Prendergast, Rutgers, School of Engineering Assistant Dean for Academic Affairs and Engineering EducationProf. Eugenia Etkina, Rutgers University I am a professor of science education at the Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University. Page 24.1054.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Review of a First-Year Engineering Design CourseAbstractResearch shows that the first year
Resources Team at Granta Design, Cambridge, UK. She has a Post Graduate Certificate in Design, Manufacturing and Management and a Bachelor’s degree in Materials Science and Metallurgy from the University of Cambridge, England and has worked in teams on various parts of product development, in different industries for 15 years. Page 24.590.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Facilitating the Teaching of Product DevelopmentAbstractProduct Development is a key topic for many engineering courses and educational programmes.The Product Development Process, as applied in
Page 24.1022.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Promoting the Adoption of Innovative Teaching Practices by Transportation Engineering Faculty in a WorkshopIntroductionThe National Transportation Curriculum Project (NTCP), a consortium of researchers fromfifteen colleges and universities, is concerned with the development, dissemination, andwidespread adoption of curricular materials and best practices in transportation engineeringeducation [1]. In 2012, the NTCP hosted a two-day Transportation Engineering EducationWorkshop (TEEW) to facilitate the collaborative development and adoption of active learningand conceptual-assessment exercises for the introduction to
]. Research also suggests that women are more likely to have amastery orientation (e.g. a focus on learning rather than outward appearances) to course materialthat is at odds with the performance-based, competitive orientation fostered by norm-referencedgrading [12]. It is reasonable to hypothesize then that women may find left-of-center gradingmore frustrating and confidence-shaking than men. Our study focuses on the perceptions of thisvulnerable population to a grading practice our interviewees claim is common in the engineeringcurriculum.2. Methods2.1 Participants:Eighty-three participants were interviewed for this project, including 27 faculty (16 female; 11male), 24 professionals (19 female; 5 male), and 32 students (19 female; 13 male). The
Paper ID #9597A Study of Feedback Provided to Student Teams Engaged in Open-EndedProjectsDr. Laura Hirshfield, Oregon State University Laura Hirshfield is a Post-Doctoral Scholar at Oregon State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Michigan and her Ph.D. from Purdue University, both in chemical engineering. She is cur- rently doing research in the engineering education field, investigating technology-mediated active learning in a chemical engineering curriculum. After her post-doc, she plans to pursue a career in academia.Ms. Jaynie L. Whinnery, Oregon State University Jaynie Whinnery is a graduate
too far from being true in undergraduate education in the United States wherein students arememorizing their way through most of the curriculum. In an US News and World Reportarticle2, “High School Students Need to Think, Not Memorize”, an Advanced Placement biologyteacher is quoted “Students go through the motions of their lab assignments without graspingwhy, and ‘the exam is largely a vocabulary test’”.David Perkins3, co-director of Harvard Project Zero, a research center for cognitivedevelopment, and senior research associate at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, pointsout several observations in his article on “Teaching for Understanding”. (1) “The student mightsimply be parroting the test and following memorized routines for stock
capacity of transmission lines, six- sigma, Design for Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, QFD, Statistics, project management, consulting, and holding workshops on team building, leadership, and creativity and innovation. Presently teaching en- gineering design methods, and coordinating/ co supervising, and instructing senor design classes and projects.Dr. Okenwa I Okoli, Florida A&M University/Florida State UniversitySungmoon Jung Ph.D., FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Dr. Jung joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering in August 2008, after working at Caterpillar Champaign Simulation Center as a staff engineer for two and half years. Dr. Jung’s research interests
(Industrial Innovation and Partnerships). In 2006 and 2007, he won the Most Cited Journal Paper award from Computer-Aided Design and the Research Excellence award in the College of Engineering at Purdue University. In 2009, he won the Outstanding Commercialization award from Purdue University and the ASME Best Paper Award from technical committees twice at the IDETC. In 2012 his labs paper won the all conference best paper award from ASME-CIE for ”Handy Potter”. Page 24.683.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 IDEA-Pen: Interactive Design and Analysis through a Pen-based
the Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Program for the Engineering Education Innovation Center at Ohio State University.Mr. Jacob T Allenstein, The Ohio State University Received a Master’s Degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2013 and a Bachelor’s Degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering at The Ohio State Uni- versity in 2011. Currently a Graduate Research Associate at the Aerospace Research Center (ARC) while an Instructor of Record for the first-year engineering program for the Engineering Education Innovation Center (EEIC) at The Ohio State UniversityDr. Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University Dr. Peter Rogers, Professor of Practice Engineering
and construction of a CubeSat to be launched in 2015. Her other areas of research interest have been in engineering education techniques, software defined radio, and neural networks. Dr. Katz is a licensed professional engineer in the state of California. Page 24.343.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 CubeSat: A Multidisciplinary Senior Design ProjectAbstractEngineering and computer science programs often require a culminating senior design project.Several of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) accreditationoutcomes are best
students. Nathan has bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Applied Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters degree in Civil Engineering from Stanford Uni- versity and a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado Boulder. Page 24.1089.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Social Responsibility Attitudes of First Year Engineering Students and the Impact of CoursesAbstractThe goal of this research was to characterize the social responsibility (SR) attitudes of first yearengineering students, determine if these
Undergraduate Course as one possibleeffective approach and present the results of a survey to quantitatively measure the effect of thecourse on preparing the students and graduates for this new work environment. We also describethe course design, the hypothesis of effect, the survey design, the data collection, and analysis.Based on the participants’ responses and the quantitative analysis presented in this paper, weconfirmed quantitatively that the course has achieved its goal of preparing our undergraduates forthe ever changing and challenging environment for developing technology applications andservices. Overall, they believe that the impact on their career is worth the “value of contribution”they have exercised and estimated.1. IntroductionDue to
Education, (2006)3. James Conrad, “Determining How to Teach Management Concepts to Engineers”, American Society for Engineering Education, (2006)4. Ana Valeria Quevedo, “Improving Generic Skills among Engineering Students through Project-Based Learning in a Project Management Course”, American Society for Engineering Education, (2013)5. Donna C.S. Summers, “Practical Methods for Keeping Project Courses on Track”, American Society for Engineering Education, (2001)6. S. Scott Moor and Bruce D. Drake, “Addressing Common Problems in Engineering Design Projects: A Project Management Approach”, Journal of Engineering Education July (2001)7. Charlie P. Edmonson Donna C.S. Summers, “Using Project Management Skills to Improve the Outcome of
research lab will serve as the training site on health and safety issues of nanomaterials. Dr. Tate is a mechanical engineer by training and has 16-plus years of academic and two years of industry experience. His research areas include developing, manufacturing; and characterizing the high-performance polymeric nanocomposites for rocket ablatives, fire-retardant interior structures of mass transit and aircraft, lighter and damage-tolerant wind turbine blades, and replacement of traditional composites using bio-based materials. He has mentored under- graduate African-American students under NASA-PAIR at NC A&T University, an HBCU, and Hispanic students under H-LSAMP at Texas State. He is a member of AIAA, ASME, ACMA