postdoctoral research scholar at The Pennsylvania State University focusing on community informatics. She earned her PhD in computer science and applications from Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University (Virginia Tech), where she was a IBM Research Fellow and won an IBM Research Dissertation Fellowship. As a graduate student, her research and perspectives were featured in the New York Times and Computerworld. She is affiliated with the Coalition to Diversify Computing (CDC), based in Washington, DC. The CDC targets students and faculty with the focus of increasing the number of minorities successfully transition- ing into computing-based careers in academia, federal laboratories, and industry. As a CDC
. Page 24.948.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 On Engineering Design Education: Exposing Students to Design KnowledgeAbstract: Design is considered by most to be the central activity of engineering. Also, it isknown that engineering programs should graduate engineers who can design effectively to meetsocial and environmental needs. Though the role and perception of design across a wide range ofeducational institutions have improved markedly in recent years; however, both design facultyand design practitioners argue that further improvements are necessary. One of the definingcharacteristics of design is that there is rarely a single correct answer to an
performance outcomes. The course grades comprised various performance-based assessments by faculty, students, and engineering practitioners. The University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez’s Technology-Based Entrepreneurship interdisciplinary course26 sought to address industry’s demand for potential engineers who are entrepreneurial and effective communicators with well-developed teamwork and decision-making skills within the framework of a four course series that also included the capstone design project course. Over 20 professors from engineering and business were involved in the course. Other key features of the course included idea generation and development mindful of engineering design as well as product development constrained by
career aspirations of the student. 2. ABET should allow accreditation of engineering programs of the same name at the baccalaureate and graduate levels in the same department to recognize that education through a “professional” master’s degree produces an AME, an accredited “master” engineer. 3. Engineering schools should more vigorously exploit the flexibility inherent in the outcomes-based accreditation approach to experiment with novel models for baccalaureate education. ABET should ensure that evaluators look for innovation and experimentation in the curriculum and not just hold institutions to a strict interpretation of the guidelines as they see them. 4. Whatever other creative approaches are taken
for Public Service from the University System of Maryland Board of Regents, and currently serves as the Chair-Elect of the K-12 and Pre-College Division of ASEE.Elizabeth A Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth A. Parry is the secondary contributor to this paper. She is an engineer and consultant in K-12 STEM Curriculum, Coaching and Professional Development and the coordinator of K-20 STEM Partner- ship Development at the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. For the past fifteen years, she has worked extensively with students from kindergarten to graduate school, parents and pre- service and in service teachers to both educate and excite them about engineering. As the Co-PI and
educational institutions, corporations, or foundations to assist individuals Experiences pursuing a course of study or research. Post-graduate fellowships assist students at the graduate level while post-doctorate fellowships provide monies for those who have already achieved their doctorate degree. Allow students to explore and apply content learned in the classroom in a specified field
with SME. Since 1974 he has held various positions leading the professional development of manufacturing practitioners, the development, advancement, and quality of manufacturing curriculum in engineering and technology programs, workforce development, and attracting students into manufacturing. He plays a key role representing SME and advancing the Society’s agenda in education through the SME Center for Education, the Manufacturing Education and Research Community, the Accreditation Committee and the North American Manufacturing Research Institution of SME. He is involved in the Manufacturing Division and the Corporate Member Council of the American Society for Engineering Education and is a graduate of Eastern
Paper ID #8919Technology, Engineering, and Design Educator Professional Development Sys-tem Implementation: Initial Pilot ResultsDr. Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech Jeremy V. Ernst is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Virginia Tech. He currently teaches graduate courses in STEM education foundations and contemporary issues in Integrative STEM Education. Jeremy specializes in research focused on dynamic intervention means for STEM education students categorized as at-risk of dropping out of school. He also has curriculum research and development experiences in technology, engineering, and
”program at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI). This program providesfinancial support, mentoring, and leadership and career development to undergraduate studentswith demonstrated potential to succeed in engineering, but who face significant financialchallenges, possibly in combination with other barriers to meeting their full academic potential,such as being a first-generation college student or a member of an underrepresented group. Inaddition to scholarship support, CLEAR Scholars are provided with an intentional set ofactivities that promotes student retention, achievement, and persistence to graduation through:(a) Community-building through a cohort model; (b) Leadership and career development; (c)Engagement with
Engineering faculty and high school teachers can use to teach and assess learning outcomes.Assess Learning and Evaluate Innovations Collaborate with our advisory board to develop and evaluate game course modules. Evaluate college students’ engagement in transportation engineering in relation to use of multiple teaching methods using motivational scale instrument. Assess college students’ learning gains using performance assessment Assess changes in high school students’ decision-making as a result of learning about the yellow light “dilemma zone” using game performance results. Conduct focus groups with advisory board members and students.Conduct Research on STEM Teaching and Learning Publish tested models of
undergraduate engineering courses and studied the effects on student learning as wellas student perception of classroom environment in the seven psychosocial dimensions:personalization, involvement, student cohesiveness, satisfaction, task orientation, innovation, andindividualization.2. Class Information The University of Pittsburgh is a public university with 16,719 full time undergraduatesand 10,297 graduate students. The flipped class contained 33 students of mixed majors andyears in school, but was predominately civil and environmental students. The class was CEE Page 24.1295.31218/2218-Design for the Environment, an experiential learning
engineering as a major, 3) how the students made their decisions about education, and 4)who the students are and how their identities compare to dominant images of what it means to bean engineer. This research is most immediately relevant to CPSU as an institution, however, thedata allow for exploration of what attracts some students to engineering, and therefore maysuggest strategies for recruitment of female and male undergraduate students in engineering atthis and other institutions, as well as additional research questions focused on studentmotivations and understandings of engineering as a discipline in pre-collegiate contexts. Thispaper reports on two years of survey data (2011 and 2013).MethodologyThis research project is survey based and was
liberal arts subjects such subjects as calculus,physics, chemistry, and other general education requirements dominate the first year engineeringcurriculum, leaving students with very little exposure to engineering and a lack of opportunityfor seeing engineering as a dynamic field. In order to increase engineering exposure, to improveretention, and make a connection between the first year courses to engineering practice, wecreated an interactive project-based engineering design course, called Engineering Exploration,at Rutgers University – School of Engineering (RU-SOE) as a replacement to the traditionalfirst-year introductory course.9,10 The traditional course is an attendance based lecture typecourse that surveys the engineering majors. We
waswell aware of the need to develop a program around an engineering science and not around aspecific given technology.The exploratory committee felt that these opportunities available to a student graduating with aBS in robotics engineering needed to be in two areas. The first required area of opportunity forgraduating students must be with industry. Does industry see the need, and does it also value anddesire to hire students who possess such a bachelor degree? Lawrence Tech found that inconsulting with its industry advisory board members, and also with numerous representativesfrom industry who were not on the school’s industry advisory board that there was anoverwhelming interest in graduates with such a degree. These industry contacts were
the curricula of mechanical engineering and related programs have an urgentneed to enhance students’ comprehension of ‘how things are made and work,’ e.g., theknowledge and skills needed to design and efficiently produce products via high-performancesystems.2A stated objective of the IMECE’s Advanced Manufacturing theme is to “increase cooperationacross multiple disciplines.” This paper attempts to foster such cooperation and illustrate the spanof topics related to manufacturing that would enhance mechanical engineering education asrelated to advanced manufacturing. Enhancing manufacturing content is doubly important as alarge percentage of graduates from mechanical engineering education programs enter careerswithin the manufacturing
Engineering and other faculty/ Engineer administrators interns Current Employers engineering Accreditation students leadersFigure 2. Members of and stakeholders in the engineering community can draw onand benefit from the EBOK.With an eye to the future, the Engineering BOK:1. Offers prospective engineering students, their parents, their teachers/ advisors, andthe general public, a glimpse of the importance of engineering (e.g., guiding principlesin Appendix B); indicates the breadth of knowledge and skills
aimed at increasing the number and diversity of students in pathways toengineering careers. This paper describes an effort to address these goals by adapting EPICS, anationally recognized project-based, service-learning university program, to the high school andmiddle school environments. Preliminary data from 60 high schools in 11 states with over 2200students indicates that this program is having an impact on students’ interest in and their views ofengineering. However, students’ academic and career choices are influenced by a number offactors. Building on previous studies which have investigated pathways to and throughengineering, this study uses Social Cognitive Career Theory to explore students’ experiences inthe program, and how these
and authentic experience for thestudents. Our current work and future plans include the following: • While not statistically significant, we did note an improvement in the results between the Spring and Fall semesters. While different faculty were often engaged between the semesters, this might reflect collective and shared learning among the involved faculty members, increasing their ease and experience with which to incorporate the developed curricula in various classroom settings. We are interested in studying the level of comfort faculty have with the teaching material and the impact of multiple exposures on students’ learning across their curriculum. • We are processing the results for the
students. The first B.E.G. talk occurred onMonday, November 18th, 2013 outside of the regularly scheduled engineering economy classtime. The B.E.G. students hosted a member of the finance faculty from the school of Business atPenn State University Park. The talk covered various topics including completing a businessminor, M.B.A. after graduation, careers in finance and accounting, corporate finance, financialstatement analysis, stocks and business planning among other topics. The talk was optional andall undergraduate students from this department were invited to attend the talk. The studentsofficially kicked off their student group (B.E.G.) at this talk. Approximately 45 undergraduateindustrial engineering students attended the talk
University Tori Vogel is a May 2014 graduate of American University. She attained her degree in Sociology with a minor in Applied Physics. In her studies she has worked to explore the various intersections between sociology and physics. In particular, she has conducted research on cochlear implants and their impact on the deaf community. In addition, she is actively pursuing a gender study of the sociological implications of factors leading to a career choice in STEM. On campus, Tori has held leadership roles within student groups. These roles include serving for two years as Vice President of Students Fighting Homelessness and Hunger and serving as President of the Downtown Touring Fellowship. While attending American
Definition of Program-level and Student-level Outcomes Criterion 2 Criterion 3Program educational objectives must be published that The program must have documented student outcomesare consistent with the mission of the institution. There that prepare graduates to attain program educationalmust be a documented and effective process, involving objectives. Student outcomes are outcomes (a) through program constituencies, for the periodic review and (k) plus additional outcomes that may be articulated by revision of these program educational objectives. a program or individual faculty members. Implementation and
with similarities such as age, gender, major, andacademic abilities. Through a LLC community, students are able to encourage one anotherduring difficult classes and help each other gain a deeper understanding of classroom concepts.20This type of peer-to-peer interaction provides assistance with students’ academic and socialintegration. Unfortunately, an unintended consequence can be the formation of cliques, orsmaller communities within the already small community.The environment of certain LLCs also encourages other types of non-peer interaction. Facultyand staff members can be involved in activities for a LLC, thereby increasing students’ comfortlevel interacting with them. Research has shown that interactions between students and faculty
in theirexplanation. For example, “I personally think that as an engineer, we should learn more aboutpolicy, because it provides good skill in decision making”.The third category of instrumental effect further explains on what these participants will be ableto do with the knowledge of policy, such as a career investment as the sixth major theme andsocial contribution as the seventh major theme. The major theme career investment had 13participants who included this theme in their explanation. Examples includes: a) “Learningabout policy would be beneficial for my future career”; b) “It is a good knowledge to have whenworking for a business since every company has their own policy that they follow”; and c)“when we graduate we will have to deal
. Maintains the role of academic advisor throughout the entire first year and will continue through the academic career of each FIG member in most cases (unless they change major).Peer Mentor PMs (locally called peer advisors) are selected by the faculty mentors, FIG Director, and the Director of Student Achievement. Each PM is compensated for about 5 hours/week for FIG work. Attends the Success4Students seminar with the FIG members. Meets with the FIG group once a week to facilitate accountability in the areas of class attendance, homework completion and time management. Provides homework and study group assistance to FIG members at least once during the week. Meets with the faculty mentor
education to allengineering students. Among the multiple and often contradictory drivers of current economies, a few areplaying as significant role as the trend towards globalization. Globalization processes imply thatnot only large companies are becoming global in terms of worldwide distribution of theirproduction facilities, but also that companies must offer an ever changing variety of products tomeet customers’ taste and preferences in different countries. This aspect of globalization,together with the e-business opportunities, makes it realistic to create new companies that aim atcustomization and personalization of consumer products and market them around the globe.Global competition, however, places such businesses under continuous
, MindWare Technologies Craig Morin is the Engineering Manager at MindWare Technologies in Gahanna, Ohio where he has worked since 2008. He received a BS in Electrical and Computer Engineering and a MS in Biomedical Engineering at The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio. Prior to his current role, he was a Design Engineer with MindWare Technologies and a Graduate Teaching Associate with the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors program at The Ohio State University. Beyond product design with an emphasis on electrical hardware, his interests include home automation, 3D printing, and ceramics.Andrew Phillips, Ohio State University Andrew H. Phillips is an Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) student at The Ohio
goals, and have graduated at a high rate; however, there is nomechanism to allow students to explore majors in engineering. Therefore, there needed to be amechanism, which would allow students to explore engineering, while still gaining experience inengineering. The structure of the institution in question did not permit for a first-year course to be Page 24.47.3taught with the rigor implemented at other institutions. Furthermore, the course was nottransferrable to many of the departments. Therefore a 0.5 credit hour course was designed toprovide rigor and to give students an experience with the engineering design process. The coursewas
engineeringand mechanical and materials engineering. LabVIEW™ and the LEGO MINDSTORMS®platform were selected as the tools for the program. LabVIEW is an especially useful tool,which engineering students repeatedly encounter during their undergraduate careers. LEGOMindstorms give students an intuitive approach to programming, with immediate, visual results.As a result of strong teaming experiences in the workshops, the students work more effectivelyand collaboratively in their coursework. The students also interact one-on-one withundergraduate and graduate engineering students who exhibit enthusiasm for engineering. Theserelationships continue into the academic year, providing a support community for the newstudents
refine the content and delivery of the IC, it wasencouraging to the design instructors that the students seemed to easily make connections toother design course content even if the terms used on the IC were slightly different. Forexample, the biomedical engineering students used the terms “merit” and “feasibility” whiledeveloping their decision matrix for their projects. The students readily translated these terms to“key features/functions” and “critical to success” metrics. It is hypothesized that this task maybe more difficult for freshman or sophomore-level students, but it is an important skill to developin graduating seniors as they head into careers where the terminology may be different, but theconcepts are the same.It was also
curricula.Another issue in borrowing the ABET criteria is that many of the associated concepts wereoriginally derived from the Western professionalism and liberal democracy. In both Confucianand Marxist tradition, it is difficult to find exact counterparts of these concepts. For instance, thecurrent ABET guidelines include eleven learning outcomes that must be met for students in anyengineering degree program. One of these, criterion 3.f, more specifically states that graduates Page 24.497.10must have “an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.”24 Interestingly, theCEEAA’s general criteria include a list of required “graduate outcomes