, reviewing literature, working witha team, and giving presentations. Rather than focusing on “hard” (technical) skills, the skillsemphasized in this class are related to the ABET “professional” skills: an ability to function on Page 24.1314.2multidisciplinary teams (3d); an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (3f); anability to communicate effectively (3g); the broad education necessary to understand the impactof engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (3h); arecognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (3i); and a knowledgeof contemporary issues (3j).5In
Parents of two or Other more*Good communication skills (1) 23% 73% 4%Systems integration (4) 13% 13% 71% 4%High ethical standards, integrity,and global, social, intellectual, and 12% 4% 4% 12% 68%technological responsibility (9)Critical thinking (10) 71% 4% 4% 21%Ability to prioritize efficiently (12) 17% 8% 8% 17% 50%Teamwork skills and ability
. These latter students, therefore, would benefitfrom engineering instruction that values their out-of-school practices and uses them as a bridgeto the formal practices of engineering so that students do not feel like engineering is a “foreign”discipline that is “not me.” 21Theoretical Perspectives of Funds of KnowledgeIn previous educational literature, the construct of “funds of knowledge” has served as a bridgethat connects students’ household and peer bodies of knowledge with the formal bodies ofknowledge learned in school. Authors have used the term “funds of knowledge” to describe thecultural knowledge and skills present in students’ households and communities, which includeknowledge related to agriculture, health, workplace skills, ethics
topics relevant to the course outcomes. [III] (g, i) {knowledge}5. Employ the ability to learn independently or to know when to ask for help, to most efficiently and successfully acquire knowledge. [III] (d, g) {application}6. Comprehend the ethics of programming. [I] (f) {comprehension}7. Identify how programming and mathematical content applies to the field of engineering. [I,II] (h) {knowledge}[ ] course outcome link to course goal( ) lower case letters (a-k) link to ABET student outcomes{ } Bloom’s taxonomy’s cognitive level of learning (knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis,evaluation)Figure 1 – An excerpt from the syllabus showing the course goals and outcomes mapped to each other, ABET
, optimization, simulation, probability and statistics, facility layout, quality control, safety, human factors, and ethics." George Mason "Students will become familiar with common SE terms and University procedures as well as terms and procedures of other engineering disciplines. Students will also learn to use CORE, a systems engineering software program."Oakland University "In order to satisfactorily complete this course, a student is expected to demonstrate competency concerning their understanding of the following objectives: • Describe the role of an Industrial Engineer in a
research projects , and holding part-timejobs on campus lead to increased retention and the likelihood of interaction with fellow students,faculty, and staff whereas off-campus activities and decentralized activities such as off-campusjobs decrease this involvement 43. The proximity to campus also is negatively correlated withcritical interactions. Students who drive to campus have less interaction with faculty (especiallyseniors) and do not take advantage of co-curricular activities, community service, andinternships. Therefore, students who tend to have a centralized community tend to see gains inpersonal and social competence associated with ethical development, appreciation for diversity,understanding of self, and citizenship 44.MethodsA
the General-Basic Level Criteria. The ABET outcomes willalso be used to assess the undergraduate goals of the university. A detailed assessment plan hasbeen developed for the BS in Robotics Engineering and is kept as an internal document withinthe mechanical engineering department.The stated educational objectives of the Robotics Engineering program are as follows:1) To educate robotics engineers who are capable of solving multidisciplinary technical problemsin a global work environment.2) To produce robotics professionals who apply ethical judgment and use effectivecommunication skills to implement engineering solutions.3) To produce individuals who contribute to contemporary engineering solutions withcommunity involvement and aspire to
Assignment 3A: CAD Modeling and Analysis 7-8 CFD – introduction and brief overview Assignment 3B: Simulation Based Design – FEA and CFD Analysis of Concepts Build prototype 9 Design for assembly Design for life-cycle Ethics Assignment 4: Detail Design10-11 Build prototype Survey 3&4 11 Project demonstration 12 Project presentations Final report13-15 Capstone project - introduction Learning essay SA
twelve credit experience.Table 1- Course Objectives for the Summer Grand Challenge ProgramRH330 • Analyzing contexts, audiences, and genres to determine how they influence communication • Crafting documents to meet the demands and constraints of professional situations • Integrating all stages of the writing process, ethically and persuasively, to respond to technical contexts and audiences—from planning, researching and drafting to designing, revising and editing • Collaborating effectively within and across teams with overlapping interestsME497 • Provide strategies and practice for design development • Applying a systems approach
, mobile computing, networks, operatingsystems, digital forensics, philosophy/ethics, programming languages, software engineering,statistics/probability, and web programming 18 . Course content may range from cryptography, andthe mathematical principles and algorithms used to protect data to system-level protocols 4 .Additionally, the goals of courses vary dramatically, such as teaching cybersecurity as practicalvocation skills, as good engineering practices, or as academic theories.The methods used to teach these courses are just as varied as their goals. Some courses focus onlaboratory-based, experimental operations 6,14 . Others are lecture-based and involve the reviewand discussion of literature, and still others are challenge based courses
5.55 4.65I have increased my ability to understand professional and ethical responsibility. 3.3 5.3 4.91 4.503I have increased my ability to communicate effectively. 3.78 6 5.55 5.11This workshop has provided me the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineeringsolutions in a global and societal context. 2.33 5.4 4.91 4.213This workshop has provided me recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. 3.11 5.6 4.91 4.54This workshop has provided me knowledge of contemporary issues. 2.33
analysis. Other seminars will be dedicated to professional development issues such as professional ethics & responsible conduct of research, how to be successful in graduate school, career path decision, and effective technical communication. Finally, selected research topics will be given by both participating faculty and other invited speakers to broaden the background of the REU students beyond their own subjects. A list of presenters and seminar topics is included in the Table below. Table 4. REU Weekly Seminar Series Presenters Topics Chiang Shih/Janice Dodge Program orientation/Lab Safety Chiang Shih Responsible
students will demonstrate “an ability to design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as Page 24.122.3economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health, safety, manufacturability, andsustainability”.Concurrent with the electrical design, technology students design a package to hold the circuitboard and batteries. The package must include design features to allow for changing the battery.Designs must be compatible with manufacture by plastic injection molding, although someallowances are given for manufacture by rapid prototyping. After a design review andsubsequent revisions, student
participation in a living-learningcommunity and persistence.2 Fundamentally, though, no negative effects to participation have Page 24.404.3been noted.Future employers of engineering and computer science undergraduates want more than just asolid technical education. A number of “soft skills” must be developed as well. Some of theseskills include work ethic, timeliness, attendance, and professionalism.6 The Center forProfessional Excellence indicates that 95% of human resources managers feel universities shouldinclude professionalism training as part of the curriculum.7 This professionalism training shouldinclude skills for interviewing, communication
were recruited from the pool of faculty members teachingthe courses whose exams were processed in phase one. As instructors, these faculty membersare very familiar with the language that ought to be discipline-specific for the courses that theyteach. This aspect of the research has passed the ethics review at the institution where this studywas conducted.The methodology of this phase of the research involves training, calibration, quantitative datacollection, and debriefing of each participant. A condensed methodology is described below:1. Participants were recruited using a standardized email request. In some cases, participants were asked in-person as a follow-up to the email, to ensure that the email was read.2. A Doodle.com account was
. Students then integrate the non-technical framework from Stages 1-3 and the technical material from Stage 4 within a problem-solving exercise. The exercises necessarily vary across courses, but they share commonelements: hands-on involvement of the student (e.g., through a laboratory or in-class exercise),analysis of real-world data or simulation (e.g., electroencephalograms during a brain-computerinterface), and reflection on ethical or practical issues raised by the data (e.g., whether the dataindicate an acceptable level of performance, given cost constraints). Instructors are urged toconnect their activities to local resources whenever possible (e.g., research laboratories or designfirms). Successful applications will not only make the GC seem
Page 24.556.14 Education Conference 2011: Developing engineers for social justice: Community involvement, ethics & sustainability 5-7 December 2011, Fremantle, Western Australia, Engineers Australia, 2011, p. 448.13. M. Hall & K. M. Elliott, Journal of Education for Business, 2003, 78:6, 301-307, DOI: 10.1080/0883232030959861714. M.M. Jennings & D. J. Dirksen. Facilitating change: A process for adoption of web-based instruction. p. 111-116 in Web-based instruction Educational Technology Publications, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey,1997.15. D. Gilbuena, C. Smith, B. Brooks, M. Miletic, & M. Koretsky, Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2013
engineer.I have doubts that I will be successful in my undergraduate engineering program.I sometimes wonder if engineering is the career for me.I can work well with people from other disciplines.I can work well with people from different countries.I am good at developing creative solutions to problems.I am good at communicating my ideas to others.I am good at solving problems that I’ve never encountered before.Knowledge of the engineering professionSuccessful engineers need to be creative.Successful engineers work well in teams with people from different disciplines.Successful engineers need to be effective communicators.Engineers need to consider the ethical implications of their work.Engineers often work in teams with members from other
University after 32 years. For the last 12 years there, she was the Vice Provost for Education and Professor in the Department of Engineering and Public Policy. She has designed and taught several interdisciplinary courses including ethics of science and technology, environmental science, technology and decision-making and radiation, health and policy. Her research has ranged over: risk assessment and communication, green design, bioelectromagnetics, education in general and pedagogies for the modern-day literacies such as scientific, environmental and global literacy. Dr. Nair chaired the national Global Learning Leadership Council of the American Association of Col- leges & Universities (AAC&U) from 2010 to 2013
, perceived cultural distance, and english self-confidence. Retrieved from ProQuest, TheUniversity of Texas at Austin.5. Ye, Y. (1992), Chinese students' needs and adjustment problems in a U.S. university. Retrieved from ProQuest,The University of Nebraska, Lincoln.6. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2001). Making their own way: Narratives for transforming higher education to promoteself-development. Sterling, VA: Stylus.7. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2008). The evolution of self-authorship. In M. S. Khine, (ed.), Knowing, knowledge andbeliefs: Epistemoloigcal studies across diverse cultures. New York: Springer.8. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.9. Belenky, M. F
Geometric Laser System Optical Devices Optics FundamentalsFresh 1 Science Introduction to Introduction to Laser Elective Solidworks Photonics Components12th College English Elective/ Ethics/ Physics Introduction to Photonics Digital ElectronicsGrade Algebra Workplace Government Computers Concepts Communications Physical Power Transfer
): p. 273-278.15. Kardos, G. Engineering cases in the classroom. in National Conference on Engineering Case Studies. 1979. Wasington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.16. Garg, K. and V. Varma. A study of the effectiveness of case study approach in software engineering education. in Software Engineering Education & Training. 2007.17. Downe‐Wamboldt, B., Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health care for women international, 1992. 13(3): p. 313-321.18. Hsieh, H.F. and S.E. Shannon, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 2005. 15(9): p. 1277-1288.19. Yadav, A. and B.E. Barry, Using case-based instruction to increase ethical understanding in
Page 24.297.3between computer and paper based exams, and, if so, what factors contribute to any differences?MethodsDescription of CourseThis study was conducted with students enrolled in the first of two courses of the FEH program.In this first-semester course, students studied problem solving by utilizing algorithmdevelopment and computational tools such as Excel, MATLAB, and C++ programming. Thecourse also covered the topics of academic integrity, engineering ethics, data analysis, teambuilding, and the engineering design process. The grade breakdown for the course is shown inTable 1. Table 1: Grade breakdown for a first-year engineering, first semester course. Grade Category
ethics, and piano technology.Dr. William R Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is a Full Professor, Emeritus of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington Uni- versity. He obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management, and Ph.D. in Engineering Management at Walden University. He holds a Professional En- gineer license and has 30 years of industrial experience as an Engineer or Engineering Manager at General Motors, Cadnetix, and Motorola. His interests include engineering management, technological literacy, improving the competitiveness
exogenous constructs impacting students’ pursuit of entrepreneurship minorPossession of the entrepreneurial mindset is perhaps the ultimate exogenous factor that mayinfluence students’ intention to minor in entrepreneurship. Kriewall11 organized a panel sessionat the annual meeting of the National Collegiate Inventors and Innovators Alliance with theintention of discussing the “defining characteristics of entrepreneurial engineers.” The panelidentified eleven attributes they felt were necessary for entrepreneurial engineers: “…integrity, tenacity, ethics, creativity, intuition, a deep knowledge of engineering fundamentals, the ability to engineer products for commercialization, a penchant for lifelong learning, an ability to
practical toarrange an industry internship when the student is not being paid under the T32 grant and caninstead be paid by the industry host site. There is considerable variation and uncertainty about policy with respect to intellectualproperty generated as part of an off-campus training experience. This is consistent with theauthors’ experience. In addition, we note that our trainees to date have demonstrated a high rateof interest in intellectual property and other issues related to entrepreneurship. Hence, we havetried to address this challenge by creating opportunities for students to learn about practical,legal, and ethical issues of intellectual property management. In conclusion, this analysis suggests that successful
outcomes in the course are focused on theengineering profession: explain the basic practice of engineering, describe background histories,impact on society, skills employed, and professional/ethical responsibilities; summarize theknowledge bases, skills, problem types, and analysis techniques of the four engineeringdisciplines offered at Quinnipiac University; and analyze information provided and learned tomake an informed decision about choice of an engineering major. These outcomes are focusedon raising student knowledge of engineering disciplines in order to enhance their ability to makean informed decision about choice of an engineering major.An important part of the course designed to solidify the class discussions is the hands-on
knowledge, education, technical, ethical and communication skills. Professor Moustafa’s expertise c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #10957 is in the areas of machine design, computer aided design and solid modeling. Moustafa taught courses in 2-D and 3-D Cad, statics and dynamics, strength of materials, design of machine elements, mechanical systems design and senior design project. He is in charge of the senior design project for the mechanical engineering technology department. He encourages seniors to work on practical projects. Some of these projects are provided by local