Education, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 617-639, 2010.[9] T. R. Kelley and J. G. Knowles, "A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 11, 2016.[10] A. J. Meadows and J. S. Levenson, "Social responsibility in science," Science and Public Policy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49-55, 1975.
.[28] Kapor Center. Culturally responsive-sustaining computer science education: A framework, 2021. URL https://kaporfoundation.org/publications/.[29] OpenAI. ChatGPT, 2024. URL https://chatgpt.com.[30] Ryan L Boyd, Ashwini Ashokkumar, Sarah Seraj, and James W Pennebaker. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. Technical report, University of Texas at Austin, 2022. URL https://www.liwc.app/.[31] Matthew L. Newman, James W. Pennebaker, Diane S. Berry, and Jane M. Richards. Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5):665–675, May 2003. ISSN 0146-1672, 1552-7433. doi: 10.1177/0146167203029005010. URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177
their petroleum partners [8]. The percent of total car sales in the US of EV’s onthe roads has increased with time from 0.2% in 2011 to 3.2-4.6% in 2021 to 7.5% in 2024 and isexpected to have a “strong acceleration” within the next decade: “S&P Global Mobility forecastselectric vehicle sales in the United States could reach 40 percent of total passenger car sales by2030” [4] [6]. EV’s are not solely increasing in the US. EV’s are also drastically increasing inChina and Europe: “In China, the number of new electric car registrations reached 8.1 million in2023, increasing by 35% relative to 2022 … [and] [i]n Europe, new electric car registrationsreached nearly 3.2 million in 2023, increasing by almost 20% relative to 2022” [11] [12]. TheUS
: National Academies Press,2021.[3] A. Johnson and T. Williams, "Mentorship as a catalyst for STEM success: A longitudinalstudy," J. High. Educ. Policy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 78–92, 2023.[4] K. Lee and P. Thompson, "Enhancing self-efficacy in STEM through structured mentorshipprograms," Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 201–215, 2023.[5] M. Rodriguez, J. Smith, and R. Taylor, "The impact of research experiences on STEMretention: A systematic review," J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 891–912, 2022.[6] S. Kim, J. Lee, and H. Park, "Developing STEM identity through mentorship: Insights fromunderrepresented students," J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 890–905, 2021.[7] X. Chen, Y. Wang, and L. Zhang, "The role of undergraduate research
Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer ….2. Gallagher, S., et al., Implementing Integrated Project-Based Learning Outcomes in a 21st- Century Environmental Engineering Curriculum in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2023, ASEE Conferences: Baltimore, MD.3. Pierrakos, O., et al. On the development of a professional identity: engineering persisters vs engineering switchers. in 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2009.4. Lockhart, M.E. and K. Rambo-Hernandez, Investigating engineering identity development and stability amongst first-year engineering students: a person-centred approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2024. 49(3): p. 411-433.5
Computer Science Education Research Conference, ser. CSERC ’11. Heerlen, NLD: Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Apr. 2011, pp. 21–31.[16] N. Nagappan, L. Williams, M. Ferzli, E. Wiebe, K. Yang, C. Miller, and S. Balik, “Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 359–362, Jan. 2003. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/792548.612006[17] K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. Van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, W. Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Gren- ning, J. Highsmith, A. Hunt, R. Jeffries et al., “Manifesto for agile software development,” 2001.[18] T. Dyba and T. Dingsoyr, “What do we know about agile software development?” IEEE software, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 6–9, 2009.[19] M. Brhel, H. Meth, A
Harkness, University of Florida My bio is here.Andreas Enqvist ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Modernization of Nuclear Engineering Undergraduate CurriculumIntroductionNuclear engineering is a well-established field of engineering in the United States, withundergraduate programs stretching back to the 1950's. Among such long-established disciplines,however, nuclear engineering undergraduate programs involve several unusual aspects: • The number of students per cohort is much smaller than in other programs (e.g., mechanical or electrical engineering). • The number of faculty is much smaller than in other programs. • There is no firm consensus in the names and content areas of
Education, 65(1):40–45, 2022.[15] Rachel S. Smith. Guidelines for authors of learning objects. The New Media Consortium, 2004.[16] Inc Instructure. Canvas. Online, March 2025. https://www.instructure.com/canvas/about [Online] (Accessed Mar. 2025).[17] Aytac Gogus. Learning Objectives, pages 1950–1954. Springer US, Boston, MA, 2012.[18] Peter J. Clarke, Debra L. Davis, Ingrid A. Buckley, Geoff Potvin, Mandayam Thirunarayanan, and Edward L. Jones. Combining learning and engagement strategies in a software testing learning environment. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., 22(2), November 2021.[19] Barbara Leigh Smith and Jean T. MacGregor. What is Collaborative Learning? In A.S. Goodsell, M.R. Maher, and V. Tinto, editors, Collaborative
education 88.4 (2004): 493–534.[2] Hunter, Anne‐Barrie, Sandra L. Laursen, and Elaine Seymour. "Becoming a scientist: Therole of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development."Science education 91.1 (2007): 36–74.[3] Marcia C. Linn et al., Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities.Science. 347, 1261757 (2015). DOI:10.1126/science.1261757[4] Madan, Christopher R., and Braden D. Teitge. "The benefits of undergraduate research: Thestudent’s perspective." The mentor: An academic advising journal 15 (2013): 1–3.[5] A. L. Zydney, J. S. Bennett, A. Shahid, and K. Bauer, “Faculty perspectives regarding theundergraduate research experience in science and engineering,” Journal of
of the inter-institutional collaboration to the nextlevel. This types of institutional collaboration and evaluation strategies will fill the critical voidthat most PWIs cannot accomplish alone, ultimately leading to greater creativity andinnovation [1].References[1] L. Fleming, S. Mingo, and D. Chen, “Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 443–475, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.2189/asqu.52.3.443.[2] J. L. Hess, J. Ströbel, and A. O. Brightman, “The development of empathic perspective‐taking in an engineering ethics course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 534–563, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1002/jee.20175.[3] D. B
. On non-functional requirements. In 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007), pages 21–26, 2007. doi: 10.1109/RE.2007.45.[10] SR Daly, CM Seifert, S Yilmaz, and R Gonzalez. Comparing ideation techniques for beginning designers. Journal of Mechanical Design, 138(10):101108, 2016.
: https://www.activeminds.org/press-releases/new-data-emphasizes-correlation-loneliness- student-mental-health/[15] S. Vossoughi, P. K. Hooper, and M. Escudé, “Making through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 206–232, 2016, doi: 10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206.
community. Second, course constraints (time/timing, co-instructor preferences) maypresent challenges to adoption in a certain contexts. We also see these constraints asopportunities to innovate and perhaps better adapt the assignment to the students andcircumstances at hand. And finally, a people-first approach can enrich the nuance and depth ofstudent work and their critical engagement with engineering.References[1] S.A. McDade, “Case Study Pedagogy to Advance Critical Thinking,” Teaching ofPsychology, vol. 22, no. 1. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 9–10, 1995.[2] J. Leydens and J. Lucena. Engineering Justice:Transforming Engineering Education andPractice. New York, NY USA: Wiley, 2018.[3] S. Luster-Teasley, S.C. Hardgrove-Leak, and W
/03043790701276874.[14] Raju, G., & Sorby, S. A., & Reid, C. (2023, June), Exploring the Role of Spatial Visualization in Design Process of Undergraduate Engineering Students, 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. 10.18260/1-2-43648.[15] McNeill, N. J., Douglas, E. P., Koro‐Ljungberg, M., Therriault, D. J., & Krause, I. (2016). Undergraduate students' beliefs about engineering problem solving. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 560-584.[16] Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267-277.APPENDIXSample course outlines from the Robotics Core:COURSE 1: INTRODUCTION TO ROBOTICS (3 Credits)Overview of
influencing participation of underrepresented students in STEM fields: matched mentors and mindsets,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 7, no. 16, 2020. [6] G. Sonnert, M. F. Fox, and A. K., “Undergraduate women in science and engineering: Effects of faculty, fileds, and institutions over time,” Social Science Quarterly, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1333–1356, 2007. [7] “Preparing Future Faculty,” https://preparing-faculty.org/. [8] “Rising Stars in EECS,” https://risingstars.utexas.edu/. [9] NC State University, “Building future faculty program,” https://diversity.ncsu.edu/building-future-faculty-program/.[10] S. M. Lord and A. Petropolu, “Professional development program for improving the diversity of faculty in electrical
Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen: Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen, R. Schwarzer and M. Jerusalem, Eds., Berlin, 1999, pp. 15–16.[14] M. Jerusalem and R. Schwarzer, “Allgemeine Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung (WIRKALL_r),” in Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen: Dokumentation der psychometrischen Verfahren im Rahmen der wissenschaftlichen Begleitung des Modellversuchs Selbstwirksame Schulen, R. Schwarzer and M. Jerusalem, Eds., Berlin, 1999, pp. 13–14.[15] E. Wolf and S. Brenning, “Wirkung messen: Handbuch zur Evaluation von MINT- Projekten für Schülerinnen
Jul. 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x[2] J. Wood, M. Campbell, K. Wood, and D. Jensen, “Enhancing the teaching of machine design by creating a basic hands-on environment with mechanical ‘breadboards’,” Int. J. of Mech. Eng. Ed., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1-25, Jan. 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.7227/IJMEE.33.1.1[3] L.E.J. Thomas-Seale, S. Kanagalingam, J.C. Kirkman-Brown, M.M. Attallah, D.M. Espino, and D.E.T. Shepherd, “Teaching design for additive manufacturing: efficacy of and engagement with lecture and laboratory approaches,” Int. J. of Tech. and Des. Ed., vol. 33, pp. 585-622, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09741-6[4] C.O. Walker, B.A. Greene, R.A. Mansell
, Nihad. "Framing Students' Learning Problems of Thermodynamics." In 2016 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition. 2016.16. Mehendale, S. (2024, June), A Novel “Positive” Approach/Analysis for Enhanced Understanding of the “Negative” Statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2-- 46465Appendix 1: Student AssignmentThree thermodynamic cycles (see figures below) are constructed such that they exchange heat withonly two isothermal energy reservoirs, 𝑅𝑅𝐻𝐻 at temperature 𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻 , and 𝑅𝑅𝐿𝐿 at temperature 𝑇𝑇𝐿𝐿 , where𝑇𝑇𝐻𝐻 > 𝑇𝑇𝐿𝐿 , as required by the Clausius statement of the second law of Thermodynamics.Furthermore, the
]. Available: https://medium.com/@lacascollaborativecrew/navigating-the-tides-of-time-a-sociological- exploration-of-students-and-time-management-9dee502d230b[12] R. Cooper, “Decoding Coding via The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers by Johnny Saldaña,” Qual. Rep., 2016, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2009.2856.[13] J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2017.[14] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications, 2016.[15] J. B. Halkiyo, S. B. Halkiyu, and N. Kellam, “Exploring how Ethiopian women students perceive a sense of belonging in engineering higher
," Studies in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 2152-2166, 2021.[6] N. Baine and K. Brakora, "Tuition Equity: A Study of the Impact of Upper/Lower Division Tuition Rates," in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, MD, 2023.[7] N. Baine and K. Brakora, "Tuition Equity: A Study of the Disparate Impacts of Block Tuition," in 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR, 2024.[8] S. Cameron, R. Daga and R. Outhred, "Setting out a conceptual framework for measuring equity in learning," in Handbook on Measuring Equity in Education, Montreal, UNESCO Institute for Statistics, 2018, pp. 16-45.[9] U.S. Supreme Court, "Griggs v. Duke Power Co. 401 U.S. 424," 1971.[10] U.S. Supreme Court, "Ricci v. DeStefano, 557
Engineering Education, 30 (1), pp. 6-13, 2014.[2] M. A. Dettman and W. L. Collett, "Multidisciplinary engineering student projects," 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2--18899.[3] N. Hotaling, B. B. Fasse, L. F. Bost, C. D. Hermann, and C. R. Forest, "A quantitative analysis of the effects of a multidisciplinary engineering capstone design course," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, pp. 630-656, 2012.[4] R. A. Bugg and W. Collins, “Safety training for students engaged in service learning projects,” 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. 10.18260/1-2-- 30947.[5] M. Anderton and S. Foroudastan, “Addressing and implementing a safety plan for intercollegiate
Practices forAssessment Paper presented at 2008 GSW, unknown. 10.18260/1-2-370-38553[8] J. K. Estell. A Heuristic Approach to Assessing Student Outcomes Using Performance Vectors.Proc. of the 2012 ABET Symposium, St. Louis, MO (2012).[9] Tahmina, Q., & Kelley, K., & Ulstad, A. T. (2021, July), Building an Effective ABET ETACAssessment Program from the Ground Up Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual AnnualConference Content Access, Virtual Conference. 10.18260/1-2—36765[10] Tahmina, Q., & Kelley, K., & Furterer, S. L. (2023, June), Implementing an Effective ABETAssessment Program for a New Bachelor of Science in Engineering Technology Degree Paperpresented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. 10.18260
and tool for analysis.SABER Working Paper Series. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/608191468326178977/pdf/799020WP0SABER0Box0379795B00PUBLIC0.pdfThiry, H., L Laursen, S., & G. Loshbaugh, H. (2015). “How do I get From Here to There?” AnExamination of Ph.D. Science Students’ Career Preparation and Decision Making. InternationalJournal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 237–256. https://doi.org/10.28945/2280Weaver, A., & Osterman, P. (2017). Skill Demands and Mismatch in U.S. Manufacturing. ILRReview, 70(2), 275–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793916660067
CollegesSPF Special Focus Institutions Size VS Very small (FTE<1000) SM Small (FTE from 1000-2999) MD Medium (FTE from 3000 - 9999) LG Large (FTE >10000)References[1] J. Farison “ASEE MECC: The Great Story of a Successful Member Initiative,” inProceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference (https://peer.asee.org/15349).[2] S. H. Vander Leest, “Advocating
. Students not only ask for more challenges but actually complete them,evinced in challenge completion rates: on average, student-teams achieve 25% more pointsduring the final challenge than required for an A grade. At the end of the quarter(s), 60% oflearners expressed strong interest in joining the university’s SlugSecurity student club andcontinue working within this community of practice to advance their skills and experience.“Thank you for teaching this class. It was a great experience, and I hope to attend Slug Security eventswhen they align with my schedule. You guys are truly knowledgeable and are great teachers, especiallyfor underclassmen.” -Learner response from internal surveyA combination of
engineering, many of the full-time facultyare formally involved in instructing the single section of the course. Because in-class meetingtime, particularly in the fall semester, is often used for design-related skill-building workshops,students are expected to set up a regular meeting time with their advisor(s) outside of class. Inelectrical engineering, the course is split into two sections, with each section instructed by onefaculty member. Advising meetings are typically conducted during course meeting times ratherthan outside of class. To accommodate the variety of projects, students are made aware of thevarious resources available to them on campus and, in some cases, outside of campus and areencouraged to pursue them based on their project's