. Research advisors often control a graduate student’sfunding, research topic, and acceptance to their graduate program [1]. Faculty often have significantinfluence over a student’s career prospects [2]. Additionally, the one-on-one pedagogical approach toPh.D. and research-based master’s programs can leave students vulnerable to faculty harassment andabuse [2]. Graduate students are often under a high level of emotional, physical, and psychological stress[3], [4], [5]. Interpersonal abuse is one of the most common sources of graduate student stress [5].Understanding the power differential between graduate students and faculty offers the STEM communitymultiple opportunities to positively impact the academic journey, professional advancement, health
institutions within West Virginia. The BridgeValley Community and Technical CollegeElectrical Engineering Technology concentration is shown in Table 1. Unless otherwise noted,these courses are three credit hours within sixteen weeks. The courses listed for each semesterare not prioritized. However, all the courses must be completed before moving forward. Thephysics and mathematics courses can be replaced with their bachelor's degree counterparts. Thisflexibility depends upon a student's previous courses or professional experience. The curriculumrequires future
Study)Introduction Colleges and universities need to educate engineering students who are technicallycompetent and ready to contribute to the needs of our increasingly diverse society. In addition toemphasizing graduates’ ability to analyze issues in professional ethics, ABET’s EngineeringAccreditation Commission (EAC) recently added applications of diversity, equity, and inclusionprinciples to the program criteria for civil and similarly named engineering programs [1]. Aftertwo years of optional pilot, EAC adopted the principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion intogeneral Criteria 5 Curriculum and Criteria 6 Faculty in their 2025-2026 accreditation cycle [2].However, the ABET Board of Directors approved the removal of all references
network, offering a more versatile and efficient solution. [Source XXIII]LPDA (Log Periodic Dipole Arrays) as a reflector antenna feed offers a wide range ofapplications. However, phase center of the LPDA changes depending on the operationfrequency, which, in turn, leads to defocusing loss as frequency changes. In this study, thedesign of 1-18 GHz printed LPDA antenna is used as a linearly polarized feed for theparabolic reflector which has a 1.2 m diameter. Optimal feed position and f/D ratio are chosenthrough extensive simulations. Performance parameters such as VSWR, gain and half powerbeamwidth are presented. Minimum aperture efficiency was recorded as 0.27 at the targetband. [Source XXIV]This resource discusses various operating principles
develop theuniversity’s first list of benchmark institutions for salary comparison [1, Appendix C]. RIT’sNSF ADVANCE IT-Catalyst project (081107, 2008-2011) was a key motivator to furtherprogress. After a 2008 internal climate survey [2] revealed significant differences in perceptionregarding salary equity by gender, RIT Human Resources (HR) and Institutional Research (IR)launched annual salary equity studies for faculty. After controlling variables such as department,degree earned, years in rank, and terminal degree, gender-based gaps in average salary werefound at each faculty rank [3], [4]. Similarly, the American Association of University Professorsreports lower salaries for women at every faculty rank, a finding that is persistent over time
based on a participant’s experiences in HEPs. Other papers publishedfrom this research study provide reasoning and background for this analysis. The research design is amixed methods approach including quantitative methods via a survey which informed the qualitativemethod via interviews [1]. To study the interactions among professional responsibility, HEPs, and DEI,two existing instruments were combined into a survey provided to engineering students and professionals.The Engineering Professional Responsibility Assessment (EPRA) was used to understand the perspectivesof students toward professional and social responsibility with special emphasis on recording participationin engineering service or humanitarian engineering projects (HEPs) [2
diverse students. However, the study also offers insightinto potential approaches for power-building amongst marginalized students, who are the bestexperts in their own experiences.IntroductionThis study takes place at a research-intensive, highly-selective public university in theMidwestern United States. This institution, and its engineering college, serves primarily whitestudents from highly affluent financial backgrounds [1], a similar educational context to eliteinstitutions throughout the United States and the Global North. Despite its legal status as a“public” institution, a previous study of engineering undergraduate student outcomes at thisinstitution found that two-thirds of the undergraduate engineering students came fromhouseholds
current system [1]. Traditionalapproaches to departmental change often emphasize immediate interventions, such asintroducing new courses, adjusting syllabi, or launching short-term faculty developmentworkshops. However, in the absence of deeper shifts, such initiatives can fail to take hold,especially when unanticipated leadership transitions leave newly implemented practices withoutchampions or embedded policies. In this example, the University of Connecticut (UConn) Schoolof Civil and Environmental Engineering (SoCEE), former department of CEE, embraced atransformative vision for engineering education by cultivating a strength-based culture in whichneurodiversity is embraced as an asset [2]. Instead of seeing cognitive variations like
successful collaborativeprogram that positively impacts both the community and partner organizations.IntroductionThe SEECS program has been in operation since the fall of 2009, with NSF S-STEM funding forall but one of those years. The grant activity has always had as a foundational element theuniversity mission which prominently features service to others. This service component hasbeen affected through community-based, engineering-forward projects completed by students inservice of some unmet community need [1],[2],[3]. SEECS has collaborated with variousexternal stakeholders on community-focused projects, engaging with organizations that supportindividuals with disabilities, at-risk youth, veterans, and environmental initiatives
. Leveraging data from a National Science Foundation(NSF) Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) project, we analyzepatterns in graduate student success, retention, and postdoctoral career trajectories in STEMdisciplines at TSU. Our findings reveal differences in faculty development participation,financial support, and degree completion rates, highlighting systemic challenges andopportunities for improvement. This study provides data-driven recommendations for TSUspecifically and for similar institutions, aiming to strengthen research capacity and enhancegraduate student outcomes1. IntroductionThe goal of the NSF’s AGEP program is to “increase the number of historically underrepresentedminority faculty in STEM” [1]. TSU partnered
Department,George Mason UniversityArvin Farid, Ph.D., P.E., Professor, Civil Engineering, Boise State UniversityMojtaba Sadegh, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Civil Engineering, Boise State UniversityRafael da Silva, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Organizational Performance and Workplace LearningDepartment, Boise State UniversityScott Lowe, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate College, Boise State UniversityKeywords: Graduate degrees, Engineering, Stakeholders, Support system, Higher Education 1 S-STEM: Challenges Stakeholders Face in Supporting Low-Income, First-Generation, and/or Rural Graduate Students There is a growing need to train
- dered if there was a way to validate and promote these discussions at the intersection of engineering, community, and identity as an integral part of STEM education and practice, when in their experience, they had often remained at the fringe or relegated to courses outside of the technical curriculum.Background and motivationScenario #0 above marks a turning point in the development of a course titled Effective andEnduring Advocacy: Leading with Compassion in STEM, catalyzing its transition from an earlyconcept into a fully supported Pilot Course [1]. We now offer the present work, a CollaborativeAutoethnography (CAE), which explores the impacts of the course on both students andfacilitators.Development of the Pilot Course
students’needs and aspirations as well as to explore experiential learning approaches to ethics trainingacross the curriculum. As part of our collaborative work, we developed a pedagogicalframework that approaches the IRB as a learning opportunity that is meaningful andtransformative. This framework addresses two major challenges each of us has encountered in ourundergraduate project advising: cultivating researcher identity and human impacts of research: 1. The first challenge is the tendency among students to shy away from building a strong sense of researcher identity in student projects that have research components. Whether involving ‘human subjects’ or not, most of our students often assume that research is a discovery of
students bolsteredhers. Kayla, in contrast, developed self-efficacy over time through a productive partnership witha supportive engineering student. These cases highlight the complex relationship between partnerdynamics, teaching roles, perceived success, and self-efficacy development. Implications forsupporting PSTs in engineering-integrated experiences are discussed. Introduction Nationwide engineering and coding standards in K-6 curriculum [1], [2] make instructionin these subjects essential for elementary teacher preparation. Along with content andpedagogical knowledge, preservice teachers (PSTs) need a belief in their ability to teach, alsoknown as teaching self-efficacy [3], [4]. Accordingly
). Each measure used a seven-point Likert scale 6from (1) strongly agree to (7) strongly disagree. Questions throughout the scales wereappropriately reversed. Demographic information was collected.PositionalityKatharine Getz is a white lesbian who believes in the expansiveness of self, gender, andsexuality. Her motivation to research the experiences of belonging and identity for LGBTQ+undergraduate engineering students comes from her own experiences and observations of herpeers. Her academic background is in chemical engineering, sexuality and gender studies, andengineering education, and her mentor for this project comes from an experienced
significant disadvantage. Many face challenges catching up or may never evenbegin. Research highlights that institutional barriers like these contribute to lower completion ratesamong students from underrepresented gender, racial, and ethnic groups [1]. Similarly, the subjectsof this study i.e., first-generation college students (FGCS) [2] and non-traditional students (NTS)[3] also experience lower rates of degree completion compared to their peers due to the similarreasons. First-generation college students (FGCS) are the first in their immediate families to pursuecollege education (neither of their parents has a bachelor’s degree) [2]. The National Center forEducation Statistics (NCES) identifies seven key traits that distinguish NTS from
' knowledge and determinetheir readiness to progress in their studies [1]. These exams are typically individual, time-limited, and closed-book, with no external aids allowed. While they serve the purpose ofevaluating students' understanding, there is substantial evidence showing that traditionalexams can induce significant stress and anxiety, negatively affecting students'performance[2], [3]. Many students report that stress and worry cause them to forgetimportant information during the exam, even when they possess the necessary knowledge[4], [5], [6], [7] . The pressure to perform within a limited timeframe exacerbates theseissues, leading to what is commonly referred to as "blanking out" during exams [8]. Thiswidespread stress is not unique to
students. Students often express astrong sense of pride in becoming an engineer and believe that their hard work, perseverance,and ability to overcome rigorous challenges are a testament to their capability and worthiness inthe field.[1] However, the intense, high-pressure culture within engineering programs often takesa serious toll on students' mental health. Engineering students, even before the COVID pandemichit, were reporting higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression than the general studentpopulation, but are less likely to seek help.[2-4] Their well-being is connected to whether theyfeel like the academic environment is supportive, hostile, or something in between.Culture change is a gradual process, requiring time, commitment, and
and skills in integratingaccessibility into product development. The course began with 35 students, the maximum enrollment limit, and concluded with29 students. It met once a week for 2 hours and 45 minutes. Each session was divided into two[THE SHIFT TOWARDS INCLUSION AND ACCESSIBILITY] 4parts: a 1 hour and 15-minute lecture covering the week’s topic, followed by a 15-minute break.The second half of the class involved interactive in-class activities to reinforce the lecture’sconcepts. Guest speakers from various companies specializing in accessibility and UX replacedsome lectures throughout the semester, sharing their professional experiences and insights. Students’ grades were
degree. Increasingly, all constituent groups cite advantages inbeginning experiential learning early – in the first or second year of college. The Interdisciplinary Projects course IDPro had 80 students enrolled in 2024, which wasoffered at both the 2000 and 4000 levels for 1-3 credit hours. IDPro was designed to providestudents with team-based, interdisciplinary, vertically integrated, project-based learningexperience before their degree-specific capstone. Examples of IDPro projects include researchprojects, industry sponsored projects, and topic-based projects selected by undergraduatestudents. IDPro functions as a 15-week course with projects expanding across semesters forstudents to continue developing over time as they hone their
that they are active participants and partners with scientists. Recent discussionsof CER are explicit in recognizing a continuum of engagement [1],[2]. CER is an umbrella ideaunder which more defined sub-types are found including community-based participatoryresearch (CBPR) [3]. A rough conceptual idea of forms of academic engagement withcommunities is shown in Figure 1, where areas within the gray box represent different forms andintensity of engagement. The activities located closer to the right side of the box represent moreleadership and agency by communities and therefore may be more likely to meet their goals. Figure 1. Examples of different
ofcommunities while introducing foundational engineering concepts. Drawing on culturallysustaining pedagogy and positionality theory, this study analyzes how the identities of instructorsshaped lesson design and delivery, and how students’ engagement with engineering wasinterpreted through a multimodal and multilingual lens. Data sources included instructorjournals, field notes, and community conversations. The thematic analysis highlights (1) theinfluence of instructors’ own definitions of engineering on classroom interactions; (2) the role ofheritage language use in building trust; and (3) students' creative engagement with materials,which surfaced localized forms of engineering not always recognized in traditional curricula.This WIP illustrates the
women’s participation in STEM, and related topics grew steadily from the 1970s onward [1],[2]. In the last two decades or so, an investment in programs that support broadeningparticipation with a lens of diversity, equity and inclusion has been prioritized in these and otheragencies. The 2024–2026 vision for NSF (produced in 2022) explicitly calls for “A nation thatleads the world in science and engineering research and innovation, to the benefit of all, withoutbarriers to participation” [3]. The NSF strategic plan further articulates core values which arethen specified within the agency’s individual programs: 1) Scientific leadership 2) Diversity andinclusion 3) Integrity and excellence 4) Public service and 5) Innovation and collaboration [3
, Dr. Povinelli has worked with leading aerospace companies, as well as collaborating with universities and government research labs. He brings over thirty years of experience in both technical and educational fields, blending scientific rigor with humanistic insight to promote holistic, transdisciplinary pedagogies. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Integrating Visual Thinking into Design EducationMark J. Povinelli, College of Arts and Sciences, Syracuse UniversityIntroductionVision is one of the first senses to develop in infancy, starting with facial recognition and objecttracking [1], [2]. As the visual system matures, it supports memory, cognition, and
pandemic disruptedthese efforts, halting relationship-building with educators and delaying the project’s progress.Since then, the work has centered on rebuilding school-university and school-industrypartnerships, while gaining a deeper understanding of the unique challenges of rural education inSouthwest Virginia. While creating widespread engineering and technical career pathways forAppalachian youth remains challenging due to broader systemic issues, recent work hasaddressed teacher professional development related to engineering, as well as increasing supportfor integrating engineering into K-12 classrooms in Southwest Virginia. Research efforts over thepast year have focused on: 1. Creating a data-informed summer engineering workshop for
educational experiences predict computing identity?. ACM Transactions on ComputingEducation (TOCE), 22(2), 1-28.Ma, J., & Baum, S. (2015). Trends in Community Colleges: Enrollment, Prices, Student Debt,and Completion [Research Breif]. College Board Research.www.luminafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/trends-in-community-colleges.pdfMountjoy, J. (2022). Community Colleges and Upward Mobility. NATIONAL BUREAU OFECONOMIC RESEARCH.Rodriguez, S. L., Blaney, J. M., Vasquez, M. C., & Salinas, C. (2021). Latino Men andMasculinities: A Multi-Institution Study of Community College Transfer Experiences.Community College Review, 49(3), 262–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521211002898Rodriguez, S. L., Lu, C., & Ramirez, D. (2020). Navigating
(National Science Foundation, 2019). However, there is limitedpublicly available data on underrepresented populations in engineering across the state. The South DakotaSchool of Mines and Technology (SD Mines) provides a partial picture, where its undergraduateengineering population for 2023 was 85% white, with Hispanic (5%), multi-ethnic (3%), Asian (2%), andBlack (1%) students making up smaller percentages (South Dakota Mines, 2023). Women represent only24% of undergraduates and 25% of engineering bachelor's degree recipients (Mapping Your Future,2025). Nationally, underrepresented minorities earn higher percentages of engineering degrees—AfricanAmericans at 4.1% and Hispanics at 11.1% (ASEE, 2020). While South Dakota’s public universitiesreported
greatest effect on participants perceived learning andconnectedness to their cohort community and the broader organization.IntroductionBackgroundRecognizing that supervisors are instrumental in shaping organizational climate and moredirectly the employee experience, an organizational development team at a military researchinstitution committed to the design and delivery of programming that would grow oursupervisors into people focused managers [1]. Traditionally, supervisor training is focused oncompetency and skill development, both critical to success on the job, but this content is oftendelivered unidirectionally, in an asynchronous model, not allowing for group reflection,feedback, collaboration nor community building. This military research
to explore and develop newprofessional opportunities by equipping them with the necessary tools to identify problems,create solutions, and carry out projects with significant impact on their communities andindustrial sectors. Recent studies have shown that universities incorporating activemethodologies, such as project-based learning or design-based learning (DBL), fosteressential skills like critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration [1], [2]. Moreover,these strategies promote a direct connection between theory and practice, allowing students togain a deeper understanding of real-world challenges.On the other hand, universities' ability to enhance the quality of their training inentrepreneurship and innovation lies in their
of Asian LGBTQIA+students.By focusing on this group, my study aims to address the gaps in current literature andprovide new insights into how engineering education can become more inclusive.This research contributes to ongoing discussions about equity in engineering,advocating for more supportive environments that account for the needs of studentswith intersecting marginalized identities.Proposed Research DesignThis study examines how Asian LGBTQIA+ engineering students experience mentalhealth challenges and perceive support within their programs. As such, my researchquestions are as follows: 1. What kinds of mental health challenges and supports are Asian LGBTQIA+ Students in engineering programs experiencing? 2. How do Asian